Skip to main content

Civility, Respect, and Engagement (CREW) in the Workplace at the Veterans Health Administration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing and Theorizing the Dynamics of the Workplace Incivility Crisis

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL,volume 8))

  • 1381 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses an intervention that promotes civil climate within organizations, designed within the USA Veterans Health Administration and called Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW). Civility in the CREW model refers to workplace behaviors that express interpersonally valuing and being valued by others, and are based on a consciously cultivated awareness of one’s interpersonal impact. CREW process within groups involves regular meetings that create opportunities for an ongoing dialogue where participants clarify and negotiate their understanding of group norms for civil interactions at work. The content of workplace behaviors considered civil is culturally specific to each workplace and is therefore defined by the participating groups themselves, a practice which results in an intentional (conceptually driven) variability in interpreting what constitutes civil behaviors across sites. We discuss the implications of this variability for designing and studying CREW interventions, understanding the mechanisms of change in CREW, and evaluating outcomes.

Civility, Respect, and Engagement in the Workplace (CREW): An intervention promoting positive organizational culture.

Katerine Osatuke, Sue Dyrenforth & Linda Belton

National Center for Organizational Development

Veterans Hospital Administration

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0_8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adlerfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., & Zmud, R. W. (1979). Interpreting the measurement of change in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 32, 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., Rousseau, D. M., Rudolph, J. W., & DePalma, J. A. (2006). On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 182–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, T. W., Tierney, S. C., Minami, T., & Wampold, B. E. (2003). Establishing specificity in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis of structural equivalence of placebo controls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 973–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A. C., & Tallman, K. (1999). How clients make therapy work: The process of active self-healing. Washington: APA Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (in press). Domain-specificity and intuitive ontology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology handbook. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth, J. D. (1999). Person-centered therapy: A revolutionary paradigm. Ross-On-Wye, UK: PCCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 2–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group lens. In R. M. Kramer, R. M., Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1991). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, R., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. E., & Cummings, T. G. (2004). Wanted: OD more alive than dead! Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. D. (2004). The limits of spectatorial folk psychology. Mind and Language, 19, 548–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H. K. S., & Finegan, J. E. (2005). Using empowerment to build trust and respect in the workplace: A strategy for addressing the nursing shortage. Nursing Economics, 23, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, H. K. S., Day, A., & Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. L. (1961). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1973). Dominance, self-esteem, self-actualization: Germinal papers of A. H. Maslow. New York: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Beyond empirically supported treatments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 580–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap, R. E., & Hartog, S. B. (1988). Alpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: A structural equation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2011). What works for whom: Tailoring psychotherapy to the person. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 67(2), 127–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osatuke, K., Moore, S. C., Ward, C., Dyrenforth, S. R., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 384–410. doi: 10.1177/0021886309335067i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altman, R. A., Lacost, H. A., et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C., Andersson, L., & Porath, C. (2005). Workplace incivility. In P. Spector & S. Fox (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 256–309). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I. (1979). The comparative impact of different OD techniques and intervention intensities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 156–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, W. B. (1994). Intervention skills: Process consultation for small groups and teams. San Diego: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, W. B., & Phillips, G. (1992). Traditional assessment: The way of the dinosaur. OD Practitioner, 24, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, R., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). The methodological war of the hardheads versus the softheads. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 32(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3, pp. 184–256)., Formulation of the person and the social context New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1977). Carl Rogers on personal power. New York: Delacorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading: Addison-Wesley-Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. (2006). Culture assessment as an OD intervention. In B. B. Jones & M. Brassel (Eds.), The NTL handbook of organization development and change: Principles, practices, and perspectives (pp. 456–465). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. P., & Ravenscroft, I. (1994). "What is folk psychology?", Cognition, 50, 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The United States Postal Service Commission (2000). Report of the U.S. Postal Service Commission on a Safe and Secure Workplace. Prepared by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University: New York. Retrieved from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS12068.

  • Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1924/78). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, Bruce E. (2007). Psychotherapy: The humanistic (and effective) treatment. American Psychologist, 62(8), 857–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. J. (2000). Managing organizational transformations: Lessons from the Veterans Healthcare Administration. California Management Review, 43, 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Leiter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leiter, M. (2013). Civility, Respect, and Engagement (CREW) in the Workplace at the Veterans Health Administration. In: Analyzing and Theorizing the Dynamics of the Workplace Incivility Crisis. SpringerBriefs in Psychology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5571-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics