Volume 115, Issue 6 p. 978-986
Sexual Medicine

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men

David Veale

Corresponding Author

David Veale

The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Correspondence: David Veale, Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma, The Maudsley Hospital, 99 Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ. UK.

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Miles

Sarah Miles

The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sally Bramley

Sally Bramley

King's College London Medical School, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Gordon Muir

Gordon Muir

King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
John Hodsoll

John Hodsoll

The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 December 2014
Citations: 125

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review and create nomograms of flaccid and erect penile size measurements.

Methods

Study key eligibility criteria: measurement of penis size by a health professional using a standard procedure; a minimum of 50 participants per sample. Exclusion criteria: samples with a congenital or acquired penile abnormality, previous surgery, complaint of small penis size or erectile dysfunction. Synthesis methods: calculation of a weighted mean and pooled standard deviation (sd) and simulation of 20 000 observations from the normal distribution to generate nomograms of penis size.

Results

Nomograms for flaccid pendulous [n = 10 704, mean (sd) 9.16 (1.57) cm] and stretched length [n = 14 160, mean (sd) 13.24 (1.89) cm], erect length [n = 692, mean (sd) 13.12 (1.66) cm], flaccid circumference [n = 9407, mean (sd) 9.31 (0.90) cm], and erect circumference [n = 381, mean (sd) 11.66 (1.10) cm] were constructed. Consistent and strongest significant correlation was between flaccid stretched or erect length and height, which ranged from r = 0.2 to 0.6. Limitations: relatively few erect measurements were conducted in a clinical setting and the greatest variability between studies was seen with flaccid stretched length.

Conclusions

Penis size nomograms may be useful in clinical and therapeutic settings to counsel men and for academic research.