Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 October;64(5) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 October;64(5):468-79

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

REVIEW   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 October;64(5):468-79

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04927-9

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Visual changes after space flight: is it really caused by increased intracranial tension? A systematic review

Reem ELWY 1, Mohamed A. SOLIMAN 1, 2 , Amr A. HASANAIN 1, Ahmed A. EZZAT 1, Mohammad ELBAROODY 1, Mohamed F. ALSAWY 1, Ehab EL REFAEE 1, 3

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada; 3 Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany



INTRODUCTION: Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS) was linked to increased intracranial pressure (ICP) attributable to the combined effects of microgravity and environmental conditions encountered during spaceflight. Microgravity countermeasures as lower body negative pressure (LBNP) are potential interventions for SANS. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive qualitative analysis of literature contrasting simulation and spaceflight studies, focusing on the pathophysiology of SANS, and highlighting gaps in current knowledge.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically searched PubMed electronic database for English primary research published until February 2019 discussing intracranial changes in spaceflight or simulated microgravity, excluding animal and experimental studies. Two authors screened all the abstracts with a third author resolving disagreements. The full-text manuscripts were analyzed in pilot-tested tables.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen studies were reviewed; 13 simulation, and two out of six spaceflight studies were prospective. ICP changes were investigated in 11 simulation studies, where eight demonstrated a significant increase in ICP after variable periods of head-down tilt. three showed a significant increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) in conjunction with ICP elevation. With increasing ambient CO 2 : one showed an increase in IOP without further increase in ICP, while another showed a slight further decrease in ICP. LBNP demonstrated no significant effect on ICP in one and a decrease thereof in another study. After spaceflight, increased ICP on lumbar puncture was demonstrated in five studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to microgravity increases ICP possibly precipitating ocular changes. Whether other factors come into play is the subject of investigation. Further randomized studies and methods of direct ICP measurement during spaceflight are needed.


KEY WORDS: Astronauts; Intracranial pressure; Weightlessness; Papilledema; Space flight

top of page