Abstract
In the present study, we assessed the relationship of serum insulin levels and three surrogate markers of recurrence, T stage, PSA, and Gleason score, in men with localized prostate cancer. Participants in our study were found through urology and radiation oncology clinics, and all eligible patients were asked to take part. All patients were asymptomatic and had been initially diagnosed on the basis of rising PSA or abnormal physical examination. Histological confirmation of diagnosis was obtained for all subjects. Serum insulin levels were determined by chemoluminescent assay with a standard, commercially available instrument. Patients were divided into three previously defined risk groups: Low risk: PSA ⩽10, stage ⩽T2a, or Gleason grade ⩽6. Medium risk: 10
Main
PSA, Gleason score, and stage at diagnosis are currently the most reliable markers of prostate cancer prognosis and tumour aggressiveness (Oesterling et al, 1997). But urologists are actively seeking additional biomarkers.
Many prostate cancers are quite indolent and may never cause a problem, but it is now impossible to identify such tumours with certainty. With more and better biomarkers, some older men might be spared the rigors of radiation therapy and/or surgery, and their complications.
Elevated insulin levels are associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (Hsing et al, 2001) and increased risk of metastatic disease in women with breast cancer (del Giudice et al, 1998; Goodwin et al, 2000). Moreover, insulin is necessary for the growth of prostate cancer cells in culture. For example, a special serum-free defined medium that can support short-term, long-term, and clonal growth of the human prostatic carcinoma cell lines LNCaP, DU 145, PC-3, and ALVA-31 must contain insulin (Hedlund and Miller, 1994).
In a previous study (Lehrer et al, 2002), we measured insulin levels in men with prostate cancer. We found that increased serum insulin levels were associated with increased risk of recurrence. We determined risk of recurrence by dividing the patients into previously defined risk groups (Stock et al, 2000), consisting of three parameters: prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, tumour stage, and Gleason score. We have now collected a larger patient sample and have performed multivariate analysis to ascertain which of the three parameters are most related to insulin level.
Methods
Participants in our study were found through urology and radiation oncology clinics, and all eligible patients were asked to take part. All patients had been initially diagnosed on the basis of rising PSA or abnormal physical examination. Histological confirmation of diagnosis was obtained for all subjects. All participants gave informed consent. All staging was clinical, because almost all the patients were to receive I-125 seed implant.
We studied men referred for treatment of localized prostate cancer. In our treatment protocol, patients are divided into three risk groups (Stock et al, 2000).
Low risk
PSA ⩽10, stage ⩽T2a, or Gleason grade ⩽6. These patients are treated with a radioactive implant.
Medium risk
10
High risk
Gleason >7, tumour in seminal vesicle biopsy, PSA >15 or stage T2c or T3. These patients are treated with 3 months' combined hormonal therapy, an implant, and after 2 months' break 6000 rads with external beam radiotherapy.
Serum insulin levels were determined by chemoluminescent assay with a standard, commercially available instrument (Immulite Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Results
Patients studied: 163; 73 were low risk, 22 medium risk, and 68 high risk. The youngest was 46, the oldest 88, average age 67±8.2 (mean ±s.d.).
There was a significant increase in serum insulin with risk group (P= 0.003, one-way anova, Figure 1). Tukey's multiple range test showed that the insulin levels of high risk patients were significantly higher than the insulin levels of medium and low risk patients (P=0.05) but the insulin levels of medium and low risk patients were not significantly different from one another.
Multivariate linear regression, with insulin as the dependent variable, Gleason score, PSA, and T stage (T1, T2, T3) as the independent variables, was significant overall (P<0.001, r2=0.120). Increased T stage was independently correlated with increased serum insulin level (P<0.001). Gleason score was negatively, insignificantly correlated with serum insulin level (P=0.059). The positive correlation of PSA and insulin level was not significant (P=0.097).
To assure normal distribution of insulin and PSA values, the regression was repeated with log (insulin) as the dependent variable, log (PSA), T stage (T1, T2, T3), and Gleason score as independent variables. The regression was significant overall (P=0.002, r2=0.095). Increased T stage was independently correlated with increased log (insulin level) (P=0.026). Gleason score was negatively, insignificantly correlated with log (insulin) level (P=0.728). The positive correlation of log (PSA) and log (insulin) levels was significant (P=0.010).
Discussion
One possible weakness in our study is the fact that serum insulin levels were measured in the three treatment groups after therapy had been completed. Therefore, it would be worthwhile in future studies to measure serum insulin levels both before and after therapy, in order to correct for possible error caused by the differences in treatment delivered to the three risk groups. Another possible weakness is the relatively smaller number of cases in the intermediate risk group, when compared to the low and high risk groups. Further larger studies should be done to eliminate this weakness.
Data from epidemiological and biological research implicate insulin-like growth factors I and II (IGF-I and IGF-II) in the regulation of prostate epithelial cell proliferation, and in the pathophysiology of prostate cancer (Pollak et al, 1998). But there has been little investigation into the role insulin itself plays in prostate cancer. Isolated epithelial cells of rat ventral prostate have insulin receptors, and fasting increases their concentration (Carmena et al, 1986). But PA-III rat prostate adenocarcinoma cells have no insulin receptor, though they do have specific binding sites for IGF-I and II (Polychronakos et al, 1991).
One large epidemiologic study found an equivocal relationship between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer. In hundreds of thousands of male respondents, the 1959–1972 Cancer Prevention Study explored whether men with diabetes were more likely to develop prostate cancer during a 13-year follow-up than men without diabetes. After adjustment for factors associated with prostate cancer in previous studies, little association was found between diabetes at baseline and prostate cancer incidence. Men who had diabetes mellitus for five or more years, however, had a higher incidence of prostate cancer than did men without diabetes. But among all study participants who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, men with diabetes were only slightly more likely to die from prostate cancer than were men without diabetes (Will et al, 1999).
The relationship between increased insulin level and advanced tumour stage in prostate cancer we describe here is biologically quite plausible, since insulin is a growth factor. Further studies may document whether serum insulin level might be a useful biomarker of prostate cancer stage.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Carmena MJ, Fernandez-Moreno MD, Prieto JC (1986) Characterization of insulin receptors in isolated epithelial cells of rat ventral prostate: effect of fasting. Cell Biochem Funct 4: 19–24
Del Giudice ME, Fantus IG, Ezzat S, McKeown Eyssen G, Page D, Goodwin PJ (1998) Insulin and related factors in premenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 47: 111–120
Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau ME, Koo J, Madarnas Y, Hood N, Hartwick W, Hoffman B (2000) Fasting insulin predicts distant disease free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with operable breast cancer (T1-3, N0-1, M0) who are receiving standard adjuvant therapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19: 272
Hedlund TE, Miller GJ (1994) A serum-free defined medium capable of supporting growth of four established human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. Prostate 24: 221–228
Hsing AW, Chua SJ, Gao YT, Gentzschein E, Chang L, Deng J, Stanczyk FZ (2001) Prostate cancer risk and serum levels of insulin and leptin: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(10): 783–789
Lehrer S, Diamond EJ, Stagger S, Stone NN, Stock RG (2002) Increased serum insulin associated with increased risk of prostate cancer recurrence. The Prostate 50: 1–3
Oesterling J, Fuks Z, Lee CT, Scher HI (1997) Cancer of the prostate. InCancer: Principles and practice of oncology 5th edn DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) pp1323–1386, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven
Pollak M, Beamer W, Zhang JC (1998) Insulin-like growth factors and prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 17: 383–390
Polychronakos C, Janthly U, Lehoux JG, Koutsilieris M (1991) Mitogenic effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factors on PA-III rat prostate adenocarcinoma cells: characterization of the receptors involved. Prostate 19: 313–321
Stock RG, Stone NN, Kao J, Iannuzzi C, Unger P (2000) The effect of disease and treatment-related factors on biopsy results after prostate brachytherapy. Cancer 89(8): 1829–1834
Will JC, Vinicor F, Calle EE (1999) Is diabetes mellitus associated with prostate cancer incidence and survival?. Epidemiology 10: 313–318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Lehrer, S., Diamond, E., Stagger, S. et al. Serum insulin level, disease stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 87, 726–728 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600526
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600526
Keywords
This article is cited by
Metformin and Prostate Cancer: a New Role for an Old Drug
Current Urology Reports (2017)
Total antioxidant intake and prostate cancer in the Cancer of the Prostate in Sweden (CAPS) study. A case control study
BMC Cancer (2016)
A pilot ‘window of opportunity’ neoadjuvant study of metformin in localised prostate cancer
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2014)
Coffee consumption and prostate cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis
Cancer Causes & Control (2014)
Urological aspects of the metabolic syndrome
Nature Reviews Urology (2011)