Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:53:53.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Paleozoic Hyolitha from North America: reexamination of Walcott's and Resser's type specimens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

John Mark Malinky
John Mark Malinky*
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Concepts of the family Hyolithidae Nicholson fide Fisher and the genera Hyolithes Eichwald and Orthotheca Novak have been expanded through time to encompass a variety of morphologically dissimilar shells. The Hyolithidae is here considered to include only those hyolithid species which have a rounded (convex) dorsum; slopes on the dorsum are inflated, and the venter may be flat or slightly inflated. Hyolithes encompasses species which possess a low dorsum and a prominent longitudinal sulcus along each edge of the dorsum; the ligula is short and the apertural rim is flared. The emended concept of Orthotheca includes only those species of orthothecid hyoliths which have a subtriangular transverse outline and longitudinal lirae covering the shell on both dorsum and venter.

Eighteen species of Hyolithes and one species of Orthotheca from the Appalachian region and Western Interior were reexamined in light of more modern taxonomic concepts and standards of quality for type material. Reexamination of type specimens of H. similis Walcott from the Lower Cambrian of Newfoundland, H. whitei Resser from the Lower Cambrian of Nevada, H. billingsi Walcott from the Lower Cambrian of Nevada, H. gallatinensis Resser from the Upper Cambrian of Wyoming, and H. partitus Resser from the Middle Cambrian of Alabama indicates that none of these species represents Hyolithes. Hyolithes similis is here included under the new genus Similotheca, in the new family Similothecidae. Hyolithes whitei is designated as the type species of the new genus Nevadotheca, to which H. billingsi may also belong. Hyolithes gallatinensis is referred to Burithes Missarzhevsky with question, and H. partitus may represent Joachimilites Marek. The type or types of H. attenuatus Walcott, H. cecrops Walcott, H. comptus Howell, H. cowanensis Resser, H. curticei Resser, H. idahoensis Resser, H. prolixus Resser, H. resseri Howell, H. shaleri Walcott, H. terranovicus Walcott, and H. wanneri Resser and Howell lack shells and/or other taxonomically important features such as a complete aperture, rendering the diagnoses of these species incomplete. Their names should only be used for the type specimens until better preserved topotypes become available for study. Morphology of the types of H.? corrugatus Walcott and “Orthotheca” sola Resser does not support placement in the Hyolitha; the affinities of these species are uncertain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , March 1988 , pp. 218 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, J. D. 1981. The Cambrian System in the Southern Canadian Rocky Mountains, Alberta and British Columbia, p. 1–27. In Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System, Guidebook for Field Trip 2.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. M. 1987. Stratigraphy of Cambrian rocks at Bacon Cove, Duffs and Manuels River, Conception Bay, Avalon Peninsula, eastern Newfoundland. Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide—Northeastern Section, p. 467–472.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1847. Pugiunculus, ein fossiles Pteropoden-Geschlect. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrafaktenkunde (1847), p. 554–558.Google Scholar
Barrande, J. 1867. Systeme silurien du centre de la Boheme. Ordres des Pteropodes, 3, 179 p.Google Scholar
Benton, J. M., and Trewin, N. H. 1981. Discussion and comments on Nicholson's 1872 manuscript “Contributions to the study of errant annelides of the older Palaeozoic rocks.” Publication of the Department of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Aberdeen, 1, 16 p.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1861. On some new and little known species of Lower Silurian fossils from the Potsdam group (Primordial zone); on some new species of fossils from the Calciferous, Chazy, Black River, and Trenton Formations. Report on the Geology of Vermont, 2:942–960.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1840. Ueber das silurische Schichtensystem in Ehstland. Zeitschrift für Natur- und Heilkunde, St. Petersburg, 1, 2,210 p.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1860. Lethaea Rossica, Vol. 1, Pt. 2. Stuttgart, 1657 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1962. Small conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, p. W98–W143. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils. Invertebrates. Conularida to Echinoidea and Appendices. A. G. Seiler and Company, New York, Vol. 2, 909 p.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1965. Faunas and stratigraphy of the Snowy Range Formation (Upper Cambrian) in southwestern Montana and northwestern Wyoming. Geological Society of America Memoir 96, 171 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Description of the organic remains of the lower division of the New York system. Palaeontology of New York. Geological Survey of the State of New York, 1, 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1861. Report of the Superintendent of the Geological Survey, exhibiting progress of work, January 1, 1861. Geological Survey of Wisconsin, 52 p.Google Scholar
Holm, G. 1893. Sveriges kambrisk-siluriska Hyolithidae och Conulariidae. Sveriges Geologiska Undersorning, series C, 112, 172 p.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1946. New names for homonym species of Hyolithes. Journal of Paleontology, 20:71.Google Scholar
Landing, E., and Benus, A. P. 1987. Stratigraphy of the Bonavista Group, southeastern Newfoundland: growth faults and the distribution of the sub-trilobitic Lower Cambrian, p. 156–181. In Trace Fossils, Small Shelly Fossils and the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary Proceedings (preprint). New York State Museum Bulletin 463.Google Scholar
Lesley, J. P. 1889. A dictionary of fossils of Pennsylvania. Geological Survey of Pennsylvania, Report P4, Vol. 1, A-M, 437 p.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M. 1987. Taxonomic revision of lower and middle Paleozoic Orthothecida (Hyolitha) from North America and China. Journal of Paleontology, 61:942–959.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M., and Mapes, R. H. 1983. First occurrences of Hyolitha (Mollusca) in the Pennsylvanian of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 57:347–353.Google Scholar
Malinky, J. M., Mapes, R. H., and Broadhead, T. W. 1986. New late Palaeozoic Hyolitha (Mollusca) from Oklahoma and Texas, and their paleoenvironmental significance. Palaeontology, 29:303–312.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1963. New knowledge on the morphology of Hyolithes. Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie, 1:53–72.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1966. New hyolithid genera from the Ordovician of Bohemia. Casopis Narodniho Muzea, 135:89–92.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1967. The class Hyolitha in the Caradoc of Bohemia. Sbornik Geologickych Ved, Paleontologie, 9:51–112.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1972. Middle Cambrian Hyolitha: Maxilites gen. n. Casopis Narodniho Muzea, 141:69–72.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1974. New Lower Ordovician hyolithid genera. Vestnik Ustredniho ustavu geologickeho, 49:287–292.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1975. The discovery of a new hyolithid fauna in the Middle Cambrian of Bohemia. Bohemia centralis, Praha, 4:64–71.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1981. Middle Cambrian hyolithid family Parentilitidae fam. nov. Casopis Narodniho Muzea, 150:163–168.Google Scholar
Marek, L. 1983. The Ordovician hyoliths of Anti-Atlas (Morocco). Sbornik Narodniho Muzea v Praze, Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae, 39, 35 p.Google Scholar
Marek, L., and Galle, A. 1976. The tabulate coral Hyostragulum, an epizoan with bearing on hyolithid ecology and systematics. Lethaia, 9:51–64.Google Scholar
Marek, L., and Yochelson, E. L. 1964. Paleozoic mollusk: Hyolithes. Science, 146:1674–1675Google Scholar
Marek, L., and Yochelson, E. L. 1976. Aspects of the biology of Hyolitha (Mollusca). Lethaia, 9:65–82.Google Scholar
Meshkova, N. P. 1974. Hyoliths of the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform. Nauka Publishing House, Novosibirsk, 97 p.Google Scholar
Missarzhevsky, V. V. 1969. Paleontologic part, p. 112–320. In Raaben, M. E. (ed.), The Tommotian Stage and the Lower Cambrian Boundary Problem. Nauka Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Morris, J. 1845. Fossil faunas, p. 261–312. In Strzelecki, P. E., Physical Description of New South Wales and Van Dieman's Land. Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1872a. On the genera Cornulites and Tentaculites and on a new genus of Conchiolites. American Journal of Science, 3:202–206.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1872b. On Ortonia, a new genus of tubicolar annelides, with notes on the genus Tentaculites. Geological Magazine, 9:446–449Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A., and Lydekker, R. 1889. Manual of Paleontology for the Use of Students with a General Introduction on the Principles of Paleontology. W. Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh, 1, 885 p.Google Scholar
Novak, O. 1886. Zur Kenntniss der fauna der Etage F-f1, in der palaeozischen Schichtengruppe Bohmens. Koniglichen bohmens Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften Sitzungberichten, 27 p.Google Scholar
Novak, O. 1891. Revision der palaeozischen Hyolithiden Bohmens. Abhandlungen der koniglische Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 7, 48 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 1971a. The Cambrian of the Great Basin and adjacent areas, Western U.S., p. 1–78. In Holland, C. H. (ed.), The Cambrian of the New World. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 1971b. The Cambrian of the Appalachian and New England regions, Eastern U.S., p. 169–217. In Holland, C. H. (ed.), The Cambrian of the New World. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1927. The Cambrian, Ozarkian and Canadian faunas of Northwest Greenland. Meddelelser om Gronland, 70:236–343.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1932. Lower Cambrian fauna of East Greenland. Meddelelser om Gronland, 87, 66 p.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., and Zhang, S. 1983. Small shelly fossils from the Xihaoping Member of the Tongying Formation in Fangxian County of Hubei Province and their stratigraphical significance. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 22:83–94.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938a. Cambrian System (restricted) of the southern Appalachians. Geological Society of America Special Paper 15, 140 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938b. Fourth contribution to the study of Cambrian fossils. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97(10), 43 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1938c. Middle Cambrian fossils from Pend Oreille Lake, Idaho. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97(3), 12 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1939a. The Spence Shale and its fauna. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 97(12), 29 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1939b. The Ptarmigania strata of the northern Wasatch Mountains. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 98(24), 71 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1942. Faunal content of the Maryville Formation. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 101(10):1–8.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E., and Howell, B. F. 1938. Lower Cambrian Olenellus zone of the Appalachians. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 49:195–248.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1981. Lower and Middle Cambrian stratigraphy, Twomile Canyon, Malad Range, Idaho, p. 159–164. In Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Great Basin and Vicinity, Western U.S. Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System, Guidebook for Field Trip 1.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1980. Hyolitha: status of the phylum. Lethaia, 13:21–25.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B., Pojeta, J., Neal, J., Taylor, J. D., Taylor, M. E., and McClung, G. 1975. Biology of the Hyolitha. Lethaia, 8:181–191.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1866. Appendix on the fossils, p. 240–381. In Ramsey, A. C., Geology of North Wales. Great Britain Geological Survey Memoir, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Shaler, N. S., and Foerste, A. F. 1888. Preliminary descriptions of North Attleboro fossils. Bulletin of the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology, 16:27–41.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R. 1944. Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 837 p.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1946. Notes on the nomenclature of Hyolithes. Journal of Paleontology, 20:72–85.Google Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., and Bulman, O. M. 1927. The Shineton shales of the Wrekin District. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 83:99–146.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1958. The superorder Hyolithoidea. Fundamentals of Paleontology. Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., 2:184–190.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1962. Cambrian hyolithids from the lower slope of the Aldan shield. Akademiya Nauk, S.S.S.R., 63 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1968. Stratigraphy and hyolithids of the oldest Cambrian beds of the Siberian Platform. Yakutsk, 67 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1974. Biostratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Cambrian of Europe and western Asia. Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., 248 p.Google Scholar
Syssoiev, V. A. 1981. The history of the study of hyoliths; a discussion of their systematic position, p. 85–92. In Sokolov, B. S. (ed.), Problems of the Phanerozoic. Nauka Publishing House, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Tschanz, C. M., and Pampeyan, E. H. 1970. Geology and mineral deposits of Lincoln County, Nevada. Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Bulletin 73, 188 p.Google Scholar
Val'kov, A. K. 1975. Biostratigraphy and hyolithids of the Lower Cambrian of the northern edge of the Siberian Platform. Akademiya Nauk S.S.S.R., 137 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884a. Paleontology of the Eureka District, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 8, 298 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884b. On the Cambrian faunas of North America. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 10, 55 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1886. Second contribution to the studies on the Cambrian faunas of North America. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 30, 369 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1890a. Description of new forms of Upper Cambrian fossils. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 13:266–279.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1890b. Descriptive notes of new genera and species from the Olenellus zone of North America. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 12:33–46.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1890c. The fauna of the Cambrian or Olenellus zone. U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 10:509–760Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1899. Cambrian fossils from the Yellowstone National Park, p. 440–478. In Geology of the Yellowstone National Park. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 22.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Mount Stephen rocks and fossils. Canadian Alpine Journal, 1:232–248.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian annelids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57:109–144.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1917. The Albertella fauna in British Columbia and Montana. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67(2):9–59.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1874. Preliminary report upon the invertebrate fossils collected by the expeditions of 1871, 1872, and 1873, with descriptions of new species. U.S. Geographic and Geologic Expedition and Survey West of the 100th Meridian, 27 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1875. Reports upon the invertebrate fossils collected in portions of Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, by parties of the expeditions of 1871, 1872, 1873, and 1874, and the extinct vertebrates obtained in New Mexico by parties of the expedition of 1874. U.S. Geographical and Geological Surveys West of the 100th Meridian, 219 p.Google Scholar
Yochelson, E. L. 1987. Recognition of Macluritella (Gastropoda) from the Upper Cambrian of Missouri and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 61:56–61.Google Scholar