Advertisement
Scientific Life| Volume 32, ISSUE 11, P803-805, November 2017

Download started.

Ok

Publishing with Objective Charisma: Breaking Science’s Paradox

Published:July 19, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.011
      Good writing takes time, but in a research environment where speed is master, is it a superfluous pursuit? Scientists spend most of their working life writing, yet our writing style obstructs its key purpose: communication. We advocate more accessible prose that boosts the influence of our publications. For those who change, the proof of their success will be science that is read, understood, and remembered.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      Read-It-Now

      Purchase access to all full-text HTML articles for 6 or 36 hr at a low cost. Click here to explore this opportunity.

      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Trends in Ecology & Evolution
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lanham R.A.
        Revising Prose.
        Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1979
        • Sword H.
        Stylish Academic Writing.
        Harvard University Press, 2012
        • Montgomery S.L.
        The Chigao Guide to Communicating Science.
        University of Chigao Press, 2003
        • Pinker S.
        The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century.
        Penguin, 2015
        • Ruben A.
        How to read a scientific paper.
        Science. 2016; (Published online January 20, 2016)https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.a1600012
        • Scheffer M.
        • et al.
        Dual thinking for scientists.
        Ecol. Soc. 2015; 20: 3
        • Ledford H.
        How to solve the world’s biggest problems.
        Nature. 2015; 525: 308-311
        • Hillier A.
        • et al.
        Narrative style influences citation frequency in climate change science.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0167983
        • Kuhn T.S.
        The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
        University of Chicago Press, 1996
        • Delanty G.
        The idea of the university in the global era: from knowledge as an end to the end of knowledge?.
        Soc. Epistemol. 1998; 12: 3-25
        • Kuehne L.M.
        • Olden J.D.
        Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015; 112: 3585-3586
        • Thomas F.-N.
        • Turner M.
        Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose.
        Princeton University Press, 2011
        • Limerick P.N.
        Dancing with professors: the trouble with academic prose.
        in: Zamel V. Spack R. Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and Learning across Languages and Cultures. Routledge, 1998: 207-215
        • Suleski J.
        • Ibaraki M.
        Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: a quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media.
        ‎Public Underst. Sci. 2010; 19: 115-125
        • Lubchenco J.
        Environmental science in a post-truth world.
        Front. Ecol. Environ. 2017; 15: 3

      Linked Article

      • Let Scientific Writing Evolve, Not Stagnate
          Doubleday et al.
        Trends in Ecology & EvolutionSeptember 10, 2018
        • In Brief
          Research articles are the currency of scientists: they are traded and they are exchanged. They validate what we do and they keep us employed. We agree with O’Connor and Cargill that no single genre of science communication can accommodate all purposes of science communication and that the research article is indeed an essential foundation to other forms of science communication [1].
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      View full text