The book entitled: “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” by Avi Loeb was fascinating and compelling on several fronts.
Professor Loeb begins with writing: “When you get a chance, step outside and admire the universe. This is best done at night, of course. … Just looking up, I find, helps change your perspective.” Moreover, he states: “This book confronts one of these profound questions, arguably the most consequential: Are we alone?” The author reminds us: “The world will end, of course, and most decidedly with a bang; our Sun, now about 4.6 billion years old, will in about 7 billion years turn into an expanding red giant and end all life on Earth. This is not up for debate, nor is it an ethical matter.”
As Professor Loeb states: “I remind my students that, as Galileo Galilei argued after looking through his telescope, evidence doesn’t care about approval.” The author goes on to set the stage “Contemplating the sky and the universe beyond teaches us humility. Cosmic space and time have vast scales. There are more than a billion trillion sun-like stars in the observable volume of the universe, and even the luckiest among us live for merely 1 percent of a millionth of the lifetime of the Sun . … Most of the evidence this book wrestles with was collected over eleven days, starting on October 19, 2017. That was the length of time we had to observe the first known interstellar visitor.”
The author encourages the reader to open their minds to the possibility of life beyond earth and goes on to explain why including explicit observations that support that hypothesis. His writing style is entertaining introducing you to his background and who he is and how he got to be a professor at Harvard. While the main theme of the book is about the discovery … “On October 19, astronomer Robert Weryk at the Haleakala Observatory discovered ‘Oumuamua in the data collected by the Pan-STARRS telescope, images that showed the object as a point of light speeding across the sky, moving too quickly to be bound by the Sun’s gravity. … The Hawaiian word ‘oumuamua (pronounced “oh moo ah moo ah”) is loosely translated as “scout.” Professor Loeb goes on to explain: “‘Oumuamua’s trajectory, its speed, and its approximate size (it was under one-quarter of a mile in diameter). None of these early details suggested that ‘Oumuamua was unusual for any reason other than its origin outside our star system.” Moreover, as he builds his case that this could be an extraterrestrial for the reader he goes on to state: “In the case of ‘Oumuamua, the object’s brightness varied tenfold every eight hours, which we deduced to be the amount of time that it took to complete one full rotation. This dramatic variability in its brightness told us that ‘Oumuamua’s shape was extreme, or at least five to ten times longer than it was wide. In a manner that he is comfortable with, Loeb states: “As with any good detective story, the evidence that emerged about ‘Oumuamua in the year after its discovery allowed us to abandon certain theories and winnow out hypotheses that did not fit the facts.”
Some of the other topics that Loeb explores include: “The Milky Way hosts tens of billions of Earth-size planets with surface temperatures similar to our own. Overall, about a quarter of our galaxy’s two hundred billion stars are orbited by planets that are habitable in the way Earth is, with surface conditions that allow liquid water and the chemistry of life as we know it.” And goes on to state “that’s counting only habitable planets within the Milky Way. Adding all other galaxies in the observable volume of the universe increases the number of habitable planets to a zetta, [or 10 to the 21st power] —a figure greater than the number of grains of sand on all of the beaches on Earth. In response to: “A billionaire entrepreneur from Silicon Valley, Yuri Milner … wanted to support a team that would engineer and launch spacecraft capable of reaching the star system closest to ours: Alpha Centauri, a group of three stars orbiting one another some 4.27 light-years from Earth.” Loeb et al. spent 6 months developing a probe that would be launched and return in less than a human’s life time. As Loeb reports: “The vision of visiting another star within our lifetimes captivated the public’s imagination in a way reminiscent of the Apollo 11 moon landing.”
Bouncing back to an earlier main topic, Professor Loeb posits: “‘Oumuamua must have been designed, built, and launched by an extraterrestrial intelligence.”
Dealing with the press: the author recalls: “the reporter asked, “Do you believe there are alien civilizations out there?” “A quarter of all stars host a planet the size and surface temperature of the Earth,” I said into the camera. “It would be arrogant to think we are alone.”” And again to the main topic of the book: “Matthew Knight, declared, “We have never seen anything like ‘Oumuamua in our solar system. It’s really a mystery still,” and then added, “but our preference is to stick with analogues we know.” … The interviewer for the German newspaper Der Spiegel put it with admirable bluntness: “According to a proverb, whoever has only a hammer will see nothing but nails.””
Going back, Loeb states: “Perhaps long, long ago, ‘Oumuamua was not junk but extraterrestrial technological equipment built for a distinct purpose. Perhaps it was something closer in intent to a buoy.” Professor Loeb values an open mind stating: “For me, it echoes a much older thought, one attributed to Heraclitus of Ephesus: “If you do not expect the unexpected, you will not find it.””
This reviewer has long been aware of natural tensions between those who mostly belief in theory and those who mostly belief in data; indeed some great theoretical physics work occurred because opportunities to work with data were restricted. Clearly, Professor Loeb is more data oriented stating: “Too often astrophysics can lose itself in theories that float free of any evidence, taking funding and talent with them.” As additional insight into the techniques that the professor employs, this reviewer is more familiar with the concept of writing an hypothesis and collecting data to either refute or support the hypothesis, for the ‘Oumuamua situation, the data is the data and the investigators are driven to look at it from all different aspects but not allowed the benefit of collecting more data; this is quite a challenge and may explain the reluctance of many scientists to move outside of their comfort zone
Professor Loeb is an excellent spokesperson for funding of science but he is not shy of objecting to the restrictions placed on science investigations by review committees and questions some investments made, stating, for example, “Just a bit under five billion dollars was spent to construct the Large Hadron Collider, a particle accelerator built in hopes of attaining confirming evidence of supersymmetry, and running it costs another one billion dollars a year. … when they insist that the multiverse must exist despite there being no data to support the theory, they are wasting precious time and money and talent. And we have not only finite funds to spend, but finite time.”
The author states: “Science is a work in progress, and the pursuit of scientific knowledge is never-ending. But that progress does not follow a straight path, and the obstacles encountered are sometimes of humanity’s own making. … in August 1909, Edward Charles Pickering argued in a Popular Science Monthly article that telescopes had reached their optimal size, fifty to seventy inches, and there was thus little point in building instruments with larger apertures. … Pickering was mistaken, of course; telescopes with larger apertures collect more photons, allowing scientists to see farther out into the cosmos and deeper into the past. … Pickering had erred due to his arrogance. … Unfortunately, Pickering was not unique in this particular blunder. Indeed, it is a recurrent mistake throughout the history of science.”
Loeb writes: “We date the birth of the universe, the Big Bang, to some 13.8 billion years ago. Fascinating, revelatory work has been done that has produced theory, data, and confirmed predictions concerning the universe’s earliest origins, including the common agreement that after the first hundred million years, everything was cloaked in darkness. Until, that is, the first star was born. … Because light travels at a finite speed, the farther out we look, the farther back in time we see.”
In terms of finding other life, the author writes: “Fermi raised a simple, provocative question: How do we explain the paradox that, given the vastness of the universe, the probability of extraterrestrial life seems high, yet there is no certain evidence for anything but terrestrial life? If life is common in the universe, he asked, “Where is everybody?” … Over the years, many answers have been formulated.
In 1998, the economist Robin Hanson published an essay titled “The Great Filter—Are We Almost Past It?” … Hanson argued, that throughout the universe a civilization’s own technological advancement overwhelmingly predicts its destruction. The very moment when a civilization reaches our stage of technological advancement—is also the moment when its technological maturity becomes sufficient for its own destruction…
Professor Loeb argues for a new discipline Astro-Archaeology stating: “We are greatly in need of a new branch of astronomy, what I have termed space archaeology. Similar to archaeologists who dig into the ground to learn about, say, Mayan society, astronomers must start searching for technological civilizations by digging into space.” Writing of life on other planets, Loeb goes on: “Over the past two decades, we have learned that the universe contains numerous exoplanets (the technical term for any planet residing outside the solar system). This spate of discoveries began in 1995, when astronomers Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz became the first to find definitive observational evidence for an exoplanet— … Their pioneering work ushered in the new era of hunting exoplanets and earned them a Nobel Prize in 2019.”
Loeb brings up some potentially controversial topics including the concept of sending biological seeds from our planet: “Selective and spontaneous adaptations that increase life’s ability to persevere is the bedrock of Darwinian biology. Life’s aim is survival, which means propagation. Those seeds need not even be restricted to bacteria. Certain viruses, which are also capable of Darwinian evolution, have proven themselves sufficiently durable. … How to ensure life is safely ejected from a planet? Eject it yourself.” He is also optimistic or perhaps naïve to expect superior beings to be benevolent.
In terms of truth in science, Loeb reminds the reader: “Galileo is supposed to have declared after looking through his telescope, “In the sciences, the authority of a thousand is not worth as much as the humble reasoning of a single individual.” Einstein, centuries later, got at the same idea when twenty-eight scholars contributed essays to a 1931 book titled A Hundred Authors Against Einstein that declared his theory of general relativity wrong. … is supposed to have replied that if he were wrong, then one author with conclusive evidence to disprove the theory would have been sufficient.”
One of the refreshing techniques in the book is that the author He is one of the few published professors I have seen who goes out of his way to explicitly credit by name several of his students and post-docs.
Bottom line about this book: it is interesting and informative and includes evidence for extraterrestrial life and how scientific methods advance our understanding of the universe; the book is worth purchasing and reading especially for those scientifically inclined.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Follow the author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Reviews with images
A Potential Alien Technosignature & Good Critique of Space Scientists
This is a good book as long as you can tolerate the rather slow initial chapters of filler which I assume were needed to make it long enough for the publisher's requirements. I have seen that some other comments highlight this slow start and it put off readers. Perhaps some will want to skip ahead to the chapters on Oumuamua.I really appreciated the detailed evaluation of the Oumuamua data and was surprised to hear that the object was likely an extremely thin circular artefact. All of the major media has shown us the rocky cigar-shaped body which was first suspected based on the astronomical information returned to earth. I have added an image that shows such a possible solar sail design that would mesh well with the Oumuamua described by Loeb in the book. Because we can't yet send a super fast probe to directly sample this visitor or build a telescope that would see it in detail, there is no way to be absolute on artificiality, but Loeb makes a strong case based on what we do know. Even the intellectual opponents have to come up with exotic solutions to the anomalies involved, no asteroid or comet that we know would fulfil the role.A good part of the book is reserved for criticism of academia, the conservatism and bias that relegates the search for alien intelligence to a joke subject, one that young scientists should avoid if they want to establish a respected name for themselves. This is ironic when considering the public have enormous interest in the possibility such aliens exist and may visit us (past, present or future). Loeb is attempting to change this situation and open a door through which a new generation of space scientists may walk."If you're not ready to find exceptional things, you won't discover them. Of course, every argument needs to be based on evidence, but if the evidence points to an anomaly, we need to talk about an anomaly." - Avi LoebPersonally, I believe Oumuamua 'may' by a true alien technosignature, but in my opinion the case is not as strong as the indications surrounding the object which arrived here 780,000 years ago, parking itself in orbit before leaving behind mysterious highly silica debris. If anyone wants to learn more on that I have provided a good many interviews and discussed the matter in my own book. Hopefully, I can write an acceptable paper on the topic but being from beyond the hallowed halls of academia that is beyond my wheelhouse.I think Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth will change the conversation on alien life and make more conservative people open their minds, but for some the subject will always be a joke and nothing the professor says will change that. Well worth reading!Disclosure: I read a free review copy as science editor for the Earth Ancients podcast.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Interesting and informative book about scientific methods and the evidence for extraterrestrial life
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2021
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2021
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2024
Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2024
Top reviews from other countries
Marcos
Abordagem puramente científica do assunto
Reviewed in Brazil on March 24, 2021
wonndatt
Brilliant! Readable! Inspirational!
Reviewed in Canada on February 1, 2021
Dr. Hugh Deasy
Truly scientific method allied fearlessly
Reviewed in Germany on June 25, 2022
