Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies and Practice

Correction factors for the calculation of metabolic equivalents (MET) in overweight to extremely obese subjects

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The metabolic equivalent (MET) is a construct that is commonly used to quantify physical activity as well as exercise performance. ‘One MET’ is equal to a resting oxygen uptake of 3.5 ml O2 kg−1 min1. However, this assumption is unlikely valid in obese subjects. The aim of our study was to quantify the difference between calculated and measured METs in overweight to severely obese subjects and to provide body mass index (BMI)-specific MET correction factors.

Subjects/Methods:

Resting oxygen uptake (VO2-REE) was measured in 1331 patients with a BMI >25 kg m−2 (72.0% women; age: 42.5±13.0 years; BMI: 42.5±7.0 kg m2) by indirect calorimetry and MET-REE, that is, VO2-REE related to body weight was calculated. Six hundred and fifty-two subjects (70.9% women) additionally underwent a bicycle cardiopulmonary exercise test for measurement of maximal MET (MET peak).

Results:

Mean MET-REE was 2.47±0.33 ml O2 kg−1 min−1 in women and 2.62±0.34 ml O2 kg−1 min−1 in men, that is, markedly lower than the expected 3.5 ml O2 kg−1 min−1. MET-REE decreased with increasing BMI (P<0.001 for both sexes). On this dataset, gender-specific MET correction factors were developed for distinct BMI groups. During the exercise test, women performed 4.4±1.3 MET peak and men 4.7±1.3. After applying our correction factors, MET peak increased to 6.2±1.7 and 6.1±1.6, respectively.

Conclusions:

Data indicate that the commonly used 1-MET value of 3.5 ml O2 kg1 min1 largely overestimates values in overweight to severely obese subjects. Our correction factors can help to reduce this systematic error and thus appear to be valuable for clinical practice as well as research studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Obarzanek E, Kriska AM, Daniels SR, Barton BA et al. Relation between the changes in physical activity and body-mass index during adolescence: a multicentre longitudinal study. Lancet 2005; 366: 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bond DS, Jakicic JM, Vithiananthan S, Thomas JG, Leahey TM, Sax HC et al. Objective quantification of physical activity in bariatric surgery candidates and normal-weight controls. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6: 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine JA, Lanningham-Foster LM, McCrady SK, Krizan AC, Olson LR, Kane PH et al. Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity. Science 2005; 307: 584–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ekelund U, Aman J, Yngve A, Renman C, Westerterp K, Sjöström M . Physical activity but not energy expenditure is reduced in obese adolescents: a case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 935–941.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulens M, Vansant G, Claessens AL, Lysens R, Muls E . Predictors of 6-minute walk test results in lean, obese and morbidly obese women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2003; 13: 98–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee DC, Sui X, Artero EG, Lee IM, Church TS, McAuley PA et al. Long-term effects of changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Circulation 2011; 124: 2483–2490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee DC, Sui X, Ortega FB, Kim YS, Church TS, Winett RA et al. Comparisons of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of all-cause mortality in men and women. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 504–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kokkinos P, Sheriff H, Kheirbek R . Physical inactivity and mortality risk. Cardiol Res Pract 2011; 2011: 924–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin M L, Mayer-Davis EJ, Addy CL, Pate RR, Durstine JL, Stolarczyk LM et al. Moderate-intensity physical activity and fasting insulin levels in women: the Cross-Cultural Activity Participation Study. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 449–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM . Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011; 8: 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Unick JL, Bond DS, Jakicic JM, Vithiananthan S, Ryder BA, Roye GD et al. Comparison of two objective monitors for assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviors in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg 2012; 22: 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Schutz Y . Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1112–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Poldermans D, Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Bax JJ, Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Boersma E, Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) De Hert S, Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eeckhout E, Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Fowkes Get al. Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 2769–2812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosy-Westphal A, Reinecke U, Schlörke T, Illner K, Kutzner D, Heller M et al. Effect of organ and tissue masses on resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight and obese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 72–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weir JB . New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949; 109: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam E, Chaitman B, Eckel R, Fleg J et al. Exercise standards for testing and training. Circulation 2001; 104: 1694–1740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 498–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvarez VP, Dixon JB, Strauss BJ, Laurie CP, Chaston TB, O'Brien PE . Single frequency bioelectrical impedance is a poor method for determining fat mass in moderately obese women. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Panotopoulos G, Ruiz JC, Guy-Grand B, Basdevant A . Dual x-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance, and near infrared interactance in obese women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 665–670.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller M, Bosy-Westphal A, Klaus S, Kreymann G, Lührmann MP, Neuhäuser-Berthold M et al. World Health Organization equations have shortcomings for predicting resting energy expenditure in persons from a modern, affluent population: generation of a new reference standard from a retrospective analysis of a German database of resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 1379–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B Schultes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilms, B., Ernst, B., Thurnheer, M. et al. Correction factors for the calculation of metabolic equivalents (MET) in overweight to extremely obese subjects. Int J Obes 38, 1383–1387 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.22

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.22

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links