Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Preventive effect of the flavonoid, quercetin, on hepatic cancer in rats via oxidant/antioxidant activity: molecular and histological evidences

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 28, Article number: 80 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing in many countries. The estimated number of new cases annually is over 500,000, and the yearly incidence comprises between 2.5 and 7% of patients with liver cirrhosis. The incidence varies between different geographic areas, being higher in developing areas; males are predominantly affected, with a 2:3 male/female ratio

Methods

Experiments were designed to examine the effect of N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) as cancer-inducer compound and to confirm the preventive effect of the flavonoid quercetin on hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. Briefly, thirty six male albino rats of Wistar strain were divided into 3 groups: the 1st group was administered NDEA alone (NDEA-treated), the 2nd group was treated simultaneously with NDEA and quercetin (NDEA+Q) and the 3rd group was used as control (CON). Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) as well as p53-specifi PCR assays were employed to determine genomic difference between treated, and control animals. Histological confirmation as well as oxidant/antioxidant status of the liver tissue was done.

Results

RAPD analysis of liver samples generated 8 monomorphic bands and 22 polymorphic bands in a total of 30-banded RAPD patterns. Cluster analysis and statistical analyses of RAPD data resulted in grouping control and NDEA+Q samples in the same group with 80% similarity cut-off value. NDEA-treated samples were clustered in a separate group. Specific PCR assay for polymorphism of P53 gene revealed a uniform pattern of allele separation in both control and NDEA+Q samples. Quercetin anticancer effect was exhibited in significant decrease of oxidative stress and significant decrease of antioxidant activity. Histopathological studies showed normal liver histology of the NDEA+Q samples. Meanwhile, several cancer-induced features were clearly observable in NDEA-treated samples.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrated that preventive effect of quercetin on hepatocarcinoma in rats by RAPD-PCR, tracing the effect on p53 gene and by histopathological evidence. Hereby, it was proved that quercetin exerted its preventive effect via decreased oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant activity.

Background

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing in many countries. The estimated number of new cases annually is over 500,000, and the yearly incidence comprises between 2.5 and 7% of patients with liver cirrhosis. The incidence varies between different geographic areas, being higher in developing areas; males are predominantly affected, with a 2:3 male/female ratio [1]. Malignant transformation of cell is due to the progressive accumulation of mutations, stable nonmutational (epigenetic) alterations in gene expression and/or gene product (protein) function [2]. Chemical carcinogens could be classified as genotoxic and nongenotoxic [3]. Although nongenotoxic carcinogen is not mutagenic, it may stimulate cell proliferation, inhibit apoptosis, increase inflammation, and/or induce stable or transient epigenetic changes in critical genes of terminally proliferating cells [3]. Nitrosamines are known as precarcinogens capable of inducing tumors in different animal species and are suspected of being involved in some human tumors [4]. N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), which is present in the environment [5] and in tobacco smoke, and is also synthesized endogenously [6], induces tumors in all species tested so far [7]. In contrast, Andrzejewski et al. [8] postulated that NDEA is epigenetic.

The antitumor effects of plant flavonoids have been reported to induce cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells [9]. Quercetin, a ubiquitous bioactive flavonoid, can inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells [10, 11]. It has been shown that quercetin treatment caused cell cycle arrests such as G2/M arrest or G1 arrest in different cell types [10, 12]. Moreover, quercetin-mediated apoptosis may result from the induction of stress proteins, disruption of microtubules and mitochondrial, release of cytochrome c, and activation of caspases [11, 13, 14]. Li et al. [15] suggested that alpha methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) staining may serve as a useful marker for the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated HCC from HCA. Increased AMACR expression and its association with tumor venous invasion suggest that AMACR may play a role in HCC development and progression.

Lipid peroxidation, initiated in the presence of hydroxy radicals resulting in the production of malondialdehyde (MDA), directly produces oxidative stress [16]. Glutathione (GSH) is a key player in reduction processes in the cell. It also plays a role in reduction of NTPs to dNTPs and in detoxification of endogenous and exogenous compounds, serves as a cofactor for various enzymes, stores and transports cysteine, and may be involved in cell cycle regulation and thermotolerance [17]. Glutathione reductase (GR) is a gene encoding for an enzyme which reduces glutathione disulfide (GSSG) to the sulfhydryl form GSH, which is an important cellular antioxidant [18, 19]. Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) is a general name of enzyme family with peroxidase activity whose main biological role is to protect the organism from oxidative damage. The biochemical function of glutathione peroxidase is to reduce lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols and to reduce free hydrogen peroxide to water [18, 19].

The main objectives of the present work were to examine the effect of NDEA as cancer-inducer compound and to confirm and throw light on the preventive effect of the flavonoid quercetin on hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. However, these issues are still debatable.

Methods

Animals and drugs

A total of 36 male albino rats of Wistar strain (170–200 g each), obtained from the central animal house of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt were used in the present study. Animals were kept in groups at constant nutritional and highly controlled conditions: 23 ± 1°C temperature, 60 ± 10% RH and 12 L: 12 D photoperiod throughout the experimental period. The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of Cairo University.

NDEA as carcinogenic material and the flavonoid quercetin, enzymes and coenzymes were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Other chemicals were from Analar grade. NDEA was dissolved in saline (8 mg/1 ml vehicle). Quercetin was suspended in 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (20 mg/1 ml vehicle).

Induction of liver carcinogenesis

Induction of liver carcinogenesis was carried out according the following protocol: each rat received an oral dose of 20 mg/kg (NDEA/weight), for 9 weeks (5 days/week) followed by another oral dose of 10 mg/kg (NDEA/weight) for 6 weeks (5 days/week).

Experimental groups

Rats were acclimatized for 4 days before carrying out the experimental work. Animals were divided into 3 groups: the 1st group (14 animals) was treated with NDEA for 15 weeks as detailed above and designated as (NDEA-treated), the 2nd group (12 animals) was treated simultaneously with NDEA (20 mg/kg for 9 weeks followed by 10 mg/kg for 6 weeks) and Quercetin in a dose of 200 mg/kg daily, for 15 weeks as detailed above, the 3rd group of rats (10 animals) was used as control (oral dose of saline was administered). At the end of the experimental period, rats were food-deprived overnight and were killed by cervical decapitation. The liver was immediately excised, rinsed with ice-cold saline and blotted dry and accurately weighed. A small portion of liver was fixed in 10% formal-saline for the histopathological studies.

DNA extraction and amplification of RAPD markers

Genomic DNA was extracted from liver samples using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega, Madison, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was visualized on a 0.7% agarose gel. Quality and concentration of DNA were determined spectrophotometrically. Three random primers were used to study the genetic difference between the examined animals. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. Optimization of PCR conditions for ultimate discriminatory power was achieved. RAPD-PCR was carried out in a 25 μl total reaction volume containing 2.5 μl 10× buffer, 0.2 mM dNT'Ps, 100 pmol primer, 2 U Taq DNA polymerase, 3.0 mM MgCl2, 50 ng DNA template and nuclease-free water. The amplification program used was 4 min at 94°C (hot start), 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 30°C and 1 min at 72°C for 36 cycles followed by one cycle of 72°C for 10 min. PCR amplification was carried out in a DNA thermal cycler (Model 380 A, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel.

Table 1 Arbitrary primer sequences used in this study
Full size table

Specific PCR assay for polymorphism of p53 gene

For the p53 PCR, DNA of control, hepatic carcinoma and quercetin-treated samples was used up for the p53-specific PCR assays. A primer set (Forward: 5'-CAT CGA ATT CTG GAA ACT TTC CAC TTG AT-3' and Reverse: 5'-GTA GGA ATT CGT CCC AAG CAA TGG ATG AT-3') was used for detection of p53 sequence. The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, then 35 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 48°C for 1 minutes and elongation at 72°C for 1 minute. In the last cycle, the elongation step was extended to 10 minutes. PCR product (300 bp) was separated in 2% agarose gel.

Oxidant/antioxidant status of liver tissue

Accurately weighed pieces of liver tissue were treated differently to study the oxidant/antioxidant status of the liver. Two portions were used to prepare 10% homogenate in 1.15% KCl and 5% homogenate in 3% sulfosalicylic acid, centrifuged at 1000 ×g at 4°C for 20 minutes. Resulted supernatants were used for the assay of malondialdehyde (MDA) as described by Yoshioka et al. [20] and glutathione (GSH) according to Srivastava and Beutler [21] levels, respectively. Portion of the liver was homogenized in Tris-sucrose buffer pH 7.4 (10% homogenate) and centrifuged at 15,000 ×g, at 4°C for 30 minutes, using Dupont-Sorvall Ultracentrifuge (USA), to isolate the cytosolic fraction. Cytosolic fraction was used for glutathione peroxidase (GPX) assay as described by Arthur and Boyne [22] and glutathione reductase (GR) according to Long and Carson [23]. Protein concentration of the above supernatant was estimated by the method of Lowry et al. [24].

Histopathological examination of liver sections of the different groups

Slices of liver tissue were fixed in formal-saline, dehydrated in alcohol series and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections were made from each paraffin block, stained by eosin and hematoxlin dyes, and then submitted to histopathological examination under light microscope (Olympus Optical Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analyses

RAPD-PCR banding patterns of the liver samples were scored for the presence (1) or for absence (0) of each amplified band. All RAPD assays were repeated thrice and only the reproducible bands were scored. For considering a marker as polymorphic, the absence of an amplified product in at least one sample was used as a criterion. For genetic distance analysis, data sets were fed into the clustering program of SPSS (Version 14.0) and similarity matrix was determined using Jaccard's coefficient. Next, distance matrix (distance = 1 - similarity) was calculated. Based on similarity matrices using the unweighted pair group method analysis, STATISTICA program for Windows, 1995 (StatSoft, Inc., USA) was used to generate UPGMA dendrogram [25]. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the data obtained. Results of oxidant/antioxidant status were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Kruskal-Wallis test using SPSS software (Ver. 14.0). Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.

Results

RAPD analysis

RAPD analysis of liver samples was carried out using four different primers. The results revealed that approximately 37 different banding patterns were obtained. Amplification with EZ primer generated 3 monomorphic bands and 6 polymorphic bands in a total of 9-banded RAPD patterns (Fig. 1). P53 forward and reverse primers generated the same banding pattern: 2 monomorphic bands and 5 polymorphic bands in a total of 7-banded RAPD patterns. Whenever, Chi15 primer generated one monomorphic band and 6 polymorphic bands in a total of 7-banded RAPD patterns (Fig. 1). A total of 30 distinct bands obtained were used for cluster analysis. The UPGMA dendrogram revealed that 80% similarity cut-off value gave two major clusters (RAPD genotypes: HC: NDEA-treated, Q_T: NDEA+Q group and CON: Control). NDEA+Q and control groups clustered in the same genotype while the NDEA-treated samples clustered in a separate genotype (Fig. 2). Chi square and Fisher's tests revealed that significant differences between both control and NDEA-treated and between NDEA-treated and NDEA+Q groups. However no significant difference between control and NDEA+Q groups was observed in case of primer P53.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative 2% agarose gels of RAPD-PCR patterns generated from 10 liver samples using three arbitrary primers: EZ: left, Chi15: middle and P53 F: right. Lane M: DNA marker 1 kb Ladder, lane 1: control animal, lanes 2–5: NDEA-treated animals and lanes 6–10: NDEA+Q-treated animals.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

A dendrogram constructed on the basis of similarity index among liver samples using the three RAPD primers. CON: control, Q_T: NDEA+Q-treated and HC: NDEA-treated animals.

Full size image

Specific PCR assay for polymorphism of p53 gene

Two oligonucleotide primers were designed to amplify 300 bp within the open reading frame (orf) of p53 gene and were successfully used in PCR. PCR analysis of liver samples revealed a uniform pattern of allele separation in both control and NDEA+Q samples emphasizing the same results obtained by RAPD-PCR analysis (Fig. 3, lanes 1, 8 and 9). These results confirmed the preventive effect of the flavonoid quercetin on hepatocarcinoma in rats (Figs. 2 and 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

PCR amplification of p53 exon from liver tissues. Lane M: DNA marker, lane 1: control, lanes 2–4 NDEA-treated animals and lanes 8–9: NDEA+Q-treated animals.

Full size image

Oxidant/antioxidant status of liver tissue

The data presented in Table 2 show the oxidative stress (MDA concentration) and antioxidant activity (GSH, GR and GPX concentrations) of control, NDEA-treated and NDEA+Q treated liver tissues. MDA was studied as oxidative stress parameter while GSH, GR and GPX were estimated as indicators for antioxidant activity. Lipid peroxidation represented in MDA concentration showed significant increase (P < 0.001) in case of NDEA-treated rats in comparison to control (about 1.6 folds of control value). Treatment with quercetin (NDEA+Q) resulted in approximately normalization of MDA concentration (Table 2). Hepatic GSH content increased significantly (P < 0.01) in cases of both NDEA-treated and NDEA+Q group of rats in comparison to control group. Although treatment with quercetin (NDEA+Q) resulted in a significant decrease (P < 0.05) of hepatic GSH when compared to NDEA-treated rats, it still significantly higher (P < 0.01) than control GSH level (Table 2). NDEA-treated group exhibited significant increase (P < 0.01) in GR and GPX activities when compared to the control group. Treatment with quercetin (NDEA+Q) resulted in approximately normalization of GR and GPX activities, based on non-significant difference between NDEA+Q and control groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Effect of quercetin treatment on liver oxidant/antioxidant biomarkers in NDEA-induced liver carcinogenesis in rats
Full size table

Histopathological examination

Hepatic histopathological features of control, NDEA-treated and NDEA+Q rats were illustrated in Fig. (4). Normal liver tissue showed hepatic lobule with normal architecture (Fig. 4a). Hepatic lobules were normal, each lobule consisted of normal hepatocytes arranged in hepatic strands, normal hepatic vein and each lobule contained blood vessels and bile ducts (Fig. 4a). No lipid droplets have been observed in the hepatocytic cytoplasm. No signs of blood congestion in blood vessels have been observed throughout the sections (Fig. 4a). Liver tissue of the NDEA-treated rats showed pleomorphism of nuclei, some cells exhibit multiple nucleoli (encircled), others are pyknotic (Pyk), some cells possess intranuclear vacuole (IV), some showed cytoplasmic vacuoles (V) and cellular infiltration (Inf) (Fig. 4b). Massive area of vacuolated hepatocytes (VH), cellular infiltration (Inf) and pyknotic nuclei were shown in Fig. (4c). Vacuolated cytoplasm (V), hyperchromatic nuclei (HC), pyknotic nuclei (Pyk) and numerous Kupffer cells (K) were seen in Fig. (4d). Hyperchromatic malignant nuclei (HCM) were exhibited in Fig. (4e). Liver tissue of the quercetin (NDEA+Q) treated rats showed normal hepatic lobule architecture (normal hepatocytes, hepatic vein, nuclei and blood vessels). Some bile droplets were observed in Fig. (4f). Fig. (4g) showed normal hepatocytes, hepatic vein, nuclei, bile ducts and blood vessels.

Figure 4
figure 4

Histopathological examination of animal livers. a: control animals; b, c, d and e: animals treated with NDEA as cancer inducer; f and g: animals treated with NDEA+Q.

Full size image

Discussion

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most frequent hepatic primary neoplasm. Its geographic distribution is inhomogeneous, with high, medium and low zones of incidence [26].

In the present study, RAPD, cluster and statistical analyses indicated the closer relation between control and NDEA+Q samples. Meanwhile, NDEA-treated samples were clustered in a separate group. These results were subsequently confirmed by specific PCR assay for polymorphism of P53 gene which revealed a uniform pattern of allele separation in both control and NDEA+Q samples. To investigate how quercetin exerted its anticancer effect, oxidant/antioxidant status was tested. NDEA-treated samples exhibited allover higher oxidant/antioxidant status than control and NDEA+Q samples. Quercetin (NDEA+Q) succeeded in most cases to normalize the oxidant/antioxidant status of NDEA-treated samples. Moreover, histopathological confirmation showed normal liver histology of the NDEA+Q samples. Our results are agreeable with Lijinsky [4] and Bogovski and Bogovski, [7] who reported that NDEA is known as precarcinogen capable of inducing tumors in different animal species and are suspected of being involved in some human tumors [7]. Confirming results reported that administration of NDEA to rats resulted in lipid peroxidation (represented in higher MDA levels) and enhanced chemiluminescence in liver preneoplastic nodules, indicating the formation of activated oxygen species [27]. NDEA also produces 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OHG) [28], an indicator of oxidative damage to DNA (P53 results) and the most abundant of more than 20 types of modifications produced under conditions of oxidative stress. This premutagenic DNA damage results in specific types of mutations and is likely to be involved in carcinogenesis. In contrast, Andrzejewski et al. [8] postulated that NDEA is an epigenetic chemical compound.

The antitumor effects of plant flavonoids have been reported to induce cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells [9]. Quercetin, a ubiquitous bioactive flavonoid, can inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells [10, 11]. It has been shown that quercetin treatment caused cell cycle arrests such as G2/M arrest or G1 arrest in different cell types [10, 29]. Moreover, quercetin-mediated apoptosis may result from the induction of stress proteins, disruption of microtubules and mitochondrial, release of cytochrome c, and activation of caspases [11, 30]. Granado-Serrano et al. [31] reported that quercetin may be a potential chemopreventive or therapeutic agent in hepatocarcinoma cells and further efforts to investigate these possibilities are needed. Specific P53 gene PCR results may be contributed to the quercetin-mediated down regulation of mutant P53 as reported by Avila et al. [32]. Contradictory results were reported by Chaumontet et al. [33] who reported the lack of tumor-promoting effects of the flavonoids. The oxidant/antioxidant status of liver samples illustrated that quercetin exerted its preventive effect through inhibition of lipid peroxidation to prevent oxidative DNA damage [28]. Consequently, the levels of GSH (a key player in reduction and detoxification processes) [17], GR (reduces GSSG to GSH which is an important cellular antioxidant) [18, 19] and GPX (whose main biological role is to protect the organism from oxidative damage) [18, 19] decreased significantly in NDEA+Q group. The higher concentration of GSH in NDEA+Q treated group than control could be attributed to the increase of GSSG-GSH transformation, by GR enzyme, to overcome the increased lipid peroxidation exerted by NDEA. Inhibitory hitopathological effect of quercetin looks like that reported in cyclo-oxygenase and phospholipase A2 inhibitors [34].

Conclusively, this paper demonstrated the carcinogenic effect of NDEA as well as the preventive effect of the flavonoid quercetin on hepatocarcinoma in rats by RAPD-PCR and by tracing the effect on P53 gene. Oxidant/antioxidant results suggested that the eventual schedule of the cell is as follows: on treating rats with NDEA (NDEA-treated), lipid peroxidation increases (represented in high MDA concentration), GR enzyme succeeded in GSSG-GSH transformation (represented in high GSH concentration), GSH and GPX enzyme failed to exert antioxidant effect and could not protect organism against oxidative damage. Oxidative damage to DNA induced specific mutations (RAPD and P53 PCR results) and these mutations are likely involved in carcinogenesis (histopathological evidence). In case of NDEA+Q group, lipid peroxidation inhibited (represented in normal MDA concentration), GR enzyme succeeded in GSSG-GSH transformation (represented in high GSH concentration), GSH and GPX enzyme exerted antioxidant effects and could protect organism against oxidative damage. DNA preserved its normal status (RAPD and P53 PCR results) and hepatic lobule exhibited normal architecture. Hereby, it was proved that the mode of action by which quercetin exerted hepatic anticancer effect could be interpreted via oxidant/antioxidant status of the liver.

References

  1. Montalto G, Cervello M, Giannitrapani L, Dantona F, Terranova A, Castagnetta LA: Epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 963: 13-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MacPhee DG: Time-dependent mutagenesis and cancer: a new role for antimutagenesis in cancer prevention?. Mutat Res. 1998, 402: 29-39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butterworth BE, Bogdanffy MS: A comprehensive approach for integration of toxicity and cancer risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999, 29: 23-36. 10.1006/rtph.1998.1273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lijinsky W: Chemistry and Biology of N-Nitroso Compounds. 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tricker AR, Preussmann R: Carcinogenic N-nitrosamines in the diet: occurrence, formation, mechanisms and carcinogenic potential. Mutat Res. 1991, 259: 277-289. 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90123-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sander J: Kann nitrit in der menschlichen nahrung ursache einer kerbsentstehung durch nitrosaminbildung sein?. Arch Hyg Bakteriol. 1967, 151: 22-28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bogovski P, Bogovski S: Animal species in which N-nitroso compounds induce cancer. Int J Cancer. 1981, 27: 471-474. 10.1002/ijc.2910270408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrzejewski P, Kasprzyk-hordern B, Nawrocki J: N-nitrosomethylethylamine (nmea) and n-nitrosodiethylamine (ndea), two new potential disinfection byproducts; formation during water disinfection with chlorine. Global NEST Journal. 2005, 7: 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Carlo G, Mascolo N, Izzo AA, Capasso F: Flavonoids: old and new aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs. Life Sci. 1999, 65: 337-353. 10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00120-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JA, Kim JY, Lee JY, Kang CM, Kwon HJ, Yoo YD, Kim TW, Lee YS, Lee SJ: Induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human breast cancer cells by quercetin. Int J Oncol. 2001, 19: 837-844.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ong CS, Tran E, Nguyen TT, Ong CK, Lee SK, Lee JJ, Ng CP, Leong C, Huynh H: Quercetin-induced growth inhibition and cell death in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells are associated with increase in Bad and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma expressions. Oncol Rep. 2004, 11: 727-733.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beniston RG, Campo MS: Quercetin elevates p27Kip1 and arrests both primary and HPV16 E6/E7 transformed human keratinocytes in G1. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 5504-5514. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta K, Panda D: Perturbation of microtubule polymerization by quercetin through tubulin binding: a novel mechanism of its antiproliferative activity. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 13029-13038. 10.1021/bi025952r.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshizumi M, Tsuchiya K, Kirima K, Kyaw M, Suzaki Y, Tamaki T: Quercetin inhibits Shc- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation by angiotensin II in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2001, 60: 656-665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li W, Cagle PT, Botero RC, Liang JJ, Zhang Z, Tan D: Significance of overexpression of alpha methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clinic Cancer Res. 2008, 27: 2-10.1186/1756-9966-27-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muller FL, Lustgarten MS, Jang Y, Richardson A, Van Remmen H: Trends in oxidative aging theories. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007, 43: 477-503. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.03.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Champe , et al: Biochemistry. 2008, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Fourth

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meister A: Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 17205-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mannervik B: The enzymes of glutathione metabolism: an overview. Biochem Soc Trans. 1987, 15: 717-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshioka T, Kawada K, Shunada T, Mori M: Lipid peroxidation in maternal and cord blood and protective mechanism against activated-oxygen toxicity in the blood. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979, 135: 372-376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Srivastava SK, Beutler E: Accurate measurement of oxidized glutathione content of human, rabbit, and rat red blood cells and tissues. Anal Biochem. 1968, 25: 70-76. 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90082-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arthur JR, Boyne R: Superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities in neutrophils from selenium deficient and copper deficient cattle. Life Sci. 1985, 36 (16): 1569-1575. 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90381-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Long WK, Carson PE: Increased erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity in diabetes mellitus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1961, 5: 394-399. 10.1016/0006-291X(61)90047-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RG: Protein measurement with Folin reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951, 193: 265-275.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Norusis MJ: SPSS professional statistics 6.1. 1994, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, 385-

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martínez C: The epidemiology and etiology of hepatocarcinoma. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1994, 86: 665-671.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nakae D, Kobayashi Y, Akai H, Andoh N, Satoh H, Ohashi K, Tsutsumi M, Konishi Y: Involvement of 8-hydroxyguanine formation in the initiation of rat liver carcinogenesis by low dose levels of N-nitrosodiet hylamine. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 1281-1287.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ampy FR, Williams AO: Dimethylnitrosamine metabolism: I. In vitro activation of dimethylnitrosamine to mutagenic substance(s) by hepatic and renal tissues from three inbred strains of mice. Life Sci. 1986, 39: 923-930. 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90374-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeong JH, An JY, Kwon YT, Rhee JG, Lee YJ: Effects of low dose quercetin: Cancer cell-specific inhibition of cell cycle progression. J Cell Biochem. 2009, 106 (1): 73-82. 10.1002/jcb.21977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang IK, Lin-Shiau SY, Lin JK: Induction of apoptosis by apigenin and related flavonoids through cytochrome c release and activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 in leukaemia HL-60 cells. Eur J Cancer. 1999, 35: 1517-1525. 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00168-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Granado-Serrano AB, Martín MA, Bravo L, Goya L, Ramos S: Quercetin Induces Apoptosis via Caspase Activation, Regulation of Bcl-2, and Inhibition of PI-3-Kinase/Akt and ERK Pathways in a Human Hepatoma Cell Line (HepG2). J Nutr. 2006, 136: 2715-2721.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chaumontet C, Suschetet M, Honikman-Leban E, Krutovskikh VA, Berges R, Le Bon AM, Heberden C, Shahin MM, Yamasaki H, Martel P: Lack of tumor-promoting effects of flavonoids: Studies on rat liver preneoplastic foci and on in vivo and in vitro gap junctional intercellular communication. Nutr Cancer. 1996, 26: 251-263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Avila MA, Juan AV, José C, Vicente N: Quercetin Mediates the Down-Regulation of Mutant p53 in the Human Breast Cancer Cell Line MDA-MB468. Cancer Research. 1994, 54: 2424-2428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Takehiro E, Tang Q, Denda A, Noguchi O, Kobayashi E, Tamura K, Horiguchi K, Ogasawara H, Tsujiuchi T, Nakae D, Sugimura1 M, KonLshi Y: Inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid, a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, and p-bromophenacylbromide, a phospholipase A2 inhibitor, of both cirrhosis and enzyme-altered nodules caused by a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined diet in rats. Carcinogenesis. 1996, 17: 467-475. 10.1093/carcin/17.3.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Dr. Fatma H. Galal for her valuable assistance in word and graphic processing throughout this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    AlaaEddeen M Seufi

  2. Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Safinz S Ibrahim

  3. Radiation Biology Department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Giza, Egypt

    Tarek K Elmaghraby

  4. Department of Molecular Plant Pathology, Agriculture Research and Development Institute, Mubarak City for Scientific Research and Technology Applications, Alexandria, Egypt

    Elsayed E Hafez

Authors
  1. AlaaEddeen M Seufi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Safinz S Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tarek K Elmaghraby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elsayed E Hafez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to AlaaEddeen M Seufi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AMS: Carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination.

SSI: Carried out the immunoassays, conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination

TKE: Participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis.

EEH: Carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seufi, A.M., Ibrahim, S.S., Elmaghraby, T.K. et al. Preventive effect of the flavonoid, quercetin, on hepatic cancer in rats via oxidant/antioxidant activity: molecular and histological evidences. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28, 80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-80

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-28-80

Keywords

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research

ISSN: 1756-9966

Contact us