Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1396

Cover-ups of unethical actions are undesirable and often costly. However, existing theory is unclear on when and why some cover-ups are punished less severely by in-group third parties compared to out-group third parties. Drawing on theories of attribution and social identity, we theorize that the punishment of cover-ups by in- and out-group third parties depends on the type of cover-up: specifically, whether individuals conceal their own unethical transgressions (personal cover-ups) or the unethical transgressions of another individual (relational cover-ups). By highlighting this distinction, we hypothesize and find across three studies that in-group third parties punish relational—but not personal—cover-ups less severely than out-group third parties. Moreover, we theorize and find support for the mediating role of perceptions of group loyalty. Our theory and results reveal the ways in which different forms of cover-ups can escape severe punishment, and offer important theoretical contributions for research on unethical behavior, social identity, and loyalty.

REFERENCES

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. 1988. Comments on the motivational status of self‐esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 317–334. Google Scholar
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179–211. Google Scholar
  • Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. 1985. The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 563–579. Google Scholar
  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. 2004. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18: 39–53. Google Scholar
  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. 2006. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 653–668. Google Scholar
  • Arvey, R., & Jones, A. P. 1985. The use of discipline in organizational settings: A framework for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 367–408. Google Scholar
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. 2003. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 1–52. Google Scholar
  • Baker, B., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., & Johnson, M. 2019. Stock market responses to unethical behavior in organizations: An organizational context model. Organization Science, 30: 319–336. Google Scholar
  • Bauman, C. W., Tost, L. P., & Ong, M. 2016. Blame the shepherd not the sheep: Imitating higher-ranking transgressors mitigates punishment for unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137: 123–141. Google Scholar
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497–529. Google Scholar
  • Blader, S. L., Patil, S., & Packer, D. J. 2017. Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37: 19–34. Google Scholar
  • Boeckmann, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. 1997. Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community: When do people receive procedural protections from others? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3: 362–380. Google Scholar
  • Bonner, J. M., Greenbaum, R. L., & Quade, M. J. 2017. Employee unethical behavior to shame as an indicator of self-image threat and exemplification as a form of self-image protection: The exacerbating role of supervisor bottom-line mentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 1203–1221. Google Scholar
  • Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. 1993. In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19: 381–388. Google Scholar
  • Brewer, M. B. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 307–324. Google Scholar
  • Brewer, M. B. 1999. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55: 429–444. Google Scholar
  • Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. 2001. Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model . In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research: 471–499. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Burris, E. R. 2012. The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 851–875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105. Google Scholar
  • Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. 2012. A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37: 441–470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Castano, E. 2008. On the perils of glorifying the in‐group: Intergroup violence, in‐group glorification, and moral disengagement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2: 154–170. Google Scholar
  • Caulfield, M., & Laufer, W. S. 2018. The promise of corporate character theory. Iowa Law Review Bull, 103: 101. Retrieved from https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/online/volume-103/the-promise-of-corporate-character-theory Google Scholar
  • Chossière, G. P., Malina, R., Ashok, A., Dedoussi, I. C., Eastham, S. D., Speth, & Barrett, S. R. H. 2017. Public health impacts of excess NOx emissions from Volkswagen diesel passenger vehicles in Germany. Environmental Research Letters, 12. Published online. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5987 Google Scholar
  • Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. 2008. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 61–149. Google Scholar
  • Darley, J. M. 1994. Organizations as a source of immoral behavior. Global Bioethics, 7: 53–63. Google Scholar
  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. 2003. The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 324–336. Google Scholar
  • DeCelles, K. A., & Aquino, K. 2017. Vigilantes at work: Examining the frequency of dark knight employees. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2960941 Google Scholar
  • DeCelles, K. A., & Aquino, K. 2020. Dark knights: When and why an employee becomes a workplace vigilante. Academy of Management Review, 45: 528–548. Google Scholar
  • DeRue, D. S., & Wellman, N. 2009. Developing leaders via experience: The role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 859–875. Google Scholar
  • Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. 1985. Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10: 823–836. Google Scholar
  • Dragoni, L. 2005. Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: the role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1084–1095. Google Scholar
  • Efran, M. G. 1974. The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8: 45–54. Google Scholar
  • Ellemers, N., van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. 1997. Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23: 186–198. Google Scholar
  • Elliston, F. A. 1982. Civil disobedience and whistleblowing: A comparative appraisal of two forms of dissent. Journal of Business Ethics, 1: 23–28. Google Scholar
  • Feather, N. T. 1996. Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 571–587. Google Scholar
  • Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. 2010. The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136: 894–914. Google Scholar
  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. 1985. A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49: 87–96. Google Scholar
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 878–902. Google Scholar
  • Flanagan, J. C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51: 327–358. Google Scholar
  • Fragale, A. R., Rosen, B., Xu, C., & Merideth, I. 2009. The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 53–65. Google Scholar
  • Furnham, A. 2003. Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34: 795–817. Google Scholar
  • Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. 2000. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 708–724. Google Scholar
  • Giacalone, R. A., & Promislo, M. D. 2013. Broken when entering: The stigmatization of goodness and business ethics education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 86–101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. 2009. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20: 393–398. Google Scholar
  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. 2013. Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93: 285–292. Google Scholar
  • Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. 2012. Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119: 15–26. Google Scholar
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
  • Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. 2010. And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31: 624–628. Google Scholar
  • Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. 2014. Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106: 148–168. Google Scholar
  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96: 1029–1046. Google Scholar
  • Graham, J. W., & Keeley, M. 1992. Hirschman’s loyalty construct. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5: 191–200. Google Scholar
  • Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. 2009. Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62: 31–55. Google Scholar
  • Greene, J. & Haidt, J. 2002. How (and where) does moral judgement work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 517–523. Google Scholar
  • Hayes, A. F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Google Scholar
  • Heck, W. P. 1992. Police who snitch: Deviant actors in a secret society. Deviant Behavior, 13: 253–270. Google Scholar
  • Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
  • Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. 2016. Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132: 16–36. Google Scholar
  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25: 121–140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. 1982. Formal and informal social controls of employee deviance. Sociological Quarterly, 23: 333–343. Google Scholar
  • Horn, L. 2017. Keeping employees loyal and content in the 21st century. Integrated Studies, 81. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/bis437/81 Google Scholar
  • Hotten, R. 2015, December 10. Volkswagen: The scandal explained. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772 Google Scholar
  • Hutchison, P., & Abrams, D. 2003. Ingroup identification moderates stereotype change in reaction to ingroup deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 497–506. Google Scholar
  • Johnson, D. 1981. Expose or cover-up: Will an employee blow the whistle? Management Accounting, 59: 32–36. Google Scholar
  • Kakkar, H., Sivanathan, N., & Gobel, M. 2020. Fall from grace: The role of dominance and prestige in the punishment of high-status actors. Academy of Management Journal, 63. Published online ahead of print. doi: 10.5465/amj.2017.0729 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. 1980. Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 457–501. Google Scholar
  • Kennedy, J. A., & Anderson, C. 2017. Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank suppresses objection to unethical practices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139: 30–49. Google Scholar
  • Kennedy, J., McDonnell, M. H., & Stephens, N. 2016, April 25. Does gender raise the ethical bar? Exploring the punishment of ethical violations at work (Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management Research paper 2770012). Published online. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2770012 Google Scholar
  • Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. 2010. The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 943–969.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff, G. J., & Galinsky, A. D. 2017. The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69: 156–162. Google Scholar
  • Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., Gallo, E., & Reade, J. 2016. Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 59. Published online ahead of print. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0545 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • King, G., & Hermodson, A. 2000. Peer reporting of coworker wrongdoing: A qualitative analysis of observer attitudes in the decision to report versus not report unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28: 309–329. Google Scholar
  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. 2009. Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 163–193. Google Scholar
  • Kleinke, C. L., Wallis, R., & Stalder, K. 1992. Evaluation of a rapist as a function of expressed intent and remorse. Journal of Social Psychology, 132: 525–537. Google Scholar
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33: 363–374. Google Scholar
  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. 2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 815–852. Google Scholar
  • Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. 2015. Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126: 88–106. Google Scholar
  • Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. 2017. TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49: 433–442. Google Scholar
  • Litzky, B. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kidder, D. L. 2006. The good, the bad, and the misguided: How managers inadvertently encourage deviant behaviors. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20: 91–103.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lykken, D. T. 1968. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70: 151–159. Google Scholar
  • Malamut, A. B., & Offermann, L. R. 2001. Coping with sexual harassment: Personal, environmental, and cognitive determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1152–1166. Google Scholar
  • Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. 2014. A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25: 147–186. Google Scholar
  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. 1988. The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 1–16. Google Scholar
  • Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., & Dasborough, M. T. 2011. Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32: 144–149. Google Scholar
  • Mayer, D. M., Nurmohamed, S., Treviño, L. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Schminke, M. 2013. Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121: 89–103. Google Scholar
  • Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. 1989. Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40: 45–81. Google Scholar
  • Miller, D. T., & Vidmar, N. 1981. The social psychology of punishment reactions . In M. J. LernerS. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: 145–172. Boston, MA: Springer. Google Scholar
  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. 2015. Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1040–1055. Google Scholar
  • Mitchell, M. S., Baer, M. D., Ambrose, M. L., Folger, R., & Palmer, N. F. 2018. Cheating under pressure: A self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 54–73. Google Scholar
  • Moberg, D. J. 2006. Best intentions, worst results: Grounding ethics students in the realities of organizational context. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5: 307–316.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore, C., & Gino, F. 2013. Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33: 53–77. Google Scholar
  • Morrison, E. W. 2011. Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 373–412.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224–247. Google Scholar
  • Mullen, B., & Hu, L. T. 1989. Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10: 233–252. Google Scholar
  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. 1995. Effective-whistle blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20: 679–708. Google Scholar
  • O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. 2011. A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36: 526–543.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parks, C. D., & Stone, A. B. 2010. The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 303–310. Google Scholar
  • Pershing, J. L. 2002. Whom to betray? Self-regulation of occupational misconduct at the United States Naval Academy. Deviant Behavior, 23: 149–175. Google Scholar
  • Pizarro, D., Uhlmann, E., & Salovey, P. 2003. Asymmetry in judgments of moral blame and praise: The role of perceived metadesires. Psychological Science, 14: 267–272. Google Scholar
  • Polman, E., Pettit, N. C., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. 2013. Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49: 614–623. Google Scholar
  • Pyszczynski, T. A., & Greenberg, J. 1981. Role of disconfirmed expectancies in the instigation of attributional processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40: 31–38. Google Scholar
  • Riley, C. 2017, September 29. Volkswagen’s diesel scandal costs hit $30 billion. CNN. Retrieved from https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/29/investing/volkswagen-diesel-cost-30-billion/index.html Google Scholar
  • Robinson, S. 2012. Fierce loyalty: Unlocking the DNA of wildly successful communities. Birmingham, AL: Hayfield Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. W. 2016. Perceptions of employee volunteering: Is it “credited” or “stigmatized” by colleagues? Academy of Management Journal, 59: 611–635.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, J. N. 2007. Whistle-blowing and the code of silence in police agencies: Policy and structural predictors. Crime & Delinquency, 53: 605–632. Google Scholar
  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. 1999. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 574–586. Google Scholar
  • Shah, R. 2010. Spam hurts crowdsourcing but can’t kill it. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/rawnshah/2010/12/17/spam-hurts-crowdsourcing-but-cant-kill-it/#5bad58bb7d73 Google Scholar
  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22: 1359–1366. Google Scholar
  • Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man; social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. 2005. Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26: 183–229. Google Scholar
  • Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. 2000. Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26: 1367–1379. Google Scholar
  • Stashevsky, S., & Weisberg, J. 2003. Covering-up behaviour in organizations . In A. SagieS. StashevskyM. Koslowsky (Eds.), Misbehaviour and dysfunctional attitudes in organizations: 57–78. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  • Staub, E. 2016. Individual and societal (group) values in a motivational perspective and their role in benevolence and harmdoing . In N. EisenbergJ. ReykowskiE. Staub (Eds.) Social and moral values: 63–80. London, U.K.: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Staw, B. M. 2016. Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3: 1–19. Google Scholar
  • Steinmetz, J., Sezer, O., & Sedikides, C. 2017. Impression mismanagement: People as inept self‐presenters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11: e1232. Published online. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12321 Google Scholar
  • Stokan, E. 2017, November 30. Competition for Amazon’s HQ2 shows how keen local governments are to offer incentives to attract firms [Blog post]. USAPP–American Politics and Policy. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/11/30/competition-for-amazons-hq2-0-shows-how-keen-local-governments-are-to-offer-incentives-to-attract-firms Google Scholar
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1979. Psychology of intergroup relations . In W. G. AustinS. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations: 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Google Scholar
  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith‐Crowe, K. 2008. Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 545–607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. 2015. Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 98–113. Google Scholar
  • Treviño, L. K. 1992. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17: 647–676.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. 2014. (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65: 635–660. Google Scholar
  • Treviño, L. K., & Victor, B. 1992. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 38–64. Google Scholar
  • Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. 1979. Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9: 187–204. Google Scholar
  • Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. 2010. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 769–780. Google Scholar
  • U.S. News. 2017. U.S. News & World Report best colleges ranking [Data set]. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges Google Scholar
  • Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. 2004. Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 585–598. Google Scholar
  • Waytz, A., & Young, L. 2018. Morality for us versus them . In K. J. GrayJ. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology: 186–192. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Weidman, A. C., Sowden, W. J., Berg, M. K., & Kross, E. 2019. Punish or protect? How close relationships shape responses to moral violations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46: 693–708. Google Scholar
  • Weiner, B. 1995. Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Wellman, N., Mayer, D. M., Ong, M., & DeRue, D. S. 2016. When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 793–814. Google Scholar
  • Welsh, D. T., Ordóñez, L. D., Snyder, D. G., & Christian, M. S. 2015. The slippery slope: How small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 114–127. Google Scholar
  • Yip, J. A., Schweitzer, M. E., & Nurmohamed, S. 2018. Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144: 125–144. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900