Jewish Porn Supporter Ben Shapiro and Candice Owens Square Off

…by Jonas E. Alexis, VT Editor

Ben Shapiro has recently vindicated what we have been saying for years about him: he passes himself as a so-called conservative spokesperson, but when you peel the political onion, he is just another Jewish shill for the Israeli regime.

We knew that Shapiro has been playing fast and loose with the facts for years. For example, in his book Porn Generation, Shapiro condemns Hollywood for selling sex to young and naïve teenagers. He writes:

“Hollywood has embraced the graphic elements of pornography, [and] the moral relativism behind these themes has become an implicit message in nearly every major mass-market films. For films targeted at youth, these messages are often explicit.”^[1]

Shapiro’s support for Pussy Riot, a Trotskyite group that eventually produced pornography at the Moscow Zoological Museum,[2] raises intriguing questions. Why would Shapiro suggest that the Pussy Riot was acting in line with the principles of democracy and freedom? And why would he wholeheartedly endorse the band’s explicit actions in a sacred place like a cathedral?

From the perspective of the “Right” vs. “Left” political spectrum in America, Shapiro’s position appears intellectually inexplicable, as he identifies as a conservative. To grasp the underlying metaphysical issues, one must look beyond mere political categories.[3]

Let us briefly acknowledge that Shapiro, following in the footsteps of his intellectual predecessor Irving Kristol, continues to engage with the Jewish revolutionary spirit. To comprehensively grasp this spirit, we must briefly discuss the subversive ideology embraced by the Pussy Riot.

The Moscow-based newspaper, The eXile, which its co-editor John Dolan humorously noted was “conceived in sin,” reported that members of the group engaged in an act they named ‘Fuck For Medvedev!’ They literally “stripped off their clothes and engaged in sexual activity in the middle of Moscow’s Biology Museum. This act was carried out for approximately 10 minutes, with photographers present, before they were ejected from the premises.”^[4]

Some members of Pussy Riot were previously affiliated with a group known as “Voina,” which translates to “war” in Russian. Voina gained notoriety for a daring act that involved “painting a 60-meter penis on St. Petersburg’s Liteiny Bridge, just in time for it to be raised, mockingly dominating the skyline above the town’s FSB (ex-KGB) headquarters. This audacious piece, titled ‘Dick Captured By the SFB,’ remained elevated for several hours.”^[5]

Voina has earned the moniker “Russia’s art terrorists” as dubbed by The Guardian, and other mainstream sources have acclaimed it as “the most renowned political artist group in Russia.”^[6] This group was co-founded by two Jewish revolutionaries, Oleg Vasilyev and his wife Natalia Sokol. Voina humorously labeled their pornographic act in the Biological Museum as the “Pre-Election Orgie in Biological Museum.”^[7] As The Guardian indirectly suggested, Voina drew its ideological inspiration from the Bolshevik Revolution.^[8]

It was almost inevitable that they would resort to promoting literal anarchy to achieve their objectives. In fact, Sokol actively promoted, produced, and participated in works with titles like “Cock in the Ass,” “Leo the Fucknut is Our President!,” “Dick Captured by KGB,” and more.^[9]

When posed with the question “What does Pussy Riot hope to achieve?” at the age of only twenty-three, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova responded,

“A revolution in Russia… I want to dismantle what I perceive as the most significant evils. I’m accomplishing this by putting my beliefs in freedom and feminism into action… I have deep affection for Russia, but I hold strong disdain for Putin.”

Tolokonnikova, who studied philosophy at Moscow State University, couldn’t simply eradicate the notion of subversive revolution from her thoughts.

It becomes evident that Tolokonnikova’s antipathy toward Putin is rooted in his staunch backing of the Orthodox Church. According to her, the Russian Orthodox Church “enslaves women,” and Putin’s “sovereign democracy” ideology aligns with the same direction. Both reject Western values, including feminism.^[10]

Tolokonnikova went so far as to derogatively refer to the church’s patriarchs as “bitches,” a common trait among revolutionaries. (Christopher Hitchens displayed a similar lack of sympathy when he referred to Mother Teresa as a “bitch.”^[11]) However, Tolokonnikova appeared to contradict herself when she stated that her video performance was “hardly the kind of thing to hurt religious feelings.”^[12] As Putin humorously remarked, one can’t help but wonder about the consequences if she and the band had staged a similar performance in a synagogue in Israel or any Western country.

What we are suggesting here is that for Ben Shapiro to use the concept of “moral purpose” in his book The Right Side of History: How Reason and Moral Purpose Made the West Great is simply window dressing. In Shapiro’s perspective, the actions of the Pussy Riot are aligned with the promotion of democracy and freedom. According to Shapiro, anyone who supported the Pussy Riot was right:

“No matter what your religious belief system, no matter how you feel about blasphemy in a church, there’s no excuse for jailing political dissidents for exercising the right to free speech…. Putin is a macho emblem of brusque disregard for human rights.”^[13]

So much for Jewish Neoconservatism. Ben Shapiro is often perceived as a figure who aligns with conservative ideas, supporting them when they align with his political views. However, on matters concerning Israel, perpetual wars in the Middle East, and, as we’ve observed, Vladimir Putin, Shapiro tends to staunchly defend what seems to be his essentially Talmudic ideology. Keep in mind that it was Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal who said that Jewish Neocons found their political and intellectual ideology “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”[14]

Shapiro’s Talmudic ideology came into full bloom during the recent Israel/Hamas conflict, where Candace Owens, a former guest on Shapiro’s show, asserted, “No government anywhere has a right to commit genocide.” Shapiro interpreted this as a reference to Israel, promptly labeling her “disgraceful” and urging her to resign from The Daily Wire.[15] Owens got fired from the Daily Wire because of her stance against what the Israeli regime was doing.

Owens declared that she could no longer remain silent and was subsequently terminated from her position at the Daily Wire. She asserted, “I am now finally free.” Owens found racism evident during her visit to Jerusalem, where she witnessed literal segregation. She said:

“I grew up in my grandparents’ house, my grandfather grew up in a segregated South, and so when I’m walking through Jerusalem, and you see, and they say, ‘These are the Muslim quarters, this is where the Muslims are allowed to live,’ that doesn’t feel like a bastion of freedom to me.”

What we’re witnessing here are the political and ideological implications of Rabbinic Judaism. Owen is a Christian, while Shapiro is a Jew who believes that Christ was attempting to lead a revolt against the Romans. Owen found herself essentially held captive by Shapiro until she eventually came to the realization that she was politically and intellectually hindered. She couldn’t speak out about what Israel was doing to the Palestinians. Now, she asserts that she’s finally free because she’s no longer being told what to think or how to think.

Perhaps this is a message for all: we should not fear proclaiming the truth, even if it may jeopardize our careers or, at times, our very lives. For truth is a cause worth living and dying for.

Are we, as men and women, strong enough to resist succumbing to fear and to boldly articulate the truth? Do we possess the moral and intellectual courage to love our enemies to such an extent that we are willing to confront them with the truth, thereby halting the corruption of our culture and the degradation of moral order? The incarnate Logos will ultimately prevail. In this sense, those who have already aligned themselves with the Logos stand on the right side of history, even amidst the illusion that all hope is lost in our current state.

Shapiro once referred to the late Rachel Corrie, who was killed by the Israelis for standing for the Palestinians, as one of the “Great idiots in history.” Even years later, he maintained the view that Corrie “was a fool” and suggested that she “was acting on behalf of nefarious interests,” specifically the “terrorists” in Palestine.

Shapiro: “… when I see in the newspapers that civilians in Afghanistan or the West Bank were killed by American or Israeli troops, I don’t really care… One American soldier is worth far more than an Afghan civilian.”

No matter how you slice it, Shapiro is an agent for Israel. So, Shapiro’s book, The Right Side of History, is simply window dressing.

Shapiro ultimately fired Candice Owens primarily due to her consistent use of the phrase “Christ is King.” Listen to this:

Four Daily Wire employees, all Christians, have approached me (their identities will remain anonymous for safety reasons) and leaked information about an “Impromptu Town Hall” that Jeremy Boreing (CEO of Daily Wire) hosted on the day of Candace’s firing.

Jeremy Boreing sent an email to all Daily Wire employees inviting them to an “Impromptu Town Hall” in Candace Owens’ studio.

The Town Hall was led by Boreing, with Andrew Klavan repeating many of the corporate talking points on his show the next day.

The four employees told me that the Town Hall attempted to BRAINWASH the employees present into believing that Candace was, in fact, an antisemite.

They view it as an extreme form of damage control to scare and prevent employees from speaking out against Owens’ firing later that day.

“The feeling was that they didn’t just want her gone, they wanted everyone to hate her like Ben does.”

“It was straight up propaganda.”

These subjects were brought up during the Town Hall:

– Candace’s repeated use of “Christ is King” was deemed antisemitic, dating back to November when a meeting with Ben Shapiro was leaked. In the meeting, he badmouthed Owens for not being overtly Pro-Israel.

– A clip of Nick Fuentes chanting “Christ is king” was played. This expression made Shapiro particularly angry, and since Fuentes is deemed an antisemite by the ADL, it was used to suggest Owens was an antisemite by association.

– A clip from Owens on Fresh & Fit was played where a “ka-ching” sound effect was heard in the background; this was an attempt to associate her with the stereotype that Jews love money.

The employees also told me that Ben had been bitter in his attitude towards Candace, as her show was outperforming Ben’s and was much better received.

Some employees are planning a lawsuit against The Daily Wire, feeling intimidated and threatened by the meeting, and also because of what they believe is an attack on Christianity at the company.

They felt the phrase “Christ is King” was seriously deemed to be antisemitic by Boreing, Klavan, and Ben. It was Candace’s repeated use of the phrase, along with her not being overtly Pro-Israel, that ultimately led to her firing.

After hearing this, no Christian, or anyone with genuine morals, should have a Daily Wire subscription or support the company in any way, shape, or form.

It is clear that Christianity is under attack at The Daily Wire, with Christian employees feeling so intimidated that they are actually consulting their lawyers.

This is totally unacceptable and must not be supported.

Candace Owens did nothing wrong.

The age-old conflict between Jews and Christians has persisted since the time of Christ. Shapiro unintentionally reignited this conflict by firing Owens, leading people to realize that the issue transcends the so-called divisions of “Left” and “Right,” which Shapiro has long exploited in his books and show.

Once again, the central issue revolves around those who embrace the concept of Logos incarnate and those who oppose it. Shapiro hired Owens with the intention of leveraging her, but the situation spiraled out of control. Now, Shapiro is paying a heavy price as virtually everyone recognizes that, as one Israeli minister aptly stated, “anti-Semitism is a trick. We always use it.”

In his recent interview with Megyn Kelly, Shapiro denied that the ideological battle with Owens revolves around Israel. He stated that he vehemently disagreed with Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, yet Walsh remains at the Daily Wire while Owens does not. Shapiro concluded, “So clearly, whatever is going on is not solely about Israel.”

Seriously? Are we supposed to accept that reasoning, Mr. Shapiro?

Here’s a question for him: What if Walsh, publicly, has expressed the same viewpoints as Owens in the media? What if Walsh has debated a rabbi, arguing that pornography, a product associated with Jewish involvement in America, is morally wrong and should be prohibited? Would Walsh still maintain his position at the Daily Wire? Come on, Shapiro!

[1] Ben Shapiro, Porn Generation: How Social Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future (Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2005), kindle edition.

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoj4IfiaNuQ.

[3] For a serious historical study on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).

[4] http://www.exile.ru/blog/detail.php?BLOG_ID=17377&AUTHOR_ID.

[5] Nick Sturdee, “Don’t Raise the Bridge: Voina, Russia’s Art Terrorists,” Guardian, April 12, 2011.

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Sokol.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Nick Sturdee, “Don’t Raise the Bridge: Voina, Russia’s Art Terrorists,” Guardian, April 12, 2011.

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Sokol.

[10]  “Interview with Pussy Riot Leader: ‘I Love Russia, But I Hate Putin,’” Spiegel International, September 3, 2013.

[11] See for example Alister McGrath, Why God Won’t Go Away (London: SPCK, 2011), 25, 96.

[12] “Interview with Pussy Riot Leader: ‘I Love Russia, But I Hate Putin,’” Spiegel International, September 3, 2013.

[13] Ben Shapiro, “Will Hollywood Riot for Pussy Riot?,” FrontPage Magazine, August 20, 2012.

[14] Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.

[15] “Far Right Media Clash: The Ben Shapiro And Candace Owens Blowup Explained,” Forbes, November 20, 2022.