ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

PDMS–Fluorous Polyoxetane–PDMS Triblock Hybrid Elastomers: Tough and Transparent with Novel Bulk Morphologies

View Author Information
Department of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 601 West Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23284-3028, United States
Department of Visual Arts, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., ThunderBay, Ontario, Canada P7B 5E1
*Ph 001-804-828-9303, Fax +804-828-3846, e-mail [email protected]
Cite this: Macromolecules 2012, 45, 19, 7900–7913
Publication Date (Web):August 28, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1021/ma301447f
Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1766

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    22
    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options
    Supporting Info (1)»

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    PDMS-3F-1.1-PDMS and PDMS-3F-4.5-PDMS triblock hybrid elastomers are investigated, wherein (1) 3F-1.1 and 3F-4.5 are poly(3-methyl-3-trifluoroethoxymethyl)-1,3-propylene oxide with Mn = 1.1 or 4.5 kDa, (2) segments are linked by urethane/urea forming reactions, and (3) the intermediate PDMS-3F-PDMS aminopropyl end segments are end-capped with isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane. After condensation cure, PDMS-3F-PDMS triblock hybrids (A-1.1 and A-4.5) form robust elastomers. In a second set, bis(triethoxysilylethane), BTESE, was incorporated to probe effects of increased siliceous domain content (B-1.1, B-4.5). All compositions are optically transparent due to nearly identical refractive indexes for 3F and PDMS segments. TM-AFM images for A-4.5, A-1.1, and B-4.5 fracture surfaces reveal microscale bulk phase separation. The A-4.5 triblock hybrid shows a particularly interesting morphology comprised of 2–3 μm ovaloids (low modulus) surrounded by a higher modulus matrix. A model is proposed for this microscale morphology based on the relative rates of physical network formation (PN, H-bonding) and chemical network formation (CN, SiO1.5) during coating deposition Despite low hard segment weight percents (2.6–3.5) the hybrid triblocks have moderate toughness with strain at break ranging from 260 to 492%. Triblock hybrid elastomer B-1.1 has the highest −SiO1.5 wt % (mostly from BTESE) and lowest 3F wt % (3F-1.1). No sign of microscale phase separation is observed by TM-AFM imaging, and a separate Tg for the 3F segment is not detected by DMA; these findings are ascribed to network constrained phase separation of that results in 3F being incorporated in an “interphase”. The absence of a separate Tg for 3F leads to a gradual decrease in storage modulus (8 to 1.4 MPa) from −90 to 150 °C. In contrast to the complex bulk morphology, TM-AFM imaging shows the hybrid surfaces are devoid of microstructural features attributable to phase separation. Based on contact angle measurements and XPS analysis, the outermost surface for all PDMS-3F-PDMS hybrid triblocks elastomers is dominated by PDMS.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Table S1 and Figures S1–S10. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 22 publications.

    1. Han Qin, Yancong Feng, Kun Liu, Jianguo Mi, Liqun Zhang, Ming Tian. From Molecular-Scale Cavities to Nanoscale Dielectric Breakdown in Polydimethylsiloxane Induced by Local Electric Field. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (5) , 1690-1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c02641
    2. Cuiping Zhou, Xuan Zhao, Xiaoyun Zhao, Hui Li, Shuxiang Zhang, Wei Feng, Yongming Zhang. Low Ice Adhesion Surfaces Based on Flexible Fluorinated Polymers with a Polynorbornene Backbone. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (47) , 53494-53502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c15627
    3. K. Sunitha, S. Bhuvaneswari, Dona Mathew, G. Unnikrishnan, and C. P. Reghunadhan Nair . Comb Polymer Network of Polydimethylsiloxane with a Novolac Stem: Synthesis via Click Coupling and Surface Morphology Architecturing by Solvents. Macromolecules 2017, 50 (24) , 9656-9665. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02046
    4. Souvik Chakrabarty, Chenyu Wang, Wei Zhang, and Kenneth J. Wynne . Rigid Adherent-Resistant Elastomers (RARE): Nano-, Meso-, and Microscale Tuning of Hybrid Fluorous Polyoxetane–Polyurethane Blend Coatings. Macromolecules 2013, 46 (8) , 2984-2996. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma4001995
    5. YuTao Cui, HuiHui Liu, BinXiao Wei, Chao Deng, YongPing Bai. Fabrication of UV-curable Anti-fouling coating based on fluorinated polyoxetane and long Side-Chain Polysilcone. European Polymer Journal 2022, 172 , 111227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111227
    6. YuTao Cui, BinXiao Wei, YiJing Wang, Xiang Guo, Jinwu Xiao, Wei Li, Aimin Pang, YongPing Bai. Fabrication of UV/moisture dual curing coatings based on fluorinated polyoxetanes for anti-fouling applications. Progress in Organic Coatings 2022, 163 , 106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106656
    7. Yuanyuan Pang, Junqiang Justin Koh, Zibiao Li, Chaobin He. Reactive Functionally Terminated Polyorganosiloxanes. 2020, 23-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527823499.ch2
    8. Yiyu Cao, Ping Zhu, Yong Zhou, Dujin Wang, Xia Dong. Influence of soft block and film thickness on confined morphology of poly(ether‐ mb ‐amide) multiblock copolymers. POLYMER CRYSTALLIZATION 2020, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/pcr2.10100
    9. Gh. Barati Darband, M. Aliofkhazraei, S. Khorsand, S. Sokhanvar, A. Kaboli. Science and Engineering of Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Review of Corrosion Resistance, Chemical and Mechanical Stability. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 2020, 13 (1) , 1763-1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.01.013
    10. Zhi Wei Kenny Low, Zibiao Li, Cally Owh, Pei Lin Chee, Enyi Ye, Dan Kai, Da‐Peng Yang, Xian Jun Loh. Using Artificial Skin Devices as Skin Replacements: Insights into Superficial Treatment. Small 2019, 15 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805453
    11. Yan Wu, Peng Guo, Yi Zhao, Xijing Liu, Zongliang Du. Hydrophobic, transparent waterborne polyurethane-polydimethylsiloxane composites prepared from aqueous sol-gel process and applied in corrosion protection. Progress in Organic Coatings 2019, 127 , 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.06.002
    12. Yiyu Cao, Ping Zhu, Zefan Wang, Yong Zhou, Haiming Chen, Alejandro J. Müller, Dujin Wang, Xia Dong. Influence of soft block crystallization on microstructural variation of double crystalline poly(ether‐ mb ‐amide) multiblock copolymers. POLYMER CRYSTALLIZATION 2018, 1 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/pcr2.10012
    13. Jianzhong Ma, Fan Zhang, Yinghuan Qiao, Qunna Xu, Jianhua Zhou, Jing Zhang. Vi‐ PDMS incorporated with protein‐based coatings designed for permeability‐enhanced applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2018, 135 (30) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.46501
    14. Zhaozhu Zhang, Bo Ge, Xuehu Men, Yong Li. Mechanically durable, superhydrophobic coatings prepared by dual-layer method for anti-corrosion and self-cleaning. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2016, 490 , 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.11.049
    15. Daniel J. Buckwalter, Joseph M. Dennis, Timothy E. Long. Amide-containing segmented copolymers. Progress in Polymer Science 2015, 45 , 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.11.003
    16. Mei-Yan Jiang, Lian-Kui Wu, Ji-Ming Hu, Jian-Qing Zhang. Silane-incorporated epoxy coatings on aluminum alloy (AA2024). Part 2: Mechanistic investigations. Corrosion Science 2015, 92 , 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.048
    17. Fangfang Yu, Xiangyu Xu, Naibo Lin, Xiang Yang Liu. Structural engineering of waterborne polyurethane for high performance waterproof coatings. RSC Advances 2015, 5 (89) , 72544-72552. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA12480H
    18. Daniel J Buckwalter, Amanda G Hudson, Robert B Moore, Timothy E Long. Synthesis and characterization of poly(propylene glycol) polytrioxamide and poly(urea oxamide) segmented copolymers. Polymer International 2014, 63 (7) , 1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4666
    19. Emel Yilgör, Iskender Yilgör. Silicone containing copolymers: Synthesis, properties and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 2014, 39 (6) , 1165-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.11.003
    20. Chenyu Wang, Wei Zhang, Kenneth J. Wynne. Hybrid networks incorporating fluorous polyoxetane soft blocks. Applied Organometallic Chemistry 2013, 27 (11) , 660-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.3022
    21. Daniel J. Buckwalter, David L. Inglefield, Joshua S. Enokida, Amanda G. Hudson, Robert B. Moore, Timothy E. Long. Effects of Copolymer Structure on the Mechanical Properties of Poly(dimethyl siloxane) Poly(oxamide) Segmented Copolymers. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 2013, 214 (18) , 2073-2082. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201300312
    22. Daniel J. Buckwalter, Mingqiang Zhang, David L. Inglefield, Robert B. Moore, Timothy E. Long. Synthesis and characterization of siloxane-containing poly(urea oxamide) segmented copolymers. Polymer 2013, 54 (18) , 4849-4857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.07.025

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect