Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plant health as a trade policy issue

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant health status has always influenced international trade. However, since the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, the plant health status of Member countries has be come an integral part of import risk analysis via the disciplines of the WTO’s SPS Agreement. It is now incumbent on Member countries not using international standards to produce import risk analyses that are science-based, objective, defensible and transparent to support the imposition of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures. The SPS Agreement builds on previous GATT trade rules to restrict the use of unjustified SPS measures for the purpose of trade protection while still acknowledging a country’s right to determine the level of health protection it deems appropriate. Now more than ever, plant health is a trade policy issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ikin B, Small N (2000) ‘National standards for documenting plant pest and disease records.’ Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication. Project AQS-2A. 38 pp.

  • Merriman P, Moran J, Rodoni B (2001) ‘Faces’ of quarantine — challenges facing growers, diagnostic scientists and quarantine managers. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 141–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn J (1999) Th e WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures as applied in the first three SPS disputes. EC-Hormones, Australia-Salmon and Japan-Varietals. Journal of International Economic Law 1999, 641–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D, Chandrashekar M, Roberts WP (1994) Pest risk analysis and its implications for pest and disease exclusion from Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 23, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D (2001) The integration of economics into SPS risk management policies: issues and challenges. In ‘The economics of quarantine and the SPS Agreement’. (Eds K Anderson. CF McRae, D Wilson) pp. 9–28. (Biosecurity Australia and Centre for International Economic Studies. Adelaide University: Aelaide)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D (2000) The appropriate level of protection. In ‘Quarantine and market access — playing by the WTO rules’. Forum Proceedings, 6–7 September 2000, Canberra, ACT, Australia. ISBN 0642455058. pp. 159–164.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biosecurity Development and Evaluation, Biosecurity Australia, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Australia, PO Box 858, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    C. F. McRae & D. Wilson

Authors
  1. C. F. McRae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. F. McRae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McRae, C.F., Wilson, D. Plant health as a trade policy issue. Australasian Plant Pathology 31, 103–105 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1071/AP02011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AP02011

Additional keywords

Search

Navigation