Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Restricted access Articles

Retaining volunteers in volunteer computing projects

Peter Darch

Peter Darch

Computing Laboratory, University of Oxford, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK

[email protected]

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
Annamaria Carusi

Annamaria Carusi

Oxford e-Research Centre, 7 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QG, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0163

    Volunteer computing projects (VCPs) have been set up by groups of scientists to recruit members of the public who are asked to donate spare capacity on their personal computers to the processing of scientific data or computationally intensive models. VCPs serve two purposes: to acquire significant computing capacity and to educate the public about science. A particular challenge for these scientists is the retention of volunteers as there is a very high drop-out rate. This paper develops recommendations for scientists and software engineers setting up or running VCPs regarding which strategies to pursue in order to improve volunteer retention rates. These recommendations are based on a qualitative study of volunteers in a VCP (climateprediction.net). A typology of volunteers has been developed, and three particularly important classes of volunteers are presented in this paper: for each type of volunteer, the particular benefits they offer to a project are described, and their motivations for continued participation in a VCP are identified and linked to particular strategies. In this way, those setting up a VCP can identify which types of volunteers they should be particularly keen to retain, and can then find recommendations to increase the retention rates of their target volunteers.

    References

    • AlmereGrid. 2010 Help de wetenschap een handje. See http://almeregrid.nl. Google Scholar
    • Anderson D. . 2003 Public computing:reconnecting people to science. Proc. Conf. on Shared Knowledge and the Web, Madrid, Spain . See http://boinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/boinc2.pdf. Google Scholar
    • BOINC Project. 2007 BOINC users’ survey. See http://boinc.berkeley.edu/poll_results.php. Google Scholar
    • BOINC Stats. 2010 Detailed user, host, team and country statistics with charts. See http://boincstats.com. Google Scholar
    • BRATS@Home. 2010 BRATS@Home gravitational lensing. See http://maxwell.dhcp.umsl.edu/brats. Google Scholar
    • Christensen C., Aina T.& Stainforth D. . 2005 The challenge of volunteer computing with lengthy climate model simulations. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on e-Science and Grid Computing, Melbourne, Australia, 5–8 December 2005 8–15 Washington, DC IEEE Computer Society. Google Scholar
    • Gordon C., Cooper C., Senior C., Banks H., Gregory J., Johns T., Mitchell J.& Wood R. . 2000 The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustment. Climate Dyn. 16, 147-168 (doi:10.1007/s003820050010). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Hey T., Tansley S.& Tolle K. . 2009 The fourth paradigm:data-intensive scientific discovery Redmond, WA Microsoft Research. Google Scholar
    • Hine C. . 2000 Virtual ethnography London, UK Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • House of Lords. 2000 Science and society. London, UK The Stationary Office. Google Scholar
    • Kondo D., Javadi B., Malecot P., Cappello F.& Anderson D. P. . 2009 Cost-benefit analysis of Cloud Computing versus desktop grids. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Parallel and Distributed Processing, Rome, Italy, 23–29 May 2009 1–12 Washington, DC IEEE Computer Society. Google Scholar
    • Marosi A., Gombas G., Balaton Z.& Kacsuk P. . 2007 SZTAKI desktop grid:building a scalable, secure platform for desktop grid computing. Making grids work , Danelutto M., Fragopoulou P.& Getov V. 363–374 New York, NY Springer. Google Scholar
    • Rosetta@Home. 2010 What is Rosetta@Home? See http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/rah_about.php. Google Scholar
    • Stainforth D., et al. 2002 Climateprediction.net:design principles for public-resource modelling research. Proc. 14th IASTED Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems, Cambridge, MA, 4–6 November 2002 32–38 Calgary, Canada ACTA Press. Google Scholar
    • Welsh E., Jirotka M.& Gavaghan D. . 2006 Post-genomic science:cross-disciplinary and large-scale collaborative research and its organizational and technological challenges for the scientific research process. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 1533-1549 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1785). Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • World Community Grid. 2010 World Community Grid—about us. See http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/about_us/viewAboutUs.do. Google Scholar
    • Wynne B.& Felt U. . 2007 Taking European knowledge society seriously:report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance Brussels, Belgium Commission of the European Communities. Google Scholar
    • Yao C.-H. . 2006 Grid computation—the fastest super computer in the world. See http://csa.com/discoveryguides/grid/review.pdf. Google Scholar