Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosing sulfur deficiency in field-grown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of increasing sulfur applications on field-grown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were investigated in 1998 and 1999, and the critical values and efficiency of several diagnostic indicators for S deficiency were determined. Critical values for leaf concentrations of total S, sulfate and glutathione changed over time and were not suitable for diagnosing S deficiency early in the growth season. The N:S ratio was more reliable but involved two analytical measurements. A practical and reliable indicator for S deficiency was the malate:sulfate peak area ratio as measured by ion chromatography, which required only a single analysis and was independent of the time of sampling or calibration of the samples. A malate:sulfate ratio ≤ 1 indicated S sufficiency at the time of sampling, whereas a ratio > 1 suggested S deficiency at the time of sampling. The malate:sulfate ratio was reliable at growth stage 3.6–3.7 (flower stalks extending to first flowers yellow) for oilseed rape and at growth stage 22–25 (main stem and 2–5 tillers) for wheat, which was sufficiently early in the growth season to apply remedial sulfur fertilizer, if necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson M E 1985 Tissue glutathione. In Handbook of Methods for Oxygen Radical Research. Ed. R A Greenwald. pp 317–323. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake-Kalff M M A, Harrison K R, Hawkesford M J, Zhao F J and McGrath S P 1998 Distribution of sulfur within oilseed rape leaves in response to sulfur deficiency during vegetative growth. Plant Physiol. 118, 1337–1344.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Zandstra M 1989 Nitrate accumulation in vegetables and its relationship to quality. Ann. Appl. Biol. 115, 553–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosland A R, Zhao F J and McGrath S P 2000 An inter-laboratory comparison of sulphur and nitrogen analysis in plants and soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. (in press).

  • Dijkshoorn W and Van Wijk A L 1966 The sulphur requirement of plants as evidenced by the sulphur- nitrogen ratio in the organic matter: A review of published data. Plant Soil 26, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MB 1986 Sulfur availability indexes. In Sulfur in Agriculture, Vol 27. Ed. M A Tabatabai. pp 549–566. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff M J 1991 Long-term effects of SO2 on plants, SO2 metabolism and regulation of intracellular pH. Plant Soil 131, 235–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lance C and Rustin P 1984 The central role of malate in plant metabolism. Physiol. Veg. 22, 625–641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinoia E and Rentsch D 1994 Malate compartmentation - responses to a complex metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 45, 447–467.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath S P and Zhao F J 1996 Sulphur uptake, yield responses and the interactions between nitrogen and sulphur in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 126, 53–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath S P, Zhao F J and Withers P J A 1996 Development of sulphur deficiency in crops and its treatment. Proceedings of the Fertilizer Society, No 379. The Fertilizer Society, Petersborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton A 1998 Critical sulfur concentrations in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in relation to nitrogen supply and to plant age. Aus. J. Exp. Agric. 38, 511–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randall P J and Wrigley C W 1986 Effects of sulfur supply on the yield, composition and quality of grain from cereals, oilseeds and legumes. Adv. Cereal Sci. Tech. 8, 171–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen P E, Ramig R E, Ekin L G and Rohde C R 1977 Tissue analyses guidelines for diagnosing sulfur deficiency in white wheat. Plant Soil 46, 153–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife A and Burns I G 1986 The sulphate-S/total S ratio in plants as an index of their sulphur status. Plant Soil 91, 61–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer K and Freney J R 1980 Assessing the sulfur status of fieldgrown wheat by plant analysis. Agron. J. 72, 469–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner M E 1978 Interpretation of nutrient ratios in plant tissue. Commun. Soil Plant Anal. 9, 335–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester-Bradley R and Makepeace R J 1984 A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Asp. Appl. Biol. 6, 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beusichem M L, Kirkby E A and Baas R 1988 Influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the uptake, assimilation, and distribution of nutrients in Ricinus communis. Plant Physiol. 86, 914–921.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Withers P J A, Tytherleigh A R J and O'Donnell F M 1995 Effect of sulphur fertilizers on the grain yield and sulphur content of cereals. J. Agric. Sci. 125, 317–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zadok J C, Chang T T and Konzak C F 1974 A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14, 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F J, McGrath S P 1994 Soil extractable sulphate and organic sulphur and their availability to plants. Plant Soil 164, 243–250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F J, Hawkesford M J, Warrilow A G S, McGrath S P and Clarkson D T 1996 Responses of two wheat varieties to sulphur addition and diagnosis of sulphur deficiency. Plant Soil 181, 317–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F J, Hawkesford M J and McGrath S P 1999 Sulphur assimilation and the effects on yield and quality of wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 30, 1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.M.A. Blake-Kalff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake-Kalff, M., Hawkesford, M., Zhao, F. et al. Diagnosing sulfur deficiency in field-grown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Plant and Soil 225, 95–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026503812267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026503812267

Navigation