Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt
Date with the Pharaohs
Ancient Egypt dominated the Mediterranean world for several thousand years. However, the absolute chronology of this civilization has been uncertain, even though the sequence of rulers is well documented. Bronk Ramsey et al. (p. 1554; see the Perspective by Bruins) now provide a detailed radiocarbon-based record using more than 200 samples that spans much of this time and reduces uncertainties in some cases to less than 20 years. To avoid artifacts, the authors dated only short-lived plant remains from known contexts (i.e., that were associated with specific reigns). They then used the known reign lengths as a further constraint to obtain a final chronology. The final dates agree most closely with the previous older chronology but force some revisions to the timing of events in the Old Kingdom, the period in the third millennium B.C.E. when Egypt attained its first continuous peak of civilization.
Abstract
The historical chronologies for dynastic Egypt are based on reign lengths inferred from written and archaeological evidence. These floating chronologies are linked to the absolute calendar by a few ancient astronomical observations, which remain a source of debate. We used 211 radiocarbon measurements made on samples from short-lived plants, together with a Bayesian model incorporating historical information on reign lengths, to produce a chronology for dynastic Egypt. A small offset (19 radiocarbon years older) in radiocarbon levels in the Nile Valley is probably a growing-season effect. Our radiocarbon data indicate that the New Kingdom started between 1570 and 1544 B.C.E., and the reign of Djoser in the Old Kingdom started between 2691 and 2625 B.C.E.; both cases are earlier than some previous historical estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Supplementary Material
References and Notes
1
Ward W. A., The present status of the Egyptian chronology. Bull. Am. Schools Orient. Res. 288, 53 (1992).
2
Kitchen K. A., The chronology of ancient Egypt. World Archaeol. 23, 201 (1991).
3
M. Bietak, Ed., The Synchronisation of Civilizations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium BC (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenshaften, Vienna, 2001).
4
M. Bietak, Ed., The Synchronisation of Civilizations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium BC II (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenshaften, Vienna, 2003).
5
M. Bietak, E. Czerny, Eds., The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium BC III (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna, 2007).
6
K. A. Kitchen, in (5), pp. 163–171.
7
Brock F., Higham T. F. G., Ditchfield P., Ramsey C. Bronk, Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52, 103 (2010).
8
Wild E. M., et al., 14C dating of the Upper Paleolithic site at Krems-Hundssteig in Lower Austria. Radiocarbon 50, 1 (2008).
9
Hua Q., et al., Radiocarbon in tropical tree rings during the Little Ice Age. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 223–224, 489 (2004).
10
Bruhn F., Duhr A., P. M. Grootes, A. Mintrop, M.-J. Nadeau, Chemical removal of conservation substances by Soxhlet-type extraction. Radiocarbon 43, 229 (2001).
11
M. Dee, C. Bronk Ramsey, Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B 172, 449 (2000).
12
Ramsey C. Bronk, Higham T., Leach P., Towards high-precision AMS: Progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46, 17 (2004).
13
Cottereau E., et al., Artemis, the new 14C AMS at LMC14 in Saclay, France. Radiocarbon 49, 291 (2007).
14
Steier P., Dellinger F., Kutschera W., Rom W., Wild E. M., Pushing the precision of 14C measurements with AMS. Radiocarbon 46, 5 (2004).
15
Reimer P. J., et al., IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0-26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46, 1029 (2004).
16
Ramsey C. Bronk, Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337 (2009).
17
Ramsey C. Bronk, Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51, 1023 (2009).
18
I. Shaw, Ed., The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).
19
Dee M. W., et al., Investigating the likelihood of a reservoir offset in the radiocarbon record for ancient Egypt. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 687 (2009).
20
Kromer B., et al., Regional 14CO2 offsets in the troposphere: Magnitude, mechanisms, and consequences. Science 294, 2529 (2001).
21
E. Hornung, R. Krauss, D. A. Warburton, Eds., Ancient Egyptian Chronology (Brill, Leiden, Netherlands, 2006).
22
Franke D., Zur Chronologie des Mittleren Reiches (12. – 18. Dynastie). Teil I: Die 12. Dynastie. Orientalia 57, 113 (1988).
23
R. Krauss, Sothis- und Monddaten: Studien zur astronomischen und technischen Chronologie altägyptens (Gerstenberg, Hildesheim, Germany, 1985).
24
Spence K., Ancient Egyptian chronology and the astronomical orientation of pyramids. Nature 408, 320 (2000).
25
Rawlins D., Pickering K., Ancient chronology: Astronomical orientation of the pyramids. Nature 412, 699 (2001).
26
Bonani G., et al., Radiocarbon dates of Old and Middle Kingdom monuments in Egypt. Radiocarbon 43, 1297 (2001).
27
M. Bietak, F. Höflmayer, in The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium BC III, M. Bietak, E. Czerny, Eds. (Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna, 2007), pp. 13–23.
28
Manning S. W., et al., Chronology for the Aegean Late Bronze Age 1700-1400 B.C. Science 312, 565 (2006).
29
Friedrich W. L., et al., Santorini eruption radiocarbon dated to 1627–1600 B.C. Science 312, 548 (2006).
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 328 | Issue 5985
18 June 2010
18 June 2010
Copyright
Copyright © 2010, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Submission history
Received: 10 March 2010
Accepted: 3 May 2010
Published in print: 18 June 2010
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. F/08 622/A). The botanical specimens were from the Oxford University Herbaria and the Natural History Museum, London. Archaeological samples were from Ägyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, Berlin; Ashmolean Museum, Oxford; Bolton Museum and Art Gallery; British Museum, London; City Museum and Art Gallery, Bristol, UK; Cornell University, New York; Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada; Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna; The Manchester Museum; Medelhavsmuseet, Stockholm; Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Musée du Louvre, Paris; Musées royaux d’art et d’histoire, Brussels; National Museums, Liverpool, UK; The Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archeology, London; The Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK; Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst, Munich; and the Victoria Museum of Egyptian Antiquities, Uppsala University, Sweden. The Oxford laboratory infrastructure was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and software development by English Heritage. The Illahun, Heqanakht, and Hatshepsut measurements and research were funded by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (grant no. I-2069-1230.4/2004); preliminary background research was aided by the SCIEM2000 project. The dating at Saclay was performed at the LMC14 (funded by CNRS, CEA, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, and Ministère de La Culture).
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
- Christopher Bronk Ramsey et al.
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory, Science Advances, 6, 12, (2020)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1096
- Radiocarbon re-dating of contact-era Iroquoian history in northeastern North America, Science Advances, 4, 12, (2018)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aav0280
- Annual radiocarbon record indicates 16th century BCE date for the Thera eruption, Science Advances, 4, 8, (2018)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aar8241
- Climate change and water management in the biblical city of Dan, Science Advances, 3, 11, (2017)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1700954
Loading...
View Options
Check Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Register for free to read this article
As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.