Abstract
This chapter discusses an intervention that promotes civil climate within organizations, designed within the USA Veterans Health Administration and called Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW). Civility in the CREW model refers to workplace behaviors that express interpersonally valuing and being valued by others, and are based on a consciously cultivated awareness of one’s interpersonal impact. CREW process within groups involves regular meetings that create opportunities for an ongoing dialogue where participants clarify and negotiate their understanding of group norms for civil interactions at work. The content of workplace behaviors considered civil is culturally specific to each workplace and is therefore defined by the participating groups themselves, a practice which results in an intentional (conceptually driven) variability in interpreting what constitutes civil behaviors across sites. We discuss the implications of this variability for designing and studying CREW interventions, understanding the mechanisms of change in CREW, and evaluating outcomes.
Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW): An intervention promoting positive organizational culture.
Katerine Osatuke, Sue Dyrenforth & Linda Belton
National Center for Organizational Development
Veterans Hospital Administration
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0_8
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adlerfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.
Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257.
Anderson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.
Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.
Armenakis, A. A., & Zmud, R. W. (1979). Interpreting the measurement of change in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 32, 709–723.
Bartunek, J. M., Rousseau, D. M., Rudolph, J. W., & DePalma, J. A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 182–206.
Baskin, T. W., Tierney, S. C., Minami, T., & Wampold, B. E. (2003). Establishing specificity in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis of structural equivalence of placebo controls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 973–979.
Bohart, A. C., & Tallman, K. (1999). How clients make therapy work: The process of active self-healing. Washington: APA Books.
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (in press). Domain-specificity and intuitive ontology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology handbook. New York: Wiley.
Bozarth, J. D. (1999). Person-centered therapy: A revolutionary paradigm. Ross-On-Wye, UK: PCCS.
Edmondson, A. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 2–28.
Edmondson, A. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group lens. In R. M. Kramer, R. M., Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: Russell Sage.
Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1991). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Golembiewski, R., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133–157.
Greiner, L. E., & Cummings, T. G. (2004). Wanted: OD more alive than dead! Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 374–391.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.
Hutto, D. D. (2004). The limits of spectatorial folk psychology. Mind and Language, 19, 548–573.
Laschinger, H. K. S., & Finegan, J. E. (2005). Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage. Nursing Economics, 23, 6–13.
Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, H. K. S., Day, A., & Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274.
Likert, R. L. (1961). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Maslow, A. H. (1973). Dominance, self-esteem, self-actualization: Germinal papers of A. H. Maslow. New York: Brooks/Cole.
Messer, S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Beyond empirically supported treatments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 580–588.
Millsap, R. E., & Hartog, S. B. (1988). Alpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: A structural equation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 574–584.
Norcross, J. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2011). What works for whom: Tailoring psychotherapy to the person. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 67(2), 127–132.
Osatuke, K., Moore, S. C., Ward, C., Dyrenforth, S. R., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 384–410. doi: 10.1177/0021886309335067i.
Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963–974.
Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altman, R. A., Lacost, H. A., et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.
Pearson, C., Andersson, L., & Porath, C. (2005). Workplace incivility. In P. Spector & S. Fox (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 256–309). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Porras, J. I. (1979). The comparative impact of different OD techniques and intervention intensities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 156–178.
Reddy, W. B. (1994). Intervention skills: Process consultation for small groups and teams. San Diego: Pfeiffer.
Reddy, W. B., & Phillips, G. (1992). Traditional assessment: The way of the dinosaur. OD Practitioner, 24, 1–2.
Rodgers, R., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). The methodological war of the hardheads versus the softheads. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 32(2), 189–208.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256)., Formulation of the person and the social context New York: McGraw Hill.
Rogers, C. R. (1977). Carl Rogers on personal power. New York: Delacorte.
Schein, E. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109–119.
Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading: Addison-Wesley-Longman.
Schein, E. (2006). Culture assessment as an OD intervention. In B. B. Jones & M. Brassel (Eds.), The NTL handbook of organization development and change: Principles, practices, and perspectives (pp. 456–465). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stich, S. P., & Ravenscroft, I. (1994). "What is folk psychology?", Cognition, 50, 447–468.
Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593–618.
Stiles, W. B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 439–458.
The United States Postal Service Commission (2000). Report of the U.S. Postal Service Commission on a Safe and Secure Workplace. Prepared by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University: New York. Retrieved from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS12068.
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1924/78). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Wampold, Bruce E. (2007). Psychotherapy: The humanistic (and effective) treatment. American Psychologist, 62(8), 857–873.
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663.
Young, G. J. (2000). Managing organizational transformations: Lessons from the Veterans Healthcare Administration. California Management Review, 43, 66–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leiter, M. (2013). Civility, Respect, and Engagement (CREW) in the Workplace at the Veterans Health Administration. In: Analyzing and Theorizing the Dynamics of the Workplace Incivility Crisis. SpringerBriefs in Psychology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5570-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5571-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)