Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Organizations Become Enduring: Disentangling the Organizational Identity Paradox

  • Chapter
Self-Reinforcing Processes in and among Organizations

Abstract

Persistence, the “ugly twin” of change, tends to be overshadowed by the more fashionable questions of innovation and novelty. Yet, especially in turbulent and shifting technological and socio-economic environments, questions have to be asked about why some organizations remain “frozen” and by what means they are capable of persisting and maintaining their structures. An environment that is supposed to be ever-changing is pushing organizations to develop adaptive capabilities. From this perspective, constant change becomes ordinary and predictable, whereas persistence is an oddity and inertia appears as the incapability to adapt. This general tendency can also be found in the growing body of literature that deals with organizational identity (see Albert and Whetten, 1985; Cornelissen, Haslam, and Balmer, 2007; Whetten, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, S. and Whetten, D. A., 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7 (1), pp. 263–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99 (1), pp. 116–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. A., 1996. Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13 (1), pp. 19–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, B. J. and Stewart, A. C., 2000. “Organizational identity as moral philosophy: Competitive implications for diversified corporations”, in M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch and M. H. Larsen (eds) The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., Bunderson, J. S., Foreman, P., Gustafson, L. T., Huff, A. S., Martins, L. L., Reger, R. K., Sarason, Y. and Stimpert, J. L., 1998. “A strategy conversation on the topic of organization identity”, in D. A. Whetten and P. C. Godfrey (eds) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 99–168.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J., 2006. Pfadabhdngigkeit: Über institutionelle Kontinuitdt, anfdllige Stabilitdt und fundamentalen Wandel. Frankfurt a.M. etc.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J., 2010. The same or not the same–on the variety of mechanisms of path dependence. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (1), pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchikhi, H. and Kimberly, J. R., 2003. Escaping the identity trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), pp. 20–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., 2001. Organization studies and identity: Towards a research agenda. Human Relations, 54 (1), pp. 113–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge, O., 2005. Organisational Self-understanding and the Strategy Process: Strategy Dynamics in Scania and Handelsbanken. Jönköping: Internationella Handelshögskolan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A., 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2), pp. 325–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A., 2008. Strategic consequences of co-evolution lock-in: insights from a longitudinal process study. Research Paper Series. No. 2007. Stanford Graduate School of Business. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. and Gedajlovic, E., 2002. The co-evolution of institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in the ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23 (1), pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chreim, S., 2005. The continuity-change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (3), pp. 567–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. and Hull, R., 1998. “Knowledge management practices” and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy, 27(3), pp. 237–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., 2004. Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57 (9), pp. 1145–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G. and Gioia, D. A., 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (2), pp. 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A. and Balmer, J. M. T., 2007. Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18, pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. and Farrell, H., 2004. Breaking the path of institutional development? Alternatives to the new determinism. Rationality and Society, 16 (1), pp. 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75 (2), pp. 332–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., 1994. Why are institutions the “carriers of history”?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2), pp. 205–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., 2007. Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1 (2), pp. 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L. and Quack, S., 2007. Overcoming path dependency: Path generation in open systems. Theory and Society, 36 (2), pp. 161–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch, L., 2008. Windows versus Linux: Markt — Organisation — Pfad. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E. and Dukerich, J. M., 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. The Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), pp. 517–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D. and Kramer, R. M., 1996. Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), pp. 442–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., 2001. Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27 (6), pp. 691–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., 2002. Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13 (6), pp. 653–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M. and Huff, A. S., 1992. Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, 29 (3), pp. 267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., 1997. The dynamic implications of increasing returns: Technological change and path dependent inefficiency. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 (6), pp. 733–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B. and Hunt, J. G., 1998. Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1), pp. 87–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., 1984. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R. and Karnøe, P. (eds), 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., 1998. “From individual to organizational identity”, in D. A. Whetten and P. C. Godfrey (eds) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 17–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K., 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), pp. 433–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M. and Corley, K. G., 2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. and Thomas, J. B., 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), pp. 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E., 1969. Wir alle spielen Theater: Die Selbstdarstellung im Alltag. München: Pieper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Baron, J. N., Hsu, G. and Kocak, O., 2006. Organizational identities and the hazard of change. Industrial Corporate Change, 15 (5), pp. 755–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Burton, M. D. and Baron, J. N., 1996. Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Industrial Corporate Change, 5 (2), pp. 503–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82 (5), pp. 929–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J., 1984. Structrual interia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2), pp. 149–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Pólos, L. and Carroll, G. R., 2003. Cascading organizational change. Organization Science, 14 (5), pp. 463–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J. and Schultz, M., 2002. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55 (8), pp. 989–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in Petroleum Firm R&D. Management Science, 40 (12), pp. 1720–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. and Barbulescu, R., 2010. Identity as narrative: prevalence, effectiveness and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 35 (1), pp. 135–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G., Christe-Zeyse, J., Keegan, A. and Polos, L., 2008. Reactions to organizational identity threats in times of change: Illustrations from the German police. Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (3), pp. 245–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, S. and Mitchell, W., 2000. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US medical sector, 1978– 1995. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11), pp. 1061–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. G., Felin, T. and Whetten, D. A., 2009. Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21 (1), pp. 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. G. and Whetten, D. A., 2008. Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11 (3), pp. 192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, S., 2008. Pfadabhängigkeit als Mehrebenenphänomen: Grundlagen und Erweiterungen des Pfadansatzes. Hamburg Review of Social Science, 3 (3), pp. 317–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, S., 2010. Organizational identities and institutions dynamics of the organizational core as a question of path dependence. Working Paper 10/4. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, S., 2012. Wer sind wir als Organisation? Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J., 2008. Strategic paths and media management: a path dependency analysis of the German news-paper branch of high quality journalism. Schmalenbach Business Review, 60 (1), pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3), pp. 383–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R., 2006. “Institutions and institutional work”, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence and W. R. Nord (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. 2nd edn Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 215–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N., 2000. Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen etc.: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S. and Hardy, C., 2005. Identity and collaborative strategy in the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain. Strategic Organization, 3 (1), pp. 11–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29 (4), pp. 507–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Simon, H. A., 1976. Organisation und Individuum: Menschliches Verhalten in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, R., Corley, K. G. and Gioia, D. A., 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (4), pp. 821–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G. and Salzman, H., 2002. Stumbling giants: The emptiness, fullness, and recursiveness of strategie management. Soziale Systeme, 8 (2), pp. 205–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94 (2), pp. 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. and Singh, J. V., 2001. “The construction of new paths: Institution-building activity in the early automobile and biotechnology industries”, in R. Garud and P. Karnøe (eds) Path Dependence and Creation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 243–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravasi, D. and Schultz, M., 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3), pp. 433–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, R. K., Gustafson, L. T., Demarie, S. M. and Mullane, J. V., 1994. Reframing the organization: Why implementing total quality is easier said than done. The Academy of Management Review, 19 (3), pp. 565–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rometsch, M. and Sydow, J., 2006. “On identities of networks and organizations–the case of franchising”, in M. Kronberger and S. Gudergan (eds) Only Connect: Neat Words, Networks and Identities. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, K. and Wedlin, L., 2008. “Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing”, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby and K. Sahlin (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 218–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, M. and Lounsbury, M., 2008. Social movements and institutional analysis. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. and Sydow, J., 2011. Organizational path dependence: A process view. Organization Studies, 32 (3), pp. 321–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüßler, E., 2009. Strategische Prozesse und Persistenzen: Pfadabhängige Organisation der Wertschöpfung in der Bekleidungsindustrie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D., 2005. Organisational Identity and Self-Transformation: An Autopoietic Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. and Anderson, L., 1987. “Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities”, The American Journal of Sociology, 92 (6), pp. 1336–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. and Mcadam, D., 2000. “Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus”, in S. Stryker, T. Owens and R. W. White (eds) Self, Identity and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimpert, J. L., Gustafson, L. T. and Sarason, Y., 1998. “Organizational identity within the strategic management conversation: Contributions and assumptions”, in D. A. Whetten and P. C. Godfrey (eds) Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 83–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. and Thelen, K., 2005. “Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies”, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveningsson, S. and Alvesson, M., 2003. Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56 (10), pp. 1163–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J., 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34 (4), pp. 689–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1), pp. 369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., 2003. “How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative-historical analysis”, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press, pp. 208–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G., 1996. “The institutionalization of institutional theory”, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organizational Studies. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 175–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., 1995. Der Prozess des Organisierens. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15 (3), pp. 219–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Stefan Kirchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität of Berlin, Germany

    Jörg Sydow  & Georg Schreyögg  & 

Copyright information

© 2013 Stefan Kirchner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kirchner, S. (2013). How Organizations Become Enduring: Disentangling the Organizational Identity Paradox. In: Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. (eds) Self-Reinforcing Processes in and among Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230392830_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation