Oded Nov
Ofer Arazy
ABSTRACT
Digital citizen science offers a low-cost way to strengthen the scientific infrastructure, and engage members of the public in science. It is based on two pillars:(1)a technological pillar, which involves developing computer systems to manage large amounts of distributed resources, and (2) a motivational pillar, which involves attracting and retaining volunteers who would contribute their skills, time, and effort to a scientific cause. While the technological dimension has been widely studied, the motivational dimension received little attention to date. To address this gap, we surveyed volunteers at Stardust@home a digital citizen science project, in which volunteers classify online images from NASA's Stardust spacecraft. We found that collective and intrinsic motivations are the most salient motivational factors, whereas reward motives seem to be less relevant. We also found that intrinsic and norm-oriented motives are most strongly associated with participation intentions, which were, in turn, found to be associated with participation effort. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
- Anderson, D., Cobb, J., Korpela, E., Lebofsky, M., Werthimer, D. (2002). SETI@home: An Experiment in Public-Resource Computing. Communications of the ACM 45, 11, 56--61. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Anderson, D. (2006). Volunteer computing: Planting the flag. PCGrid 2007 Workshop, Long Beach, CA, USA, March 2007.Google Scholar
- Anderson D. and Fedak. G. (2006). The computational and storage potential of volunteer computing. CCGRID'06, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25, 3, 351--370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bonetta L. Tough Challenges for the Next NIH Director (2008) Cell 135 (4), pp. 583--585.Google Scholar
- Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. Proc. CHI '09. 945--954. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., and Kraut, R. (2002). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband and L. At water (Eds.) Leadership at a distance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides G, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Chin, W., Marcolin B, Newsted P. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects. Information Systems Research 14(2): 189--217. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., et al. (2010). Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 756--760.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Das R, Baker D. (2007) Automated de novo prediction of native-like RNA tertiary structures. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science; 104:14664--69.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319--339.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.Google Scholar
- Fornell, C. D. Larker. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39--50 (1981).Google Scholar
- Hand, E. (2010) Citizen science: People power. Nature 466, 685--687.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32, 1159--1177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lakhani, K., & Wolf, R. (2005). Why hackers do what they do. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives in Free and Open-Source Software. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lintott, C., Schawinski, K., Keel W., et al. (2009). Galaxy Zoo: 'Hanny's Voorwerp', a q uasar light echo? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, S., Meliker, I, et al. (2009). Use of land surface remotely sensed satellite and airborne data for environmental exposure assessment in cancer research. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.Google Scholar
- Nov, O. (2007). What motivates Wikipedians. Communications of the ACM, 50 (11) 60--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oreg, S. and O. Nov (2008). Exploring motivations forcontributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values. Computers in Human Behavior (24) 5, 2055--2073. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Carney, K., et al, (2009). Citizen Science: Status and Research Directions for the Coming Decade. ASTRO2010 Decadal Survey Position Paper.Google Scholar
- Raman, S., Lange, O. F., Rossi, P., et al. (2010) NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science, 327, 1014--1018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ringle, C. M, Wende, S, SmartPLS 2.0. www.smartpls.de (accessed 20 July 2010).Google Scholar
- Roberts, J., Hann, I. H., & Slaughter, S. (2006). Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Science, 52(7) 984--999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rose, A. (2009). Temporal and Individual Variation in Offspring Provisioning by Tree Swallows: A New Method of Automated Nest Attendance Monitoring. PLoS ONE 4(1): e411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schroer, J., & Hertel, G. (2009). Voluntary engagement in an open Web based encyclopedia: Wikipedians, and why they do it. Media Psychology, 12, 1--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simon, B., Loewy, M., Sturmer, S., et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 646--658.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Straub, D. M.-C. Boudreau, Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the AIS, 13, 380--427 (2004).Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M, User Acceptance of Information Technology - Toward a Unified View. MIS Quart, 2003; 27,3, 425--478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342--366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh V, Davis F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the "Private-Collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209--223. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wu, C. and Gerlach, Y. (2007). An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions. Information & Management, 44, 253--262 (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young, J. Crowd science reaches new heights. The chronicle of higher education, 28 May 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
-
Dusting for science: motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers
-
Recommendations
-
Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects
CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative WorkOnline citizen science projects engage volunteers in collecting, analyzing, and curating scientific data. Existing projects have demonstrated the value of using volunteers to collect data, but few projects have reached the full collaborative potential ...
-
Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science?: a study of volunteer motivations
CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIncreasingly, games are being incorporated into online citizen science (CS) projects as a way of crowdsourcing data; yet the influence of gamification on volunteer motivations and engagement in CS projects is still unknown. In an interview study with 8 ...
-
Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn most online citizen science projects, a large proportion of participants contribute in small quantities. To investigate how low contributors differ from committed volunteers, we distributed a survey to members of the Old Weather project, followed by ...
Comments