Skip to main content
Log in

Postmortem imaging of sudden cardiac death

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postmortem imaging is increasingly used in forensic practice in cases of natural deaths related to cardiovascular diseases, which represent the most common causes of death in developed countries. While radiological examination is generally considered to be a good complement for conventional autopsy, it was thought to have limited application in cardiovascular pathology. At present, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), CT angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used in postmortem radiological investigation of cardiovascular pathologies. This review presents the actual state of postmortem imaging for cardiovascular pathologies in cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD), taking into consideration both the advantages and limitations. The radiological evaluation of ischemic heart disease (IHD), the most frequent cause of SCD in the general population of industrialized countries, includes the examination of the coronary arteries and myocardium. Postmortem CT angiography (PMCTA) is very useful for the detection of stenoses and occlusions of coronary arteries but less so for the identification of ischemic myocardium. MRI is the method of choice for the radiological investigation of the myocardium in clinical practice, but its accessibility and application are still limited in postmortem practice. There are very few reports implicating postmortem radiology in the investigation of other causes of SCD, such as cardiomyopathies, coronary artery abnormalities, and valvular pathologies. Cardiomyopathies representing the most frequent cause of SCD in young athletes cannot be diagnosed by echocardiography, the most widely available technique in clinical practice for the functional evaluation of the heart and the detection of cardiomyopathies. PMCTA and MRI have the potential to detect advanced stages of diseases when morphological substrate is present, but these methods have yet to be sufficiently validated for postmortem cases. Genetically determined channelopathies cannot be detected radiologically. This review underlines the need to establish the role of postmortem radiology in the diagnosis of SCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, van Dijke CF, Renken NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW (2009) Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? 1 Radiology 250(3):897–904. doi:10.1148/radiol.2503080421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhofer R, Dominguez A, Sollberger B, Gygax E, Rizzo E, Chevallier C, Meuli R, Mangin P (2010) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. International Journal of Legal Medicine:1–12. doi:10.1007/s00414-010-0526-5

  3. Michaud K, Grabherr S, Doenz F, Mangin P (2012) Evaluation of postmortem MDCT and MDCT-angiography for the investigation of sudden cardiac death related to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Int J Cardvasc Imag 28(7):1807–1822. doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0012-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2011) Diagnosis of coronary artery disease using minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol 66(7):645–650. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.01.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts WT, Bax JJ, Davies LC (2008) Cardiac CT and CT coronary angiography: technology and application. Heart 94(6):781–792. doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.116392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saunders S, Morgan B, Raj V, Robinson C, Rutty G (2011) Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: proof of concept. International Journal of Legal Medicine:1–8. doi:10.1007/s00414-011-0559-4

  7. Ross SG, Thali MJ, Bolliger S, Germerott T, Ruder TD, Flach PM (2012) Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.12092415

  8. Jackowski C, Warntjes M, Berge J, Bär W, Persson A (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging goes postmortem: noninvasive detection and assessment of myocardial infarction by postmortem MRI. Eur Radiol 21(1):70–78. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1884-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackowski C, Christe A, Sonnenschein M, Aghayev E, Thali MJ (2006) Postmortem unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial infarction in correlation to histological infarction age characterization. Eur Hear J 27(20):2459–2467. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Basso C, Burke M, Fornes P, Gallagher P, de Gouveia R, Sheppard M, Thiene G, van der Wal A, Association for European Cardiovascular P (2008) Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death. Virchows Archiv 452(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chugh SS, Reinier K, Teodorescu C, Evanado A, Kehr E, Al Samara M, Mariani R, Gunson K, Jui J (2008) Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 51(3):213–228. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2008.06.003

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MEMBERS WG, Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J, Committee obotAHAS, Subcommittee SS (2010) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update. Circulation 121(7):e46–e215. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deo R, Albert CM (2012) Epidemiology and genetics of sudden cardiac death. Circulation 125(4):620–637. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.023838

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Papadakis M, Sharma S, Cox S, Sheppard MN, Panoulas VF, Behr ER (2009) The magnitude of sudden cardiac death in the young: a death certificate-based review in England and Wales. Europace 11(10):1353–1358. doi:10.1093/europace/eup229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Behr ER, Casey A, Sheppard M, Wright M, Bowker TJ, Davies MJ, McKenna WJ, Wood DA (2007) Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: a national survey of sudden unexplained cardiac death. Heart 93(5):601–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Margey R, Roy A, Tobin S, O’Keane CJ, McGorrian C, Morris V, Jennings S, Galvin J (2011) Sudden cardiac death in 14- to 35-year olds in Ireland from 2005 to 2007: a retrospective registry. Europace 13(10):1411–1418. doi:10.1093/europace/eur161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eckart RE, Shry EA, Burke AP, McNear JA, Appel DA, Castillo-Rojas LM, Avedissian L, Pearse LA, Potter RN, Tremaine L, Gentlesk PJ, Huffer L, Reich SS, Stevenson WG (2011) Sudden death in young adults: an autopsy-based series of a population undergoing active surveillance. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(12):1254–1261. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maron BJ, Doerer JJ, Haas TS, Tierney DM, Mueller FO (2009) Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes. Circulation 119(8):1085–1092. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.804617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corrado D, Basso C, Rizzoli G, Schiavon M, Thiene G (2003) Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults? J Am Coll Cardiol 42(11):1959–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holst AG, Winkel BG, Theilade J, Kristensen IB, Thomsen JL, Ottesen GL, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S, Prescott E, Tfelt-Hansen J (2010) Incidence and etiology of sports-related sudden cardiac death in Denmark—implications for preparticipation screening. Hear Rhythm 7(10):1365–1371. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2010) Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30(7):1282–1292. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thiene G, Basso C (2010) Myocardial infarction: a paradigm of success in modern medicine. Cardiovasc Pathol 19(1):1–5. doi:10.1016/j.carpath.2009.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schlattmann P, Schuetz G, Dewey M (2011) Influence of coronary artery disease prevalence on predictive values of coronary CT angiography: a meta-regression analysis. European Radiology:1–10. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2142-2

  24. Zidan M, Nicoll R, Schmermund A, Henein M (2009) Cardiac multi-detector CT: its unique contribution to cardiology practice. Int J Cardiol 132(1):25–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sparrow PJ, Merchant N, Provost YL, Doyle DJ, Nguyen ET, Paul NS (2009) CT and MR imaging findings in patients with acquired heart disease at risk for sudden cardiac death1. RadioGraphics 29(3):805–823. doi:10.1148/rg.293085715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sadeghi MM, Glover DK, Lanza GM, Fayad ZA, Johnson LL (2010) Imaging atherosclerosis and vulnerable plaque. J Nucl Med 51(Supplement 1):51S–65S. doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.068163

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suh WM, Seto AH, Margey RJP, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Jang I-K (2011) Intravascular detection of the vulnerable plaque. Circ: Cardiovasc Imaging 4(2):169–178. doi:10.1161/circimaging.110.958777

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nicoll R, Henein MY (2012) Arterial calcification: friend or foe? Int J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.110

  29. Grabherr S, Djonov V, Yen K, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R (2007) Postmortem angiography: review of former and current methods. Am J Roentgenol 188(3):832–838. doi:10.2214/ajr.06.0787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackowski C, Hofmann K, Schwendener N, Schweitzer W, Keller-Sutter M (2012) Coronary thrombus and peracute myocardial infarction visualized by unenhanced postmortem MRI prior to autopsy. Forensic Sci Int 214(1–3):e16–e19. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruder TD, Bauer-Kreutz R, Ampanozi G, Rosskopf AB, Pilgrim TM, Weber OM, Thali MJ, Hatch GM (2012) Assessment of coronary artery disease by post-mortem cardiac MR. Eur J Radiol 81(9):2208–2214. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, Antzelevitch C, Corrado D, Arnett D, Moss AJ, Seidman CE, Young JB (2006) Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 113(14):1807–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shehata ML, Turkbey EB, Vogel-Claussen J, Bluemke DA (2008) Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 19(1):43–57. doi:10.1097/RMR.1090b1013e31816fcb31822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arrigan MT, Killeen RP, Dodd JD, Torreggiani WC (2011) Imaging spectrum of sudden athlete cardiac death. Clin Radiol 66(3):203–223. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.10.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, Naidu SS, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Rakowski H, Seidman CE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE, Yancy CW, Jacobs AK, Smith SC Jr, Anderson JL, Albert NM, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Nishimura RA, Ohman EM, Page RL, Stevenson WG, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(6):e153–e203. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koss E, Garcia MJ (2012) Role of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Semin Roentgenol 47(3):253–261. doi:10.1053/j.ro.2012.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hughes SE (2004) The pathology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Histopathology 44(5):412–427. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01835.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Thali M, Yen K, Aghayev E, Sonnenschein M, Vock P, Dirnhofer R (2005) Virtopsy: postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI. Forensic Sci Int 149(1):11–23. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Basso C, Corrado D, Marcus FI, Nava A, Thiene G Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. The Lancet 373 (9671):1289–1300. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60256-7

  40. Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, Bauce B, Bluemke DA, Calkins H, Corrado D, Cox MGPJ, Daubert JP, Fontaine G, Gear K, Hauer R, Nava A, Picard MH, Protonotarios N, Saffitz JE, Sanborn DMY, Steinberg JS, Tandri H, Thiene G, Towbin JA, Tsatsopoulou A, Wichter T, Zareba W (2010) Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Circulation 121(13):1533–1541. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.840827

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jacobi AH, Gohari A, Zalta B, Stein MW, Haramati LB (2007) Ventricular myocardial fat: CT findings and clinical correlates. J Thorac Imaging 22(2):130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rybicki BA, Major M, Popovich J, Maliank MJ, Iannuzzi MC (1997) Racial differences in sarcoidosis incidence: a 5-year study in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol 145(3):234–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leone O, Veinot JP, Angelini A, Baandrup UT, Basso C, Berry G, Bruneval P, Burke M, Butany J, Calabrese F, D’Amati G, Edwards WD, Fallon JT, Fishbein MC, Gallagher PJ, Halushka MK, McManus B, Pucci A, Rodriguez ER, Saffitz JE, Sheppard MN, Steenbergen C, Stone JR, Tan C, Thiene G, van der Wal AC, Winters GL (2012) 2011 consensus statement on endomyocardial biopsy from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol 21(4):245–274. doi:10.1016/j.carpath.2011.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, Levine GN, Narula J, Starling RC, Towbin J, Virmani R (2007) The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease. Eur Hear J 28(24):3076–3093. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kindermann I, Barth C, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Lenski M, Yilmaz A, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Sechtem U, Cooper LT, Böhm M (2012) Update on myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(9):779–792. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lurz P, Eitel I, Adam J, Steiner J, Grothoff M, Desch S, Fuernau G, de Waha S, Sareban M, Luecke C, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Schuler G, Gutberlet M, Thiele H (2012) Diagnostic performance of CMR imaging compared with EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 5(5):513–524. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.11.022

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zamorano J-L, Bax J, Rademakers F, Knuuti J (eds) (2010) The ESC textbook of cardiovascular imaging. Springer, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-421-8

    Google Scholar 

  48. Erol C, Seker M (2011) Coronary artery anomalies: the prevalence of origination, course, and termination anomalies of coronary arteries detected by 64-detector computed tomography coronary angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(5):618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shriki JE, Shinbane JS, Rashid MA, Hindoyan A, Withey JG, DeFrance A, Cunningham M, Oliveira GR, Warren BH, Wilcox A (2012) Identifying, characterizing, and classifying congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries. RadioGraphics 32(2):453–468. doi:10.1148/rg.322115097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tariq R, Kureshi SB, Siddiqui UT, Ahmed R (2012) Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries: diagnosis with 64 slice multidetector CT. Eur J Radiol 81(8):1790–1797. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeina AR, Blinder J, Sharif D, Rosenschein U, Barmeir E (2009) Congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults: non-invasive assessment with multidetector CT. Br J Radiol 82(975):254–261. doi:10.1259/bjr/80369775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Okura N, Okuda T, Shiotani S, Kohno M, Hayakawa H, Suzuki A, Kawasaki T (2012) Sudden death as a late sequel of Kawasaki disease: postmortem CT demonstration of coronary artery aneurysm. Forensic Sci Int (0). doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.036

  53. Feuchtner GM, Schachner T, Bonatti J, Friedrich GJ, Soegner P, Klauser A, Dz N (2007) Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Roentgenol 189(3):574–580. doi:10.2214/ajr.07.2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Uva MS, Matias F, Mesquita A, Costa R, Baú J, Pedro A, Magalhães MP (2008) Sixteen-slice multidetector computed tomography for graft patency evaluation after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg 23(1):17–22. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00479.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hecht HS, Gade C (2011) Current and evolving stent evaluation by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(6):843–859. doi:10.1002/ccd.22897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Charlier P, Carlier R, Roffi F, Ezra J, Chaillot PF, Duchat F, Huynh-Charlier I, Lorin de la Grandmaison G (2012) Postmortem abdominal CT: assessing normal cadaveric modifications and pathological processes. Eur J Radiol 81(4):639–647. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Egger C, Vaucher P, Doenz F, Palmiere C, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2012) Development and validation of a postmortem radiological alteration index: the RA-index. Int J Legal Med 126(4):559–566. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0686-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE Jr, Ettinger SM, Fesmire FM, Ganiats TG, Jneid H, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Philippides GJ, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Zidar JP (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(19):e215–e367. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. The Lancet 379 (9811):136–142. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61483-9

  60. Saukko P, Knight B (2004) Knight’s forensic pathology, 3rd edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 35–36

    Google Scholar 

  61. McCreadie G, Oliver TB (2009) Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol 64(5):491–499. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.12.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fitzgerald R (2001) Error in radiology. Clin Radiol 56(12):938–946. doi:10.1053/crad.2001.0858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Heriot GS, McKelvie P, Pitman AG (2009) Diagnostic errors in patients dying in hospital: radiology’s contribution. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 53(2):188–193. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02065.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Shriki JE, Shinbane J, Lee C, Khan AR, Burns N, Hindoyan A, Wilcox A (2012) Incidental myocardial infarct on conventional nongated CT: a review of the spectrum of findings with gated CT and cardiac MRI correlation. Am J Roentgenol 198(3):496–504. doi:10.2214/ajr.11.7683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Murken DR, Ding M, Branstetter BF, Nichols L (2012) Autopsy as a quality control measure for radiology, and vice versa. Am J Roentgenol 199(2):394–401. doi:10.2214/ajr.11.8386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Westphal S, Apitzsch J, Penzkofer T, Mahnken A, Knüchel R (2012) Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies. Virchows Archiv 461(2):211–219. doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1257-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Michaud.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 160 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaud, K., Grabherr, S., Jackowski, C. et al. Postmortem imaging of sudden cardiac death. Int J Legal Med 128, 127–137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0819-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0819-6

Keywords

Navigation