Volume 25, Issue 3 p. 249-251
Original Clinical Article

Position-related changes in uroflowmetric parameters in healthy young men

Bilal Eryıldırım

Bilal Eryıldırım

Urology Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Fatih Tarhan

Corresponding Author

Fatih Tarhan

Urology Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Altunizade Mah. Acıbadem Cad., Genç Sk. Elvermez Apt. 10/7, TR-34660 Uskudar/Istanbul, Turkey.Search for more papers by this author
Uğur Kuyumcuoğlu

Uğur Kuyumcuoğlu

Urology Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Erkan Erbay

Erkan Erbay

Urology Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Necmettin Pembegül

Necmettin Pembegül

Urology Clinic, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 February 2006
Citations: 17

Abstract

Aims

Uroflowmetric measurements are a common procedure in urological examination of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms and it can be influenced by various factors. In this study, we investigated position-related changes in uroflowmetric parameters and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) volume in healthy young men.

Materials and Methods

Thirty normal healthy male volunteers, whose mean age was 28.6 ± 0.7 years old were studied and evaluated with uroflowmetry in the standing, sitting, and squatting down voiding positions. Three measurements were obtained for each voiding position and for each man (total 270 urinary flows). PVR were measured by transabdominal ultrasound. The maximum flow rate (Qmax), average flow rate (Qave), corrected maximum flow rate (cQmax), voiding volume (VV), voiding time (VT), and PVR values were compared between the three different voiding positions.

Results

The mean Qmax values for the standing, sitting, and squatting down voiding positions of the patient group were 26.8 ± 1.3, 31.3 ± 1.2, 31.0 ± 1.0 ml/sec, respectively and the mean Qave values were 16.8 ± 0.6, 18.5 ± 0.6, 18.6 ± 0.6 ml/sec, respectively. There were significant differences between voiding positions regarding the Qmax (P < 0.0001) and Qave (P = 0.0002) values in the patient groups. However, the difference between VT, VV, and PVR in the standing, sitting, and squatting down voiding position of the patient group was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the urinary flow rates are affected by the voiding position. Therefore, it is important to perform uroflowmetric measurements in the same position. Neurourol. Urodynam. 25:249–251, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.