$29.95
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Tuesday, May 7 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery Friday, May 3. Order within 19 hrs 11 mins
In Stock
$$29.95 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$29.95
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Amazon book clubs early access

Join or create book clubs

Choose books together

Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

From MAD to Madness: Inside Pentagon Nuclear War Planning Paperback – December 14, 2016

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 9 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$29.95","priceAmount":29.95,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"29","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"95","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"Ae%2FFRTEdOlKSv6ZPLuaFNkK8rOjiOIODZEdmc4BW%2FjjYuuDpSh1OZ3EwO5q4K%2Fj15xjYgCZBxIuQ4FhfOo0lHc27F2ggfr7OU71T4x4BHJJ2dnpWFQsLOiZsRN573JZsZkkIcbfAdY2kYlG1ACHSjA%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

This deathbed memoir by Dr. Paul H. Johnstone, former senior analyst in the Strategic Weapons Evaluation Group (WSEG) in the Pentagon and a co-author of The Pentagon Papers, provides an authoritative analysis of the implications of nuclear war that remain insurmountable today. Indeed, such research has been kept largely secret, with the intention “not to alarm the public” about what was being cooked up. This is the story of how U.S. strategic planners in the 1950s and 1960s worked their way to the conclusion that nuclear war was unthinkable. It drives home these key understandings: • That whichever way you look at it -- and this book shows the many ways analysts tried to skirt the problem -- nuclear war means mutual destruction • That Pentagon planners could accept the possibility of totally destroying another nation, while taking massive destructive losses ourselves, and still conclude that “we would prevail”. • That the supposedly “scientific answers” provided to a wide range of unanswerable questions are of highly dubious standing. • That official spheres neglect anything near a comparable effort to understand the “enemy” point of view, rather than to annihilate him, or to use such understanding to make peace. Dr. Johnstone’s memoirs of twenty years in the Pentagon tell that story succinctly, coolly and objectively. He largely lets the facts speak for themselves, while commenting on the influence of the Cold War spirit of the times and its influence on decision-makers. Johnstone writes: “Theorizing about nuclear war was a sort of virtuoso exercise in creating an imaginary world wherein all statements must be consistent with each other, but nothing need be consistent with reality because there was no reality to be checked against.” While remaining highly secret – so much so that Dr. Johnstone himself was denied access to what he had written – these studies had a major impact on official policy. They contributed to a shift from the notion that the United States could inflict “massive retaliation” on its Soviet enemy to recognition that a nuclear exchange would bring about Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). The alarming truth today is that these lessons seem to have been forgotten in Washington, just as United States policy has become as hostile to Russia as it was toward the Soviet Union during the Cold War. U.S. foreign policy is pursuing hostile encirclement of two major nuclear powers, Russia and China. Without public debate, apparently without much of any public interest, the United States is preparing to allocate a trillion dollars over the next thirty years to modernize its entire nuclear arsenal. It is as if all that was once understood about the danger of nuclear war has been forgotten.

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"From MAD to Madness could not be more timely reading. In it, a former senior Pentagon analyst from the last Cold War comes back from the past to warn us of the disaster we are courting in the new Cold War. We should heed his warning." -- -Ron Paul, M.D., Former Member of Congress (R-TX)

"Johnstone, who was there, depicts the thinking inside the Pentagon -- and the thinking is sheer insanity..." -- David Swanson, War Is a Lie

About the Author

Dr. Paul H. Johnstone was a senior analyst in the Strategic Weapons Evaluation Group (WSEG) in the Pentagon. He was assistant director of three crucial studies on outcomes of nuclear war and the director of a fourth, on the impact on civilians. He also initiated a series of "critical incident" studies recounting decision-making problems, which led to the McNamara study of the errors of Vietnam war policy known as The Pentagon Papers and was one of its authors.

Diana Johnstone is a former European editor of In These Times and press officer of the Green group in the European Parliament from 1990 to 1996. She is the author of The Politics of Euromissiles, Fools' Crusade and Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton.. She lives in Paris.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ 0997287098
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Clarity Press, Inc. (December 14, 2016)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 300 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 9780997287097
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0997287097
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.01 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 9 ratings

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
9 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2017
The Fog of Cold War.
The superb memoir, From MAD to Madness, penned by Paul Johnstone shortly before his death in 1981, is as relevant today as it was during the period that it chronicles. 1949-1969. That was the initial period of the first Cold War when Paul Johnstone served in the Pentagon and when the world trembled as the Berlin Wall Crisis and the Cuban Missile Crises unfolded. It was during that time that the term Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) was coined to describe the nuclear balance of terror between the US and USSR, a balance that hangs over our heads to this very day. Johnstone headed groups that decided the targets to be struck should that Cold War turn hot and helped design the configuration of the unholy nuclear Triad that would attack. Now that we have entered a period which Russian scholar Stephen F. Cohen calls the New Cold War with Russia, Johnstone’s experience is highly instructive. The book is in fact indispensible for scholars of “nuclear war planning,” an odious phrase, but one which is all too much with us. In fact some of what Johnstone wrote is included in the Pentagon Papers.

But the issues that Johnstone raises are relevant not only for scholars, but for each and every one of us since our very existence hangs by a thread increasingly frayed by the incessant anti-Russia drumbeat in our media. Johnstone’s first hand account of decisions during the Cold War shows how ineptly they were made, due to human limitations for getting at the truth and to the obstacles vested interests place in the way. The limited ability of intelligence agencies to ferret out the truth necessarily gives rise to what we might call a fog of Cold War. One of the best ways to appreciate how perilous this renders our existence is to read Johnstone’s depiction of how conclusions were reached and decisions were made back then.

That relevance is inescapable, because it is laid out with considerable insight in a preface and a postscript by Johnstone’s daughter, Diana. Diana Johnstone, a journalist residing in Paris, a frequent commenter on French and U.S. Politics and formerly a Green representative in the EU Parliament is also the author of The Politics of Euromissiles (1984), Greens in the European Parliament - A New Sense of Purpose for Europe (1994), Fool’s Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions (2003), and Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton (2015). Obviously father inspired daughter. In addition, Paul Craig Roberts’s Foreword adds a further dimension to the book since he worked with some of Paul Johnstone’s colleagues of the period and inside the Reagan cabinet when the first Cold War finally came to an end.

Two major contributions of this work stand out. First the danger we face today is even greater than the one we faced in the first Cold War. As Diana Johnstone points out, the collapse of the USSR took us abruptly back to the period between Hiroshima and 1949 when the US had unrivalled power and was often on the brink of using nuclear weapons in an attempt to destroy the USSR and China, a holocaust beyond imagination. Then, when the USSR unexpectedly exploded its first nuclear bomb on August 29, 1949, a balance of nuclear terror replaced the U.S. monopoly on it. When that period of balance came to an end with the collapse of the USSR, the U.S. reverted to the pre-1949 position of sole “superpower” and this led to the doctrine of Paul Wolfowitz and his fellow neoconservatives that the U.S. could and must remain forever in that globally dominant position. And so the idea of using nuclear weapons to preserve the hegemonic status quo gained new currency at that moment. Now the idea floats about again that perhaps the U.S. can assert control of the planet by developing the capacity for a knockout First Strike if only it can invent that lucrative will-o'-the-wisp, an ABM system that actually works. The MAD doctrine that gave rise to the maxim that “nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought,” articulated by Robert McNamara, John F. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev may now be in peril, Diana Johnstone instructs us. The US is at present suffering from a hangover of the decade of America as sole superpower, the 1990s, even though the world is no longer America’s oyster.

Second, the failure of national “intelligence” and the frail reeds upon which that “intelligence” is based are all too apparent in Paul Johnstone’s work. The conclusions reached by the intelligence community are shaped by beliefs and prejudices to which mere facts are subservient. And in addition all too often relevant facts are unattainable. To this we must add the prejudices that grow out of greed or lust for power or the interests of an “ally.” This is clear when we remember that the “intelligence” agencies told us that there were WMD in Iraq or that Iraq was behind 9/11 or now without a shred of evidence that Putin is determining the outcome of U.S. and European elections and somehow hypnotizing Donald J. Trump into subservience. Simply put, Johnstone’s book shows us in detail why the “intelligence” agencies are not to be believed sans convincing evidence. For even when they do not lie outright, they regularly do not have the capacity to get to the truth. So when making existential decisions we are frequently running on empty. The only way forward is to abandon the notion that we can make such existential decisions in a rational way and to get rid of the WMD that can all too easily take us from MAD to madness and on to Armageddon. And one of the best ways to understand that is to read Johnstone’s account of how such decisions were made during the last Cold War. For, unfortunately, it does not appear that much has changed.
18 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2017
The perspective afforded the reader regarding America's stewardship of the nuclear weapon's arsenal by this insightful and authoritative author couldn't be any more timely. While these are events thirty to sixty years ago the relevance to today's geopolitics is stunning. This is insider information affording a window into the decision process as well as the unedited history of our Pentagon and civilian nuclear history allowing the reader to understand issues impossible for the best investigative journalism to uncover. I recommend this book for all citizen;s wanting to enhance their critical thinking regarding our nuclear policies and arsenal.
5 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2018
Ok, but could have been better. I think the issue with all books on this topic is that there is no broadly available declassified files on the actual war plans or policies at the time. This book is no different, with the author recounting the story from his own point of view based on his first had experience of being an analyst at the time.

Still, a worthy read for whoever is interested in the historical point of view.
Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2017
good researched book
2 people found this helpful
Report