Advertisement
No access
Report

Though They May Be Unaware, Newlyweds Implicitly Know Whether Their Marriage Will Be Satisfying

Science
29 Nov 2013
Vol 342, Issue 6162
pp. 1119-1120

Newlywed Game?

The extent to which our “gut” feelings influence our social interactions has been a matter of debate. Social psychologists have sometimes been criticized for their reliance on short-term analyses of undergraduates as test subjects. McNulty et al. (p. 1119) measured explicit and implicit attitudes of newlywed couples toward one another twice a year for 4 years. Over time, the implicit or unaware evaluations of the relationship predicted changes of marital satisfaction, whereas the explicit or conscious evaluations did not.

Abstract

For decades, social psychological theories have posited that the automatic processes captured by implicit measures have implications for social outcomes. Yet few studies have demonstrated any long-term implications of automatic processes, and some scholars have begun to question the relevance and even the validity of these theories. At baseline of our longitudinal study, 135 newlywed couples (270 individuals) completed an explicit measure of their conscious attitudes toward their relationship and an implicit measure of their automatic attitudes toward their partner. They then reported their marital satisfaction every 6 months for the next 4 years. We found no correlation between spouses’ automatic and conscious attitudes, which suggests that spouses were unaware of their automatic attitudes. Further, spouses’ automatic attitudes, not their conscious ones, predicted changes in their marital satisfaction, such that spouses with more positive automatic attitudes were less likely to experience declines in marital satisfaction over time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Tables S1 and S2
References (2328)

Resources

File (1119.mp3)
File (mcnulty.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
McNulty J. K., O’Mara E. M., Karney B. R., Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff”... But it is not all small stuff. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 631–646 (2008).
2
Lavner J. A., Karney B. R., Bradbury T. N., Newlyweds’ optimistic forecasts of their marriage: For better or for worse? J. Fam. Psychol. 27, 531–540 (2013).
3
Murray S. L., Griffin D. W., Derrick J. L., Harris B., Aloni M., Leder S., Tempting fate or inviting happiness?: Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 22, 619–626 (2011).
4
A. Dijksterhuis, L. W. Albers, K. C. Bongers, in Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, P. Briñol, Eds. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2009), pp. 229–250.
5
Scinta A., Gable S. L., Automatic and self-reported attitudes in romantic relationships. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33, 1008–1022 (2007).
6
S. Chaiken, Y. Trope, Eds., Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (Guilford, New York, 1999).
7
Fazio R. H., Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23, 75–109 (1990).
8
M. A. Olson, R. H. Fazio, in Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures, R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, P. Briñol, Eds. (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2009), pp. 19–64.
9
Fazio R. H., Ledbetter J. E., Towles-Schwen T., On the costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object has changed. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 197–210 (2000).
10
LeBel E. P., Campbell L., Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 1291–1294 (2009).
11
LeBel E. P., Campbell L., The interactive role of implicit and explicit partner evaluations on ongoing affective and behavioral romantic realities. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4, 167–174 (2013).
12
Lee S., Rogge R. D., Reis H. T., Assessing the seeds of relationship decay: Using implicit evaluations to detect the early stages of disillusionment. Psychol. Sci. 21, 857–864 (2010).
13
Murray S. L., Gomillion S., Holmes J. G., Harris B., Lamarche V., The dynamics of relationship promotion: Controlling the automatic inclination to trust. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104, 305–334 (2013).
14
Towles-Schwen T., Fazio R. H., Automatically-activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 698–705 (2006).
15
C. E. Osgood, G. J. Suci, P. H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning (Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1957).
16
Fazio R. H., Jackson J. R., Dunton B. C., Williams C. J., Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 1013–1027 (1995).
17
See supplementary materials on Science Online.
18
Tofighi D., MacKinnon D. P., RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behav. Res. Methods 43, 692–700 (2011).
19
Fazio R. H., Olson M. A., Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 297–327 (2003).
20
Arkes H. R., Tetlock P. E., Attributions of implicit prejudice, or would Jesse Jackson ‘fail’ the implicit association test? Psychol. Inq. 15, 257–278 (2004).
21
Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C. L., Cleeremans A., Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLOS ONE 7, e29081 (2012).
22
Pashler H., Coburn N., Harris C. R., Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments. PLOS ONE 7, e42510 (2012).
23
Norton R., Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. J. Marriage Fam. 45, 141–151 (1983).
24
Geiss S. K., O’Leary K. D., Therapist ratings of frequency and severity of marital problems: Implications for research. J. Marital Fam. Ther. 7, 515–520 (1981).
25
M. Rosenberg, Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965).
26
Frye N. E., McNulty J. K., Karney B. R., How do constraints on leaving a marriage affect behavior within the marriage? J. Fam. Psychol. 22, 153–161 (2008).
27
K. A. Brennan, C. L. Clark, P. R. Shaver, Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, J. A. Simpson, W. S. Rholes, Eds. (Guilford, New York, 1998), pp. 394–428.
28
L. R. Goldberg, A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Personality Psychology in Europe, I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf, Eds. (Tilburg Univ. Press, Tilburg, Netherlands, 1999), vol. 7, pp. 7–28.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 342 | Issue 6162
29 November 2013

Submission history

Received: 12 July 2013
Accepted: 17 October 2013
Published in print: 29 November 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

Supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant RHD058314A and NSF grant BCS-1251520 (J.K.M.). We thank D. Atkins, R. Baumeister, and J. Maner for their helpful comments regarding this research. Data are available from the first author upon request.

Authors

Affiliations

James K. McNulty* [email protected]
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Michael A. Olson
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Andrea L. Meltzer
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA.
Matthew J. Shaffer
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

Notes

*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Affective or cognitive interpersonal emotion regulation in couples: an fNIRS hyperscanning study, Cerebral Cortex, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad091
    Crossref
  2. Three tests of the Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation Model: Independent prediction, mediation, and generalizability, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921485
    Crossref
  3. Do I Like You? Effects of Daily Negative Events and Implicit Self-Esteem on Daily Implicit Partner Regard, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13, 8, (1269-1280), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211070511
    Crossref
  4. Predicting romantic interest during early relationship development: A preregistered investigation using machine learning, European Journal of Personality, (089020702210858), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070221085877
    Crossref
  5. Temptation at your door: Receiving mate poaching attempts and perceived Partners' desirability, Personal Relationships, 29, 3, (566-580), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12433
    Crossref
  6. Factors that contribute to the maintenance or decline of relationship satisfaction, Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 3, (161-173), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00026-2
    Crossref
  7. Implicit impressions of creative people: Creativity evaluation in a stigmatized domain, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 169, (104116), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.104116
    Crossref
  8. Penalized for Challenging Traditional Gender Roles: Why Heterosexual Relationships in Which Women Wear the Pants May Be More Precarious, Sex Roles, 88, 3-4, (130-154), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01339-5
    Crossref
  9. Couple Communication Behaviors During Sexual and Nonsexual Discussions and Their Association with Relationship Satisfaction, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 3, (1541-1557), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02204-4
    Crossref
  10. Adopting Evaluative Conditioning to Improve Coach–Athlete Relationships, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, (2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751990
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media