Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an improved tool to facilitate simulation modelling of complex manufacturing systems

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer-based simulation is one of the most valuable aids for manufacturing systems design, yet its use remains limited. The main reason for this is that current manufacturing systems are extremely complex and the user-friendly capabilities provided even by the most advanced simulation tools are not sufficient to cope with such complexity. On this basis, the paper explores the development of an improved tool to ease and speed up simulation modelling of complex manufacturing systems. A simulation interface, created and currently used at a major automotive manufacturer, is considered and a rigorous assessment of the extent to which this interface can support the simulation modelling process is provided. The paper evaluates the viability to use the interface as a basis for a general purpose simulation modelling tool capable of coping with any complex manufacturing systems, analyses its potential values, and proposes developments that can support the uptake of simulation techniques within the manufacturing industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klingstam P, Gullander P (1999) Overview of simulation tools for computer-aided production engineering. Comput Ind 38(2):173–186 doi:10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00117-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baines TS, Kay JM (2002) Human performance modelling as an aid in the process of manufacturing system design: a pilot study. Int J Prod Res 40(10):2321–2334 doi:10.1080/00207540210128198

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Holst L, Bolmsjö G (2001) Simulation integration in manufacturing system development: a study of Japanese industry. Ind Manage Data Syst 101(7):339–356 doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks J, Hugan JC, Lendermann P, McLean C, Page EH, Pedgen CD et al (2003) The future of the simulation industry. In: Chick S et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 2033–2043

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson S (2005) Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next? J Oper Res Soc 56(6):619–629 doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601864

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Baines TS, Mason S, Siebers PO, Ladbrook J (2004) Humans: the missing link in manufacturing simulation. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory 12(7–8):515–526 doi:10.1016/S1569-190X(03)00094-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunha P, Dionisio J, Henriques E (2003) An architecture to support the manufacturing system design and planning. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 16(7–8):605–612 doi:10.1080/0951192031000115660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Banks J (1999) Introduction to simulation. In: Farrington PA et al (ed) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung CA (2004) Simulation modelling handbook: a practical approach. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carrie A (1998) Simulation of manufacturing systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carson JS II (2005) Introduction to modeling and simulation. In: Kuhl ME et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 16–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Banks J (2000) Introduction to simulation. In: Joines JA, Barton RR, Kang K, Fishwick PA (eds) Proceedings of the 2000 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Law AM (2005) How to build valid and credible simulation models. In: Kuhl ME et al (ed) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference, Piscataway, NJ, pp 24–32

  14. Pidd M, Carvalho A (2006) Simulation software: not the same yesterday, today or forever. J Simulat 1(1):7–20 doi:10.1057/palgrave.jos.4250004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson S (2004) Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hollocks BW (2004) Still simulating after all these years—reflections on 40 years in simulation. In: Brailsford SC, Oakshott L, Robinson S, Taylor SJE (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 operational research society simulation workshop. Operational Research Society, Birmingham, UK, pp 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seila AF (2001) Spreadsheet simulation.. In: Peters BA, Smith JS, Medeiros DJ, Rohrer MW (eds) Proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp 74–78

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hlupic V, Paul RJ (1999) Guidelines for selection of manufacturing simulation software. IIE Trans 31(1):21–29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bovone M, De Ferrari V, Manuelli R (1989) How to choose useful simulation software. Proceedings of the 1989 European Simulation Multiconference—SCS Simulation Computer Society, San Diego, pp. 39–43

  20. Ekere NN, Hannam RG (1989) An evaluation of approaches to modelling and simulating manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 27(4):599–611 doi:10.1080/00207548908942571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holder K (1990) Selecting simulation software. OR Insight 3(4):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis L, Williams G (1994) Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process. Integrated Manuf Syst 5(1):23–32 doi:10.1108/09576069410050314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (2001) ISO/IEC 9126-1, Software engineering—product quality, Part 1: Quality in use metrics. Author, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  24. International Organization for Standardization (1998) ISO 9241-11, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva

  25. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990) 610.12-1990, IEEE Standard glossary of software engineering terminology. Los Alamitos, CA

  26. Kirakowski J, Corbett M (1993) SUMI: the Software measurement inventory. Br J Educ Technol 24(3):210–214 doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.1993.tb00076.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis JR (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Macleod M, Bowden R, Bevan N, Curson I (1997) The MUSiC performance measurement method. Behav Inf Technol 16(4–5):279–293 doi:10.1080/014492997119842

    Google Scholar 

  29. Seffah A, Donyaee M, Kline RB (2006) Usability measurement and metrics: a consolidated model. Softw Qual J 14(2):159–178 doi:10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W (2003) Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO Standards. Softw Qual J 11(4):325–338 doi:10.1023/A:1025869312943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holzinger A (2005) Usability engineering methods for software developers. Commun ACM 48(1):71–74 doi:10.1145/1039539.1039541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Basili V, Shneiderman B (1999) Perspective-based usability inspection: an empirical validation of efficacy. Empir Softw Eng 4(1):43–69 doi:10.1023/A:1009803214692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Simeral EJ, Branghan RJ (1997) A comparative analysis of heuristic and usability evaluation methods. In: STC Proceedings 1997. Available online at http://www.stc.org/confproceed/1997/PDFs/0140.PDF

  34. Hornbaek K (2006) Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(2):79–102 doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robson C (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioners, 2nd edn. Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Viale Japigia, 182, Bari, Italy

    Ornella Benedettini

  2. Manufacturing Department, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK

    Benny Tjahjono

Authors
  1. Ornella Benedettini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benny Tjahjono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benny Tjahjono.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benedettini, O., Tjahjono, B. Towards an improved tool to facilitate simulation modelling of complex manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43, 191–199 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1686-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1686-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation