skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2207754acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"A pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on an empirical study where we cut off email usage for five workdays for 13 information workers in an organization. We employed both quantitative measures such as computer log data and ethnographic methods to compare a baseline condition (normal email usage) with our experimental manipulation (email cutoff). Our results show that without email, people multitasked less and had a longer task focus, as measured by a lower frequency of shifting between windows and a longer duration of time spent working in each computer window. Further, we directly measured stress using wearable heart rate monitors and found that stress, as measured by heart rate variability, was lower without email. Interview data were consistent with our quantitative measures, as participants reported being able to focus more on their tasks. We discuss the implications for managing email better in organizations.

References

  1. Acharya, U. R., Joseph, K. P., Kannathal, N., Lim, C. M., and Suri, J. S. Heart rate variability: A review. Medical & Bio Engineering & Comp 44, 12 (2006), 1031--1051.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barley, S., Myerson, D., and Grodel, S. E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science 22, 4 (2011), 887--906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I., and Grinter, R. E. Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. HumanComputer Interaction 20, 1 (2005), 89--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Berntson, G. G. and Cacioppo, J. T. Heart rate variability: Stress and psychiatric conditions. In M. Malik and A. J. Camm (Eds.), Dynamic Electrocardiography, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berntson, G., Bigger, J., Eckberg, D., Grossman, P., Kaufmann, P., Malik, M., Nagaraja, H., Porges, S., Saul, J., Stone, P., and van der Molen, M. Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 34, 6 (1997), 623--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bluedorn, A., Kalliath, T., Strube, M., and Martin, G. Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. J of Managerial Psychology 14, 3/4 (1999), 205--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Boutcher, S. H., Nugent, F. W., McLaren, P. F., and Weltman, A. L. Heart period variability of trained and untrained men at rest and during mental challenge. Psychophysiology 35, 1 (1998), 16--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., and Wilhite, S. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proc. INTERACT 2001, IOS Press (2001), 263--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dabbish, L. A. and Kraut, R. E. Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S. E., Atkeson, C. G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J. C., and Yang, J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction 12, 1 (2005), 119--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. González, V. M. and Mark, G. "Constant, constant, multitasking craziness": Managing multiple working spheres. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. González, V.M., Nardi, B., and Mark, G. Ensembles: Understanding the instantiation of activities. Information Tech & People 22, 2 (2009), 109--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gorman, J. M. and Sloan, R. P. Heart rate variability in depressive and anxiety disorders. American Heart Journal 140, 4, Part B (2000), 77--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASATLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988), 239--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hewlett, S. A. and Luce, C. B. Extreme jobs: The dangerous allure of the 70-hour workweek. Harvard Business Review 84, 12 (2006), 49--59, 162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hjortskov, N. Rissén, D., Blangsted, A., Fallentin, N., Lundberg, U., and Søgaard, K. The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. Eur J of Appl Phys 92, 1-2 (2004), 84--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hutchings, D. R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proc. AVI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jackson, T., Dawson, R., and Wilson, D. Reducing the effect of email interruptions on employees. International J of Information Management 23, 1 (2003), 55--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Klosterman, C. My zombie, myself: Why modern life feels rather undead. The New York Times, Dec. 3, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mark, G., González, V., and Harris, J. No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mintzberg, H. Structured observation as a method to study managerial work. J Mgt Stud 7, 1 (1970), 87--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nair, R., Voida, S., and Mynatt, E. D. Frequency-based detection of task switches. In Proc. HCI 2005. Springer (2005), 94--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Perlow, L. A. The time famine: Towards a sociology of work time. Admin Sci Quarterly 44, 1 (1999), 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Renaud, K., Ramsay, J., and Hair, M. "You've got email!" & shall I deal with it now? Electronic mail from the recipient's perspective. IJHCI 21, 3 (2006), 313--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robbins, S. Tips for mastering e-mail overload. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge (2004, Oct 25). http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4438.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Stein, P. K., Ehsani, A. A., Domitrovich, P. P., Kleiger, R. E., and Rottman, J. N. Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in healthy older adults. American Heart Journal 138, 3 (1999), 567--576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Turkle, S. Alone Together. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wacjman, J. and Rose, E. Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies 32, 7 (2011), 941--961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Whittaker, S., and Sidner, C. Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. In Proc. CHI 1996, ACM Press (1996), 276--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yeragani, V. K., Sobolewski, E., Igel, G., Johnson, C., Jampala, V. C., Kay, J., Hillman, N., Yeragani, S., and Vempati, S. Decreased heart-period variability in patients with panic disorder: A study of Holter ECG records. Psychiatry Research 78, 1-2 (1998), 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "A pace not dictated by electrons": an empirical study of work without email

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2012
        3276 pages
        ISBN:9781450310154
        DOI:10.1145/2207676

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 May 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader