Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personal emission permit trading scheme: urban spatial equilibrium and planning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of personal emission permit trading scheme as a policy to limit greenhouse gas emissions from commuting and housing. First, urban spatial equilibrium is established under personal emission permit trading scheme which incorporates the interaction between residents’ location choice and emission permit market. For a given emission permit scheme, residents’ residential location choices and housing market structure in terms of housing rental price and space can be endogenously determined and the permit price is governed by the permit market equilibrium. On this basis, we prove its equivalence with the first-best planning model and propose the social welfare maximization planning model to determine the total amount of permits issued and the endogenous permit price. Model properties and income redistribution effect are numerically illustrated. Further, the pareto-improving scheme is numerically explored in terms of residents’ utility improvement and emission reduction. The study helps show the effectiveness and efficiency of the personal emission permit trading scheme and planning on the urban system in terms of emissions reduction, social welfare and residents’ utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data source: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm.

References

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bento AM, Franco SF, Kaffine D (2006) The efficiency and distributional impacts of alternative anti-sprawl policies. J Urban Econ 59(1):121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borck R (2016) Will skyscrapers save the planet? Building height limits and urban greenhouse gas emissions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 58:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borck R, Brueckner JK (2018) Optimal energy taxation in cities. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 5(2):481–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow AL, Wardman M, Zanni AM, Chintakayala PK (2010) Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecol Econ 69(9):1824–1837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Thisse JF, Zenou Y (1999) Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? Amenity-Based Theory Europ Econ Rev 43(1):91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capstick S, Lewis A (2009) Personal carbon allowances: a pilot simulation and questionnaire. UK Energy Research Centre, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Denant-Boèmont L, Gaigné C, Gaté R (2018) Urban spatial structure, transport-related emissions and welfare. J Environ Econ Manag 89:29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Wang S, Wu Y, Li J, Zhao D (2015) Buffer effect and price effect of a personal carbon trading scheme. Energy 82:601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Li J, Wu Y, Wang S, Zhao D (2016) The effects of allowance price on energy demand under a personal carbon trading scheme. Appl Energy 170:242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2010) Personal carbon trading: a policy ahead of its time? Energy Policy 38(11):6868–6876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T., Parag, Y. (2010). An introduction to personal carbon trading.

  • Fleming D (2007) Energy and the Common Purpose: Descending the Energy Staircase with Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs), 3rd edn. The Lean Economy Connection, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuso Nerini F, Fawcett T, Parag Y et al (2021) Personal carbon allowances revisited. Nat Sustain 4:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaigné C, Riou S, Thisse JF (2012) Are compact cities environmentally friendly? J Urban Econ 72(2–3):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser EL, Kahn ME, Rappaport J (2008) Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. J Urban Econ 63(1):1–24

  • Guo D, Chen H, Long R (2019) How to involve individuals in personal carbon trading? A game model taking into account the heterogeneous emotions of government and individuals. Nat Hazards 95:419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman M, Fawcett T (2004) How we can save the planet. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson W, Yezer A (2015) The energy implications of city size and density. J Urban Econ 90:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson W, Zhao W (2020) Self-driving cars and the city: effects on sprawl, energy consumption, and housing affordability. Reg Sci Urban Econ 81:103484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZC, Peng YT (2016) Modeling the effects of vehicle emission taxes on residential location choices of different-income households. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 48:248–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XY, Tang BJ (2017) Incorporating the transport sector into carbon emission trading scheme: an overview and outlook. Nat Hazards 88(2):683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZC, Wang YD, Lam WH, Sumalee A, Choi K (2014) Design of sustainable cordon toll pricing schemes in a monocentric city. Netw Spat Econ 14(2):133–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Long R, Chen H, Yang T, Geng J, Yang M (2018a) Effects of personal carbon trading on the decision to adopt battery electric vehicles: analysis based on a choice experiment in Jiangsu, China. Appl Energy 209:478–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ukkusuri SV, Fan J (2018b) Managing congestion and emissions in transportation networks with dynamic carbon credit charge scheme. Comput Oper Res 99:90–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Long R, Chen H, Yang M, Chen F, Zheng X, Li C (2019) Would personal carbon trading enhance individual adopting intention of battery electric vehicles more effectively than a carbon tax? Resour Conserv Recycl 149:638–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Jia Z (2020) Does the different sectoral coverage matter? an analysis of China’s carbon trading market. Energy Policy 137:111164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek E, Raux C, Engelmann D (2018) Personal carbon allowances: Can a budget label do the trick? Transp Policy 69:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills ES, (1972) Urban Economics. Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois.

  • Muth RF (1969) Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier D, Gould G, Karner A, Hixson M, Bachmann B, Okma C et al (2008) Rethinking downstream regulation: California’s opportunity to engage households in reducing greenhouse gases. Energy Policy 36(9):3436–3447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parag Y, Eyre N (2010) Barriers to personal carbon trading in the policy arena. Climate Policy 10(4):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penic MA, Upchurch J (1992) TRANSYT-7F: enhancement for fuel consumption, pollution emissions, and user costs. Transp Res Rec (1360)

  • Pitkänen A, von Wright T, Kaseva J, Kahiluoto H (2022) Distributional fairness of personal carbon trading. Ecol Econ 201:107587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raux C, Croissant Y, Pons D (2015) Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 35:72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee HJ (2009) Telecommuting and urban sprawl. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 14(7):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safirova E (2002) Telecommuting, traffic congestion, and agglomeration: a general equilibrium model. J Urban Econ 52(1):26–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan X, Wang X, Zaidi SHA (2019) What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon-trading scheme? a case study of Guangzhou Pilot. China Ecol Econ 165:106389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Tuuli W, Janne K, Helena K (2022) Needs must? Fair allocation of personal carbon allowances in mobility. Ecol Econ 200:107491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadud Z, Chintakayala PK (2019) Personal carbon trading: trade-off and complementarity between in-home and transport related emissions reduction. Ecol Econ 156:397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Yang H, Zhu D, Li C (2012) Tradable travel credits for congestion management with heterogeneous users. Transport Res Part E: Log Transport Rev 48(2):426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao YF, Liang QM (2016) Approaches to carbon allowance allocation in China: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Nat Hazards 84:333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Lawphongpanich S (2006) Internalizing emission externality on road networks. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 11(4):292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharenko R (2016) Self-driving cars will change cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 61:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Li Y, Jia Z (2018) Impact of carbon allowance allocation on power industry in China’s carbon trading market: Computable general equilibrium based analysis. Appl Energy 229:814–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904039) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2021HGTB0068). The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the model construction and design. Model calculation and numerical analysis were performed by Yao Li. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Shuai Wang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yao Li and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuai Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript.

Ethical Standards

The authors promised that all procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix Mathematical symbol description table

Appendix Mathematical symbol description table

Variable and parameters

Description

\(U\)

Household utility

\(g(x)\)

Housing good consumption at location \(x\)

\(z(x)\)

Non-housing good consumption at location \(x\)

\(c\left(x\right)\)

One-way travel cost of a resident at location \(x\)

\(T\left(x\right)\)

Total travel time from the location \(x\) to CBD

\(\phi (x)\)

Revenue or expenditure on emission permit trading at location \(x\)

\(s(x)\)

Emission permit consumption at location \(x\)

\(p(x)\)

Bid housing rental price per square meter at location \(x\)

\(r(x)\)

Land rent cost at location \(x\)

\(h(x)\)

Housing production at location \(x\)

\(n(x)\)

Population density at location \(x\)

\(B\)

City boundary

\(G\)

City-wide emission permit issued

\(E\)

Total emissions

\({E}_{c}\)

Total commuting emissions

\({E}_{h}\)

Total housing emissions

\(\tau\)

Permit price

\(\lambda\)

Marginal damage of the pollutant emissions

\(\alpha ,\beta ,\)

Coefficients of Cobb–Douglas function

\(a\)

Value of travel time

\({c}_{f},{c}_{v}\)

Fixed cost, and variable cost per unit of distance

\(m\)

Initial permit allocation to each resident

\(e\)

The amount of commuting emissions per kilometers

\(\gamma\)

The amount of housing emissions per square meters

\(\upxi\)

Annual work-home round trips

\(Y\)

Residents’ annual income

\({\theta }_{1},{\theta }_{2}\)

Parameters in the housing production function

\(i\)

Price of capital

\(N\)

Total population in the city

\({r}_{a}\)

Agriculture rent

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Wang, S. Personal emission permit trading scheme: urban spatial equilibrium and planning. Nat Hazards 116, 1239–1259 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05719-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05719-8

Keywords

Navigation