The UK government has published a document titled ‘REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’ on the gov.uk website and it makes for interesting reading.

The document states –

‘This medicinal product does not have a UK marketing authorisation but has been given
authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency for active immunization to prevent
COVID-19 disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus in individuals aged 16 years of age and over.’

This confirms that this vaccine has been approved via the emergency powers granted earlier this year and has not been subject to the usual stringent checks required for vaccines – checks that on average take 8 years to complete.

The document gets more interesting in section 4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation, stating –

‘Pregnancy
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
6
Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to
the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used
during breast-feeding.
Fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.’

So now the government has confirmed in a document that no tests have been carried out to confirm the effects on fertility.

So it may be of interest to know about the comments from ex employee’s of Pfizer. You can read about them here.

We can tell you that this information on the unknown impact on fertility will NOT be on the fact sheet given to all individuals who decide to have the vaccine.

In section 4.8 of the document the government states –

The most frequent adverse reactions in participants 16 years of age and older were pain at the injection
site (> 80%), fatigue (> 60%), headache (> 50%), myalgia (> 30%), chills (> 30%), arthralgia (> 20%)
and pyrexia (> 10%) and were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days
after vaccination. If required, symptomatic treatment with analgesic and/or anti-pyretic medicinal
products (e.g. paracetamol-containing products) may be used’

So we have a vaccine causing symptoms of the very thing it is meant to protect against? When the majority infected with this supposed virus will only ever suffer from mild symptoms or apparently no symptoms at all?

Only 0.2% of those infected apparently die – yet we know even those statistics are questionable due to the majority of deaths being in those older than the national average life span of 82 years and most have underlying health conditions.

Will you still obey the man in a suit on the telescreen and inject these chemicals into your body?

The full document can be found here.