The Evolutionary Significance of Autopolyploidy

Arne Müntzing,

Arne Müntzing

Svalöf, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author

Arne Müntzing,

Arne Müntzing

Svalöf, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author

First published: March 1936

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1936.tb03204.x

Citations: 22

About

PDF

Tools

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

LITERATURE CITED

1 Afzelius, K. 1924. Embryologische und zytologische Studien in Senecio und verwandten Gattungen. Acta Horti Bergiani, Bd. 8, No. 7, pp. 123–219.

Google Scholar
2 Anderson, E. and Diehl, D. G. 1932. Contributions to the Tradescantia problem. Journ. of the Arnold Arboretum, Vol. XIII, pp. 213–231.

Google Scholar
3 Anderson, E. and Sax, K. 1935. Chromosome numbers in the Hamamelidaceae and their phylogenetic significance. Journ. of the Arnold Arboretum, Vol. XVI, pp. 210–215.

Google Scholar
4 Anderson, E. and Woodson, R. E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. — Contributions fr. the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, No. IX, pp. 1–132.

Google Scholar
5 Andersson-Kottö, I. and Gairdner, A. E. 1931. Interspecific crosses in the genus Dianthus. Genetica XIII, pp. 77–112.
10.1007/BF01725040
Google Scholar
6 Artom, C. 1928. La polyploidie dans ses corrélations morphologiques et biologiques. Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de Biologie, Bd. XCIX, No. 25, pp. 29–49.

Google Scholar
7 Avdulow, N. P. 1931. Karyo-systematische Untersuchung der Familie Gramineen. Supplement 43rd to the bull, of appl. bot., of genetics and plantbreeding, pp. 1–428.

Google Scholar
8 Babcock, E. B. 1934. Genetic evolutionary processes. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 510–515.
10.1073/pnas.20.9.510
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
9 Babcock, E. B. and Cameron, D. R. 1934. Chromosomes and phylogeny in Crepis. II. The relationships of one hundred eight species. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agricult. Sc., Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 287–324.

Google Scholar
10 Babcock, E. B. and Navashin, M. 1930. The genus Crepis. Bibliographia Genetica, Vol. VI, pp. 1–90.

Google Scholar
11 Babcock, E. B. and Swezy, O. 1935. The chromosomes of Crepis biennis L. and Crepis ciliata C. Koch. Cytologia, Vol. 6, No. 2–3, pp. 256–265.
10.1508/cytologia.6.256
Google Scholar
12 Becker, G. 1931. Experimentelle Analyse der Genom- und Plasmonwirkung bei Moosen. III. Osmotischer Wert heteroploider Pflanzen. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. LX, H. 1, pp. 17–38.

Google Scholar
13 Belling, J. and Blakeslee, A. F. 1922. The assortment of chromosomes in triploid Daturas. Am. Natur., Vol. 56, pp. 339–346.
10.1086/279873
Google Scholar
14 Belling, J. and Blakeslee, A. F. 1924. The distribution of chromosomes in tetraploid Daturas. Am. Natur., Vol. LVIII, pp. 60–70.
10.1086/279955
Google Scholar
15 Bergman, B. 1934. Zytologische Studien über sexuelles und asexuelles Hieracium umbellatum. Hereditas XX, pp. 47–64.

Google Scholar
16 Blackburn, K. B. 1928. Chromosome number in Silene and the neighbouring genera. — Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Verhandl. des V. internationalen Kongresses für Vererbungswissenschaft, Berlin 1927, Supplementbd. I, pp. 439–446.

Google Scholar
17 Blackburn, K. B. 1930. Polyploidy within the species. — Report of Proceedings, Fifth international botanical congress, Cambridge 1930, pp. 234–235.

Google Scholar
18 Blackburn, K. B. 1933. On the relation between geographic races and polyploidy in Silene ciliata Pourr. Genetica XV, pp. 49–66.
10.1007/BF01591850
Google Scholar
19 Blakeslee, A. F. 1921. Types of mutations and their possible significance in evolution. Am. Natur., Vol. LV, No. 638, pp. 254–267.
10.1086/279810
Google Scholar
20 Blakeslee, A. F. 1928. Genetics of Datura. Verhandl. V. internat. Kongr. f. Vererb.- wissenschaft, Berlin 1927, Bd. 1.

Google Scholar
21 Blakeslee, A. F. and Avery, B. T. 1919. Mutations in the Jimson weed. Journ. of Heredity, Vol. X, No. 3, pp. 111–120.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a101893
Google Scholar
22 Bleier, H. 1933. Die Meiosis von Haplodiplonten. Genetica 15, pp. 129–176.
10.1007/BF01507330
Google Scholar
23 Bleier, H. 1934. Bastardkaryologie. Bibliogr. Genetica, Vol. XI, pp. 393–489.

Google Scholar
24 Bruun, H. G. 1930. The cytology of the genus Primula. (A preliminary report). Svensk Botan. Tidskrift, Bd. 24, H. 3, pp. 468–475.

Google Scholar
25 Bruun, H. G. 1932. Cytological studies in Primula. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 1, pp. 1–239.

Google Scholar
26 Böcher, T. W. 1936. Cytological studies on Campanula rotundifolia. Hereditas XXII. (In the press.).

Google Scholar
27 Cheesman, E. E. 1932. Genetic and cytological studies of Musa, I and II. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXVI, No. 3, pp. 291–316.
10.1007/BF02984490
Google Scholar
28 Clausen, J. 1926. Genetical and cytological investigations in Viola tricolor L. and V. arvensis Murr. Hereditas VIII, pp. 1–156.

Google Scholar
29 Clausen, J. 1927. Chromosome number and the relationship of species in the genus Viola. Annals of Botany, Vol. XLI, No. CLXIV, pp. 677–714.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090098
Google Scholar
30 Clausen, J. 1929. Chromosome number and relationship of some North American species of Viola. Annals of Botany, Vol. XLIII, No. CLXXII, pp. 741–764.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090198
Google Scholar
31 Clausen, J. 1931 a. Viola canina L., a cytologically irregular species. Hereditas XV, pp. 67–88.

Google Scholar
32 Clausen, J. 1931 b. Cyto-genetic and taxonomic investigations on Melanium violets. Hereditas XV, pp. 219–308.

Google Scholar
33 Clausen, J. 1933. Cytological evidence for the hybrid origin of Pentstemon neotericus Keck. Hereditas XVIII, pp. 65–76.

Google Scholar
34 Clausen, J., Keck, D. D. and Heusi, W. M. 1934. Experimental taxonomy. — Annual Report of the Div. of Plant Biology, Carnegie Inst. of Washington, pp. 173–177.

Google Scholar
35 Collins, J. L. 1933. Morphological and cytological characteristics of triploid pine-apples. Cytologia, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 248–256.
10.1508/cytologia.4.248
Google Scholar
36 Collins, J. L. and Mann, M. C. 1923. Interspecific hybrids in Crepis. II. A preliminary report on the results of hybridizing Crepis setosa with C. capillaris and with C. biennis. Genetics, Vol. 8, pp. 212–232.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
37 Crane, M. B. and Zilva, S. S. 1931. The antiscorbutic vitamin of apples. Journ. of Pomology and Horticult. Science, Vol. IX, No. 3, pp. 228–231.
10.1080/03683621.1931.11513378
Google Scholar
38 Dark, S. O. S. 1931. Chromosome association in triploid Primula sinensis. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXV, No. 1, pp. 91–95.
10.1007/BF02983935
Google Scholar
39 Darlington, C. D. 1931. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploid Primula sinensis. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXIV, No. 1, pp. 65–96.
10.1007/BF03020823
Google Scholar
40 Darlington, C. D. 1932. Recent advances in cytology. — London.

Google Scholar
41 Darlington, C. D. 1933. The origin and behaviour of chiasmata. X. Diploid and tetraploid Avena. Cytologia, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 128–134.
10.1508/cytologia.5.128
Google Scholar
42 Davis, B. M. 1933. The genetics and cytology of a tetraploid from Oenothera franciscana Bartlett. Genetics 18, pp. 293–318.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
43 Dörries-Rüger, K. 1929. Experimentelle Analyse der Genom- und Plasmon-wirkung bei Moosen. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- und Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. 52, pp. 390–405.
10.1007/BF01847276
Google Scholar
44 Erlanson, E. W. 1929. Cytological conditions and evidences for hybridity in North American wild roses. Botan. Gazette, Vol. LXXXVII, No. 4, pp. 443–506.
10.1086/333956
Google Scholar
45 Ernst, A. 1918. Bastardierung als Ursache der Apogamie im Pflanzenreich. — Jena.

Google Scholar
46 Fagerlind, F. 1934. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Zytologie der Rubiaceen. Hereditas XIX, pp. 223–232.

Google Scholar
47 Fagerlind, F. 1936. Die Chromosomenzahl von Alectorolophus und Saison-Dimorphismus. Hereditas XXII. (In the press.).

Google Scholar
48 Federley, H. 1932. The conjugation of the chromosomes. Proc. of the sixth international congress of genetics, Vol. 1, pp. 153–164.

Google Scholar
49 Fernandes, A. 1934. Nouvelles études caryologiques sur le genre »Narcissus» L. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana, Vol. XI, II:e série, pp. 1–201.

Google Scholar
50 Fisher, R. A. 1930. Statistical methods for research workers. — London, Oliver and Boyd.

Google Scholar
51 Gaiser, L. O. 1926. A list of chromosome numbers in Angiosperms. Genetica VIII, pp. 401–484.
10.1007/BF01488002
Google Scholar
52 Gaiser, L. O. 1930 a. Chromosome numbers in Angiosperms. II. Bibliogr. Genetica VI, pp. 171–466.

Google Scholar
53 Gaiser, L. O. 1930 b. Chromosome numbers in Angiosperms. III. Genetica XII, pp. 161–260.
10.1007/BF01508091
Google Scholar
54 Gaiser, L. O. 1933. Chromosome numbers in Angiosperms. IV. Bibliogr. Genetica X, pp. 105–250.

Google Scholar
55 Garcke, A. 1895. Illustrierte Flora von Deutschland. — Berlin.

Google Scholar
56 Gates, R. R. 1913. A contribution to a knowledge of the mutating Oenotheras. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, 2nd. Ser. Botany, Vol. 8, part 1, pp. 1–67.
10.1111/j.1095-8339.1913.tb00622.x
Google Scholar
57 Gates, R. R. 1915. The mutation factor in evolution. — London.

Google Scholar
58 Graze, H. 1935. Weitere Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei Veronica-Arten der Sektion Pseudolysimachia Koch. Jahrb. für wiss. Botanik, Bd. LXXXI, H. 4, pp. 609–662.

Google Scholar
59 Gregor, J. W. 1931. Experimental delimitation of species. The New Phytologist, Vol. XXX, No. 3, pp. 204–217.

Google Scholar
60 Gregor, J. W. and Horne, F. R. 1935. Growth forms: Genecology and its agricultural significance. Agricult. Progress. Vol. XII, pp. 89–98.

Google Scholar
61 Gregor, J. W. and Sansome, F. W. 1930. Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. II. Phleum pratense L. and the hybrid P. pratense L. ×P. alpinum L. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXII, No. 3, pp. 373–387.
10.1007/BF02984198
Google Scholar
62 Gross, F. 1932. Untersuchungen über die Polyploidie und die Variabilität bei Artemia salina. Die Naturwissenschaften, Bd. 20, pp. 962–967.
10.1007/BF01504723
Google Scholar
63 Gustafsson, Å. 1935. The importance of the apomicts for plant geography. Botan. Notiser, pp. 325–330.

Google Scholar
64 Hagerup, O. 1927. Empetrum hermaphroditum (Lge) Hagerup. A new tetraploid, bisexual species. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv, Bd. 5, No. 2, pp. 1–17.

Google Scholar
65 Hagerup, O. 1931. Über Polyploidie in Beziehung zu Klima, Ökologie und Phylogenie. Hereditas XVI, pp. 19–40.

Google Scholar
66 Hagerup, O. 1933. Studies on polyploid ecotypes in Vaccinium uliginosum L. Hereditas XVIII, pp. 122–128.

Google Scholar
67 Hartman, C. J. 18201879. Handbok i Skandinaviens flora. — Stockholm (11 different editions).

Google Scholar
68 Heilborn, O. 1924. Chromosome numbers and dimensions, species-formation and phylogeny in the genus Carex. Hereditas V, pp. 129–216.

Google Scholar
69 Heilborn, O. 1927. Chromosome numbers in Draba. Hereditas IX, pp. 59–68.

Google Scholar
70 Heilborn, O. 1932. Aneuploidy and polyploidy im Carex. Svensk Botan. Tidskrift, Bd. 26, H. 1–2, pp. 137–146.

Google Scholar
71 Heilborn, O. 1935. Reduction division, pollen lethality and polyploidy in apples. Acta Horti Bergiani, Bd. 11, No. 7, pp. 129–184.

Google Scholar
72 Heilbronn, A. 1928. Über experimentell erzeugte Tetraploidie bei Farnen. — Verhandl. des V. internat. Kongr. für Vererbungswiss., Berlin 1927; Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Supplementbd. II.

Google Scholar
73 Heilbronn, A. 1935. Über die Mutabilität mono- und digenomatischer Farne. Revue de la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université d'Istanbul, Bd. 1, H. 1, pp. 55–60.

Google Scholar
74 Helms, A. og Jørgensen, C. A. 1927. Birkene paa Maglemose. Botan. Tidsskrift, Vol. 39, pp. 57–133.

Google Scholar
75 Hofelich, A. 1935. Die Sektion Alsinebe Griesb. der Gattung Veronica in ihren chromosomalen Grundlagen. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., Bd. LXXXI, H. 4, pp. 541–572.

Google Scholar
76 Hollingshead, L. 1930. A cytological study of haploid Crepis capillaris plants. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agricult. Sc., Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 107–134.

Google Scholar
77 Hollingshead, L. and Babcock, E. B. 1930. Chromosomes and phylogeny in Crepis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agricult. Sc., Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–53.

Google Scholar
78 Holmgren, I. 1919. Die Fortpflanzung bei den Gattungen Erigeron und Eupatorium. Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. handl., Bd. 59, No. 7, pp. 1–118.

Google Scholar
79 Homeyer, H. 1935. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Zytologie und Systematik der Rubiaceen. Botan. Jahrbücher, Bd. LXVII, H. 3, pp. 237–263.

Google Scholar
80 Honing, J. A. 1928. Canna crosses. II. The chromosome numbers of Canna glauca, C. glauca × indica F₁, C. aureo-vittata and C. aureo-vittata gigas. Mededeelingen van de Landbouwhoogeschool at Wageningen, Vol. 32, pp. 1–14.

Google Scholar
81 Huskins, C. L. 1931. The origin of Spartina Townsendii. Genetica, Bd. 12, pp. 531–538.

Google Scholar
82 Huskins, C. L. and Smith, S. G. 1932. A cytological study of the genus Sorghum Pers. I. The somatic chromosomes. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXV, No. 2, pp. 241–249.
10.1007/BF02983256
Google Scholar
83 Huskins, C. L. and Smith, S. G. 1934. A cytological study of the genus Sorghum Pers. II. The meiotic chromosomes. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXVIII, No. 3, pp. 387–395.
10.1007/BF02981761
Google Scholar
84 Håkansson, A. 1929 a. Über verschiedene Chromosomenzahlen in Scirpus palustris L. Hereditas XIII, pp. 53–60.

Google Scholar
85 Håkansson, A. 1929 b. Die Chromosomen in der Kreuzung Salix viminalis × caprea von Heribert Nilsson. Hereditas XIII, pp. 1–52.

Google Scholar
86 Håkansson, A. 1933. Beiträge zur Polyploidie der Umbelliferen. Hereditas XVII, pp. 246–248.

Google Scholar
87 Jaretzky, R. 1928. Histologische und karyologische Studien an Polygonaceen. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., Bd. LXIX, H. 3, pp. 357–490.

Google Scholar
88 Jenkin, T. J. 1933. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. Initial crosses. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 205–264.
10.1007/BF02981774
Google Scholar
89 Jørgensen, C. A. 1925. Studies on Callitrichaceae. Dansk Botan. Tidsskrift, Vol. 38.

Google Scholar
90 Jørgensen, C. A. 1927. Chromosomes and sex in Vallisneria. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 63–75.
10.1007/BF03052602
Google Scholar
91 Jørgensen, C. A. 1928. The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genus Solanum. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XIX, No. 2, pp. 133–211.
10.1007/BF02984237
Google Scholar
92 Kattermann, G. 1931. Über die Bildung polyvalenter Chromosomenverbände bei einigen Gramineen. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Biologie, Abt. E, Planta, Bd. 12, pp. 732–774.

Google Scholar
93 Kattermann, G. 1934. Die zytologischen Verhältnisse einiger Weizen—Roggen-Bastarden und ihrer Nachkommenschaft (»F₂»). Der Züchter, H. 5, pp. 97–107.

Google Scholar
94 Keeble, F. 1912. Gigantism in Primula sinensis. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 2.
10.1007/BF02984340
Google Scholar
95 Kihara, H. 1930. Genomanalyse bei Triticum und Aegilops. — Kihara, H. und Nishiyama, I. Genomaffinitäten in tri-, tetra- und pentaploiden Weizenbastarden. — Cytologia, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 263–284.
10.1508/cytologia.1.263
Google Scholar
96 Kihara, H. 1932. Genomanalyse bei Triticum und Aegilops. IV. — Kihara, H. und Lilienfeld, F. Untersuchungen an Aegilops × Triticum- und Aegilops × Aegilops-Bastarden. Cytologia, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 384–456.
10.1508/cytologia.3.384
Google Scholar
97 Kihara, H. und Ono, T. 1927. Chromosomenzahlen und systematische Gruppierung der Rumex-Arten. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Biologie, Abt. B., Bd. 4, H. 3, pp. 475–481.

Google Scholar
98 King, E. 1933. Chromosome behaviour in a triploid Tradescantia. Journ. of Heredity, Vol. XXIV, No. 6, pp. 253–256.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103793
Google Scholar
99 Kostoff, D. and Axamitnaja, I. A. 1935 a. Studies on polyploid plants. VII. Chemical analysis of F₁-hybrids and their amphidiploids. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, Vol. I, No. 5, pp. 325–329.

Google Scholar
100 Kostoff, D. and Axamitnaja, I. A. 1935 b. Studies on polyploid plants. IX. Chemical analysis of diploid and their autotetraploid plants. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, Vol. II, No. 34, pp. 293–297.

Google Scholar
101 Kostoff, D. and Kendall, J. 1931. Studies on certain Petunia aberrants. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 165–178.
10.1007/BF02983851
Google Scholar
102 Kostoff, D. and Kendall, J. 1934. Studies on polyploid plants. III. Cyto-genetics of tetraploid tomatoes. Gartenbauwissenschaft, Bd. 9, H. 1, pp. 20–44.

Google Scholar
103 Kuhn, E. 1928. Zur Zytologie von Thalictrum. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot. LXVIII, H. 3, pp. 382–430.

Google Scholar
104 Langlet, O. 1932. Über Chromosomenverhältnisse und Systematik der Ranunculaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskrift, Bd. 26, H. 1–2, pp. 381–400.

Google Scholar
105 Langlet, O. und Söderberg, E. 1927. Über die Chromosomenzahlen einiger Nymphaeaceen. Acta Horti Bergiani, Bd. 9, No. 4, pp. 85–104.

Google Scholar
106 Lehmann, E. 1922. Die Theorien der Oenothera-Forschung. — Jena.

Google Scholar
107 Lesley, M. M. and Lesley, J. W. 1930. The mode of origin and chromosome behaviour in pollen mother cells of a tetraploid seedling tomato. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXII, No. 3, pp. 419–425.
10.1007/BF02984202
Google Scholar
108 Levan, A. 1930. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Chromosomen in der Gattung Dactylis L. Botan. Notiser, pp. 95–104.

Google Scholar
109 Levan, A. 1931. Cytological studies in Allium. A preliminary note. Hereditas XV, pp. 347–356.

Google Scholar
110 Levan, A. 1936. Zytologische Studien an Allium schoenoprasum. Hereditas XXII, pp. 1–128. (In the press.).

Google Scholar
111 Lewitsky, G. A. and Kuzmina, N. E. 1927. Karyological investigations on the systematics and phylogenetics of the genus Festuca. Bull. of appl. bot., of genetics and plant-breeding, Vol. 17.

Google Scholar
112 Lilienfeld, F. A. 1933. Karyologische und genetische Studien an Fragaria. Ein tetraploider fertiler Bastard zwischen F. nipponica (n = 7) und F. elatior (n = 21). Jap. Journ. of Botany, Vol. VI, No. 3, pp. 425–458.

Google Scholar
113 Liljefors, A. 1934. Über normale und apospore Embryosackentwicklung in der Gattung Sorbus, nebst einigen Bemerkungen über die Chromosomenzahlen. Svensk Botan. Tidskrift, Bd. 28, H. 2, pp. 290–299.

Google Scholar
114 Lindstrom, E. W. and Humphrey, L. M. 1933. Comparative cyto-genetic studies of tetraploid tomatoes from different origins. Genetics 18, pp. 193–209.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
115 Lindstrom, E. W. and Koos, K. 1931. Cyto-genetic investigations of a haploid tomato and its diploid and tetraploid progeny. American Journ. of Botany, Vol. XVIII, No. 6, pp. 398–410.
10.2307/2435875
Google Scholar
116 Ljungdahl, H. 1924. Über die Herkunft der in der Meiosis konjugierenden Chromosomen bei Papaver-Hybriden. Svensk Botan. Tidskrift, Bd. 18, pp. 279–291.

Google Scholar
117 Longley, A. E. 1924. Chromosomes in maize and maize relatives. Journ. of Agricult. Research, Vol. XXVIII, No. 7, pp. 673–682.

Google Scholar
118 Longley, A. E. 1932. Chromosomes in grass Sorghums. Journ. of Agricult. Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 317–321.

Google Scholar
119 Mangelsdorf, P. C. and Reeves, R. G. 1931. Hybridization of maize, Tripsacum and Euchlaena. Journ. of Heredity, Vol. XXII, pp. 329–344.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a103399
Google Scholar
120 Manton, I. 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Annals of Botany, Vol. XLVI, No. CLXXXIII, pp. 509–556.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090334
Google Scholar
121 Manton, I. 1934. The problem of Biscutella laevigata L. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. LXVII, H. 1, pp. 41–57.
10.1007/BF01744017
Google Scholar
122 Manton, I. 1935. The cytological history of Watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.). Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. LXIX, H. 1, pp. 132–157.
10.1007/BF01762872
Google Scholar
123 McClintock, B. 1929. A cytological and genetical study of triploid maize. Genetics 14, pp. 180–222.
10.1093/genetics/14.2.180
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
124 McClintock, B. 1933. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis in Zea mays. Zeitschr. f. Zellforschung und mikr. Anatomie, Bd. 19, H. 2, pp. 192–237.

Google Scholar
125 McCullagh, D. 1934. Chromosome and chromosome morphology in Plantaginaceae. I. Genetica XVI, pp. 1–44.
10.1007/BF01837857
Google Scholar
126 Meurman, O. 1929a. Association and types of chromosomes in Aucuba japonica. Hereditas XII, pp 179–209.

Google Scholar
127 Meurman, O. 1929b. Prunus laurocerasus L., a species showing high polyploidy. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXI, No. 1, pp. 85–94.
10.1007/BF02983360
Google Scholar
128 Miyaji, Y. 19291930. Studien über die Zahlenverhältnisse der Chromosomen bei der Gattung Viola. Cytologia, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 28–58.
10.1508/cytologia.1.28
Google Scholar
129 Moffett, A. A. 1932. Chromosome studies in Anemone. I. A new type of chiasma behaviour. Cytologia, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 26–37.
10.1508/cytologia.4.26
Google Scholar
130 Müntzing, A. 1928. Pseudogamie in der Gattung Potentilla. Hereditas XI, pp. 267–283.

Google Scholar
131 Müntzing, A. 1930a. Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genus Galeopsis. Hereditas XIII, pp. 185–341.

Google Scholar
132 Müntzing, A. 1930b. Über Chromosomenvermehrung in Galeopsis-Kreuzungen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Hereditas XIV, pp. 153–172.

Google Scholar
133 Müntzing, A. 1931a. Note on the cytology of some apomictic Potentilla-species. Hereditas XV, pp. 166–178.

Google Scholar
134 Müntzing, A. 1931b. De empiriska förutsättningarna för förädling genom kromosomökning. Nordisk Jordbrugsforskning, pp. 1–20.

Google Scholar
135 Müntzing, A. 1932a. Cyto-genetic investigations on synthetic Galeopsis Tetrahit. Hereditas XVI, pp. 105–154.

Google Scholar
136 Müntzing, A. 1932b. Apomictic and sexual seed formation in Poa. Hereditas XVII, pp. 131–154.

Google Scholar
137 Müntzing, A. 1933a. Quadrivalent formation and aneuploidy in Dactylis glomerata. Botan. Notiser, pp. 198–205.

Google Scholar
138 Müntzing, A. 1933b. Hybrid incompatibility and the origin of polyploidy. Hereditas XVIII, pp. 33–55.

Google Scholar
139 Müntzing, A. 1935. Cyto-genetic studies on hybrids between two Phleum species. Hereditas XX, pp. 103–136.

Google Scholar
140 Nagao, S. 1933. Number and behaviour of chromosome in the genus Narcissus. Memoirs of the College of Science, Kyoto Imp. Univ., Series B, Vol. VIII, No. 2, pp. 81–200.

Google Scholar
141 Navashin, M. 1927. Variabilität des Zellkerns bei Crepis-Arten in bezug auf die Artbildung. Zschr. f. wiss. Biol., Abt. B, Bd. 4, pp. 171–215.

Google Scholar
142 Navashin, M. 1929. Studies on polyploidy. I. Cytological investigations on triploidy in Crepis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agr. Sci., Vol. 2, No. 14, pp. 377–400.

Google Scholar
143 Navashin, M. 1931. Spontaneous chromosome alterations in Crepis tectorum L. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agricult. Sci., Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 201–206.

Google Scholar
144 Nilsson, N. Heribert. 1920. Zuwachsgeschwindigkeit der Pollenschläuche und gestörte Mendelzahlen bei Oenothera Lamarckiana. Hereditas I, pp. 41–67.

Google Scholar
145 Nishiyama, I. 1934. The genetics and cytology of certain cereals. VI. Chromosome behaviour and its bearing on inheritance in triploid Avena hybrids. — Memoirs of the Coll. of Agricult., Kyoto Imp. Univ., No. 32, pp. 1–157.

Google Scholar
146 Percival, J. 1927. The morphology and cytology of some hybrids of Aegilops ovata L. × wheats. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 49–66.
10.1007/BF02983306
Google Scholar
147 Peterson, D. 1935. Some chromosome numbers in the genus Stellaria. Botan. Notiser, pp. 409–410.

Google Scholar
148 Peto, F. H. 1933. The cytology of certain intergeneric hybrids between Festuca and Lolium. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXVIII, No. 1, pp. 113–156.
10.1007/BF02981770
Google Scholar
149 Poole, C. F. 1931. The interspecific hybrid, Crepis rubra × foetida, and some of its derivatives. I. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agricult. Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 169–200.

Google Scholar
150 Randolph, L. F. 1932. Some effects of high temperature on polyploidy and other variations in maize. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 222–229.
10.1073/pnas.18.3.222
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
151 Renner, O. 1933. Zur Kenntnis der gigas- und hemigigas-Typen bei Oenothera. Flora oder allg. bot. Zeitung, Neue Folge, Bd. 28, pp. 123–144.
10.1016/S0367-1615(17)31829-3
Google Scholar
152 Rohweder, H. 1934. Beiträge zur Systematik und Phylogenie des Genus Dianthus unter Berücksichtigung der karyologischen Verhältnisse. (Diss. Kiel, 1932.) Botan. Jahrbücher, Bd. LXVI, H. 3, pp. 249–369.

Google Scholar
153 Samuelsson, G. 1923. Floristiska fragment. V. Svensk Botan. Tidskrift, Bd. 17, pp. 132–137.

Google Scholar
154 Sansome, F. W. and Philp, J. 1932. Recent advances in plant genetics. — London.

Google Scholar
155 Sansome, F. W. and Zilva, S. S. 1933. Polyploidy and vitamin C. Biochemical Journ., Vol. XXVII, No. 6, pp. 1935–1941.
10.1042/bj0271935
Google Scholar
156 Sax, K. 1933. Chromosome numbers in Ulmus and related genera. Journ. of the Arnold Arboretum, Vol. XIV, pp. 82–84.

Google Scholar
157 Sax, K. 1935. The cytological analysis of species hybrids. Botan. Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 100–117.
10.1007/BF02868620
Google Scholar
158 Schiemann, E. 1929. Zytologische Beiträge zur Gattung Aegilops. Chromosomenzahlen und Morphologie. (III. Mitteilung). Ber. der Deutschen Botan. Gesellsch., Bd. 47, pp. 164–180.

Google Scholar
159 Schiemann, E. 1932. Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Handbuch der Vererbungswiss., Bd. III, pp. 1–377.

Google Scholar
160 Schinz, H. und Keller, R. 1909. Flora der Schweiz. I. Teil. — Zürich.

Google Scholar
161 Seiler, J. 1927. Ergebnisse aus der Kreuzung parthenogenetischer und zweigeschlechtlichen Schmetterlinge. Biolog. Zentralblatt, Bd. 47, H. 7, pp. 426–446.

Google Scholar
162 Senjaninova, M. 1927. Beitrag zur vergleichend-karyologischen Untersuchung des Linneons Valeriana officinalis L. (sensu-lato). Zeitschr. f. Zellf. u. mikroskop. Anat., Abt. B, Bd. 5, H. 5, pp. 675–679.
10.1007/BF00376331
Google Scholar
163 Sharp, L. W. 1934. Introduction to cytology. — New York and London.

Google Scholar
164 Shimotomai, N. 1931. Bastardierungsversuche bei Chrysanthemum. I. Journ. of Science of the Hiroshima Univ., Series B, Div. 2, Vol. 1, pp. 37–54.

Google Scholar
165 Shimotomai, N. 1932. Bastardierungsversuche bei Chrysanthemum. II. Entstehung eines fruchtbaren Bastardes (haploid 4n) aus der Kreuzung von Ch. marginatum (hapl. 5n) mit Ch. morifolium (hapl. 3n). Journ. of Science of the Hiroshima Univ., Series B, Div. 2, Vol. 1, pp. 117–120.

Google Scholar
166 Shimotomai, N. 1933. Zur Karyogenetik der Gattung Chrysanthemum. Journ. of Science of the Hiroshima University, Series B, Div. 2, Vol. 2, pp. 1–100.

Google Scholar
167 Simonet, M. 1932. Polyploidie accompagnée de gigantisme chez les plantes horticóles. — Comptes rendus du X:e Congr. Int. d'Horticulture, pp. 1–12.

Google Scholar
168 Simonet, M. 1934a. Sur la régularité de la réduction chromatique et la parfaite constitution pollinique d'un hybride entre espèces à nombres inégaux et aneuploides de chromosomes (Iris autosyndetica Nob.). Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Bd. 198, p. 1173.

Google Scholar
169 Simonet, M. 1934b. Contribution à l'étude caryologique des Veronica. Comptes rendus de séances de la Société de Biologie, Tome CXVII, p. 1153.

Google Scholar
170 Simonet, M. 1934c. Nouvelles recherches cytologiques et génétiques chez les Iris. Ann. des sc. nat. bot., 10:e série, pp. 229–383.

Google Scholar
171 Simonet, M. 1935. Conjugaison autosyndétique des chromosomes à la méiose de quelques hybrides interspécifiques d'Iris. Bull. Biologique de la France et de la Belgique. Bd. LXIX, H. 2, pp. 178–212.

Google Scholar
172 Skalinska, M. 1933a. Analyse génétique de la descendance d'un hybride tétraploide d'Aquilegia. Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de Biologie, Bd. CXIV, pp. 335–336.

Google Scholar
173 Skalinska, M. 1933b. Les Aquilegia allotétraploides représentent-ils une nouvelle espèce?. Comptes rendus des séances de la Soc. de Biol., Bd. CXV, pp. 651–653.

Google Scholar
174 Skalinska, M. 1934. Etudes cyto-génétiques sur un hybride triploide d'Aquilegia. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, Vol. XI, Suppl., pp. 55–86.

Google Scholar
175 Skovsted, A. 1934. Cytological studies in the tribe Saxifrageae. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv, Bd. 8, H. 5, pp. 1–52.

Google Scholar
176 Stockwell, P. 1935. Chromosome numbers of the Cactaceae. Botan. Gazette, Vol. XCVI, No. 3, pp. 565–570.
10.1086/334502
Google Scholar
177 Stomps, T. J. 1925. Sur Oenothera biennis mut. gigas. La Cellule, Bd. 36, Volume Jubilaire V. Grégoire, 2:e Partie, pp. 235–254.

Google Scholar
178 Stählin, A. 1929. Morphologische und zytologische Untersuchungen an Gramineen. Wissensch. Archiv für Landwirtsch., A. Pflanzenbau, Bd. 1, pp. 330–398.

Google Scholar
179 Sweschnikowa, I. 1928. Die Genese des Kerns im Genus Vicia. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Verhandl. des V. internationalen Kongresses für Vererbungswissenschaft, Berlin, Supplementbd. II, pp. 1415–1421.

Google Scholar
180 Sweschnikowa, I. 1929. Vicia sativa L. and Vicia cracca L. Annals of Timiriasev agri-cultural academy 4, pp. 1–22.

Google Scholar
181 Sömme, A. S. 1930. Genetics and cytology of the tetraploid form of Primula sinensis. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 23, pp. 447–509.
10.1007/BF03161436
Google Scholar
182 Tischler, G. 1929. Revisionen früherer Chromosomenzählungen und anschliessende Untersuchungen. Planta, Archiv f. wiss. Bot., Bd. 8, H. 5, pp. 685–697.

Google Scholar
183 Tischler, G. 1931. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae biologicae periodicae, Bd. I, pp. 109–226.

Google Scholar
184 Tischler, G. 1935. Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Verbreitung der Angiosper-men. Botan. Jahrbücher, Bd. LXVII, H. 1, pp. 1–36.

Google Scholar
185 Turesson, G. 1929. Ecotypical selection in Siberian Dactylis glomerata. Hereditas XII, pp. 335–351.

Google Scholar
186 Turesson, G. 1930. Studien über Festuca ovina L. II. Chromosomenzahl und Viviparie. Hereditas XIII, pp. 177–184.

Google Scholar
187 Turesson, G. 1931a. Über verschiedene Chromosomenzahlen in Allium schoenoprasum L. Botan. Notiser, pp. 15–20.

Google Scholar
188 Turesson, G. 1931b. Studien über Festuca ovina L. III. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Chromosomenzahlen viviparer Formen. Hereditas XV, pp. 13–16.

Google Scholar
189 Ufer, M. 1927. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über Cleome spinosa, Cleome gigantea und ihre Gigas-Formen. — Diss. Hamburg 1927, pp. 1–59.

Google Scholar
190 Upcott, M. 1935. The cytology of triploid and tetraploid Lycopersicum esculentum. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXXI, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
10.1007/BF02982275
Google Scholar
191 de Vries, H. 1906. Arten und Varietäten und ihre Entstehung durch Mutation. — Berlin.

Google Scholar
192 de Vries, H. 1913. Gruppenweise Artbildung unter spezieller Berücksichtigung der Gattung Oenothera. — Berlin.

Google Scholar
193 Wanscher, J. H. 1931. Studies on the chromosome numbers of the Umbelliferae. Hereditas XV, pp. 179–184.

Google Scholar
194 Wanscher, J. H. 1932. Studies on the chromosome numbers of the Umbelliferae. II. Botanisk Tidsskrift, Bd. 42, H. 1, pp. 49–58.

Google Scholar
195 Wanscher, J. H. 1933. Studies on the chromosome numbers of the Umbelliferae. III. Botanisk Tidsskrift, Bd. 42, H. 4, pp. 384–399.

Google Scholar
196 Watkins, A. E. 1927. Genetic and cytological studies in wheat. III. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. 18, pp. 375–396.
10.1007/BF02983114
Google Scholar
197 Watkins, A. E. 1932. Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XXV, No. 2, pp. 125–162.
10.1007/BF02983249
Google Scholar
198 Wettstein, F. v. 1924a. Kreuzungsversuche mit multiploiden Moosrassen. II. Biolog. Zentralblatt, Bd. 44, H. 4, pp. 145–168.

Google Scholar
199 Wettstein, F. v. 1924b. Morphologie und Physiologie des Formwechsels der Moose auf genetischer Grundlage. I. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. XXXIII, pp. 1–236.
10.1007/BF01762372
Google Scholar
200 Wettstein, F. v. 1927. Die Erscheinung der Heteroploidie, besonders im Pflanzenreich. Ergebnisse der Biologie, Bd. 2, pp. 311–356.
10.1007/978-3-642-49712-4_5
Google Scholar
201 Wettstein, F. v. 1928. Morphologie und Physiologie des Formwechsels der Moose auf genetischer Grundlage. II. Bibliotheca Genetica, Bd. X, pp. 1–216.

Google Scholar
202 Wettstein, F. v. 1932. Bastardpolyploidie als Artbildungsvorgang bei Pflanzen. Die Naturwissenschaften, Bd. 20, H. 51, pp. 981–984.
10.1007/BF01504729
Google Scholar
203 Winge, Ö. 1926. Das Problem der Jordan—Rosen'schen Erophila-Kleinarten. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen, 14.

Google Scholar
204 Winge, Ö. 1933. A case of amphidiploidy within the collective species Erophila verna. Hereditas XVIII, pp. 181–191.

Google Scholar
205 Winkler, H. 1916. Über die experimentelle Erzeugung von Pflanzen mit abweichenden Chromosomenzahlen. Zeitschr. f. Botanik VIII, pp. 417–531.

Google Scholar
206 Winkler, H. 1920. Verbreitung und Ursache der Parthenogenesis im Pflanzen- und Tierreiche. — Jena.

Google Scholar
207 Winkler, H. 1922. Über die Entstehung von genotypischer Verschiedenheit innerhalb einer reinen Linie. Deutsche Ges. für Vererbungswiss., Versammlungsbericht, Zschr. f. ind. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-Lehre, Bd. XXVII, pp. 244–245.

Google Scholar
208 Yamamoto, Y. 1935. Karyogenetische Untersuchungen bei der Gattung Rumex. II. F₁-Bastard zwischen Rumex acetosa L. und Rumex montanus Desf. III. Eine autohexaploide Pflanze bei Rumex acetosa L. Japanese Journ. of Genetics, Vol. XI, No. 1, pp. 6–17.
10.1266/jjg.11.6
Google Scholar
209 Åkerman, Å. 1922. Untersuchungen über eine in direktem Sonnenlichte nicht lebensfähige Sippe von Avena sativa. Hereditas III, pp. 147–177.

Google Scholar
210 Åkerman, Å. und Mühlow, J. 1933. Über die Vererbung des Ligulamerk-males beim Hafer. Hereditas XVIII, pp. 140–144.

Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume21, Issue2-3

March 1936

Pages 363-378

The Evolutionary Significance of Autopolyploidy

LITERATURE CITED

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

The Evolutionary Significance of Autopolyploidy

LITERATURE CITED

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information