Advertisement

Editor’s summary

Traditionally, researchers believed that humans arrived in North America around 16,000 to 13,000 years ago. Recently, however, evidence has accumulated supporting a much earlier date. In 2021, fossilized footprints from White Sands National Park in New Mexico were dated to between 20,000 and 23,000 years ago, providing key evidence for earlier occupation, although this finding was controversial. Pigati et al. returned to the White Sands footprints and obtained new dates from multiple, highly reliable sources (see the Perspective by Philippsen). They, too, resolved dates of 20,000 to 23,000 years ago, reconfirming that humans were present far south of the ice sheets during the Last Glacial Maximum. —Sacha Vignieri

Abstract

Human footprints at White Sands National Park, New Mexico, USA, reportedly date to between ~23,000 and 21,000 years ago according to radiocarbon dating of seeds from the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa. These ages remain controversial because of potential old carbon reservoir effects that could compromise their accuracy. We present new calibrated 14C ages of terrestrial pollen collected from the same stratigraphic horizons as those of the Ruppia seeds, along with optically stimulated luminescence ages of sediments from within the human footprint–bearing sequence, to evaluate the veracity of the seed ages. The results show that the chronologic framework originally established for the White Sands footprints is robust and reaffirm that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S10
Tables S1 and S2
References (3462)

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:

MDAR Reproducibility Checklist

References and Notes

1
M. R. Bennett, D. Bustos, J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, T. M. Urban, V. T. Holliday, S. C. Reynolds, M. Budka, J. S. Honke, A. M. Hudson, B. Fenerty, C. Connelly, P. J. Martinez, V. L. Santucci, D. Odess, Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum. Science 373, 1528–1531 (2021).
2
P. U. Clark, A. S. Dyke, J. D. Shakun, A. E. Carlson, J. Clark, B. Wohlfarth, J. X. Mitrovica, S. W. Hostetler, A. M. McCabe, The Last Glacial Maximum. Science 325, 710–714 (2009).
3
J. T. Faith, T. A. Surovell, Synchronous extinction of North America’s Pleistocene mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 20641–20645 (2009).
4
D. B. Madsen, L. G. Davis, D. Rhode, C. G. Oviatt, Comment on “Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum”. Science 375, eabm4678 (2022).
5
C. G. Oviatt, D. B. Madsen, D. Rhode, L. G. Davis, A critical assessment of claims that human footprints in the Lake Otero basin, New Mexico date to the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Res. 111, 138–147 (2022).
6
C. V. Haynes Jr., Evidence for humans at White Sands National Park during the Last Glacial Maximum could actually be for Clovis people ~13,000 years ago. PaleoAmerica 8, 95–98 (2021).
7
D. M. Rachal, J. I. Mead, R. Dello-Russo, M. T. Cuba, Deep‐water delivery model of Ruppia seeds to a nearshore/terrestrial setting and its chronological implications for Late Pleistocene footprints, Tularosa Basin, New Mexico. Geoarchaeology 37, 923–933 (2022).
8
R. S. Bradley, Paleoclimatology: Reconstructing Climates of the Quaternary (Academic Press, ed. 3, 2015), pp. 675.
9
T. A. Brown, D. E. Nelson, R. W. Mathewes, J. S. Vogel, J. R. Southon, Radiocarbon dating of pollen by accelerator mass spectrometry. Quat. Res. 32, 205–212 (1989).
10
T. A. Brown, G. W. Farwell, P. M. Grootes, F. H. Schmidt, Radiocarbon AMS dating of pollen extracted from peat samples. Radiocarbon 34, 550–556 (1992).
11
A. Long, O. K. Davis, J. de Lanois, Separation and 14C dating of pure pollen from lake sediments: Nanofossil AMS dating. Radiocarbon 34, 557–560 (1992).
12
J. Regnéll, E. Everitt, Preparative centrifugation—A new method for preparing pollen concentrates suitable for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 5, 201 (1996).
13
S. Mensing, J. Southon, A simple method to separate pollen for AMS radiocarbon dating and its application to lacustrine and marine sediments. Radiocarbon 41, 1–8 (1999).
14
M. R. Kilian, J. Van Der Plicht, B. Van Geel, T. Goslar, Problematic 14C-AMS dates of pollen concentrates from Lake Gosciaz (Poland). Quat. Int. 88, 21–26 (2002).
15
N. Piotrowska, A. Bluszcz, D. Demske, W. Granoszewski, G. Heumann, Extraction and AMS radiocarbon dating of pollen from Lake Baikal sediments. Radiocarbon 46, 181–187 (2004).
16
W. J. Fletcher, C. Zielhofer, S. Mischke, C. Bryant, X. Xu, D. Fink, AMS radiocarbon dating of pollen concentrates in a karstic lake system. Quat. Geochronol. 39, 112–123 (2017).
17
C. M. Schiller, C. Whitlock, K. L. Elder, N. A. Iverson, M. B. Abbott, Erroneously old radiocarbon ages from terrestrial pollen concentrates in Yellowstone Lake, Wyoming, USA. Radiocarbon 63, 321–342 (2021).
18
R. K. Tennant, R. T. Jones, F. Brock, C. Cook, C. S. M. Turney, J. Love, R. Lee, A new flow cytometry method enabling rapid purification of fossil pollen from terrestrial sediments for AMS radiocarbon dating. J. Quaternary Sci. 28, 229–236 (2013).
19
S. R. H. Zimmerman, T. A. Brown, C. Hassel, J. Heck, Testing pollen sorted by flow cytometry as the basis for high resolution lacustrine chronologies. Radiocarbon 61, 359–374 (2018).
20
I. Tunno, S. R. H. Zimmerman, T. A. Brown, C. A. Hassel, An improved method for extracting, sorting, and AMS dating of pollen concentrates from lake sediment. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 668676 (2021).
21
K. Yamada, T. Omori, I. Kitaba, T. Hori, T. Nakagawa, Extraction method for fossil pollen grains using a cell sorter suitable for routine 14C dating. Quat. Sci. Rev. 272, 107236 (2021).
22
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
23
S. A. Hall, in New Mexico’s Ice Ages, S. G. Lucas, G. S. Morgan, K. E. Zeigler, Eds., New Mex. Mus. Natur. Hist. Sci. Bull. 28, 171–183 (2005).
24
D. J. Donahue, T. W. Linick, A. J. T. Jull, Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32, 135–142 (1990).
25
J. S. Vogel, D. E. Nelson, J. R. Southon, 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29, 323–333 (1987).
26
T. A. Brown, J. R. Southon, Corrections for contamination background in AMS 14C measurements. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 123, 208–213 (1997).
27
A. Murray, L. J. Arnold, J.-P. Buylaert, G. Guérin, J. Qin, A. K. Singhvi, R. Smedley, K. J. Thomsen, Optically stimulated luminescence dating using quartz. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 72 (2021).
28
T. Neulieb, E. Levac, J. Southon, M. Lewis, I. F. Pendea, G. L. Chmura, Potential pitfalls of pollen dating. Radiocarbon 55, 1142–1155 (2013).
29
Q. Hua, M. Barbetti, Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46, 1273–1298 (2004).
30
J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, M. R. Bennett, D. Bustos, T. M. Urban, V. T. Holliday, S. C. Reynolds, D. Odess, Response to comment on “Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum”. Science 375, eabm6987 (2022).
31
J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, V. T. Holliday, M. R. Bennett, D. Bustos, T. M. Urban, S. C. Reynolds, D. Odess, Reply to “Evidence for humans at White Sands National Park during the Last Glacial Maximum could actually be for Clovis People ∼13,000 years ago” by C. Vance Haynes, Jr. PaleoAmerica 8, 99–101 (2022).
32
C. Bronk Ramsey, OxCal 4.4.4 (2022); https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal.html.
33
J. S. Pigati, K. B. Springer, J. S. Honke, D. Wahl, M. R. Champagne, S. R. H. Zimmerman, H. J. Gray, D. Odess, D. Bustos, M. R. Bennett, Data release for Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints in White Sands. US Geological Survey data release (2023); https://doi.org/10.5066/P9E36U4B.
34
J. S. Vogel, Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34, 344–350 (1992).
35
M. Stuiver, H. A. Polach, Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).
36
K. R. Lajoie, “Quaternary stratigraphy and geologic history of Mono Basin, Eastern California,” thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1968).
37
S. R. H. Zimmerman, S. R. Hemming, N. G. Hemming, P. B. Tomascak, C. Pearl, High-resolution chemostratigraphic record of late Pleistocene lake-level variability, Mono Lake, California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 123, 2320–2334 (2011).
38
G. A. H. Ali, K. Lin, S. R. Hemming, S. E. Cox, P. Ruprecht, S. R. H. Zimmerman, S. Stine, X. Wang, Emergence of wet conditions in the Mono Basin of the Western USA coincident with inception of the Last Glaciation. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 134, 2267 (2022).
39
J. A. Vazquez, M. I. Lidzbarski, High-resolution tephrochronology of the Wilson Creek Formation (Mono Lake, California) and Laschamp event using 238U-230Th SIMS dating of accessory mineral rims. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 357-358, 54–67 (2012).
40
P. J. Reimer, W. E. N. Austin, E. Bard, A. Bayliss, P. G. Blackwell, C. Bronk Ramsey, M. Butzin, H. Cheng, R. L. Edwards, M. Friedrich, P. M. Grootes, T. P. Guilderson, I. Hajdas, T. J. Heaton, A. G. Hogg, K. A. Hughen, B. Kromer, S. W. Manning, R. Muscheler, J. G. Palmer, C. Pearson, J. van der Plicht, R. W. Reimer, D. A. Richards, E. M. Scott, J. R. Southon, C. S. M. Turney, L. Wacker, F. Adolphi, U. Büntgen, M. Capano, S. M. Fahrni, A. Fogtmann-Schulz, R. Friedrich, P. Köhler, S. Kudsk, F. Miyake, J. Olsen, F. Reinig, M. Sakamoto, A. Sookdeo, S. Talamo, The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0-55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62, 725–757 (2020).
41
M. S. Nelson, H. J. Gray, J. A. Johnson, T. M. Rittenour, J. K. Feathers, S. A. Mahan, User guide for luminescence sampling in archaeological and geological contexts. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 3, 166–177 (2015).
42
R. Sohbati, A. Murray, L. Lindvold, J. P. Buylaert, M. Jain, Optimization of laboratory illumination in optical dating. Quat. Geochronol. 39, 105–111 (2017).
43
H. J. Gray, S. A. Mahan, T. Rittenour, M. Nelson, W. R. Lund, Guide to luminescence dating techniques and their application for paleoseismic research, in Proceedings Volume, Basin and Range Province Seismic Hazards Summit III, 2015, Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 15-5 (Utah Geological Survey, 2015).
44
J. A. Durcan, G. E. King, G. A. T. Duller, DRAC: Dose Rate and Age Calculator for trapped charge dating. Quat. Geochronol. 28, 54–61 (2015).
45
S. Kreutzer et al., Introducing an R package for luminescence dating analysis. Anc. TL 30, 1 (2012).
46
M. S. Nelson, T. M. Rittenour, Using grain-size characteristics to model soil water content: Application to dose-rate calculation for luminescence dating. Radiat. Meas. 81, 142–149 (2015).
47
D. Steffen, F. Preusser, F. Schlunegger, OSL quartz age underestimation due to unstable signal components. Quat. Geochronol. 4, 353–362 (2009).
48
G. A. T. Duller, Distinguishing quartz and feldspar in single grain luminescence measurements. Radiat. Meas. 37, 161–165 (2003).
49
J. A. Durcan, G. A. T. Duller, The fast ratio: A rapid measure for testing the dominance of the fast component in the initial OSL signal from quartz. Radiat. Meas. 46, 1065–1072 (2011).
50
A. S. Wintle, A. G. Murray, A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols. Radiat. Meas. 41, 369–391 (2006).
51
G. A. T. Duller, Single‐grain optical dating of Quaternary sediments: Why aliquot size matters in luminescence dating. Boreas 37, 589–612 (2008).
52
M. Jain, A. S. Murray, L. Bøtter-Jensen, Characterisation of blue-light stimulated luminescence components in different quartz samples: Implications for dose measurement. Radiat. Meas. 37, 441–449 (2003).
53
J. S. Singarayer, R. M. Bailey, Further investigations of the quartz optically stimulated luminescence components using linear modulation. Radiat. Meas. 37, 451–458 (2003).
54
M. J. Lawson, B. J. Roder, D. M. Stang, E. J. Rhodes, OSL and IRSL characteristics of quartz and feldspar from southern California, USA. Radiat. Meas. 47, 830–836 (2012).
55
H. J. Gray, M. Jain, A. O. Sawakuchi, S. A. Mahan, G. E. Tucker, Luminescence as a sediment tracer and provenance tool. Rev. Geophys. 57, 987–1017 (2019).
56
A. O. Sawakuchi, M. W. Blair, R. DeWitt, F. M. Faleiros, T. Hyppolito, C. C. F. Guedes, Thermal history versus sedimentary history: OSL sensitivity of quartz grains extracted from rocks and sediments. Quat. Geochronol. 6, 261–272 (2011).
57
L. Baly, I. Quesada, A. S. Murray, G. Martin, P. Espen, R. Arteche, M. Jain, Modeling the charge deposition in quartz grains during natural irradiation and its influence on the optically stimulated luminescence signal. Radiat. Meas. 142, 106564 (2021).
58
T. J. Pietsch, J. M. Olley, G. C. Nanson, Fluvial transport as a natural luminescence sensitiser of quartz. Quat. Geochronol. 3, 365–376 (2008).
59
R. F. Galbraith, R. G. Roberts, Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: An overview and some recommendations. Quat. Geochronol. 11, 1–27 (2012).
60
I. J. Bassett, C. W. Crompton, J. A. Parmelee, An atlas of airborne pollen grains and common fungus spores of Canada (Monograph–Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, 1978).
61
H. Halbritter et al., Illustrated Pollen Terminology (Springer, 2018).
62
R. O. Kapp, How to Know Pollen and Spores (W. C. Brown, 1969).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 382 | Issue 6666
6 October 2023

Article versions

Submission history

Received: 7 March 2023
Accepted: 10 August 2023
Published in print: 6 October 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

Science is a way of knowing, and we acknowledge that there are many ways of knowing. Therefore, we deeply appreciate the perspectives, cultural practices, and oral histories of the tribes and pueblos whose homeland is in southern New Mexico. In addition, we thank White Sands National Park Superintendent M. F. Sauter and the park staff for their support of our research. We also thank P. Henne (US Geological Survey) for preliminary analysis of the pollen assemblages, C. Hassel (Flow Cytometry Resource Facility, Indiana University) for performing the flow cytometry, and T. Brown (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) and M. Springer (University of California, Riverside) for helpful discussions. We also thank A. Hudson and M. Berry (both US Geological Survey) and three anonymous reviewers for providing constructive reviews of this manuscript. This study was conducted under National Park Service permits issued to K.B.S. and J.S.P. (WHSA-2021-SCI-0002) and to D.O. (WHSA-2021-SCI-0001). This work was also performed partly under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. This is LLNL-JRNL-844446. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US government.
Funding: Funding for J.S.P., K.B.S., and J.S.H. was provided by the US Geological Survey’s Climate Research and Development Program and by the US Geological Survey–National Park Service Natural Resources Preservation Program. Funding for D.W. and M.R.C. was also provided by the US Geological Survey’s Climate Research and Development Program. M.R.B. acknowledges the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/X001326/1). D.B. and M.R.B. thank the Western National Parks Association for support.
Author contributions: J.S.P. and K.B.S. conceptualized the project and completed the field work. J.S.H., D.W., M.R.C., and S.R.H.Z. performed the pollen analysis and radiocarbon laboratory work, and H.J.G. performed the luminescence laboratory work. The original manuscript was drafted by J.S.P. and K.B.S. Editing of the manuscript was done by J.S.P., K.B.S., J.S.H., D.W., M.R.C., S.R.H.Z., H.J.G., V.L.S., D.O., D.B., and MRB.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing or conflicting interests.
Data availability: Downloadable files of the data presented in the supplementary materials (tables S1 and S2) can be found at (33).
License information: Copyright © 2023 the authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original US government works. https://www.science.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

Authors

Affiliations

US Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
US Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
US Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Resources.
US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Roles: Investigation, Methodology, and Writing - review & editing.
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA.
Roles: Investigation, Methodology, and Writing - review & editing.
US Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, and Writing - original draft.
National Park Service, Geologic Resources Division, Washington, DC 20240, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
National Park Service, Cultural Resources Directorate, Washington, DC 20240, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, and Project administration.
Present address: University of Alaska Museum of the North, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.
National Park Service, White Sands National Park, Holloman Air Force Base, NM 88330, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, and Visualization.
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.

Funding Information

Notes

*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (J.S.P.); [email protected] (K.B.S.)
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media