Skip to main content
AAN.com
Articles
May 9, 2012
Letter to the Editor

Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method

May 22, 2012 issue
78 (21) 1684-1691

Abstract

Objective:

To assess prospectively the accuracy and precision of a method for noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement compared with invasive gold standard CSF pressure measurement.

Methods:

Included were 62 neurologic patients (37 idiopathic intracranial hypertension, 20 multiple sclerosis, 1 Guillain-Barré syndrome, 1 polyneuropathy, and 3 hydrocephalus). The average age was 40 ± 12 years. All patients had lumbar puncture indicated as a diagnostic procedure. ICP was measured using a noninvasive ICP measurement method, which is based on a two-depth high-resolution transcranial Doppler insonation of the ophthalmic artery (OA). The OA is being used as a natural pair of scales, in which the intracranial segment of the OA is compressed by ICP and the extracranial segment of the OA is compressed by extracranial pressure (Pe) applied to the orbit. The blood flow parameters in both OA segments are approximately the same in the scales balance case when Pe = ICP. All patients had simultaneous recording of noninvasive ICP values and invasive gold standard CSF pressure values.

Results:

Analysis of the 72 simultaneous paired recordings of noninvasive ICP and the gold standard CSF pressure showed good accuracy for the noninvasive method as indicated by the low mean systematic error (0.12 mm Hg; confidence level [CL] 0.98). The method also showed high precision as indicated by the low SD of the paired recordings (2.19 mm Hg; CL 0.98). The method does not need calibration.

Conclusion:

The proposed noninvasive ICP measurement method is precise and accurate compared with gold standard CSF pressure measured via lumbar puncture.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (appendix_e-1.doc)

REFERENCES

1.
Popovic D, Khoo M, Lee S. Noninvasive monitoring of intracranial pressure. Recent Patents Biomed Eng 2009; 2: 165– 179.
2.
Andrews P, Citerio G, Longhi L, Polderman K, Sahuquillo J, Vajkoczy P. NICEM consensus on neurological monitoring in acute neurological disease. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1362– 1370.
3.
Langfitt TW, Weinstein JD, Kassell NF, Simeone FA. Transmission of increased intracranial pressure within the craniospinal axis. J Neurosurg 1964; 21: 989– 997.
4.
Lenfeldt N, Koskinen L, Bergenheim A, Malm J, Eklund A. CSF pressure assessed by lumbar puncture agrees with intracranial pressure. Neurology 2007; 68: 155– 158.
5.
Digre KB, Corbett JJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri): a reappraisal. Neurologist 2001; 7: 2– 67.
6.
American College of Surgeons. Head Trauma. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 1997; 181– 206.
7.
Brain Injury Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Initial management. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 463– 469.
8.
Moulin DE, Lo R, Chiang J, et al. Prognosis in middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 1985; 16: 282– 284.
9.
Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: S37– S44.
10.
Geeraerts T, Newcome VF, Coles JP, et al. Use of T2-weighted MRI of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure. Crit Care 2008; 12: R114.
11.
Soldatos T, Karakitsos D, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A, Karabinis A. Optic nerve sonography in the diagnostic evaluation of adult brain injury. Crit Care 2008; 12: R67.
12.
Goel RS, Goyal NK, Dharap SB, Kumar M, Gore MA. Utility of optic nerve ultrasonography in head injury. Injury 2008; 39: 519– 524.
13.
Watanabe A, Kinouchi H, Horikoshi T, Uchida M, Ishigame K. Effect of intracranial pressure on the diameter of the optic nerve sheath. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 255– 258.
14.
Aggarwal S, Brooks DM, Kang Y, Linden PK, Patzer JF. Noninvasive monitoring of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with acute liver failure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 1048– 1057.
15.
Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, et al. Adaptive noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation. Stroke 2003; 34: 84– 89.
16.
Querfurth H, Lieberman P, Arms S, Mundell S, Bennett M, van Horne C. Ophthalmodynamometry for ICP prediction and pilot test on the Mt. Everest. BMC Neurol 2010; 10: 106.
17.
Alperin N, Lee SH, Loth F, Raksin P, Lichtor T. MR intracranial pressure (ICP): a method for noninvasive measurement of intracranial pressure and elastance: baboon and human study. Radiology 2000; 217: 877– 885.
18.
Firsching R, Schultze R, Motschmann M, Behrens-Baumann W. Venous ophthalmodynamometry: a noninvasive method for assessment of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 2000; 93: 33– 36.
19.
Taylor JR. An Introduction to Error Analysis: the Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurement, 2nd ed. Herndon, VA: University Science Books; 1997; 128– 129.
20.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. International Vocabulary of Metrology: Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM), 3rd ed. JGCM 200: 2012. Available at: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2012.
21.
Ragauskas A, Daubaris G, Dziugys A, Azelis V, Gedrimas V. Innovative non-invasive method for absolute intracranial pressure measurement without calibration. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005; 95: 357– 361.
22.
Lundberg N. Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1960; 36: 1– 193.
23.
Paramore CG. Relative risks of ventriculostomies. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1994; 127: 79– 84.
24.
Citerio G, Piper I, Chambers IR, et al. Multicenter clinical assessment of the Raumedic Neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor: a report by the BrainIT group. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 1152– 1158.
Letters to the Editor
5 July 2012
Blood flow velocities are reduced in the optic nerve with elevated intracranial pressure
Marijean M. Miller MD, Attending, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Director, Neonatal Ophthalmology, Associate Professor of Oph
Taeun Chang, MD Director, Neonatal Neurology Division, Neurophysiology & Epilepsy; Robert Keating, MD Professor and Chief Department of Neurosurgery; Craig Sable, MD Director, Echocardio

We have concerns with the article by Ragauskas et al. who assessed the precision of a method for noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement compared with the invasive gold standard CSF pressure measurement. [1]

The authors assume that extracranial ophthalmic arterial blood flow is independent of ICP. We disagree. Both adult and pediatric work in the last decade demonstrated the effect and correlation of ICP on distal blood vessels. [2-5] In 2009, we measured central retinal artery and vein blood flow velocities by spectral Doppler imaging in awake, supine children and determined the velocity of blood flow is reduced by elevated ICP. [5] Our method is noninvasive and can be performed without anesthesia on children.

We also have safety concerns. Transcranial spectral Doppler imaging through bone necessitates the use of higher Doppler power than ocular Doppler imaging. The authors' diagram (Figure 1) places the transcranial Doppler probe precariously close to the lens, but does not publish powers used. Their method would only be applicable in alert and cooperative adults. In addition, applying prolonged pressure to the globe can reduce central retinal artery blood flow and may result in vision loss.

1. Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R, et. Al. Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 2012; 78:1684-1691.

2. Mitra RA, Sergott RC, Flaharty PM, et al. Optic nerve decompression improves hemodynamic parameters in papilledema. Ophthalmology 1993; 100:987-997.

3. Querfurth HW, Lagreze WD, Hedges TR, Heggerick PA. Flow velocity and pulsatility of the ocular circulation in chronic intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurol Scand 2002; 105:431-440.

4. Miller M, Sable C, Chang T. Spectral Doppler imaging of vessels in the optic nerve of children. J Child Neurol 2007; 22:809-811.

5. Miller MM, Chang T, Keating R, Crouch E, Sable C. Blood flow velocities are reduced in the optic nerve of children with elevated intracranial pressure. J Child Neurol 2009; 24:30-35.

For disclosures, contact the editorial office at [email protected].

7 September 2012
Response to Miller et al.
A. Ragauskas
V. Matijosaitis (Kaunas, Lithuania), R. Zakelis (Kaunas, Lithuania), K. Petrikonis (Kaunas, Lithuania), D. Rastenyte (Kaunas, Lithuania), I. Piper (Glasgow), G. Daubaris (Kaunas, Lithuania)

We thank Miller et al. for their interest in the results of our assessment of non-invasive ICP measurement technology. This method is accurate and sensitivity and specificity are much higher compared with other approaches. [1,2,3]

Blood flow in both segments of the ophthalmic artery (OA) depends on ICP, ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure, intraorbital pressure, and other factors. [1]. The benefit of our method is in the equilibration of ICP with Pe. The balance ICP=Pe is not dependent on influential factors. OA blood flow velocities could be very different in different patients [1] but the balance ICP=Pe does not depend on the OA blood flow velocity values. As a result, our method does not need a patient-specific calibration. All "correlation based" non-invasive ICP measurement approaches cannot be used for absolute ICP value measurements because they need patient-specific calibration, which is impossible.

Our two-depth TCD technology complies with all safety standards. The maximum value of Pe is 50 mmHg and so Pe is applied to the orbit for just 90 seconds. We diagnosed vision changes after 115 snapshot ICP measurements. Experts have agreed that our technology has no influence on vision impairment.

1. Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R, et al. Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 2012;78:1684 -1691.

2. Ragauskas A, Bartusis L, Zakelis R, Daubaris G. Non-invasive absolute intracranial pressure value measurements during HUT/HDT tests. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012; 33(Suppl 1): 78.

3. Ragauskas A, Bartusis L, Zakelis R, et al. Statistical validity of non-invasive absolute intracranial pressure value meter for evidence based medicine. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;33(Suppl 1):74.

For disclosures, contact the editorial office at [email protected].

7 September 2012
Response Liebeskind et al.
A. Ragauskas, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania
V. Matijosaitis (Kaunas, Lithuania), R. Zakelis (Kaunas, Lithuania), K. Petrikonis (Kaunas, Lithuania), D. Rastenyte (Kaunas, Lithuania), I. Piper (Glasgow), G. Daubaris (Kaunas, Lithuania)

We thank Liebeskind et al. for their interest in the results of our assessment of non-invasive ICP measurement technology, which does not need patient-specific calibration. [1] We respectfully disagree with the assumption that "pressure on the orbit does not balance transmural pressure in the segments of ophthalmic artery (OA)." Statistically significant evidence-based results of clinical [1,3] and healthy volunteer [2] studies show that this assumption has no scientific background. Dr Heyreh demonstrated [2] that intracranial segment (IOA) of the OA is absent in 5% of humans. Our multi-depth TCD technology [1] with increased resolution of OA blood velocity measurements is a tool for accurate experimental identification of the anatomical structure of the IOA and of the OA physiological reactions to ICP. [3] Absolute ICP non-invasive measurements of hundreds of healthy volunteers, neurological and TBI patients showed that our technology can be used on more than 96% of individuals independently of age, gender, or intracraniospinal pathology. Physiological findings [1,3,4] of OA reaction to ICP and pressure on the orbit fully support conclusions of an anatomical study, [2] which showed that the intracranial course of OA may be absent in just 5% of individuals.

1. Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R, et al. Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 2012; 78: 1684-1691.

2. Hayreh S. Orbital vascular anatomy. Eye 2006;20:1130 -1144.

3. Ragauskas A, Bartusis L, Zakelis R, Daubaris G. Non-invasive absolute intracranial pressure value measurements during HUT/HDT tests. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;v33(Suppl 1):78.

4. Ragauskas A, Bartusis L, Zakelis R, et al. Statistical validity of non-invasive absolute intracranial pressure value meter for evidence based medicine. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2012;33(Suppl 1): 74.

For disclosures, please contact the editorial office at [email protected].

20 June 2012
Pressure On The Orbit Does Not Balance Transmural Pressure In The Segments Of Ophthalmic Artery
David S. Liebeskind, Physician
E.Marcinkevicius, Kaunas, Lithuania; M.Pranevicius NY,NY; O.Pranevicius NY,NY

Ragauskas et al. [1] demonstrated that when external pressure is applied, the orbit tends to equilibrate flow in the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery (OA) when its level approaches intracranial pressure (ICP). The authors detected this relationship by making the OA into a "natural pair of scales, in which the intracranial segment of the OA is compressed by extracranial pressure (Pe) applied to the orbit."

Although the conclusion is interesting, there is an implicit assumption that OA crosses a compartmental barrier, which in this case can only be the dural boundary. Consequently, the proposition that ICP can be measured noninvasively, by merely balancing external pressures between the subdural and extradural parts of OA, assumes that these two segments of the OA exist in the entire-- or at least the majority-- of the population. However, microanatomical studies have shown different configurations and variability [2,3], reporting that incidence of the OA originating from the intradural portion of the internal carotid artery ranges from 4.7%-89.6%.

The described effect is therefore unlikely as it is solely explained by transmural pressure balances across these distinct OA segments, thus leaving the underlying mechanism still unclear.

1. Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R, et al. Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 2012;78:1684-1691.

2. Matsumura Y, Nagashima M. Anatomical variations in the origin of the human ophthalmic artery with special reference to the cavernous sinus and surrounding meninges. Cells Tissues Organs 1999;164:112-121.

3. Huynh-Le P, Natori Y, Sasaki T. Surgical anatomy of the ophthalmic artery: its origin and proximal course. Neurosurgery 2005;57(4 Suppl):236-241.

For disclosures, contact the editorial office at [email protected].

25 May 2012
A noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method: promising in understanding hyper-perfusion syndrome
Yingkun He, Dr.
Interventional Department of Henan Provincial people's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, No.7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, 450003, China;

Revascularization including stenting, endarterectomy and bypass surgery has been used to treat cerebrovascular stenosis and occlusion. [1-3] However, cerebral hyper-perfusion syndrome (CHS) can be catastrophic. [3] The proposed noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement method is accurate compared with gold standard CSF pressure measured via lumbar puncture. [4] However, It was a pity that individuals with brain lesions such as hemorrhages and infarcts were excluded when Ragauskas et al. tested the noninvasive method. [4] Their phase B clinical study should consider these patients and even patients with the severe stenosis or occlusion of internal carotid artery beyond the ophthalmic artery segment. Regional CBF is determined by local cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and local cerebrovascular resistance (CVR): CBF=CPP/CVR. CPP is equal to the difference between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) driving blood into the brain and the venous backpressure. Venous backpressure is negligible unless there is elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) or obstruction of venous outflow. If it were feasible for this noninvasive method to be used in stroke patients, we could monitor and obtain ICP and MAP, which would be helpful to understand the physiological mechanism from the change of ICP and MAP.

1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993-1003.

2. Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RJ, Videen TO, Adams HJ, Derdeyn CP. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial. JAMA 2011;306:1983-1992.

3. De Rango P. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome: the dark side of carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43:377.

4. Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R, et al. Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 2012;78:1684-1691.

For disclosures, contact editorial office at [email protected].

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Neurology®
Volume 78Number 21May 22, 2012
Pages: 1684-1691
PubMed: 22573638

Publication History

Received: September 6, 2011
Accepted: January 25, 2012
Published online: May 9, 2012
Published in print: May 22, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

Authors

Affiliations & Disclosures

A. Ragauskas, DSc
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
European Commision Framework 7 projects
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
V. Matijosaitis, MD
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
European Commision Framework 7 projects "BrainSafe" (Grant Agreement No 232545) and "TBIcare" (Grant Agreement No 270259)
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
R. Zakelis, MSc
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
European Commision Framework 7 projects
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
K. Petrikonis, MD, DSc
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
D. Rastenyte, MD, DHabil
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
I. Piper, PhD
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE
G. Daubaris, DSc
From the Telematics Science Laboratory (A.R., R.Z., G.D.), Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Neurology (V.M., K.P., D.R.), Clinics of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; and BrainIT Group (I.P.), Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Disclosure
Scientific Advisory Boards:
1.
NONE
Gifts:
1.
NONE
Funding for Travel or Speaker Honoraria:
1.
NONE
Editorial Boards:
1.
NONE
Patents:
1.
NONE
Publishing Royalties:
1.
NONE
Employment, Commercial Entity:
1.
NONE
Consultancies:
1.
NONE
Speakers’ Bureaus:
1.
NONE
Other Activities:
1.
NONE
Clinical Procedures or Imaging Studies:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Commercial Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Government Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Academic Entities:
1.
NONE
Research Support, Foundations and Societies:
1.
European Commission Framework 7 projects BrainSafe (Grant Agreement No. 232545) and TBICare (Grant Agreement No. 270259)
Stock/stock Options/board of Directors Compensation:
1.
NONE
License Fee Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Royalty Payments, Technology or Inventions:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Research Sponsor:
1.
NONE
Stock/stock Options, Medical Equipment & Materials:
1.
NONE
Legal Proceedings:
1.
NONE

Notes

Study funding: Supported in part by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme projects BrainSafe (grant agreement no. 232545) and TBIcare (grant agreement no. 270259).
Correspondence & reprint requests to Dr. Ragauskas: [email protected]

Author Contributions

Dr. Ragauskas: drafting/revising the manuscript, study concept or design, analysis or interpretation of data, acquisition of data, statistical analysis, obtaining funding, study supervision. Dr. Matijosaitis: drafting/revising the manuscript, study concept or design, analysis or interpretation of data, acquisition of data, study supervision. R. Zakelis: study concept or design, acquisition of data, statistical analysis. Dr. Petrikonis: drafting/revising the manuscript, study concept or design, analysis or interpretation of data, contribution of vital reagents/tools/patients, acquisition of data, study supervision. Dr. Rastenyte: drafting/revising the manuscript, study concept or design, study supervision. Dr. Piper: drafting/revising the manuscript, obtaining some EC funding on this technology. Dr. Daubaris: study concept or design, acquisition of data.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited By
  1. Intraorbital pressure–volume characteristics in a piglet model: In vivo pilot study, PLOS ONE, 19, 1, (e0296780), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296780
    Crossref
  2. Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, 6, (2209), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062209
    Crossref
  3. Association between Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Lamina Cribrosa Morphology in Normal-Tension Glaucoma, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, 1, (360), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010360
    Crossref
  4. Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring in central nervous system infections, Minerva Anestesiologica, 89, 3, (2023).https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16863-X
    Crossref
  5. Intracranial pressure monitoring in neurosurgery: the present situation and prospects, Chinese Neurosurgical Journal, 9, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-023-00327-2
    Crossref
  6. Noninvasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pulse Waves, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 70, 1, (144-153), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3186748
    Crossref
  7. The effect of body position change on noninvasively acquired intracranial pulse waves, Physiological Measurement, 44, 3, (035014), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/acc3d6
    Crossref
  8. Intensivtherapie bei erhöhtem intrakraniellem Druck, Die Intensivmedizin, (1-11), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54675-4_24-2
    Crossref
  9. Role of Brain Ultrasound for the Assessment of Intracranial Hypertension, Basic Ultrasound Skills “Head to Toe” for General Intensivists, (291-308), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32462-8_19
    Crossref
  10. A Review of the Methods of Non-Invasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure through Ocular Measurement, Bioengineering, 9, 7, (304), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070304
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to get full access to it.

Purchase Access, $39 for 24hr of access

View options

Full Text

View Full Text

Full Text HTML

View Full Text HTML

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share