Volume 13, Issue 8 p. 711-722

Self-report use-of-time tools for the assessment of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: systematic review

L. Foley

Corresponding Author

L. Foley

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Dr L Foley, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
R. Maddison

R. Maddison

Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
T. Olds

T. Olds

Health and Use of Time (HUT) Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
K. Ridley

K. Ridley

School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 March 2012
Citations: 26

Summary

Regular physical activity and limiting extended periods of sitting are two behaviours critical for the prevention of obesity in young people. The purpose of the systematic review was to synthesize the psychometric evidence for self-report use-of-time tools that assess these behaviours. Articles were retrieved that reported reliability and/or validity for use-of-time tools in participants aged 18 years or under. Outcome variables were physical activity, sedentary behaviour and energy expenditure. Study quality was appraised, and the results summarized narratively. Sixteen studies and six different tools were identified. The tools were the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall, the Three-Day Physical Activity Recall, the Physical Activity Interview, the Computerized Activity Recall, the Activitygram, and the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents. Overall, tools indicated moderate validity compared with objective and criterion comparison methods. Generally, validity correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.30–0.40. Correlation coefficients for test–retest reliability ranged widely from 0.24 to 0.98. Conclusion: Use-of-time tools have indicated moderate reliability and validity for the assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure. Future research should focus on using criterion methods and on validating specifically for sedentary behaviour outcomes. Implementation of these tools for population surveillance should be considered.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.