Advertisement

Abstract

The gravitational pull of subducted slabs is thought to drive the motions of Earth's tectonic plates, but the coupling between slabs and plates is not well established. If a slab is mechanically attached to a subducting plate, it can exert a direct pull on the plate. Alternatively, a detached slab may drive a plate by exciting flow in the mantle that exerts a shear traction on the base of the plate. From the geologic history of subduction, we estimated the relative importance of “pull” versus “suction” for the present-day plates. Observed plate motions are best predicted if slabs in the upper mantle are attached to plates and generate slab pull forces that account for about half of the total driving force on plates. Slabs in the lower mantle are supported by viscous mantle forces and drive plates through slab suction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (conradsom.pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Turcotte D. L., Oxburgh E. R., J. Fluid Mech. 28, 29 (1967).
2
Solomon S. C., Sleep N. H., J. Geophys. Res. 79, 2557 (1974).
3
Forsyth D., Uyeda S., Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 43, 163 (1975).
4
Chapple W. M., Tullis T. E., J. Geophys. Res. 82, 1967 (1977).
5
Hager B. H., O'Connell R. J., J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4843 (1981).
6
Lithgow-Bertelloni C., Richards M. A., Rev. Geophys. 36, 27 (1998).
7
Becker T. W., O'Connell R. J., Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2, 2001GC000171 (2001).
8
McKenzie D., Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 18, 1 (1969).
9
Richter F., McKenzie D., J. Geophys. 44, 441 (1978).
10
Hager B. H., J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6003 (1984).
11
Grand S. P., van der Hilst R. D., Widiyantoro S., GSA Today 7, 1 (1997).
12
Bijwaard H., Spakman W., Engdahl E. R., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 30055 (1998).
13
Conrad C. P., Hager B. H., J. Geophys. Res. 104, 17551 (1999).
14
W. M. Elsasser, in The Application of Modern Physics to the Earth and Planetary Interiors, S. K. Runcorn, Ed. (Wiley, New York, 1969), pp. 223–249.
15
Ricard Y., Vigny C., J. Geophys. Res. 94, 17543 (1989).
16
Ricard Y., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 98, 21895 (1993).
17
See supporting data on Science Online.
18
Gordon R. G., Jurdy D. M., J. Geophys. Res. 91, 12389 (1986).
19
Christensen U., Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 127, 25 (2001).
20
Trench rollback rates (1 to 2 cm/year) are 10 to 25% of subduction rates (6 to 10 cm/year) (27). The larger value (25%) is about equal to the maximum amount of trench rollback for which a vertically coherent slab is found in experiments (19).
21
Zhong S., J. Geophys. Res. 106, 703 (2001).
22
Gripp A. E., Gordon R. G., Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1109 (1990).
23
Kohlstedt D. L., et al., J. Geophys. Res. 100, 17587 (1995).
24
Hanks T. C., Pure Appl. Geophys. 115, 441 (1977).
25
Ito E., Sato H., Nature 351, 140 (1991).
26
Moresi L., Gurnis M., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 138, 15 (1996).
27
Jarrard R. D., Rev. Geophys. 24, 217 (1986).
28
Supported by a fellowship from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (C.L.-B.). We thank two anonymous reviewers for comments.
Materials and Methods
Fig. S1

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 298 | Issue 5591
4 October 2002

Submission history

Received: 20 May 2002
Accepted: 3 September 2002
Published in print: 4 October 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Clinton P. Conrad*
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Carolina Lithgow-Bertelloni
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Fine-Scale Modeling of Global Plate Tectonics, Science, 329, 5995, (1020-1021), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1194858
    Abstract
  2. The Dynamics of Plate Tectonics and Mantle Flow: From Local to Global Scales, Science, 329, 5995, (1033-1038), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1191223
    Abstract
  3. Seismological evidence for the earliest global subduction network at 2 Ga ago, Science Advances, 6, 32, (2020)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abc5491
    Abstract
  4. What drives tectonic plates?, Science Advances, 5, 10, (2019)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aax4295
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media