EFSA Supporting Publications

Volume 11, Issue 11 689E

Technical report

Open Access

Explanatory Note for the Guidance of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Search for more papers by this author

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 14 November 2014

https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-689

Citations: 4

Published date: 14 November 2014

Question number: EFSA-Q-2014-00750

About

PDF

Tools

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

This output supersedes the previous output(s): https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2903/sp.efsa.2011.EN-579

References

Douglass JS, Barraj LM, Tennant DR, Long WR and Chaisson CF, 1997. Evaluation of the Budget Method for screening food additive intakes. Food Additives and Contaminants, 14, 791–802.
10.1080/02652039709374590
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
EC (European Commission), 1998. Report on methodologies for the monitoring of food additive intake across the European Union (Final report submitted by the Task Co-ordinator 16 January 1998), Reports of a working Group on Scientific Co-operation on questions relating to food. Task 4.2. SCOOP/INT/REPORT/2. European Commission Directorate General III Industry, Brussels.

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2005. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a generic approach to the safety assessment by EFSA of micro-organisms used in food/feed and the production of food/feed additives. The EFSA Journal 2005, 226, 1–12.

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. The EFSA Journal 2006, 99, 1–100.

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Technical guidance of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the Update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance. The EFSA Journal 2008, 732, 1–15.

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009a. Guidance document of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Material, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes. The EFSA Journal 2009, 1305, 1–26.

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009b. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on the Potential Risks Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies on Food and Feed Safety. The EFSA Journal 2009, 958, 1–39.

Google Scholar
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), 2011. Guidance on the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their products intended for food and feed use. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(6):2193, 54 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2193

Google Scholar
EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards), 2013. Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update). EFSA Journal 2013; 11(11):3449, 108 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3449

Google Scholar
EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), 2014. Guidance on the assessment of the toxigenic potential of Bacillus species used in animal nutrition. EFSA Journal 2014; 12(5):3665, 10 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3665

Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2014. Administrative Guidance to applicants on the suitability check of applications for authorisation of food enzymes submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008. EFSA supporting publication 2014:EN-638. 17 pp.

Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 2006. JECFA Monographs 3, (ISBN 92-5-105559-9). Available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0675e/a0675e00.pdf (last visited on 19 June 2006).

Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (Food and Agricultural Organization/Word Health Organization), 2001. FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. FAO/WHO, January 2001, Rome. Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/en/ec_jan2001.pdf, last visited on 31/07/2009.

Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (Food and Agricultural Organization/Word Health Organization), 2006. General Specifications and Considerations for Enzyme Preparations Used in Food Processing. Compendium of food additive specifications, sixty-seventh meeting.

Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (Food and Agricultural Organization/Word Health Organization), 2008. Dietary exposure assessment of chemicals in food. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation, 2–6 May 2005, Annapolis, Maryland, USA. WHO: Geneva. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241597470_eng.pdf (last visited 31/07/2009).

Google Scholar
FAO/WHO (Food and Agricultural Organization/Word Health Organization), 2009. Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food: Chapter 6 Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chemicals in Food. Environmental Health Criteria 240, World Health Organization 2009. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ehc/WHO_EHC_240_9_eng_Chapter6.pdf

Google Scholar
Hansen SC, 1966. Acceptable daily intake of food additives and ceiling on levels of use. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 4, 427–432.
10.1016/S0015-6264(66)80584-9
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hansen SC, 1979. Conditions for use of food additives based on a budget for an acceptable daily intake. Food Protect, 42, 429–432.
10.4315/0362-028X-42.5.429
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
OECD, 2003. Guidance Document on the Use of Taxonomy in Risk Assessment of Micro-organisms: Bacteria Available online: http://www.oecd.org/science/biotrack/46815778.pdf

Google Scholar
Olempska-Beer ZS, Merke RI, Ditto MD and DiNovi MJ, 2006. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant micro-organisms – a review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 45, 144–158.
10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.05.001
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Pariza MW and Johnson EA, 2001. Evaluating the safety of microbial enzyme preparations used in food processing: Update for a new century. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 33, 173–186.
10.1006/rtph.2001.1466
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
WHO (World Health Organization), 2003. Guidelines on transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in relation to biological and pharmaceutical products. WHO/BCT/QSD/03.01. Geneva, World Health Organization, p. 1–26.

Google Scholar
WHO (World Health Organization), 2009. Principles and Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food: Chapter 6 Dietary Exposure Assessment of Chemicals in Food. Environmental Health Criteria 240. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ehc/WHO_EHC_240_9_eng_Chapter6.pdf

Google Scholar

4. Literature

Aeschbacher HU, Finot PA and Wolleb U, 1983. Interactions of histidine-containing test substances and extraction methods with the Ames mutagenicity test. Mutation Research, 113, 103–116.
10.1016/0165-1161(83)90223-6
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Khandoudi N, Porte P, Chtourou S, Nesslany F, Marzin D and Le Curieux F, 2009. The presence of arginine may be a source of false positive results in the Ames test. Mutation Research, 679, 65–71.
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.03.010
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Kirkland DJ and Kim NN, 1995. Special considerations for conducting genotoxicity tests with protein materials. Mutagenesis, 10, 393–398.
10.1093/mutage/10.5.393
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
de Mitchell I G, Dixon PA, Gilbert PJ and White DJ, 1980. Mutagenicity of antibiotics in microbial assays: problems of evaluation. Mutation Research, 79, 91–105.
10.1016/0165-1218(80)90077-4
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
O'Connor HJ, Axon ATR, Riley SE and Garner RC, 1984. Mutagenicity of gastric juice: the importance of controlling histidine concentration when using Salmonella tester strains. Carcinogenesis, 5, 853–856.
10.1093/carcin/5.7.853
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1997. Test No. 471: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.

Google Scholar
Thompson C, Morley P, Kirkland D and Proudlock R, 2005. Modified bacterial mutation test procedures for evaluation of peptides and amino acid-containing material. Mutagenesis, 20, 345–350.
10.1093/mutage/gei045
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Verhagen H, Bruijntjes-Rozier GCDM, Coenen TMM and Oosterom J, 1994. Modified suspension Ames test for testing proteinaceous substances: an initial step. Food Chemical Toxicology, 32, 1161–1166.
10.1016/0278-6915(94)90132-5
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume11, Issue11

November 2014

689E

Explanatory Note for the Guidance of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes

Abstract

References

4. Literature

Citing Literature

References

Information

RESOURCES

PUBLICATION INFO

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Explanatory Note for the Guidance of the Scientific Panel of Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on the Submission of a Dossier on Food Enzymes

Abstract

References

4. Literature

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information

RESOURCES

PUBLICATION INFO