Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Pugh, S. Douglas and Dietz, Joerg 2008. Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 44.
Meyer, John P. and Gagnè, Maryléne 2008. Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 60.
Vosburgh, Richard M. 2008. State–Trait Returns! And One Practitioner’s Request. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 72.
Masson, Rebecca C. Royal, Mark A. Agnew, Tom G. and Fine, Saul 2008. Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical Implications. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 56.
Storey, John Welbourne, Theresa Wright, Patrick and Ulrich, Dave 2008. The Routledge Companion to Strategic Human Resource Management. p. 299.
Dalal, Reeshad S. Brummel, Bradley J. Wee, Serena and Thomas, Lisa L. 2008. Defining Employee Engagement for Productive Research and Practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 52.
Macey, William H. and Schneider, Benjamin 2008. Engaged in Engagement: We Are Delighted We Did It. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 76.
Harter, James K. and Schmidt, Frank L. 2008. Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 36.
Newman, Daniel A. and Harrison, David A. 2008. Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct “Wines”?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 31.
Griffin, Mark A. Parker, Sharon K. and Neal, Andrew 2008. Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 48.
Frese, Michael 2008. The Word Is Out: We Need an Active Performance Concept for Modern Workplaces. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 67.
Saks, Alan M. 2008. The Meaning and Bleeding of Employee Engagement: How Muddy Is the Water?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 40.
Burke, Michael J. 2008. On the Skilled Aspect of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 70.
Hirschfeld, Robert R. and Thomas, Christopher H. 2008. Representations of Trait Engagement: Integration, Additions, and Mechanisms. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 63.
Chiocchio, F. and Lafrenière, A. 2009. A project management perspective on student's declarative commitments to goals established within asynchronous communication. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 294.
Schielke, Hugo Josef Fishman, Jonathan Louis Osatuke, Katerine and Stiles, William B. 2009. Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: The Ward method. Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 19, Issue. 4-5, p. 558.
Bledow, Ronald Frese, Michael Anderson, Neil Erez, Miriam and Farr, James 2009. A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 305.
Wefald, Andrew J. and Downey, Ronald G. 2009. Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 141.
Tan, Hwee Hoon 2009. Firm–employee relationship strength — Competitive advantage through people revisited: A commentary essay. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, Issue. 11, p. 1108.
De Cooman, Rein De Gieter, Sara Pepermans, Roland Jegers, Marc and Van Acker, Frederik 2009. Development and Validation of the Work Effort Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 266.