Advertisement

Following Folding Fast

Many protein functions involve conformational changes that occur on time-scales between tens of microseconds and milliseconds. This has limited the usefulness of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, which are performed over shorter time-scales. Shaw et al. (p. 341) now report millisecond-scale, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations in an explicitly represented solvent environment. Simulation of the folding of a WW domain showed a well-defined folding pathway and simulation of the dynamics of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor showed interconversion between distinct conformational states.

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are widely used to study protein motions at an atomic level of detail, but they have been limited to time scales shorter than those of many biologically critical conformational changes. We examined two fundamental processes in protein dynamics—protein folding and conformational change within the folded state—by means of extremely long all-atom MD simulations conducted on a special-purpose machine. Equilibrium simulations of a WW protein domain captured multiple folding and unfolding events that consistently follow a well-defined folding pathway; separate simulations of the protein’s constituent substructures shed light on possible determinants of this pathway. A 1-millisecond simulation of the folded protein BPTI reveals a small number of structurally distinct conformational states whose reversible interconversion is slower than local relaxations within those states by a factor of more than 1000.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (1187409s_pdb.zip)
File (shaw.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Mittermaier A., Kay L. E., New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 312, 224 (2006).
2
Gardino A. K., et al., Transient non-native hydrogen bonds promote activation of a signaling protein. Cell 139, 1109 (2009).
3
Abrahams J. P., Leslie A. G. W., Lutter R., Walker J. E., Structure at 2.8 A resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature 370, 621 (1994).
4
Noji H., Yasuda R., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature 386, 299 (1997).
5
Frauenfelder H., Sligar S. G., Wolynes P. G., The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254, 1598 (1991).
6
Chung H. S., Louis J. M., Eaton W. A., Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 11837 (2009).
7
Lei H., Duan Y., Improved sampling methods for molecular simulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 187 (2007).
8
Snow C. D., Nguyen H., Pande V. S., Gruebele M., Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature 420, 102 (2002).
9
Klepeis J. L., Lindorff-Larsen K., Dror R. O., Shaw D. E., Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 120 (2009).
10
Freddolino P. L., Liu F., Gruebele M., Schulten K., Ten-microsecond molecular dynamics simulation of a fast-folding WW domain. Biophys. J. 94, L75 (2008).
11
D. E. Shaw et al., Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC09) (ACM Press, New York, 2009).
12
Liu F., et al., An experimental survey of the transition between two-state and downhill protein folding scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2369 (2008).
13
McCammon J. A., Gelin B. R., Karplus M., Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 267, 585 (1977).
14
Levitt M., Warshel A., Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 253, 694 (1975).
15
Jäger M., et al., Structure-function-folding relationship in a WW domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10648 (2006).
16
Deechongkit S., et al., Context-dependent contributions of backbone hydrogen bonding to β-sheet folding energetics. Nature 430, 101 (2004).
17
Jäger M., Nguyen H., Crane J. C., Kelly J. W., Gruebele M., The folding mechanism of a β-sheet: The WW domain. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 373 (2001).
18
Petrovich M., Jonsson A. L., Ferguson N., Daggett V., Fersht A. R., Phi-analysis at the experimental limits: Mechanism of beta-hairpin formation. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 865 (2006).
19
Freddolino P. L., Park S., Roux B., Schulten K., Force field bias in protein folding simulations. Biophys. J. 96, 3772 (2009).
20
Noé F., Schütte C., Vanden-Eijnden E., Reich L., Weikl T. R., Constructing the equilibrium ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19011 (2009).
21
Ensign D. L., Pande V. S., The Fip35 WW domain folds with structural and mechanistic heterogeneity in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 96, L53 (2009).
22
Juraszek J., Bolhuis P. G., (Un)Folding mechanisms of the FBP28 WW domain in explicit solvent revealed by multiple rare event simulation methods. Biophys. J. 98, 646 (2010).
23
Lindorff-Larsen K., et al., Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB force field. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 78, 1950 (2010).
24
Kubelka J., Chiu T. K., Davies D. R., Eaton W. A., Hofrichter J., Sub-microsecond protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 359, 546 (2006).
25
See supporting material on Science Online.
26
Gianni S., et al., Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 13286 (2003).
27
McCallister E. L., Alm E., Baker D., Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 669 (2000).
28
Karplus M., Weaver D. L., Protein folding dynamics: The diffusion-collision model and experimental data. Protein Sci. 3, 650 (1994).
29
Best R. B., Hummer G., Reaction coordinates and rates from transition paths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 6732 (2005).
30
Matouschek A., Kellis J. T., Serrano L., Fersht A. R., Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering. Nature 340, 122 (1989).
31
Vendruscolo M., Paci E., Dobson C. M., Karplus M., Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409, 641 (2001).
32
Cota E., Hamill S. J., Fowler S. B., Clarke J., Two proteins with the same structure respond very differently to mutation: The role of plasticity in protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 713 (2000).
33
Nymeyer H., Socci N. D., Onuchic J. N., Landscape approaches for determining the ensemble of folding transition states: Success and failure hinge on the degree of frustration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 634 (2000).
34
Settanni G., Rao F., Caflisch A., ϕ-value analysis by molecular dynamics simulations of reversible folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 628 (2005).
35
Geierhaas C. D., Salvatella X., Clarke J., Vendruscolo M., Characterisation of transition state structures for protein folding using ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’ ϕ-values. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 21, 215 (2008).
36
Fersht A. R., Sato S., ϕ-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7976 (2004).
37
Liu F., Nakaema M., Gruebele M., The transition state transit time of WW domain folding is controlled by energy landscape roughness. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 195101 (2009).
38
Wüthrich K., Wagner G., NMR investigations of the dynamics of the aromatic amino acid residues in the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. FEBS Lett. 50, 265 (1975).
39
Otting G., Liepinsh E., Wüthrich K., Protein hydration in aqueous solution. Science 254, 974 (1991).
40
Persson E., Halle B., Nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics probed by magnetic relaxation dispersion of buried water molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1774 (2008).
41
Wagner G., Brühwiler D., Wüthrich K., Reinvestigation of the aromatic side-chains in the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor by heteronuclear two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 227 (1987).
42
Otting G., Liepinsh E., Wüthrich K., Disulfide bond isomerization in BPTI and BPTI(G36S): An NMR study of correlated mobility in proteins. Biochemistry 32, 3571 (1993).
43
Grey M. J., Wang C., Palmer A. G., Disulfide bond isomerization in basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor: Multisite chemical exchange quantified by CPMG relaxation dispersion and chemical shift modeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 14324 (2003).
44
Wlodawer A., Walter J., Huber R., Sjölin L., Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Results of joint neutron and X-ray refinement of crystal form II. J. Mol. Biol. 180, 301 (1984).
45
Zhou Y., Vitkup D., Karplus M., Native proteins are surface-molten solids: Application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1371 (1999).
46
Lindorff-Larsen K., Best R. B., DePristo M. A., Dobson C. M., Vendruscolo M., Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 433, 128 (2005).
47
Chakrapani S., Auerbach A., A speed limit for conformational change of an allosteric membrane protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 87 (2005).
48
Kubelka J., Hofrichter J., Eaton W. A.,. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 76 (2004).
49
Jäger M., Dendle M., Kelly J. W., Sequence determinants of thermodynamic stability in a WW domain—an all-beta-sheet protein. Protein Sci. 18, 1806 (2009).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 330 | Issue 6002
15 October 2010

Submission history

Received: 22 January 2010
Accepted: 31 August 2010
Published in print: 15 October 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to all members of the Anton hardware and software teams, without whom this work would not have been possible. We thank G. Hummer for providing us with the software to calculate position-dependent diffusion constants, A. Pan for helpful suggestions, T. Tu for assisting with trajectory analysis, A. Philippsen for helping with the BPTI renderings, K. Mackenzie for monitoring and supporting the BPTI simulation, and R. Kastleman and J. McGrady for editorial assistance.

Authors

Affiliations

David E. Shaw* [email protected]
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Paul Maragakis
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Stefano Piana
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Ron O. Dror
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Michael P. Eastwood
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Joseph A. Bank
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
John M. Jumper
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
John K. Salmon
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Yibing Shan
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.
Willy Wriggers
D. E. Shaw Research, 120 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Dimeric Lectin Chimeras as Novel Candidates for Gb3-Mediated Transcytotic Drug Delivery through Cellular Barriers, Pharmaceutics, 15, 1, (225), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010225
    Crossref
  2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Proteins Regulating Synaptic Vesicle Fusion, Membranes, 13, 3, (307), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030307
    Crossref
  3. Novel Inhibitory Role of Fenofibric Acid by Targeting Cryptic Site on the RBD of SARS-CoV-2, Biomolecules, 13, 2, (359), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020359
    Crossref
  4. Mitochondrial genome in sporadic breast cancer: A case control study and a proteomic analysis in a Sinhalese cohort from Sri Lanka, PLOS ONE, 18, 2, (e0281620), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281620
    Crossref
  5. Phytomolecules as potential candidates to intervene the function of E. coli sodium-proton antiporters; Ec-NhaA , Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, (1-12), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2191130
    Crossref
  6. Revealing the biotoxicity of phosphorene oxide nanosheets based on the villin headpiece, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 25, 4, (3100-3109), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CP04080H
    Crossref
  7. Statistical Mechanical Design Principles for Coarse-Grained Interactions across Different Conformational Free Energy Surfaces, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 14, 6, (1354-1362), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03844
    Crossref
  8. NMR Studies of Aromatic Ring Flips to Probe Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 127, 3, (591-599), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c07258
    Crossref
  9. Learned Reconstruction of Protein Folding Trajectories from Noisy Single-Molecule Time Series, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00920
    Crossref
  10. Atomistic Details of Peptide Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography from Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Analytical Chemistry, 95, 7, (3892-3900), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05667
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media