The functions of program theory

Leonard Bickman,

Leonard Bickman

Peabody College, Vanderbilt University

Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies

Search for more papers by this author

Leonard Bickman,

Leonard Bickman

Peabody College, Vanderbilt University

Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies

Search for more papers by this author

First published: Spring 1987

https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1443

Citations: 137

About

PDF

Tools

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

The role of theory in program evaluation is an important but neglected area in evaluation practice and theory. Program theory has several important functions that can improve our ability to generalize from particular evaluations, contribute to social science theory, and achieve consensus in evaluation planning.

References

Anderson, C. A., and Sechler, E. S. “Effects Explanation and Counterexplanation in the Development and Use of Social Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50, 24–34.
10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.24
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Bandura, A. Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

Google Scholar
Bickman, L. “Program Evaluation and Social Psychology: The Achievement of Relevancy.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 483–490.
10.1177/014616727900500410
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Bickman, L. “Evaluating Prevention Programs.” Journal of Social Issues, 1983, 39, 181.
10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00135.x
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Bickman, L. “Improving Established Statewide Programs: A Component Theory of Evaluation.” Evaluation Review, 1985a, 9, 189–208.
10.1177/0193841X8500900206
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Bickman, L. “Randomized Field Experiments in Education: Implementation Lessons.” In R. Boruch and W. Wothke (eds.), Randomization and Field Experimentation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 28. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985b.

Google Scholar
Bickman, L., and Rog, D. “ The Use of Stakeholders in Planning Evaluations of Early Intervention Programs.” In L. Bickman and D. Weatherford (eds.), Evaluating Early Intervention Programs for Severely Handicapped Children and Their Families. Austin, Tex.: Pro-ed Press, 1986.

Google Scholar
Brenner, M. “ Intensive Interviewing.” In M. Brenner, J. Brown, and D. Canter (eds.), The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. London: Academic Press, 1985.

Web of Science®Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 409–428.
10.1037/h0027982
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Canter, D., Brown, J., and Groat, L. “ A Multiple Sorting Procedure for Studying Conceptual Systems.” In M. Brenner, J. Brown, and D. Canter (eds.), The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches. London: Academic Press, 1985.

Google Scholar
Chen, H.-T., and Rossi, P. H. “ The Multi-Goal, Theory-Driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science.” In H. E. Freeman, and M. A. Solomon (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.

Google Scholar
Chen, H.-T., and Rossi, P. H. “Evaluating with Sense: The Theory-Driven Approach.” Evaluation Review, 1983, 7, 283–302.
10.1177/0193841X8300700301
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. Quasi-Experimentation Design: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Skokie, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1979.

Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., Leviton, L. C., and Shadish, W. R., Jr. “ Program Evaluation.” In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. ( 3rd ed.) New York: Random House, 1985.

Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., and Shadish, W. R., Jr. “Program Evaluation: The Worldly Science.” Annual Review of Psychology, 1986, 37, 193–232.
10.1146/annurev.ps.37.020186.001205
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. Designing Evaluations of Education and Social Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.

Web of Science®Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Hotch, D., and Bickman, L. “ Measuring Children's Health-Related Attitudes and Knowledge.” In L. Bickman (ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 3. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982.

Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., and Mann, L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis on Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press, 1977.

Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W., Crosse, S., Dunkle, J., Pollard, J., and Stobart, G. “Evaluation: The State of the Art and the Sorry State of Science.” In D. S. Cordray (ed.), Utilizing Prior Research in Evaluation Planning. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 27. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.

Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., Ross, and Lepper, M. R. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 2098–2109.
10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Rog, D., and Bickman, L. “The Feedback Research Approach to Evaluation: A Method to Increase Evaluation Utility.” Evaluation and Program Planning, 1984, 7, 169–175.
10.1016/0149-7189(84)90042-9
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rutman, L. Planning Useful Evaluations: Evaluability Assessment. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.

Google Scholar
Scheirer, M. A. Program Implementation: The Organizational Context. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.

Google Scholar
Scriven, M. The Logic of Evaluation. Inverness, Calif.: Edgepress, 1980.

Google Scholar
Scriven, M. “ Evaluation Ideologies.” In G. F. Madavs, M. Scriven, and D. L. Stuffelbeam (eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston, Mass.: Klower-Nijhoff, 1983.

Web of Science®Google Scholar
Shaklee, H., and Fischoff, B. “Strategies of Information Search and Causal Analysis.” Memory and Cognition, 1982, 10, 520–530.
10.3758/BF03202434
Web of Science®Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. “The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry.” Educational Research, 1978, 7, 5–8.
10.3102/0013189X007002005
Google Scholar
Suchman, E. A. Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.

Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., and Bougon, M. G. “ Organization as Cognitive Maps.” In H. P. Simms, and D. A. Gioia (eds.), Social Cognition in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.

Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H. Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Inglewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

Google Scholar
Wholey, J. S. “ Evaluability Assessment.” In L. Rutman (ed.), Evaluative Research Methods: A Basic Guide. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1977.

Google Scholar
Wholey, J. S. Evaluation: Promise and Performance. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, 1979.

Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume1987, Issue33

Special Issue:Using Program Theory in Evaluation

Spring 1987

Pages 5-18

The functions of program theory

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

The functions of program theory

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information