Volume 25, Issue 10 p. 1437-1443
Research Article

Clinical efficacy of istradefylline (KW-6002) in Parkinson's disease: A randomized, controlled study

Yoshikuni Mizuno MD

Corresponding Author

Yoshikuni Mizuno MD

Department of Neurology, Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, JapanSearch for more papers by this author
Kazuko Hasegawa MD

Kazuko Hasegawa MD

Department of Neurology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomoyoshi Kondo MD

Tomoyoshi Kondo MD

Department of Neurology, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Sadako Kuno MD

Sadako Kuno MD

Department of Neurology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Mitsutoshi Yamamoto MD

Mitsutoshi Yamamoto MD

Department of Neurology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
The Japanese Istradefylline Study Group

The Japanese Istradefylline Study Group

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2010
Citations: 157

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

Members of the Japanese Istradefylline Study Group are listed as an Appendix

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of istradefylline at an oral dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor complications on levodopa therapy based on the change in the daily OFF time compared with placebo and to assess the safety at these doses. A total of 363 subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg/day istradefylline (n = 119), 40 mg/day istradefylline (n = 125), or placebo (n = 119). The primary outcome variable was the change from baseline at endpoint in daily OFF time based on patients' ON/OFF diaries. At endpoint, the daily OFF time reduced from baseline by 1.31 hours for 20 mg/day istradefylline (P = 0.013 as compared to the placebo), 1.58 hours for 40 mg/day istradefylline (P < 0.001), and 0.66 hours for placebo; istradefylline significantly reduced the daily OFF time compared with placebo. The UPDRS Part III subscale score (ON state) reduced by 5.7 at endpoint in both istradefylline groups and 3.7 in the placebo group (P = 0.006 for 20 mg/day and P = 0.006 for 40 mg/day group as compared with placebo). The most commonly reported drug-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was dyskinesia, which occurred in 2.5% (3/119) of subjects receiving placebo, 8.5% (10/118) receiving 20 mg/day istradefylline, and 6.4% (8/125) receiving 40 mg/day istradefylline. We conclude that istradefylline at 20 mg and 40 mg once daily is effective in relieving wearing-off fluctuations of PD patients. In addition, istradefylline was well tolerated at both doses. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society