Advertisement

Extreme events bring rapid change

Environmental adaptation is often considered a slow process. However, extreme events, such as heat waves or cold snaps, can produce rapid changes, both morphologically and genetically. Campbell-Staton et al. studied a population of green anole lizards during an extreme cold snap in the southern United States (see the Perspective by Grant). After the cold snap, the lizards showed greater cold resistance and displayed changes in six genomic regions that are important for regulation of function in the cold. Understanding how extreme climatic events influence adaptive potential will become increasingly important as the climate becomes more volatile.
Science, this issue p. 495; see also p. 451

Abstract

Extreme environmental perturbations offer opportunities to observe the effects of natural selection in wild populations. During the winter of 2013–2014, the southeastern United States endured an extreme cold event. We used thermal performance, transcriptomics, and genome scans to measure responses of lizard populations to storm-induced selection. We found significant increases in cold tolerance at the species’ southern limit. Gene expression in southern survivors shifted toward patterns characteristic of northern populations. Comparing samples before and after the extreme winter, 14 genomic regions were differentiated in the surviving southern population; four also exhibited signatures of local adaptation across the latitudinal gradient and implicate genes involved in nervous system function. Together, our results suggest that extreme winter events can rapidly produce strong selection on natural populations at multiple biological levels that recapitulate geographic patterns of local adaptation.
In 1898, Hermon Bumpus provided the first measurement of the effects of natural selection operating on a wild population (1). By comparing house sparrows that survived a severe snowstorm to those that perished, he was able to quantify selection on body size and shape. Events like the 1898 snowstorm can result in intense episodes of rapid demographic and evolutionary change (14) and, despite their brevity, may account for a large portion of total selection experienced by a population (5). However, despite advances in technology and statistical inference, there are still surprisingly few empirical examples of natural selection imposed by intense weather events (1, 3, 4) and fewer still have investigated the regulatory and genetic mechanisms targeted by such events (6, 7).
Here, we investigate the effects of natural selection in response to an extreme cold event at the phenotypic, regulatory, and genetic level in wild populations of the green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis. We measured critical thermal minimum (CTmin), the temperature at which lizards lose coordination under cold challenge (8), at five sites along a latitudinal transect in August 2013 (Fig. 1A). During winter 2013–2014, weakening of the arctic low-pressure zone (the “polar vortex”) led to an extreme cold snap throughout the southern United States (Fig. 1), resulting in minimum temperatures that were significantly colder than those in the previous 15 years at all sites [Welch’s two sample t test; Brownsville, Texas (BRO): P << 0.01; Victoria, Texas (VIC): P = 0.047; Austin, Texas (AUS): P = 0.021; Arlington, Texas (ARL): P << 0.01; Hodgen, Oklahoma (HOD): P << 0.01]. Because cold tolerance in this species naturally varies with latitude (9), we estimated the local intensity of storm-induced cold stress at each site as the number of days each population experienced temperatures below its mean CTmin compared to the previous winter. The southernmost population experienced the greatest increase in days below CTmin (BRO: 164.71%, 28 days). Populations farther north also experienced increased cold stress, although to a lesser degree (VIC: 30.77%, 20 days; AUS: 8.33%, 7 days; ARL: 26.9%, 20 days; HOD: 4.63%, 5 days).
Fig. 1 Distribution of collection sites along a latitudinal cline.
(A) Collection localities. (B) Minimum daily temperatures of 1998 to 2013 (November 1 to February 28). Daily values were averaged for the 15 years before the winter of 2013–2014. (C) Percentage increase in days below the minimum thermal limits of the population at each collection site. All data are ordered by latitude from top to bottom.
We hypothesized that the extreme cold may have exerted natural selection on these populations, eliminating less cold-hardy individuals. Therefore, we investigated whether survivors of the 2013–2014 winter storms displayed greater cold tolerance than individuals sampled the previous year. We revisited BRO and AUS in April 2014 to measure CTmin of the survivors. The southernmost population (BRO) showed a significant increase in cold tolerance (linear mixed effects model, t = –2.09, P = 0.043), whereas AUS showed no change (t = –0.182, P = 0.856) (Fig. 2). To rule out potential effects of seasonal plasticity, we returned to these localities during late July 2014 to remeasure CTmin. If the shifts observed in the spring were due to seasonal plasticity, we expected CTmin in BRO to return to prewinter estimates the following summer. Instead, the increase in cold tolerance in BRO was maintained through the summer (t = –2.72, P = 0.009). We revisited the remaining sites during late July 2014 to measure the geographic extent of this effect. VIC also displayed a significant increase in cold tolerance (t = –2.057, P < 0.05), whereas more northern sites did not (AUS: t = 0.116, P = 0.908; ARL: t = –0.818, P = 0.429; HOD: t = 1.064, P = 0.299). Because cold tolerance is heritable (9) and locally adapted (9, 10) in the green anole, strong selection may lead to rapid evolutionary response of this phenotype.
Fig. 2 Response of cold tolerance to the extreme winter of 2013–2014.
(A) Mean ± SEM of critical thermal minimum (CTmin) in July and August of 2013 (summer 2013), April 2014 (spring 2014), and July 2014 (summer 2014). (B) Mean ± SEM of (CTmin) during the summers of 2013 and 2014. Asterisks indicate that CTmin was significantly lower after the extreme cold event of 2013–2014.
Next, we tested the hypothesis that the cold snap selected for individuals in southern populations with regulatory phenotypes more similar to their northern counterparts. We sequenced 48 liver transcriptomes of lizards collected before and after the focal winter. Before the winter storms, eight individuals were sampled from each end of the latitudinal transect following a 14-day common-garden acclimation to either 30°C (BRO: N = 4; HOD: N = 4) or 20°C (BRO: N = 4; HOD: N = 4). An additional 10 animals were also sampled from the mid-latitude sites before the winter storms and acclimated to 30°C for 14 days (VIC: N = 6; AUS: N = 4). After the winter storms, 22 animals were sampled from four sites (BRO: N = 8; VIC: N = 6; AUS: N = 8) after a 14-day, 30°C acclimation period. We used the program WGCNA (11) to identify modules of coexpressed genes across all 48 liver transcriptomes. Scores from the first principal components analysis axis of variation were used as a measure of module expression and regressed against latitude of origin (Fig. 3). We identified 57 coexpression modules, three of which were significantly associated with latitude after controlling for variation in mass, sex, and acclimation condition (table S1).
Fig. 3 Expression of regulatory modules associated with latitude.
(A to C) Associations between module expression and sampling latitude. Crosses and dots represent module expression scores from samples acclimated for 2 weeks at 20° and 30°C, respectively. (D to F) Bar plots representing the number of genes within each module that shift in expression in the southernmost population (BRO) after the storm in the same direction as gene expression differences between BRO and the northernmost site (HOD).
Next, we used individuals from the 30°C acclimation to test for storm-mediated shifts in gene expression. We found that winter survivors in BRO displayed shifts in gene expression predominantly toward mean expression levels of the northern-most population (HOD) (exact binomial test; Module 16: P = 0.038; Module 18: P = 0.041; Module 53: P << 0.001) (Fig. 3). These shifts support the hypothesis that the extreme winter at the southernmost site selected for survivors with regulatory phenotypes more similar to lizards that frequently endure harsher winters farther north. This trend was not apparent in survivors at the other collection sites (see the supplementary materials), likely due to the lesser effect of the winter storms at these sites.
Finally, we identified putative genomic targets of storm-induced selection in the southernmost site (BRO) by mapping RNA sequencing reads from individuals collected before (N = 8) and after (N = 8) the winter storms. Fourteen genomic regions displayed significantly elevated genetic divergence [fixation index (FST) outlier peaks] between individuals collected before and after the storm (bootstrap resampling, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A). Four of these regions also show signatures of genetic divergence between BRO and the northernmost site (HOD) (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the extreme winter event targeted regions of the genome that may also be involved in local adaptation across the latitudinal cline. Absolute divergence, dXY (12), was significantly elevated within southern versus northern FST outlier peaks (mean within-peak dXY = 0.00063; mean outside-peak dXY = 0.00054; Wilcoxon rank sum test: P = 0.01) (figs. S5 and S6), suggesting that the observed patterns of differentiation are not an artifact of low-diversity regions across the species’ genome (12).
Fig. 4 Genomic scan for targets of storm-mediated selection.
(A) Scan for genetic differentiation between lizards collected before and after the winter of 2013–2014 from BRO. Gray points represent individual values of FST for each single-nucleotide polymorphism. Black dots indicate nonsignificant FST values within 5-Mb windows (bootstrap resampling, P ≥ 0.05) in pre- versus post-storm comparisons. Blue dots indicate nonsignificant FST values within 5-Mb windows (bootstrap resampling, P ≥ 0.05) in north (HOD) versus south (BRO) comparisons. Red and green dots indicate regions of significantly elevated FST between samples (bootstrap resampling, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Black lines indicate differentially expressed genes within FST outlier peaks. (B to F) Expression differences between pre- and post-storm BRO samples at gene expression outliers. Genes shown are associated with cholinesterase activity and sodium symporter activity.
Differentially expressed genes under FST peaks (N = 12) were enriched for carboxylic ester hydrolase activity (GO:00052689, P = 0.012) and sodium symporter activity (GO:0005328, P = 0.014; GO:000345, P = 0.016), which participate in maintenance of synaptic function, a proposed contributor to temperature-induced loss of function and death in ectothermic species (13). Three of these genes [acetylcholinesterase, LOC100557088 (cholinesterase), and LOC100561946 (cholinesterase)] are acetylcholinesterase orthologs that play an important role in neurotransmission (14). Additionally, two gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporters (SLC6A1 and SLC6A8) within FST outlier peaks are associated with sodium symporter activity. GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter crucial to the maintenance of muscle tone. All five genes are located on chromosome 2 of the green anole genome, under a single FST outlier peak (Fig. 4, B to F). Differential expression of these genes in the liver may reflect functional differences throughout the autonomic nervous system. Further study is needed to investigate the potential role of these genes in cold-dependent organismal function.
Extreme weather events are expected to increase in frequency and magnitude due to human-mediated climate change (15). These events may have drastic effects on natural populations by inducing intense episodes of natural selection and driving evolution on contemporary time scales (16). Understanding the biological effects of these events has important implications for the continued survival of species around the globe. This study demonstrates that such events can rapidly induce natural selection at the phenotypic, regulatory, and genetic levels resulting in patterns of divergence similar to those driven by local adaptation along natural climatic gradients.

Acknowledgments

M. Fujita, Y. Stuart, and A. Jaffe provided assistance in collecting samples. National Science Foundation, Harvard University, and University of Illinois provided funding. Sequence data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information: SAMN06042490 to SAMN06042537. Cold tolerance data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g500m. Samples are accessioned in the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ Cryogenic 4448-4586).

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S8
Table S1
References (1727)

Resources

File (aam5512_campbell-staton_sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
H. Bumpus, The elimination of the unfit as illustrated by the introduced sparrow, Passer domesticus: A fourth contribution to the study of variation. Biol. Lect. Woods Hole Mar. Biol. Lab. 1898, 209–225 (1898).
2
N. G. Hairston, W. E. Walton, Rapid evolution of a life history trait. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 4831–4833 (1986).
3
B. R. Grant, P. R. Grant, Evolution of Darwin’s finches caused by a rare climatic event. Proc. Biol. Sci. 251, 111–117 (1993).
4
C. R. Brown, M. B. Brown, Intense natural selection on body size and wing and tail asymmetry in Cliff Swallows during severe weather. Evolution 52, 1461–1475 (1998).
5
P. O’Donald, A further analysis of Bumpus’ Data: The intensity of natural selection. Evolution 27, 398–404 (1973).
6
F. Rodríguez-Trelles, R. Tarrío, M. Santos, Genome-wide evolutionary response to a heat wave in Drosophila. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130228 (2013).
7
S. Lamichhaney, J. Berglund, M. S. Almén, K. Maqbool, M. Grabherr, A. Martinez-Barrio, M. Promerová, C.-J. Rubin, C. Wang, N. Zamani, B. R. Grant, P. R. Grant, M. T. Webster, L. Andersson, Evolution of Darwin’s finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing. Nature 518, 371–375 (2015).
8
R. Cowles, C. Bogert, A preliminary study of the thermal requirements of desert reptiles. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 83, 265–296 (1944).
9
S. C. Campbell-Staton, S. V. Edwards, J. B. Losos, Climate-mediated adaptation after mainland colonization of an ancestrally subtropical island lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 2168–2180 (2016).
10
M. A. Wilson, A. C. Echternacht, Geographic variation in the critical thermal minimum of the green anole, Anolis carolinensis (sauria:Iguanidae), along a latitudinal gradient. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A. Physiol. 87, 757–760 (1987).
11
P. Langfelder, S. Horvath, WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008).
12
T. E. Cruickshank, M. W. Hahn, Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3133–3157 (2014).
13
H. O. Pörtner, P. L. M. Van Dijk, I. Hardewing, A. Sommer, in Antarctic Ecosystems: Models for Wider Ecological Understanding, W. Davison, C. H. Williams, Eds. (Caxton Press, Christchurch New Zealand, 2000), pp. 109–122.
14
D. Nachmansohn, Proteins in bioelectricity: The control of ion movements across excitable membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 61, 1034–1041 (1968).
15
G. C. Hegerl, H. Hanlon, C. Beierkuhnlein, Climate science: Elusive extremes. Nat. Geosci. 4, 142–143 (2011).
16
P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, R. B. Huey, M. T. J. Johnson, A. H. Knoll, J. Schmitt, Evolution caused by extreme events. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160146 (2017).
17
T. W. Schoener, A. Schoener, Estimating and interpreting body-size growth in some Anolis lizards. Copeia 1978, 390–405 (1978).
18
A. M. Bolger, M. Lohse, B. Usadel, Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
19
J. Alföldi, F. Di Palma, M. Grabherr, C. Williams, L. Kong, E. Mauceli, P. Russell, C. B. Lowe, R. E. Glor, J. D. Jaffe, D. A. Ray, S. Boissinot, A. M. Shedlock, C. Botka, T. A. Castoe, J. K. Colbourne, M. K. Fujita, R. G. Moreno, B. F. ten Hallers, D. Haussler, A. Heger, D. Heiman, D. E. Janes, J. Johnson, P. J. de Jong, M. Y. Koriabine, M. Lara, P. A. Novick, C. L. Organ, S. E. Peach, S. Poe, D. D. Pollock, K. de Queiroz, T. Sanger, S. Searle, J. D. Smith, Z. Smith, R. Swofford, J. Turner-Maier, J. Wade, S. Young, A. Zadissa, S. V. Edwards, T. C. Glenn, C. J. Schneider, J. B. Losos, E. S. Lander, M. Breen, C. P. Ponting, K. Lindblad-Toh, The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477, 587–591 (2011).
20
D. Kim, G. Pertea, C. Trapnell, H. Pimentel, R. Kelley, S. L. Salzberg, TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
21
M. D. Robinson, G. K. Smyth, Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics 9, 321–332 (2008).
22
B. Zhang, S. Horvath, A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 4, 10.2202/1544-6115.1128 (2005). 10.2202/1544-6115.1128
23
A. Dobin, C. A. Davis, F. Schlesinger, J. Drenkow, C. Zaleski, S. Jha, P. Batut, M. Chaisson, T. R. Gingeras, STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
24
A. Yates, W. Akanni, M. R. Amode, D. Barrell, K. Billis, D. Carvalho-Silva, C. Cummins, P. Clapham, S. Fitzgerald, L. Gil, C. G. Girón, L. Gordon, T. Hourlier, S. E. Hunt, S. H. Janacek, N. Johnson, T. Juettemann, S. Keenan, I. Lavidas, F. J. Martin, T. Maurel, W. McLaren, D. N. Murphy, R. Nag, M. Nuhn, A. Parker, M. Patricio, M. Pignatelli, M. Rahtz, H. S. Riat, D. Sheppard, K. Taylor, A. Thormann, A. Vullo, S. P. Wilder, A. Zadissa, E. Birney, J. Harrow, M. Muffato, E. Perry, M. Ruffier, G. Spudich, S. J. Trevanion, F. Cunningham, B. L. Aken, D. R. Zerbino, P. Flicek, Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D710–D716 (2016).
25
A. McKenna, M. Hanna, E. Banks, A. Sivachenko, K. Cibulskis, A. Kernytsky, K. Garimella, D. Altshuler, S. Gabriel, M. Daly, M. A. DePristo, The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
26
J. Catchen, P. A. Hohenlohe, S. Bassham, A. Amores, W. A. Cresko, Stacks: An analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3124–3140 (2013).
27
B. S. Weir, Genetic Data Analysis II: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1996).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 357 | Issue 6350
4 August 2017

Submission history

Received: 19 December 2016
Accepted: 5 July 2017
Published in print: 4 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

M. Fujita, Y. Stuart, and A. Jaffe provided assistance in collecting samples. National Science Foundation, Harvard University, and University of Illinois provided funding. Sequence data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information: SAMN06042490 to SAMN06042537. Cold tolerance data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.g500m. Samples are accessioned in the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ Cryogenic 4448-4586).

Authors

Affiliations

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Zachary A. Cheviron
University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Jonathan B. Losos
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding Information

National Science Foundation: award314449, DEB-1311484

Notes

*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Genome Evolution and the Future of Phylogenomics of Non-Avian Reptiles, Animals, 13, 3, (471), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030471
    Crossref
  2. Marine heatwaves threaten cryptic coral diversity and erode associations among coevolving partners, Science Advances, 9, 32, (2023)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf0954
    Abstract
  3. Environmental drivers of body size in North American bats, Functional Ecology, 37, 4, (1020-1032), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14287
    Crossref
  4. Blowing in the wind: Experimental assessment of clinging performance and behaviour in Anolis lizards during hurricane‐force winds , Functional Ecology, 37, 3, (638-647), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14260
    Crossref
  5. The ecological consequences of the timing of extreme climate events, Ecology and Evolution, 13, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9661
    Crossref
  6. Drivers of adaptive capacity in wild populations: Implications for genetic interventions, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.947989
    Crossref
  7. Draft genome of six Cuban Anolis lizards and insights into genetic changes during their diversification, BMC Ecology and Evolution, 22, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-02086-7
    Crossref
  8. Local Adaptation: Causal Agents of Selection and Adaptive Trait Divergence, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 53, 1, (87-111), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012722-035231
    Crossref
  9. Genome-Wide Association Studies across Environmental and Genetic Contexts Reveal Complex Genetic Architecture of Symbiotic Extended Phenotypes, mBio, 13, 6, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01823-22
    Crossref
  10. Comparative phylogeography in the genomic age: Opportunities and challenges, Journal of Biogeography, 49, 12, (2130-2144), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14481
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media