Volume 77, Issue 5 p. 1311-1342

Prejudice Control and Interracial Relations: The Role of Motivation to Respond Without Prejudice

David A. Butz

David A. Butz

Morehead State University

Search for more papers by this author
E. Ashby Plant

E. Ashby Plant

Florida State University

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 September 2009
Citations: 60
concerning this article should be addressed to David A. Butz, Department of Psychology, Morehead State University, 601 Ginger Hall, Morehead, KY 40351. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

ABSTRACT A decade of research indicates that individual differences in motivation to respond without prejudice have important implications for the control of prejudice and interracial relations. In reviewing this work, we draw on W. Mischel and Y. Shoda's (1995, 1999) Cognitive–Affective Processing System (CAPS) to demonstrate that people with varying sources of motivation to respond without prejudice respond in distinct ways to situational cues, resulting in differing situation–behavior profiles in interracial contexts. People whose motivation is self-determined (i.e., the internally motivated) effectively control prejudice across situations and strive for positive interracial interactions. In contrast, people who respond without prejudice to avoid social sanction (i.e., the primarily externally motivated) consistently fail at regulating difficult to control prejudice and respond with anxiety and avoidance in interracial interactions. We further consider the nature of the cognitive–affective units of personality associated with motivation to respond without prejudice and their implications for the quality of interracial relations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.