Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative teacher research: integrating professional learning and university study

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In line with teaching standards requiring teachers to evidence research capacities, this paper explores responses to a professional learning programme designed in partnership by an educational authority and a university. Intended to enable practising teachers to develop research capacities and complete postgraduate qualifications, the professional learning programme featured collaboration, distributed leadership and participatory action research. Focusing on the experiences and responses of teachers participating in the collaborative project, data collected through teacher interviews, focus groups, researcher observations and teacher-and-student documentation were analysed. Findings indicate that a collaborative practice-based approach to professional learning and postgraduate studies developed teacher appetite for, appreciation of and emerging capacities in both empirical and conceptual research including defining a research question; reviewing literature; conducting an action research project; engaging with evidence; criticality; and reporting on findings. Enabling conditions of and limitations to the development of research-based capacities are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). My School. Retrieved 24 May 2018 from https://www.myschool.edu.au.

  • Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian Qualifications Framework, Second edition. Retrieved 24 May 2018 from: https://www.aqf.edu.au/sites/aqf/files/aqf-2nd-edition-january-2013.pdf.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2014). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Melbourne: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguley, M., Findlay, Y., & Kerby, M. (Eds.). (2015). Meanings and motivation in education research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (2018). Collaborative inquiry as an authentic form of professional development for preschool practitioners. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1452770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1999). Teacher practitioner research: Academics and teachers as knowledge producers and partners in learning communities. Australian Educational Researcher, 26(3), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Liston, D., & Whitcomb, J. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Creswell, D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(9), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (2004). Using research to improve practice: The notion of evidence-based practice. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 264–290). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough, K. (2011). Examining the long-term impact of collaborative action research on teacher identity and practice: The perceptions of K–12 teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., Murray, L., Care, E., Thomas, A., & Perri, P. (2010). Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F., & Augustin, D. (2018). Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: Potential and problems. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (2015). Issues of professionalism and teachers: Critical observations from research and the literature. Australian Educational Researcher., 42(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education, 6(15), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (Ed.). (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalising educational accountabilities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, N. M., & Ling, L. M. (2009). The research journey: A Lonely Planet approach. Issues in Educational Research, 19(1), 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2000). Action Research: A brief overview. 14 paragraphs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(1). Article 17. Retrieved 24 May 2018 from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001173.

  • Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2016). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., & Beckett, D. (2010). Educational research: Creative thinking and doing. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2011). Becoming a teacher researcher in literacy teaching and learning: Strategies and tools for the inquiry process. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA). (2018). Primary English Teaching Association Research Grants. Retrieved 24 May 2018 from http://www.petaa.edu.au/imis_prod/w/About/PETAA_Research_Grant/w/About/ResearchGrant.aspx.

  • Ravitch, S. (2014). The transformative power of taking an inquiry stance on practice: Practitioner research as narrative and counter-narrative. Perspectives on Urban Education., 11(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B., Burman, E., Delamont, S., Meyer, J., Payne, M., & Thorpe, R. (2011). Research in the social sciences. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Theory and methods in social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1976). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stremmel, A. (2007). The value of teacher research: Nurturing professional and personal growth through inquiry. Voices of Practitioners, 2(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swennen, A., Jones, K., & Volman, M. (2010). Teacher educators: Their identities, sub‐identities and implications for professional development. Professional development in education, 36(1–2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hansen, S., Kansanen, P., & Bjorkvist, O. (2007). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett, M., Segal, D., & Walford, W. (2014). National teaching workforce dataset data analysis report. Department of Education, Canberra. Retrieved 24 May 2018 from http://docs.education.gov.au/node/36283.

  • Woods, P. (2013). Researching the art of teaching: Ethnography for educational use. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the support of Catholic Education Melbourne in funding this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Cloonan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cloonan, A. Collaborative teacher research: integrating professional learning and university study. Aust. Educ. Res. 46, 385–403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0290-y

Keywords

Navigation