ARTICLE
Examining the implications of work–nonwork demand congruence
Kirby Hockensmith,
Jennifer M. Ragsdale,
Rose Fonseca,
Corresponding Author
Kirby Hockensmith
University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Correspondence
Kirby Hockensmith, Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, 800 S. Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Software, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer M. Ragsdale
University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Supervision, Data curation
Search for more papers by this authorRose Fonseca
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, United States
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Investigation
Search for more papers by this author
Kirby Hockensmith,
Jennifer M. Ragsdale,
Rose Fonseca,
Corresponding Author
Kirby Hockensmith
University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Correspondence
Kirby Hockensmith, Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa, 800 S. Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Software, Formal analysis, Project administration, Data curation
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer M. Ragsdale
University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Supervision, Data curation
Search for more papers by this authorRose Fonseca
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, United States
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Investigation
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2024
Abstract
Examining the implications of excessive work demands on employee well-being is an important research area of occupational health psychology. Recovery during nonwork time has been emphasized as an important process for mitigating the negative implications of excessive work demands. However, this notion ignores the potential for nonwork activities to be comparably demanding to work activities. There has been a lack of attention paid to the potentially complex interrelationships between work and nonwork demands. Using the effort–recovery and challenge–hindrance stressor models, we developed a set of hypotheses for both the positive and negative implications of the interplay between employee work and nonwork cognitive demands. We collected information on cognitive workweek job demands (Friday) and nonwork cognitive weekend demands (Sunday) from a sample of workers (N = 146), and we used polynomial regression with response surface analysis to examine how different aspects of work–nonwork cognitive demand (in)congruence related to Monday work engagement. In general, higher cognitive workweek job demands promoted work engagement, even when nonwork cognitive demands were equally high. Cognitive demand incongruence that favoured higher cognitive work demands was also beneficial for employee work engagement. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, along with directions for future research in this area.
CONFLICT oF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in ‘figshare’ at [https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Examining_the_implications_of_work-nonwork_demand_congruence_-_JOOP_Dataset/22348951].
REFERENCES
- Bakker, A. B., van Emmerik, I. H., Geurts, S. A. E., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Recovery turns job demands into challenges: A diary study on work engagement and performance. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- Bakker, A. B. (2014). Daily fluctuations in work engagement: An overview and current directions. European Psychologist, 19, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000160
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933 Google Scholar
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5), 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705055967
- Barber, L. K., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038278
- Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054
- Bennett, A. A., Gabriel, A. S., Calderwood, C., Dahling, J. J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2016). Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1635–1654. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000157
- Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2010). Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A week-level study examining intra-individual relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X418049
- Bowling, N. A., & Kirkendall, C. (2012). Workload: A review of causes, consequences, and potential interventions. In Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 221–238). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119942849
10.1002/9781119942849.ch13 Google Scholar
- Bringmann, L. F., Hamaker, E. L., Vigo, D. E., Aubert, A., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2017). Changing dynamics: Time-varying autoregressive models using generalized additive modeling. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000085
- Clinton, M. E., Conway, N., & Sturges, J. (2017). “It's tough hanging-up a call”: The relationships between calling and work hours, psychological detachment, sleep quality, and morning vigor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000025
- Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
- De Bloom, J., Kinnunen, U., & Korpela, K. (2015). Recovery processes during and after work. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(7), 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000475
- De Bloom, J., Rantanen, J., Tement, S., & Kinnunen, U. (2018). Longitudinal leisure activity profiles and their associations with recovery experiences and job performance. Leisure Sciences, 40(3), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1356254
- Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
- Dienstbier, R. A. (1989). Arousal and physiological toughness: Implications for mental and physical health. Psychological Review, 96(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.84
- Drach-Zahavy, A., & Marzuq, N. (2013). The weekend matters: Exploring when and how nurses best recover from work stress. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(3), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06033.x
- Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
- Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). Jossey-Bass.
- Edwards, J. R. (2007). Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In C. Ostroff & T. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on fit in organizations (pp. 361–372). Erlbaum.
- Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (2018). On the use of spline regression in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 68–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117715067
- Geurts, S. A., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 482-492, 482–492. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1053
10.5271/sjweh.1053 Google Scholar
- Ginoux, C., Isoard-Gautheur, S., & Sarrazin, P. (2021). “What did you do this weekend?” relationships between weekend activities, recovery experiences, and changes in work-related well-being. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 13(4), 798–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12272
- Grandey, A. A., & Sayre, G. M. (2019). Emotional labor: Regulating emotions for a wage. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418812771
- Harju, L. K., Hakanen, J. J., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2016). Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.001
- Honn, K. A., Van Dongen, H. P. A., & Dawson, D. (2019). Working time society consensus statements: Prescriptive rule sets and risk management-based approaches for the management of fatigue-related risk in working time arrangements. Industrial Health, 57, 264–280. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.sw-8
- Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618757600
- Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
- Kando, T. M., & Summers, W. C. (1971). The impact of work on leisure: Toward a paradigm and research strategy. The Pacific Sociological Review, 14(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388645
- Karasek, R. A., Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
- Kern, M., & Zapf, D. (2021). Ready for change? A longitudinal examination of challenge stressors in the context of organizational change. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(3), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000214
- Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., & Siltaloppi, M. (2010). Job insecurity, recovery and well-being at work: Recovery experiences as moderators. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09358366
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
- LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Saul, J. R. (2007). Relationships among work and non-work challenge and hindrance stressors and non-work and work criteria: A model of cross-domain stressor effects. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the work and non-work interface (pp. 35–72). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
- LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921
- LePine, M. A. (2022). The challenge-hindrance stressor framework: An integrative conceptual review and path forward. Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 223–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221079970
- Mazzola, J. J., & Disselhorst, R. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees?: A critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge-hindrance model of stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
- McEwen, B. S. (1998). Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307
- Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J. Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5–33). Psychology Press.
- Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
- Nestler, S., Humberg, S., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Response surface analysis with multilevel data: Illustration for the case of congruence hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000199
- O'Brien, K. E., & Beehr, T. A. (2019). So far, so good: Up to now, the challenge–hindrance framework describes a practical and accurate distinction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 962–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2405
- Oerlemans, W. G., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). How feeling happy during off-job activities helps successful recovery from work: A day reconstruction study. Work & Stress, 28(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.901993
- Olafsen, A. H., & Frølund, C. W. (2018). Challenge accepted! Distinguishing between challenge- and hindrance demands. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(4–5), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2017-0143
- Pindek, S., Arvan, M. L., & Spector, P. E. (2019). The stressor–strain relationship in diary studies: A meta-analysis of the within and between levels. Work & Stress, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1445672
- Podsakoff, N. P., Freiburger, K. J., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rosen, C. C. (2023). Laying the foundation for the Challenge–Hindrance Stressor Framework 2.0. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-080422-052147
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-080422-052147 Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
- Ragsdale, J. M., & Beehr, T. A. (2016). A rigorous test of a model of employees' resource recovery mechanisms during a weekend. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2086
- Rosen, C. C., Dimotakis, N., Cole, M. S., Taylor, S. G., Simon, L. S., Smith, T. A., & Reina, C. S. (2020). When challenges hinder: An investigation of when and how challenge stressors impact employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(10), 1181–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000483
- Rubenstein, A. L., Zhang, Y., Ma, K., Morrison, H. M., & Jorgensen, D. F. (2019). Trait expression through perceived job characteristics: A meta-analytic path model linking personality and job attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.002
- Saxbe, D. E., Repetti, R. L., & Graesch, A. P. (2011). Time spent in housework and leisure: Links with parents' physiological recovery from work. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023048
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
- Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). RSA: An R package for response surface analysis (version 0.9.6). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSA/index.html
- Seibel, S., & Volmer, J. (2021). A diary study on anticipated leisure time, morning recovery, and employees' work engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9436.
- Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
- Shimazu, A., Matsudaira, K., Jonge, J. D., Tosaka, N., Watanabe, K., & Takahashi, M. (2016). Psychological detachment from work during nonwork time: Linear or curvilinear relations with mental health and work engagement? Industrial Health, 54(3), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.ms1131
- Sianoja, M., Syrek, C., de Bloom, J., Korpela, K., & Kinnunen, U. (2022). Recovery across different temporal settings: How lunchtime activities influence evening activities. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.129
10.16993/sjwop.129 Google Scholar
- Sirgy, M. J. (2021). Effects of domain dynamics on wellbeing. In The psychology of quality of life: Wellbeing and positive mental health (pp. 341–371). Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-030-71888-6_16 Google Scholar
- Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.196
- Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B. H., & Parker, S. L. (2022). Recovery from work: Advancing the field toward the future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355 Google Scholar
- Sonnentag, S., Eck, K., Fritz, C., & Kühnel, J. (2019). Morning Reattachment to Work and Work Engagement During the Day: A Look at Day-Level Mediators. Journal of Management, 46(8), 1408–1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319829823
- Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
- Sonnentag, S., & Kühnel, J. (2016). Coming back to work in the morning: Psychological detachment and reattachment as predictors of work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000020
- Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Neff, A. (2012). Recovery: Nonwork experiences that promote positive states. In The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 867–881). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0066
- Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017). Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000079
- Steed, L. B., Swider, B. W., Keem, S., & Liu, J. T. (2021). Leaving work at work: A meta-analysis on employee recovery from work. Journal of Management, 47(4), 867–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319864153
- Su, R., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., & Tay, L. (2019). Modeling congruence in organizational research with latent moderated structural equations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(11), 1404–1433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000411
- Tanskanen, J., Taipale, S., & Anttila, T. (2016). Revealing hidden curvilinear relations between work engagement and its predictors: Demonstrating the added value of generalized additive model (GAM). Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9599-z
- ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029213
- ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Trougakos, J. P. (2014). The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12050
- Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands–Resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(6), 735–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903223839
- Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2014). Driving it home: How workplace emotional labor harms employee home life. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12044
- Webster, J. R., & Adams, G. A. (2020). The differential role of job demands in relation to nonwork domain outcomes based on the challenge-hindrance framework. Work & Stress, 34(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1662855
- Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.012
- Weigelt, O., Siestrup, K., & Prem, R. (2021). Continuity in transition: Combining recovery and day-of-week perspectives to understand changes in employee energy across the 7-day week. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2514
- Widmer, P. S., Semmer, N. K., Kälin, W., Jacobshagen, N., & Meier, L. L. (2012). The ambivalence of challenge stressors: Time pressure associated with both negative and positive well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2011.09.006
- Wong, I. S., Popkin, S., & Folkard, S. (2019). Working time society consensus statements: A multilevel approach to managing occupational sleep-related fatigue. Industrial Health, 57, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.sw-6
- Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2013). State work engagement: The significance of within-person fluctuations. In A. B. Bakker & K. Daniels (Eds.), A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 25–40). Psychology Press.
- Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Oerlemans, W. G., & Koszucka, M. (2018). Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2245
- Yao, Y. A., & Ma, Z. (2023). Toward a holistic perspective of congruence research with the polynomial regression model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001028
- Zapf, D. (2002). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00048-7
10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00048-7 Google Scholar
- Zijlstra, F. R. H., Cropley, M., & Rydstedt, L. W. (2014). From recovery to regulation: An attempt to reconceptualize “recovery from work”. Stress and Health, 30, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2604
