THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LEADERSHIP, WORK ENGAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE INDIAN R&D CONTEXT

References

• Agarwal, UA, S Dutta, S Blake-Beard and S Bhargava [2012] Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17, 208–230. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM [1983] The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM [1997] Motivating creativity in organizations. California Management Review, 40, 39–58. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM, R Conti, H Coon, J Lazenby and M Herron [1996] Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM, EA Schatzel, GB Moneta and SJ Kramer [2004] Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5–32. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Anderson, JC and DW Gerbing [1988] Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Ángel, PO and LS Sánchez [2009] “R&D managers” adaptation of firms’ HRM practices. R&D Management, 39, 271–290. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, JL [2013] IBM SPSS AMOS 22 User Guide. New York: Microsoft. Google Scholar
• Arnold, JA, S Arad, JA Rhoades and F Drasgow [2000] The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249–269. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Aryee, S, FO Walumbwa, Q Zhou and CA Hartnell [2012] Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25, 1–25. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Axtell, CM, DJ Holman, KL Unsworth, TD Wall and PE Waterson [2000] Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Badawy, MK [1988] What we’ve learned: Managing human resources. Research-Technology Management, 31(5), 19–35. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Baer, M [2012] Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1102–1119. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, RP and JR Edwards [1998] A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB [2011] An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20 (4), 265–269. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB, Albrecht, SL and MP Leiter [2011] Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4–28. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB and E Demerouti [2007] The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB and E Demerouti [2008] Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB, E Demerouti and AI Sanz-Vergel [2014] Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB and WB Schaufeli [2008] Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB and D Xanthopoulou [2009] The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1562–1571. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bakker, AB and D Xanthopoulou [2013] Creativity and charisma among female leaders: The role of resources and work engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2760–2779. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bandura, A [2001] Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Berson, Y and JD Linton [2005] An examination of the relationships between leadership style, quality, and employee satisfaction in R&D versus administrative environments. R&D Management, 35, 51–60. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, J [2012] Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 928–951. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Bliese, PD [2000] Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses . In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, KJ KleinSWJ Kozlowski (eds.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 349–381. Google Scholar
• Blomme, RJ, B Kodden and A Beasley-Suffolk [2015] Leadership theories and the concept of work engagement: Creating a conceptual framework for management implications and research. Journal of Management & Organization, 21, 125–144. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Brunetto, Y, S Teo, K Shacklock and R Farr-Wharton [2012] Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, well-being and engagement: Explaining organisational commitment and turnover intentions in policing. Human Resource Management Journal, 22, 428–441. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Byrne, BM [2010] Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Cameron, AC and RK Trivedi [1998] Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A, JE Dutton and AE Hardin [2015] Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68, 1021–1047. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Cassanelli, AN, G Fernandez-Sanchez and MC Guiridlian [2017] Principal researcher and project manager: Who should drive R&D projects? R&D Management, 47, 277–287. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Castañer, X [2016] Redefining creativity and innovation in organisations: Suggestions for redirecting research. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20, 1–23. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Choi, SB, TBH Tran and BI Park [2015] Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43, 931–944. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Christian, MS, AS Garza and JE Slaughter [2011] Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with a contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Çokpekin, Ö and MP Knudsen [2012] Does organizing for creativity really lead to innovation? Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 304–314. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• de Jong, JPJ and DN den Hartog [2007] How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 41–64. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci, EL and RM Ryan [2000] The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Deci, EL and RM Ryan [2008] Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Dewett, T [2007] Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37, 197–208. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Dvir, T, D Eden, BJ Avolio and B Shamir [2002] Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R, JR Jones, F Stinglhamber, L Shanock and AT Randall [2005] Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 755–75. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Eldor, L [2016] Work engagement: Toward a general theoretical enriching model. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 317–339. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Elkins, T and RT Keller [2003] Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 587–606. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Fornell, C and DF Larcker [1981] Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, BL [2001] The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• George, JM and J Zhou [2007] Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605–622. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Gomes, C, L Curral and A Caetano [2015] The mediating effect of work engagement on the relationship between self-leadership and individual innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19, 1–18. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Gupta, V and S Kumar [2013] Impact of performance appraisal justice on employee engagement: A study of Indian professionals. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 35, 61–78. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Gupta, V and S Singh [2013] How leaders impact employee creativity: A study of Indian R&D laboratories. Management Research Review, 36, 66–88. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta, V and S Singh [2014] Psychological capital as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and creative performance behaviors: Empirical evidence from the Indian R&D sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1373–1394. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Gupta, V and S Singh [2015] Leadership and creative performance behaviors in R&D laboratories: Examining the role of justice perceptions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 22, 21–36. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Gupta, V, S Singh and N Khatri [2013] Creativity in research and development laboratories: A new scale for leader behaviors. IIMB Management Review, 25, 83–90. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall, RJ, AF Snell and MS Foust [1999] Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233–256. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Hallberg, UE and WB Schaufeli [2006] “Same same” but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11, 119–127. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Harju, LK, JJ Hakanen and WB Shaufeli [2016] Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 11–20. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Harter, JK, FL Schmidt and TL Hayes [2002] Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S and L Olsson [2011] Creativity-stimulating leadership: A critical incident study of leaders’ influence on creativity in research groups. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20, 49–58. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Henker, N, S Sonnentag and D Unger [2015] Transformational leadership and employee creativity: The mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement. Journal of Business Psychology, 30, 235–247. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Hirst, G and L Mann [2004] A model of R&D leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance. R&D Management, 34, 147–160. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Hirst, G, D van Knippenberg and J Zhou [2009] A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Hoegl, M, K Weinkauf and HG Gemuenden [2004] Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15, 38–55. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Huhtala, H and M-R Parzefall [2007] A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 299–306. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen, O [2000] Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Judge, WQ, GE Fryxell and RS Dooley [1997] The new task of R&D management: Creating goal-directed communities for innovation. California Management Review, 39, 72–85. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Kahn, WA [1990] Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Kerr, S and JM Jermier [1978] Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Kim, Y, B Min and J Cha [1999] The roles of R&D team leaders in Korea: A contingent approach. R&D Management, 29, 153–165. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• King, G [2011] Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science (Washington), 331 (6018), 719–721. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Kline, RB [2011] Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. New York: Guildford Press. Google Scholar
• Koch, AR, C Binnewies and C Dormann [2015] Motivating innovation in schools: School principals’ work engagement as a motivator for schools’ innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 505–517. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Lee, RT and BE Ashforth [1996] A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 123–133. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Madjar, N and R Ortiz-Walters [2009] Trust in supervisors and trust in customers: Their independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance, 22, 128–142. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Manolopoulos, D [2006] What motivates R&D professionals? Evidence from decentralized laboratories in Greece. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 616–647. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Mayer, JD, DR Caruso and P Salovey [2000] Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Montag, T, CP Maertz Jr and M Baer [2012] A critical analysis of the workplace creativity criterion space. Journal of Management, 38, 1362–1386. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Mumford, MD, GM Scott, B Gaddis and JM Strange [2002] Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Ng, TWH, DC Feldman and SSK Lam [2010] Psychological contract breaches, organizational commitment, and innovation-related behaviors: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 744–751. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Nunnally, JC and IH Bernstein [1994] Psychometric Theory, 3 New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Oldham, GR and A Cummings [1996] Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Paulsen, N, AJ Callan, O Ayoko and D Saunders [2013] Transformational leadership and innovation in an R&D organization experiencing major change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26, 595–610. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, PM, SB MacKenzie, JY Lee and NP Podsakoff [2003] Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Quinn, JB [1979] Technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategy. Sloan Management Review, 20, 19–30. Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, N, PC Flood, T Slattery and R Sardessai [2005] Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 142–150. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raub, S and C Robert [2010] Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63, 1743–1770. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Rego, A, F Sousa, C Marques and MP e Cunha [2012] Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65, 429–437. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Rich, BL, JA Lepine and ER Crawford [2010] Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Salanova, M and WB Schaufeli [2008] A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 116–131. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, WB and AB Bakker [2004] Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, WB, AB Bakker and M Salanova [2006] The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, WB, AB Bakker and W van Rhenen [2009a] How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 893–917. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, WB, MP Leiter and C Maslach [2009b] Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14, 204–220. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A, DND Hartog and FD Belschak [2016] Transformational leadership and proactive work behaviour: A moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 588–610. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Schoorman, FD and RC Mayer [2008] The value of common perspectives in self-reported appraisals: You get what you ask for. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 148–159. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Shalley, CE and LL Gilson [2004] What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Shalley, CE, LL Gilson and TC Blum [2009] Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489–505. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Shalley, CE and JE Perry-Smith [2001] Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1–22. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Shalley, CE, J Zhou and GR Oldham [2004] The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Shin, SJ and J Zhou [2003] Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703–714. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Somech, A and A Drach-Zahavy [2013] Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684–708. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Stoker, JI, JC Looise, OAM Fisscher and RD De Jong [2001] Leadership and innovation: Relations between leadership, individual characteristics and the functioning of R&D teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1141–1151. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Thamhain, H [2003] Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33, 297–311. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Tierney, P and SM Farmer [2002] Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Tierney, P, SM Farmer and GB Graen [1999] An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• To, ML, CD Fisher and NM Ashkanasy [2015] Unleashing angst: Negative mood, learning goal orientation, psychological empowerment and creative behaviour. Human Relations, 68, 1601–1622, doi:10.1177/0018726714562235. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D and SB Sitkin [2013] A critical assessment of charismatic — transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1–60. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Wallace, JC, MM Butts, PD Johnson, FG Stevens and MB Smith [2016] A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management, 42, 982–1004. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• West, MA [2002] Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355–424. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Williams, LJ and EH O’Boyle Jr [2008] Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233–242. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Yong, E [2012] In the wake of high profile controversies, psychologists are facing up to problems with replication. Nature, 483, 298–300. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Yukl, GA [1999] An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Yukl, GA [2008] Leadership in Organizations, 6th edn. New Delhi: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
• Yukl, GA, A Gordon and T Taber [2002] A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 15–32. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl, GA and DD van Fleet [1992] Theory and research on leadership in organizations . In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, MD DunnetteLM Hough (Eds.), 2nd edn., Vol. 3, pp. 147–197, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar
• Zhang, X and KM Bartol [2010] Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• Zheng, W, AE Khoury, and C Grobmeiher [2010] How do leadership and context matter in R&D team innovation? A multiple case study. Human Resource Development International, 13, 265–283. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q and W Pan [2015] A cross-level examination of the process linking transformational leadership and creativity: The role of psychological safety climate. Human Performance, 28, 405–424. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar