Volume 29, Issue 11 p. 2039-2051
RESEARCH PAPER

A changing climate is snuffing out post-fire recovery in montane forests

Kyle C. Rodman

Corresponding Author

Kyle C. Rodman

Department of Geography, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Correspondence

Kyle C. Rodman, Department of Geography, University of Colorado Boulder, GUGG 110, 260 UCB, Boulder, Colorado, 80309, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas T. Veblen

Thomas T. Veblen

Department of Geography, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mike A. Battaglia

Mike A. Battaglia

US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Marin E. Chambers

Marin E. Chambers

Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paula J. Fornwalt

Paula J. Fornwalt

US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Zachary A. Holden

Zachary A. Holden

US Forest Service Northern Region, Missoula, Montana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas E. Kolb

Thomas E. Kolb

School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica R. Ouzts

Jessica R. Ouzts

US Forest Service, Kaibab National Forest, Williams, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Monica T. Rother

Monica T. Rother

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 August 2020
Citations: 43

Abstract

Aim

Climate warming is increasing fire activity in many of Earth’s forested ecosystems. Because fire is a catalyst for change, investigation of post-fire vegetation response is critical to understanding the potential for future conversions from forest to non-forest vegetation types. We characterized the influences of climate and terrain on post-fire tree regeneration and assessed how these biophysical factors might shape future vulnerability to wildfire-driven forest conversion.

Location

Montane forests, Rocky Mountains, USA.

Time period

1981–2099.

Taxa studied

Pinus ponderosa; Pseudotsuga menziesii.

Methods

We developed a database of dendrochronological samples (n = 717) and plots (n = 1,301) in post-fire environments spanning a range of topoclimatic settings. We then used statistical models to predict annual post-fire seedling establishment suitability and total post-fire seedling abundance from a suite of biophysical correlates. Finally, we reconstructed recent trends in post-fire recovery and projected future dynamics using three general circulation models (GCMs) under moderate and extreme CO2 emission scenarios.

Results

Though growing season (April–September) precipitation during the recent period (1981–2015) was positively associated with suitability for post-fire tree seedling establishment, future (2021–2099) trends in precipitation were widely variable among GCMs, leading to mixed projections of future establishment suitability. In contrast, climatic water deficit (CWD), which is indicative of warm, dry conditions, was negatively associated with post-fire seedling abundance during the recent period and was projected to increase throughout the southern Rocky Mountains in the future. Our findings suggest that future increases in CWD and an increased frequency of extreme drought years will substantially reduce post-fire seedling densities.

Main conclusions

This study highlights the key roles of warming and drying in declining forest resilience to wildfire. Moisture stress, driven by macroclimate and topographic setting, will interact with wildfire activity to shape future vegetation patterns throughout the southern Rocky Mountains, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Field data, spatial data, gridded climate data, final statistical models, and example model outputs from this study are available in the Dryad Digital Repository (Rodman, Veblen, Battaglia, et al., 2020): https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qz612jmb7.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.