Apolipoprotein E4 Domain Interaction Accelerates Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in Hypomorphic Arg-61 Apoe Mice

Introduction

As a central modulator of plasma lipoprotein clearance, apolipoprotein (apo) E is a recognized determinant of cardiovascular disease susceptibility.¹ In humans, apoE exists in 3 common isoforms (apoE2, apoE3, and apoE4) that are encoded by 3 alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4).¹ ApoE3 (Cys-112, Arg-158) is regarded as the normal isoform whereas apoE4 (Arg-112, Arg-158) and apoE2 (Cys-112, Cys-158) are variants. Numerous reports have established that the ε4 allele is associated with increased plasma cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)–cholesterol levels, and risk of premature atherosclerosis.^2,3 Approximately 20% of individuals worldwide carry at least 1 ε4 allele,³ emphasizing the major impact of this cardiovascular risk factor on the general population.

ApoE is composed of 2 globular domains which function independently⁴: the amino-terminal domain contains the binding site for the LDL receptor (LDLR), and the carboxyl-terminal domain contains the major lipoprotein-binding region. A series of biochemical and x-ray crystallographic studies revealed that apoE4 differs from apoE3 by at least 2 unique structural features: domain interaction, which causes the 2 globular domains of apoE4 to interact,^5,6 and the molten globule state, which predisposes apoE4 to instability and unfolding.⁷ Previous studies using knock-in and transgenic mouse models of human apoE4 examined mechanisms by which apoE4 promotes atherosclerosis.^8–10 However, these studies could not determine the potential individual proatherogenic contributions of either domain interaction or molten globule state, respectively. Understanding how the biophysical properties of apoE4 impact atherosclerosis is critical to gain new mechanistic insights into apoE4 biology as well as to develop targeted therapeutics.

Domain interaction results from the Cys-112 to Arg-112 mutation specific to the apoE4 isoform. This modification causes Arg-61 in the amino-terminal domain to change conformation and interact with Glu-255 in the carboxyl-terminal domain through the formation of a salt bridge, leading to a more compact structure of the protein.^5,6 Changing Arg-61 to the noncharged amino acid Thr-61 prevents the formation of domain interaction in human apoE4, highlighting the critical importance of Arg-61 in causing this structural property.⁵ Like human apoE4, mouse apoE contains the equivalent of Arg-112 and Glu-255; however, it lacks the critical Arg-61 equivalent (it contains Thr-61). Substituting Arg-61 for Thr-61 into the mouse Apoe locus introduced domain interaction without molten globule state,⁶ and created the Arg-61 apoE mouse model,¹¹ allowing us to study the pathological properties of domain interaction in vivo. Like human apoE4, Arg-61 mouse apoE preferentially distributes to very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) whereas Thr-61 mouse apoE preferentially distributes to high-density lipoprotein similar to human apoE3.¹¹

In this study, our goal was to determine the potential contribution of domain interaction in atherosclerosis susceptibility. Mice expressing normal levels of Thr-61 and Arg-61 apoE are resistant to diet-induced hyperlipidemia¹¹ and atherosclerosis (Eberlé D, Raffai RL, unpublished data, 2010). However, hypomorphic versions of these mouse models are highly susceptible to diet-induced hypercholesterolemia attributable to their low plasma apoE levels (≈10% of wild-type (WT) levels).¹² Here, we assessed susceptibility to diet-induced atherosclerosis in hypomorphic Apoe mice expressing either Thr-61 apoE (ApoeT^h/h) or Arg-61 apoE (ApoeR^h/h). We show that on an atherogenic diet, both male and female ApoeR^h/h mice developed increased atherosclerosis in the aortic root and the aorta, and that the presence of domain interaction in ApoeR^h/hmice was associated with increased plasma VLDL-cholesterol, decreased macrophage-derived apoE secretion, and increased macrophage activation. Our study provides evidence that domain interaction mediates proatherogenic effects of human apoE4 in part by modulating lipoprotein metabolism and macrophage biology.

Materials and Methods

For complete details on Materials and Methods, please refer to the online-only Data Supplement.

Mice and Diets

Hypomorphic ApoeT^h/h mice were generated by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells as previously described for ApoeR^h/h mice.¹² All hypomorphic Apoe mice carried the inducible Mx1-cre transgene that can be activated to repair the hypomorphic allele and restore normal Apoe expression levels.¹² However, in this study, the Mx1-cre transgene was not induced and remained silent throughout the study,^12,13 resulting in consistently reduced Apoe expression among all hypomorphic mice (as shown in Figure 1B). Hypomorphic Apoe mice were backcrossed for 12 generations to C57Bl/6 mice. Mice were fed a chow diet (2916, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) or an atherogenic high-cholesterol diet (HCD) (16% fat, 1.25% cholesterol, and 0.5% cholic acid (wt/wt) (D12336, Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ). This atherogenic diet provokes very high plasma cholesterol levels in hypomorphic Apoe mice, unlike the Western diet without cholate which only doubles their plasma cholesterol level,¹² which would likely induce small atherosclerotic lesions only after 6 to 9 months. Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

Plasma Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis

Metabolic parameters were monitored in 4-hour-fasted mice. Plasma lipoproteins were fractionated by fast performance liquid chromatography or by sequential density ultracentrifugation using a pool of plasma taken from at least 4 mice. Lipid levels were measured by colorimetric assays. Plasma and lipoproteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, subjected to Coomassie blue staining or Western blotting with antibodies directed against mouse apoE,¹² apoA1, and apoB.¹²

Analysis of Atherosclerotic Lesion Size and Composition

After 9 or 15 weeks of HCD, overnight-fasted mice were euthanized and tissues were collected. Aortic root plaque and necrotic core areas were quantified in hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections. Collagen was revealed by picro-sirius red staining. Detections of apoE and MOMA-2 positive macrophages were performed by immunofluorescence. Surface areas in aortic root or en face aorta were quantified with ImageJ or MetaMorph software.

Blood Leukocyte Analysis

Leukocyte subsets were identified by flow cytometry using combinations of antibodies specific for cell surface markers detailed in the online-only Data Supplement. Analysis was performed using FlowJo software using specific gates as specified in Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement.

Peritoneal Macrophages Analysis

Macrophages isolated by peritoneal lavage were either analyzed directly by flow cytometry or after separation from other cells by their adhesion to culture vessels. Medium and cellular apoE levels were assessed in macrophages cultured for 48 hours in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum using a previously described anti-mouse apoE antibody.¹² Foam cell formation was quantified by the accumulation of fluorescent dil-labeled oxidized LDL. Relative cholesterol efflux (%) was measured in macrophages loaded with fluorescent 25-NBD-cholesterol and acetylated LDL for 24 hours, equilibrated in DMEM 0.3% BSA, and stimulated 6 hours with human apoA1 or with mouse high-density lipoprotein in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium 0.3% BSA or in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium only.

Gene Expression

Gene expression was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using in-house made primers (Table I in the online-only Data Supplement) or Assay-On-Demand. Expression was normalized to housekeeping genes, TATA box-binding protein (Tbp), or peptidylprolyl isomerase A (Ppia), and levels calculated according to the 2-Δcycle threshold method.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean±SD or mean±SEM as mentioned in legends. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5 software using 2-tailed Student t tests unless otherwise stated. A difference with a P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Hepatic and Plasma ApoE Levels in Chow-Fed ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h Mice

ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h mice were genetically identical except for a single nucleotide change in exon 3 (169C/G) coding for the Thr-61 to Arg-61 substitution (Figure 1A). Both hypomorphic Apoe alleles contained a LoxP-flanked neomycin cassette in intron 3 responsible for reduced apoE expression, presumably by interfering with the splicing efficiency of the primary Apoe mRNA transcript.¹² When fed a chow diet, both strains of hypomorphic Apoe female mice displayed similar levels of Apoe mRNA in liver (~13% of WT levels, Figure 1B), resulting in similar levels of plasma apoE (~14% of WT levels, Figure 1C). Plasma apoA1 levels were also comparable in both strains of hypomorphic Apoe mice and similar to those of WT mice (Figure 1C). Similar results were obtained in male mice (not shown). These results demonstrate that hepatic and plasma apoE levels were similarly reduced in both chow-fed ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h mice.

Domain Interaction Increases Diet-Induced Plasma VLDL-Cholesterol

When fed a chow diet, both female and male ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h mice were normolipidemic with similar plasma lipid levels (Table) and lipoprotein cholesterol profiles, mainly containing high-density lipoprotein (Figure 2A). However, when fed HCD, both hypomorphic Apoe mice developed pronounced hypercholesterolemia (Table), at least 2-fold higher than nonhypomorphic Apoe mice (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement). After 4 and 12 weeks of HCD, female ApoeR^h/h mice showed a modest but significant increase in plasma cholesterol levels compared with ApoeT^h/h females (12.1% and 11.6%, respectively; Table), whereas levels were not different in male mice (Table).

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

Analysis of plasma lipoproteins isolated by fast performance liquid chromatography or ultracentrifugation demonstrated that ApoeR^h/h mice consistently accumulated more cholesterol in VLDL than ApoeT^h/h mice. After 4 weeks of HCD, both female and male ApoeR^h/h mice showed a 19% and 17% increase, respectively, in VLDL-cholesterol levels compared with ApoeT^h/h counterparts (Figure 2A). Levels of all lipid classes, phospholipids, free cholesterol, cholesterol esters, and triglycerides were increased by 11% to 49% in VLDL fractions from HCD-fed ApoeR^h/h female and male mice (Figure 2B and 2C). Because these differences were modest, we reassessed plasma and lipoprotein cholesterol levels after only 1 week of diet initiation to investigate the kinetics of HCD response between ApoeR^h/h and ApoeT^h/h mice. The increase in VLDL-cholesterol in ApoeR^h/h mice was even more pronounced at this time point, averaging 47% and 28% for male and female mice, respectively (Figure 2A), and resulted in increased total plasma cholesterol levels in both sexes of ApoeR^h/h mice (males: 23.7%, P=0.002, n=15–20; females: 16.7%, P=0.1, n=10). Female hypomorphic Apoe mice developed diet-induced hypercholesterolemia faster than male mice in both ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h strains (Table and Figure 2A). Compared with ApoeT^h/h mice, levels of apoB-100, apoB-48, and apoE were also increased by 77%, 52%, and 51%, respectively, in VLDL fractions of male ApoeR^h/h mice after 1 week of HCD (Figure 2G). Similar increases were seen in fast performance liquid chromatography fractions from female mice (Figure 2F). Higher levels of apoB-100, apoB-48, and apoE in VLDL fractions of ApoeR^h/h female and male mice were also observed using density ultracentrifugation isolation after 6 weeks of HCD (Figure 2D and 2E). Taken together, these data demonstrate that domain interaction caused a small but significant accumulation of apoB-containing VLDL particles in plasma of both female and male ApoeR^h/h mice when fed a HCD. This accumulation of VLDL occurred despite similar expression levels of Apoe and the LDL receptor (Ldlr) in the livers of female ApoeR^h/h and ApoeT^h/h mice fed with HCD (not shown).

Domain Interaction Accelerates Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis

We first assessed atherosclerotic lesion formation in aortic roots of female hypomorphic Apoe mice fed a HCD for 9 and 15 weeks, and of male mice fed a HCD for 15 weeks. As shown in Figure 3A, female ApoeR^h/h mice displayed a 45% increase in atherosclerotic lesion area after 9 weeks of HCD and trended to an increase after 15 weeks of HCD, indicating that the increase in lesion size was more pronounced at an early stage of atherosclerosis. Male ApoeR^h/h mice showed a 62% increase in atherosclerotic lesion area after 15 weeks of HCD (Figure 3B). The increased atherosclerosis in the aortic roots of ApoeR^h/h mice was reproduced in separate cohorts of females and male mice (Figure IIA and IIB in the online-only Data Supplement). The proatherogenic effect of domain interaction was also examined in en face aorta preparations of female and male hypomorphic Apoe mice fed the HCD for 15 weeks. Using this methodology, both female and male ApoeR^h/hmice displayed increased lesion area within the descending aorta relative to ApoeT^h/h mice (+73% and +74%, respectively), although there was no difference in the aortic arch at this time point (Figure 3C and 3D). Finally, female ApoeR^h/h mice fed the HCD for 9 weeks displayed a 136% increase in lesion area in the aortic arch (Figure 3C). Our results indicate that domain interaction accelerated diet-induced atherosclerosis in both sexes of mice. This effect was independent of any change in the weight of organs (liver, epidydimal fat, and spleen) involved in metabolic and immune functions (not shown).

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

The composition of aortic root atheromas was further investigated by immunohistological analysis (Figure 4A). The relative proportions of apoE (Figure 4B), lesional macrophages (Figure 4C), necrotic core (Figure 4D), and collagen (Figure 4E) in aortic root sections varied significantly with the lesion stage (9 versus 15 weeks) and sex. However, lesion composition was not significantly different between mice of either genotype, suggesting that apoE4 domain interaction did not significantly change atheroma composition. Overall, our data suggest that atherosclerosis developed in a similar manner in mice expressing either apoE isoform but that the process occurred more rapidly in mice expressing Arg-61 apoE.

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

Domain Interaction Does Not Alter Blood Leukocyte Levels

Because atherosclerosis develops in part through leukocyte infiltration into the artery wall, we assessed whether domain interaction affected blood monocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts. We did not observe any differences in circulating leukocyte counts (Figure IIIA in the online-only Data Supplement) between ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h male mice fed HCD for 4 weeks. The percentages of Ly6C^low and Ly6C^high monocyte subsets as well as the percentages of CD62L⁺ monocytes were not different between both strains of HCD-fed hypomorphic Apoe mice, nor were there differences in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell numbers and activation status (Figure IIIB and IIIC in the online-only Data Supplement). Similar data were obtained in female mice (Figure III in the online-only Data Supplement). Thus, the proatherogenic effects of domain interaction do not extend to alter circulating leukocyte populations in HCD-fed hypomorphic Apoe mice.

Domain Interaction Reduces the Amount of ApoE Released into the Medium of Cultured Macrophages

Although the increased atherosclerosis in ApoeR^h/h mice occurred with a slight but significant increase in plasma VLDL levels and total cholesterol, we asked whether domain interaction caused cellular dysfunction, particularly in macrophages. ApoE is expressed by macrophages and was detected in lesional macrophages within the plaque of both strains of hypomorphic mice (Figure 4A). First, we tested whether domain interaction affected macrophage apoE levels. Using resident peritoneal macrophages isolated from hypomorphic Apoe mice, we observed a 52% decrease in the amount of apoE accumulating in the culture medium of ApoeR^h/h macrophages compared with ApoeT^h/h macrophages (Figure 5A). However, there was no change in cellular apoE levels in macrophages as detected by immunofluorescence (Figure 5B). In this condition, cultured peritoneal macrophages isolated from ApoeR^h/h mice showed a modest but detectable 30% decrease in Apoe mRNA levels compared with ApoeT^h/h macrophages (P<0.05). We also sought to assess Apoe mRNA expression levels in resident peritoneal macrophages freshly isolated from both strains of mice before culturing them. As shown in Figure 5C, macrophages isolated from ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h mice fed a chow or HCD for 4 weeks displayed similar levels of Apoe mRNA (Figure 5C). HCD feeding significantly increased Apoe mRNA expression in macrophages isolated from both strains and sexes of mice (≈1.5 and 2.5 fold in females and males, respectively; Figure 5C). Taken together, these results demonstrate that domain interaction reduces macrophage-derived apoE secretion.

• Download figure
• Download PowerPoint

Domain Interaction and Macrophage Lipid Homeostasis

To assess possible functional defects in macrophages caused by domain interaction, we focused on assessing its impact on lipid, stress, and immune homeostasis, previously described to be regulated by macrophage apoE.^14,15 We first assessed oxidized LDL uptake capacity and found that macrophages isolated from both ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h mice accumulated similar amounts of oxidized LDL (Figure IVA in the online-only Data Supplement). Second, ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h macrophages showed a similar cholesterol efflux capacity both in a nonstimulated condition (passive efflux) or by active acceptors such as apoA1 and high-density lipoprotein (Figure IVB and IVC in the online-only Data Supplement). These results suggest that domain interaction does not affect foam cell formation and cholesterol efflux in macrophages derived from hypomorphic Apoe mice.

Domain Interaction and Macrophage Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

A recent study documented that astrocytes derived from Arg-61 apoE mice displayed features of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress.¹⁶ Thus, we assessed the expression levels of ER stress-related proteins in resident peritoneal macrophages. Expression levels of ER stress indicators Atf4, Chop, and Trb3 were generally slightly lower in macrophages freshly isolated from ApoeR^h/h mice fed either chow or HCD (Table III in the online-only Data Supplement). When macrophages were cultured in basal medium for 48 hours, no significant differences were observed in the expression levels of these ER stress-related proteins (Table IV in the online-only Data Supplement). Overall, our results suggest that the presence of domain interaction in Arg-61 apoE does not induce major changes in ER stress pathways at the gene expression level in macrophages derived from hypomorphic Apoe mice.

Domain Interaction Enhances Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Expression in Macrophages

Finally, apoE has been shown to modulate antigen presenting capacity in macrophages by reducing the expression of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) and some costimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD40.¹⁵ Thus, we tested whether domain interaction impacted macrophage activation in response to HCD. Resident peritoneal macrophages were identified using flow cytometry by their expression of the specific cell surface marker F4/80 (Figure 5D). We observed a 2-fold increase in the proportion of macrophages positive for MHCII isolated from ApoeR^h/h mice fed HCD for 4 weeks (18.5% versus 38.1% for ApoeT^h/h mice) (Figure 5D). This was not accompanied by an increase in the frequency of macrophages positive for costimulatory molecules, CD80, and CD86. Instead, the frequency of CD80⁺ macrophages was not different, whereas the frequency of CD86⁺ macrophages was slightly decreased (Figure 5D). All together, these data demonstrate that apoE4 domain interaction increases the proportion of activated macrophages positive for MHCII.

Discussion

Human apoE4 differs from apoE3 by at least 2 structural features: the domain interaction that causes the 2 globular domains of apoE4 to interact,⁶ and the molten globule state that predisposes apoE4 to instability and unfolding.⁷ To delineate the role of domain interaction in atherosclerosis, we studied the atherosclerosis susceptibility of hypomorphic Apoe mice expressing either Arg-61 apoE (ApoeR^h/h) or Thr-61 apoE (ApoeT^h/h). Substituting Arg-61 for Thr-61 in mouse apoE introduced domain interaction without molten globule state,^6,11 allowing us to identify pathological effects specifically caused by domain interaction. In this study, we found that domain interaction accelerated atherosclerosis in hypomorphic Apoe mice. We showed that both male and female ApoeR^h/h mice developed increased atherosclerosis in the aortic root and aorta when fed an atherogenic diet. However, domain interaction did not cause measurable differences in atheroma composition in terms of macrophage, collagen, and necrotic core content. These results suggest that the proatherogenic properties of human apoE4 domain interaction could reside in its propensity to promote atherosclerosis development rather than by altering plaque composition. Interestingly, the proatherogenic effect of domain interaction was most noticeable at an early lesion stage in both the aortic root and the arch of female ApoeR^h/h mice, suggesting that domain interaction facilitates lesion initiation.

Further, we found that domain interaction promoted the accumulation of proatherogenic lipoproteins in ApoeR^h/h mouse plasma. Our results are consistent with observations made in human apoE4 individuals who display modest increases in total plasma cholesterol and LDL levels compared with apoE3 individuals.³ However, unlike humans, ApoeR^h/h mice fed an atherogenic diet developed increased VLDL levels. Similar results were reported in studies of knock-in mice that expressed the human apoE4 isoform in place of the murine Apoe locus.^8,17 In humans, the liver produces exclusively apoB-100 containing VLDL that are converted to LDL by lipolytic catabolism in the circulation. In contrast, the mouse liver secretes both apoB-100 and apoB-48 containing VLDL. Consequently, unlike humans, hyperlipidemic mice accumulate small quantities of apoB-100 LDL and larger amounts of apoB-48 VLDL remnants. Interestingly, a recent study showed that VLDL level is a better predictor of atherosclerosis than LDL level in mice.¹⁸

Hypercholesterolemia promotes blood leukocyte activation and proliferation,¹⁹ important driving forces of atherosclerosis progression. In this study, we found that populations of blood monocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophils were similar in both strains of hypomorphic Apoe mice. It is possible that the increase in blood cholesterol levels observed in ApoeR^h/h mice may be too subtle to translate into detectable changes in circulating leukocyte populations, thus obscuring potential effects of domain interaction.

The mechanism by which domain interaction causes accumulation of VLDL in ApoeR^h/h mice is unclear. As a high-affinity ligand for members of the LDLR gene family, apoE plays a critical role in receptor-mediated clearance of plasma remnant lipoproteins.¹ Although studies have reported that apoE4 binds to the LDLR with a slightly higher affinity than apoE3,^8,20,21 the presence of apoE4 is paradoxically associated with higher plasma levels of apoB lipoproteins in both humans and mice. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for these observations. A long-standing hypothesis derived from early lipoprotein turnover studies in humans proposed that by accelerating VLDL clearance in the liver, apoE4 could downregulate hepatic Ldlr expression and thereby raise plasma LDL levels.^22,23 However, recent studies support an alternate mechanism by which the enhanced affinity of apoE4 for the LDLR would enhance the sequestration of VLDL on hepatocyte cell surfaces but delay their internalization and clearance.^8,9,17 This effect would enhance the lipolytic conversion of VLDL to cholesterol-enriched remnants and favor their accumulation in plasma after being released from the surface of hepatocytes, leading to elevated apoB-100 LDL in humans and elevated apoB-48 VLDL remnants in mice. Studies in apoE4 individuals showing increased apoB-48 lipoproteins levels in the postprandial state²⁴ and increased conversion of VLDL to LDL²⁵ provide support for this hypothesis.

A second major finding of this study is that domain interaction affected macrophage biology. We show that domain interaction reduced the amount of apoE released into the culture medium of ApoeR^h/h macrophages. Our results are consistent with the slight decrease in apoE production observed in macrophages derived from apoE4 individuals.²⁶ As we did not observe a major change in Apoe expression, it is likely that domain interaction affects posttranslational regulation of apoE in macrophages. Interestingly, it has been proposed that the enhanced affinity of macrophage-derived apoE4 for cell surface proteoglycans^26,27 and other apoE receptors such as the LDLR²⁸ enhance the reuptake of secreted apoE4, lowering its amount released into the medium. Recently, domain interaction was found to decrease apoE secretion in astrocytes¹⁶ and slow down the trafficking of apoE molecules along the secretory pathway in neurons.²⁹ Overall, our findings and those of others suggest that domain interaction is an important modulator of cell-derived apoE4 production.

Our study also addressed the potential role of domain of interaction in modulating macrophage cholesterol homeostasis. We observed no differences in cholesterol accumulation and efflux between ApoeT^h/h and ApoeR^h/h macrophages, suggesting that endogenously expressed Arg-61 apoE does not impact cholesterol homeostasis in hypomorphic Apoe macrophages. Studies performed to assess the differential effects of endogeneous apoE4 and apoE3 isoforms on macrophage cholesterol efflux have either detected no differences^26,27,30,31 or slight alterations with apoE4 only in passive efflux and when the LDLR was overexpressed.³¹ Although it can seem surprising to observe no variation in cholesterol efflux capacity in the presence of decreased apoE secretion, Basu et al³² reported many years ago that apoE secretion and cholesterol efflux can be uncoupled, suggesting that the 2 processes may function via independent pathways.

Finally, we found that domain interaction influenced macrophage activation. We show that ApoeR^h/h mice fed an atherogenic diet displayed a higher percentage of peritoneal macrophages positive for MHCII, a molecule critical for antigen presentation and activation of T cells. In fact, Tenger et al¹⁵ reported increased MHCII levels on macrophages derived from Apoe−/− mice compared with WT macrophages. In that study, the enhanced cellular activation state of Apoe−/− macrophages resulted in increased T cell proliferation and activation.¹⁵ Another recent study found that T cell proliferation was increased in human apoE4 transgenic mice.³³ Multiple studies have identified T cell–mediated immune responses in the artery wall as key components in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis in mice.³⁴ More recent studies demonstrated reduced atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice in response to the suppression of T cell–mediated immunity in the artery wall.³⁵ These findings, together with results reported here, suggest that domain interaction accelerates atherosclerosis in part by enhancing macrophage antigen presentation capacity to T cells and their potential activation in the artery wall. Further studies are required to test this hypothesis.

Beyond its association with atherosclerosis, apoE4 is also a major risk factor for Alzheimer disease.³⁶ Domain interaction appears critical for the pathological effects of apoE4 in Alzheimer disease,³⁷ causing various defects in neurons^29,38 and astrocytes.¹⁶ Domain interaction was found to enhance ER stress and decrease apoE secretion in astrocytes,¹⁶ however Brodbeck et al²⁹ did not observe enhanced ER stress in neurons. In this study, we found that domain interaction caused reduced macrophage-derived apoE secretion but did not result in enhanced ER stress. It is possible that domain interaction causes cell-specific defects that do not require coupling of enhanced ER stress with decreased apoE secretion.

In conclusion, our study shows that domain interaction accelerates diet-induced atherosclerosis and enhances several proatherogenic factors, including plasma VLDL accumulation, decreased macrophage-derived apoE production, and enhanced macrophage activation. Our results have important implications for the design of future treatments to prevent and treat atherosclerosis in apoE4 individuals. In this regard, small-molecule structure correctors of apoE4 domain interaction were recently shown to rescue neuronal defects in mice expressing human apoE4.^29,38 Our findings support testing the efficacy of such compounds in preventing diet-induced atherosclerosis in our models.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Sandra Erickson, Karl Weisgraber, Michael Conte, and Kang Li, as well as Joel Haas for critical review of the manuscript. We thank Susie Wong for excellent technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from the American Heart Association Western States affiliate ( 0565117Y ) and from the National Institutes of Health ( HL089871 ) to Dr Raffai, both of which were administered by the Northern California Institute for Research and Education ; a Merit Review award, 5I01BX000532 , from the Department of Veterans Affairs to Dr Raffai; and by funds from the Foundation for Accelerated Vascular Research and the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco , both to Dr Raffai. The work was performed at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California .

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes