Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T23:39:43.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of recommended daily allowances to assess dietary adequacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Alison E. Black
Alison E. Black
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutrition Unit, Downham's Lane, Milton Road, Cambrdige CB4 IXJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 369 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

Bartley, W., Krebs, H. A. & O'Brien, J. R. P. (1953). Medical Research Council's Special Report Series no. 280. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. A. (1983). The use of urinary metabolities as an independent marker for the assessment of dietary protein intake in individuals. PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. A. (1986). Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews (In the Press).Google Scholar
Bingham, S. A., McNeil, N. I. & Cummings, J. H. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. E., Ravenscroft, C. & Sims, A. J. (1984). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 38A, 165–174.Google Scholar
Black, A. E., Wiles, S. J. & Paul, A. A. (1986). British Journal of Nutrition 56, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, S., Passmore, R., Brock, J. K. & Truswell, A. S. (1979). Human Nutrition and Dietetics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1969). Report on Public Health and Medical Subjects no. 120. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1979). Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 15. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dreosti, I. (1982). Journal of Food and Nutrition 39, 167–173.Google Scholar
Huensemann, R. L. & Turner, D. (1942). Journal of the American Dietetic Association 18, 562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, M., Howe, G. R., Johnson, K. C. & Miver, A. B. (1980). American Journal of Epidemiology 111, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallner, A., Hartman, D. & Hornig, D. (1979). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 530–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, T. D. B., Smith, H. & Smith, L. B. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 42, 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. V. (1965). Series Haematologica 6, 1–14.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1980). Recommended Dietary Allowances, 9th revised ed. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Nelson, M., Dyson, P. A. & Paul, A. A. (1985). British Journal of Nutrition 54, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutishauser, I. H. E. (1982). Journal of Food and Nutrition 39, 158–167.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1959). British Journal of Nutrition 13, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, P. M., Toft, R. & Garrow, J. S. (1978). International Journal of Obesity, 2, 396.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1967). Technical Report Series no. 362. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1970). Technical Report Series no. 452. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar