Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 15, 2011

Designing and conducting randomized controlled trials in palliative care: A summary of discussions from the 2010 clinical research forum of the Australian Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative

Abstract

Rigorous clinical research in palliative care is challenging but achievable. Trial participants are likely to have deteriorating performance status, co-morbidities and progressive disease. It is difficult to recruit patients, and attrition unrelated to the intervention being trialled is high. The aim of this paper is to highlight practical considerations from a forum held to discuss these issues by active palliative care clinical researchers.
To date, the Australian Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC) has randomized more than 500 participants across 12 sites in 8 Phase III studies. Insights from the 2010 clinical research forum of the PaCCSC are reported. All active Australian researchers in palliative care were invited to present their current research and address three specific questions: (1) What has worked well? (2) What didn’t work well? and (3) How should the research be done differently next time?
Fourteen studies were presented, including six double-blind, randomized, controlled, multi-site trials run by the PaCCSC. Key recommendations are reported, including guidance on design; methodologies; and strategies for maximizing recruitment and retention. These recommendations will help to inform future trial design and conduct in palliative care.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S, Fayers P, et al. Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment attrition and compliance: experience from a randomized controlled trial. Palliat Med 1999; 13: 299–310.
2. Toerien M, Brookes ST, Metcalfe C, et al. A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. Trials 2009; 10: 52.
3. Ling J, Rees E, Hardy J. What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre?. Eur J Canc 2000; 36: 621–626.
4. Karim K. Conducting research involving palliative patients. Nurs Stand 2000; 1: 34–35.
5. Hardy J. Consent for trials in palliative care. Lancet 2000; 356: S44.
6. Tieman J, Sladek RM, Currow D. Changes in the quantity and quality of palliative care literature. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5679–5683.
7. Goodwin DM, Higginson IJ, Edwards AGK, et al. An evaluation of systematic reviews of palliative care services. J Palliat Care 2002; 18: 77–83.
8. McWhinney IR, Bass MJ, Donner A. An evaluation of a palliative care service: problems and pitfalls. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1340–1342.
9. Abernethy AP, Hanson LC, Main DS, et al. Palliative Care Research Networks, a requirement for evidence-based palliative care: time for coordinated action. J Palliat Med 2007; 10: 845–850.
10. Masso M, Dodds S, Fildes D, Yeatman H, Eagar K. ‘Ethical Research in Palliative Care: A Guide through the Human Research Ethics Committee Process’, Centre for Health Development – CHSD, Paper 12, http:/ro/uow.edu.au/chsd/12 (2004) accessed 12 July 2011.
11. Hudson P, Aranda S, McMurray N. Randomized controlled trials in palliative care: overcoming the obstacles. Int J Palliat Nurs 2001; 7: 427–434.
12. World Medical Association. ‘Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects’, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html (revised 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2008, accessed 17 December 2010).
13. Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, et al. Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet 2004; 363: 263–270.
14. Currow DC, Eagar K, Aoun S, Fildes D, Yates P, Kristjanson LJ. Is it feasible and desirable to collect voluntarily quality and outcome data nationally in palliative oncology care?. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3853–3859.
15. White C, Gilshenan K, Hardy J. A survey of the views of palliative care health professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care. Support Care Canc 2008; 16: 1397–1405.
16. Casarett DJ. Assessing decision-making capacity in the setting of palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: S6–13.
17. Hardy J, Shelby-James T, Currow DC. Research in palliative care: is death always an adverse event?. Intern Med J 2010; 40: 89–90.
18. Nikles J, Mitchell GK, Schluter P, et al. Aggregating single patient (n-of-1) trials in populations where recruitment and retention was difficult: the case of palliative care. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 471–480.
19. Currow DC, Shelby-James TM, Agar M, et al. Planning phase III multi-site clinical trials in palliative care: the role of consecutive cohort audits to identify potential participant populations. J Support Care Canc 2010; 18: 1571–1579.
20. Kaasa S, Caraceni A. Palliative cancer care research. Palliat Med 2010; 24: 259–260.
21. Farrell B, Kenyon S, Shakur H. Managing clinical trials. Trials 2010; 11: 78.
22. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Wurzelmann J, et al. Enhancing enrollment in palliative care trials: key insights from a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Support Oncol 2010; 8: 139–144.
23. Tieman J, Abernethy AP, Fazekas BS, Currow DC. CareSearch: finding and evaluating Australia’s missing palliative care literature. BMC Palliat Care 2005; 4: 4.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 15, 2011
Issue published: December 2012

Keywords

  1. Clinical trials methodology
  2. palliative care
  3. participant recruitment
  4. phase III trials
  5. randomized controlled trials

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2011.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 21844138

Authors

Affiliations

Tania M Shelby-James
Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Australia
Janet Hardy
Mater Health Services, Australia
Meera Agar
Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Australia; Department of Palliative Care, Braeside Hospital, Australia; Improving Palliative Care Through Clinical Trials (ImPaCCT), South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
Patsy Yates
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Geoff Mitchell
School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia
Christine Sanderson
Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Australia; Calvary Health Care, Australia
Tim Luckett
Improving Palliative Care Through Clinical Trials (ImPaCCT), South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
Amy P Abernethy
Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Australia; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Centre, USA
David C Currow
Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Australia

Notes

David C Currow, Discipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, 700 Goodwood Road, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Palliative Medicine.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 351

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 30 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 31

  1. Patient experiences of randomised placebo-controlled trial participati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Creating more comparable cohorts in observational palliative care stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Participant Safety in Multisite, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in palliative medicine: multicentric qua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Attitudes of Palliative Care Practitioners Towards Enrolling Patients ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  6. Palliative Care Clinical Trials: Building Capability and Capacity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Successful Strategies and Areas of Improvement–Lessons Learned from De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Interventions for palliative symptom control in COVID-19 patients
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. ‘Palliative-D’—Vitamin D Supplementation to Palliative Cancer Patients...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Managing uncertain recovery for patients nearing the end of life in ho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A Response to: Challenges in Recruiting Patients to a Controlled Feasi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Manualised cognitive–behavioural therapy in treating depression in adv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Psychoeducational Intervention for Symptom Management of Fatigue, Pain...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Using the ‘Social Marketing Mix Framework’ to explore recruitment barr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  15. Strategies to address the shortcomings of commonly used advanced chron...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  16. Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Disea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  17. Somatostatin Analogues Compared With Placebo and Other Pharmacologic A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Searching PubMed for a broad subject area: how effective are palliativ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Establishment and preliminary outcomes of a palliative care research n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Evidence-Based Palliative Care 13 Years On: Has anything changed?
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  23. The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggreg...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Uptake of clinical trials in a palliative care setting: A retrospectiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Aggregated N-of-1 Trials
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. An audit of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl prescribing at a u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Unanswered Questions in Malignant Bowel Obstruction
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  28. Treating an Established Episode of Delirium in Palliative Care: Expert...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. An Analytical Framework for Delirium Research in Palliative Care Setti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Enjeux d'une recherche en et pour les soins palliatifs : quelles diffi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Mixed Methods Research in the Development and Evaluation of Complex In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text