Volume 21, Issue 3 p. 261-267
Research Article

Comparison of three different extraction methods and HPLC determination of the anthraquinones aloe-emodine, emodine, rheine, chrysophanol and physcione in the bark of Rhamnus alpinus L. (Rhamnaceae)

S. Genovese

Corresponding Author

S. Genovese

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘G. D'Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università ‘G. D'Annunzio’, Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), ItalySearch for more papers by this author
F. Tammaro

F. Tammaro

Dipartimento di Chimica, Ingegneria Chimica e dei Materiali, Università degli Studi ‘L'Aquila’, Via Vetoio, 67100 Coppito, L'Aquila (AQ), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
L. Menghini

L. Menghini

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘G. D'Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
G. Carlucci

G. Carlucci

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘G. D'Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
F. Epifano

F. Epifano

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘G. D'Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
M. Locatelli

M. Locatelli

Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘G. D'Annunzio’ Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 December 2009
Citations: 54

Abstract

Introduction – Rhamnus alpinus L. (Rhamnaceae), a traditional plants in the flora of the Abruzzo region, is known to contain active anthraquinone secondary metabolites. However, the content of anthraquinones varies among R. alpinus samples depending on collection season and site. Thus, using simple, reliable and accurate analytical methods for the determination of anthraquinones in R. alpinus extracts allows comparative study of different methods of extraction.

Objective – After a partial validation of an HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of five anthraquinones, aloe-emodine, rheine, emodine, chrysophanol and physcione, in the bark of R. alpinus, we compared three different methods of extraction.

Methodology – Anthraquinones were extracted from the bark of R. alpinus using different techniques (methanol maceration, ultrasonic and supercritical CO2 extraction). Separation and quantification of anthraquinones were accomplished using a reversed-phase C18 column with the mobile phase of H2O–methanol (40 : 60, v/v, 1% formic acid) at a wavelength of 254  nm. The qualitative analyses were also achieved at wavelength of 435  nm.

Results – All calibration curves were linear over the concentration range tested (10–200  mM) with the determination coefficients ≥0.991. The detection limits (S/N = 3) were 5  mM for each analytes. All five anthraquinones were found in the samples tested at concentrations reported in experimental data.

Conclusion – The described HPLC method and optimised extraction procedure are simple, accurate and selective for separation and quantification of anthraquinones in the bark of R. alpinus and allow evaluation of the best extraction procedure between the tested assays. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.