Skip to main content
Log in

Art Auctions and Bidding Rings: Empirical Evidence from German Auction Data

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article illustrates the determinants of bidder collusion using data from German auctions. Special attention is thereby devoted to the question at whether art and antiques auctions are particularly attractive for bidding rings as the conditions for rings to succeed may be quite favorable at these auctions. Cartel stability at art auctions, for example, may be enforced by the structure of bidders or the expected surplus from collusive arrangements. Actually, the estimations of a binary choice model show that even after controlling for determinants suggested by auction theory, art and antiques auctions turn out to be particularly susceptible to bidder collusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, Chungrong and Norton, Edward C. (2003) “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models”. Economics Letters 80: 123-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley (1989) “How Auctions Work for Wine and Art”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (3): 23-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and Graddy, Kathryn (2003) “Auctions and the Price of Art”. Journal of Economic Literature 41: 763-786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley, Graddy, Kathryn, and Stevens, Margaret (2002) “A Study of Sale Rates and Prices in Impressionist and Contemporary Art Auctions”. Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.

  • Baldwin, Laura H., Marshall, Robert C., and Richard, Jean-Francois (1997) “Bidder Collusion at Forest Service Timber Sales”. Journal of Political Economy 105: 657-699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, Luc and Ginsburgh, Victor (2000) “Art Experts and Auctions: Are Pre-Sale Estimates Unbiased and Fully Informative?”. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 66: 131-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Michael (1999) Ökonomische Analyse deutscher Auktionen. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, Alan and Graddy, Kathryn (1997) “Declining Values and the Afternoon Effect: Evidence from Art Auctions”. Rand Journal of Economics 28: 544-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannman, Lance E. (1996) “Potential Competition and Possible Collusion in Forest Service Timber Auctions”. Economic Inquiry 34: 730-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Hitt, Lorin M. (2002) “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 339-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, Ralph (1967) Auctions and Auctioneering. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, Peter C. (1995) “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction”. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4: 267-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, Ulrich and Güth, Werner (1987) “Internal and External Stability of Bidder Cartels in Auctions and Public Tenders: A Comparison of Pricing Rules”. International Journal of Industrial Organization 5: 303-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Robert A. and Mehra, Rajnish (1993) “Auctions-Theory and Applications”. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 40: 485-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Daniel A. and Marshall, Robert C. (1987) “Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single-Object Second-Price and English Auctions”. Journal of Political Economy 95: 1217-1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Srabana (2001) “The Effect of Bid Rigging on Prices: A Study of the Highway Construction Industry”. Review of Industrial Organization 19: 453-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Srabana (2002) “Competition and Collusion in a Government Procurement Auction Market”. Atlantic Economic Journal 30: 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, Kenneth and Porter, Robert H. (1988) “An Empirical Study of an Auction with Asymmetric Information”. American Economic Review 78: 865-883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, Paul (1999) “Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature”. Journal of Economic Surveys 13: 227-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kräkel, Matthias (1992) Auktionstheorie und interne Organisation. Gabler, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kräkel, Matthias (1993) “Zur Regulierung öffentlicher Ausschreibungen”. Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaft 44: 278-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. Scott (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston and McMillan, John (1987) “Auctions and Bidding”. Journal of Economic Literature 25: 699-738.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. Preston and McMillan, John (1992) “Bidding Rings”. American Economic Review 82: 579-599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul R. (1987) “Auctions Theory”, in Truman F. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory-Fifth World Congress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul R. and Weber, Robert J. (1982) “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding”. Econometrica 50: 1089-1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Robert H. and Zona, J. Douglas (1993) “Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions”. Journal of Political Economy 101: 518-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauenberg, Bernd (1991) “Organisationsprobleme bei dauerhafter Kooperation”, in Dieter Ordelheide, Bernd Rudolph and Elke Büsselmann (eds.), Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Ökonomische Theorie. Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp. 329-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherstyuk, Katerina (2002) “Collusion in Private Value Ascending Price Auctions”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48: 177-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Charles W. (1989) Auctions: The Social Construction of Value. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Halbert (1980) “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity”. Econometrica 48: 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter, Elmar (1996) “Auctions: An Introduction”. Journal of Economic Surveys 10: 367-420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckmann, M. Art Auctions and Bidding Rings: Empirical Evidence from German Auction Data. Journal of Cultural Economics 28, 125–141 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019483.38761.63

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019483.38761.63

Navigation