Why is High-Quality Research on Palliative Care So Hard To Do? Barriers to Improved Research from a Survey of Palliative Care Researchers
Publication: Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 17, Issue Number 7
Abstract
Background: Substantial agreement has been achieved on research priorities in palliative care over the past 15 years, as evidenced by consensus conferences and systematic reviews. Despite the presence of a widely endorsed research agenda, however, addressing the gaps in scientific knowledge has progressed slowly, suggesting that researchers face significant obstacles to conducting high-quality research on the most pressing topics in the field.
Objective: To systematically identify barriers to improved and expanded palliative care research as reported by researchers.
Design: Semistructured telephone interviews to solicit barriers to research in palliative care.
Setting/Subjects: A purposive, interdisciplinary sample of 61 leading researchers in palliative care.
Measurements: Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using standard qualitative methods.
Results: Respondents named five barriers impeding progress: (1) funding, (2) institutional capacity, (3) researcher workforce, (4) challenges related to the topic and population (e.g., attrition, heightened human subjects protections), and (5) public and professional misunderstanding of palliative care and aversion to topics related to serious illness and end-of-life.
Conclusions: Research in palliative care is being held back by significant barriers that require the attention of institutions and funders. The consensus within the interdisciplinary sample indicates that concentrated effort to address barriers related to funding and researcher workforce could facilitate progress on established research priorities. More research is needed on viable strategies for overcoming the identified barriers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Dahlin C (ed): Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, 3rd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care, 2013.
2.
Building Momentum: The Science of End-of-Life and Palliative Care. A Review of Research Trends and Funding, 1997–2010. Bethesda, MD: The National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Nursing Research, 2013.
3.
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on improving end-of-life care. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2004;21:1–28.
4.
Aldridge Carlson MD: Research methods priorities in geriatric palliative medicine. J Palliat Med 2013;16:838–842.
5.
Aziz NM, Miller JL, Curtis JR: Palliative and end-of-life care research: Embracing new opportunities. Nurs Outlook 2012;60:384–390.
6.
Field MJ, Behrman RE: When Children Die. Improving Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care for Children and their Families. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2003.
7.
Field MJ, Cassel CK: Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1997.
8.
Foley KM, Gelband H: Improving Palliative Care for Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2001.
9.
Grady P: Introduction. Papers from the National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference on improving end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2005;8(Suppl 1):s1–3.
10.
Hudson P, Payne S: Family caregivers and palliative care: Current status and agenda for the future. J Palliat Med 2011;14:864–869.
11.
Knebel A, Coen Buckwalkter K: Integrative workshop on end-of-life research: Preface. Gerontologist 2002;42(Special Issues III):4–10.
12.
Kramer BJ, Christ GH, Bern-Klug M, Francoeur RB: A national agenda for social work research in palliative and end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2005;8:418–431.
13.
Morrison RS: Research priorities in geriatric palliative care: An introduction to a new series. J Palliat Med 2013;16:1–6.
14.
Puchalski C, Ferrell B, Virani R, Otis-Green S, Baird P, Bull J, Chochinov H, Handzo G, Nelson-Becker H, Prince-Paul M: Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: The report of the consensus conference. J Palliat Med 2009;12:885–904.
15.
Docherty A, Owens A, Asadi-Lari M, Petchey R, Williams J, Carter YH: Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: A qualitative systematic review. Palliat Med 2008;22:153–171.
16.
Harding R, Higginson IJ: What is the best way to help caregivers in cancer and palliative care? A systematic literature review of interventions and their effectiveness. Palliat Med 2003;17:63–74.
17.
Lorenz KA, Lynn J, Dy SM, Shugarman LR, Wilkinson A, Mularski RA, Morton SC, Hughes RG, Hilton LK, Maglione M: Evidence for improving palliative care at the end of life: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:147–159.
18.
Slort W, Schweitzer B, Blankenstein A, Abarshi E, Riphagen I, Echteld M, Aaronson N, Van der Horst H, Deliens L: Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner–patient communication in palliative care: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2011;25:613–629.
19.
Zimmermann C, Riechelmann R, Krzyzanowska M, Rodin G, Tannock I: Effectiveness of specialized palliative care. JAMA 2008;299:1698–1709.
20.
Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications, 2006.
21.
Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
22.
Borkan J: Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds): Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999, pp. 179–194.
23.
Glazer BG, Straus A: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine, 1967.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 17 • Issue Number 7 • July 2014
Pages: 782 - 787
PubMed: 24885960
Copyright
Copyright 2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 3 July 2014
Published in print: July 2014
Published ahead of print: 2 June 2014
Accepted: 28 January 2014
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.