On the subjective experience and correlates of downtime at work: A mixed-method examination
Corresponding Author
Xue Lei
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Correspondence
Xue Lei, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN-3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSeth A. Kaplan
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorChristy E. Dye
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorCarol M. Wong
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xue Lei
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Correspondence
Xue Lei, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN-3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSeth A. Kaplan
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorChristy E. Dye
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorCarol M. Wong
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
In the current paper, we studied downtime at work. Downtime represents a unique aspect of work time, as employees have low workload and more discretion about their activities but are still paid to be at work. Despite its prevalence and potentially significant implications for productivity and well-being, the experience of downtime has not been a focus in the literature. To study this phenomenon, we first used a qualitative method involving 15 focus groups. Results from 95 employees showed that downtime is distinct from formal breaks and withdrawal behavior and is generally a negative subjective experience. Categories of antecedents of experience and downtime activities were classified. Next, to further explore the phenomenon, and based on Study 1 and relevant literature, we proposed several hypotheses and tested them using an experience sampling method. Results from 86 employees (across 5 workdays and 689 data points) indicated that the amount of downtime was negatively related to day level job satisfaction, job performance, and subjective health. The duration of relaxation activities during downtime mitigated the negative effects of downtime on fatigue. The effects of enjoyment level of the activities, job autonomy, work engagement, and boredom proneness were also examined. Implications, limitations, and future research are discussed.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
job2336_sup-0001-st1-st2.docxWord 2007 document , 20.6 KB | Table S1 Study 1 Job Titles Table 2 Study 2 Job Titles |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
10.1108/13620430810870476 Google Scholar
- Bartone, P. T. (2005). The need for positive meaning in military operations: Reflections on Abu Ghraib. Military Psychology, 17, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1704_5
- Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103257361
- Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054
- Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
- Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Brincks, A. M., Enders, C. K., Llabre, M. M., Bulotsky-Shearer, R. J., Prado, G., & Feaster, D. J. (2017). Centering predictor variables in three-level contextual models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 149–163.
- Brodsky, A., & Amabile, T. M. (2018). The downside of downtime: The prevalence and work pacing consequences of idle time at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 496–512. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000294
- Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. In Unpublished manuscript. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
- Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative Barton review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
- de Bloom, J., Kinnunen, U., & Korpela, K. (2015). Recovery processes during and after work: Associations with health, work engagement, and job performance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000475
- Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A. M., Park, C. R., Halonen, J., & Zoladz, P. R. (2007). The temporal dynamics model of emotional memory processing: A synthesis on the neurobiological basis of stress-induced amnesia, flashbulb and traumatic memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson law. Neural Plasticity, 2007, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/60803
10.1155/2007/60803 Google Scholar
- Drory, A. (1982). Individual differences in boredom proneness and task effectiveness at work. Personnel Psychology, 35, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02190.x
- Eddy, E. R., D'Abate, C. P., & Thurston, P. W. Jr. (2010). Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time. Personnel Review, 39, 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481011064181
- Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086
- Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
- Fisher, C. D. (1993). Boredom at work: A neglected concept. Human Relations, 46, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600305
- Fisher, C. D., & Noble, C. S. (2004). A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance, 17, 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1702_2
- Fisher, K., & Layte, R. (2004). Measuring work-life balance using time diary data. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.1.1.1-13
10.13085/eIJTUR.1.1.1-13 Google Scholar
- Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2971
- Fritz, C., Ellis, A. M., Demsky, C. A., Lin, B. C., & Guros, F. (2013). Embracing work breaks. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.07.005
- Fritz, C., Lam, C. F., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011). It's the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers' energy management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 28–39.
- Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
- Galletta, A., & Cross, W. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York; London: NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Game, A. M. (2007). Workplace boredom coping: Health, safety, and HR implications. Personnel Review, 36, 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710774007
- Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113518348
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson.
- Grant, A. M., Berg, J. M., & Cable, D. M. (2014). Job titles as identity badges: How self-reflective titles can reduce emotional exhaustion. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1201–1225. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0338
- Grech, M. R., Neal, A., Yeo, G., Humphreys, M., & Smith, S. (2009). An examination of the relationship between workload and fatigue within and across consecutive days of work: Is the relationship static or dynamic? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014952
- Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1991). General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90006-8
- Harrison, D. A., & Newman, D. A. (2013). Absence, lateness, turnover, and retirement: Narrow and broad under-standings of withdrawal behavior and behavioral engagement. In N. Schmitt, & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology ( ed., Vol. 12) (pp. 262–291). NJ: Hoboken.
- Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.4324/9781315744094 Google Scholar
- Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and informal social controls of employee deviance. Sociological Quarterly, 23, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb01016.x
- Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 43–54. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.mutex.gmu.edu/docview/210518333?accountid=14541
10.5465/AME.1992.4274395 Google Scholar
- Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153
- Hunter, E. M., & Wu, C. (2016). Give me a better break: Choosing workday break activities to maximize resource recovery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000045
- Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 772–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000308
- Kim, S., Park, Y., & Niu, Q. (2017). Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2109
- Little, L. M., Major, V. S., Hinojosa, A. S., & Nelson, D. L. (2015). Professional image maintenance: How women navigate pregnancy in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 8–37. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0599
- Loukidou, L., Loan-Clarke, J., & Daniels, K. (2009). Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00267.x
- Mael, F., & Jex, S. (2015). Workplace boredom: An integrative model of traditional and contemporary approaches. Group & Organization Management, 40, 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115575148
- Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2, 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315
- McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Profile of Mood States Manual ( 2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
- Peugh, J. L. (2014). Conducting three-level cross-sectional analyses. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 7–37.
- Pratt, M. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107303349
- Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
- Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
10.1023/A:1015630930326 Google Scholar
- Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
- Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196
- Sonnentag, S., & Natter, E. (2004). Flight attendants' daily recovery from work: Is there no place like home? International Journal of Stress Management, 11, 366–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.11.4.366
10.1037/1072-5245.11.4.366 Google Scholar
- Sonnentag, S., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.330
- Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332 Google Scholar
- Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988). The MOS short-form general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26, 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Strongman, K. T., & Burt, C. D. B. (2000). Taking breaks from work: An exploratory inquiry. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 134, 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009600864
- Struk, A. A., Carriere, J. S., Cheyne, J. A., & Danckert, J. (2015). A short boredom proneness scale: Development and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24, 1–14.
- Terkel, S. (1974). Working: People talk about what they do all day and how they feel about what they do. New York: Pantheon.
- Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141
- Trougakos, J. P., Beal, D. J., Green, S. G., & Weiss, H. M. (2008). Making the break count: An episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 131–146. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.30764063
- Trougakos, J. P., Hideg, I., Cheng, B. H., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 405–421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1072
- Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
- van Hooff, M. L., Geurts, S. A., Beckers, D. G., & Kompier, M. A. (2011). Daily recovery from work: The role of activities, effort and pleasure. Work & Stress, 25, 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.570941
- Vodanovich, S. J., & Kass, S. J. (1990). A factor analytic study of the boredom proneness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674051
- Volman, F. E., Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2013). Recovery at home and performance at work: A diary study on self–family facilitation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.648375
- Wangh, M. (1975). Boredom in psychoanalytic perspective. Social Research, 42, 538–550.
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
- Wilcox, K., Laran, J., Stephen, A. T., & Zubcsek, P. P. (2016). How being busy can increase motivation and reduce task completion time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000045
- Zacher, H., Brailsford, H. A., & Parker, S. L. (2014). Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.005
- Zawadzki, M. J., Smyth, J. M., & Costigan, H. J. (2015). Real-time associations between engaging in leisure and daily health and well-being. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9694-3