Skip main navigation

Antioxidant Vitamin C Improves Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Smokers

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.94.1.6Circulation. 1996;94:6–9

    Abstract

    Background Chronic smoking is associated with endothelial dysfunction, an early stage of atherosclerosis. It has been suggested that endothelial dysfunction may be a consequence of enhanced degradation of nitric oxide secondary to formation of oxygen-derived free radicals. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of the antioxidant vitamin C on endothelium-dependent responses in chronic smokers.

    Methods and Results Forearm blood flow responses to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (7.5, 15, 30, and 60 μg/min) and the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (1, 3, and 10 μg/min) were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 control subjects and 10 chronic smokers. Drugs were infused into the brachial artery, and forearm blood flow was measured for each drug before and during concomitant intra-arterial infusion of the antioxidant vitamin C (18 mg/min). In control subjects, vitamin C had no effect on forearm blood flow in response to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside. In contrast, in chronic smokers the attenuated forearm blood flow responses to acetylcholine were markedly improved by concomitant administration of vitamin C, whereas the vasodilator responses to sodium nitroprusside were not affected.

    Conclusions The present studies demonstrate that the antioxidant vitamin C markedly improves endothelium-dependent responses in chronic smokers. This observation supports the concept that endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers is at least in part mediated by enhanced formation of oxygen-derived free radicals.

    Chronic cigarette smoking represents a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis associated with coronary and peripheral vascular disease.1 Cigarette smoke is known to contain a large number of oxidants, and it has been hypothesized that many of the adverse effects of smoking may result from oxidative damage to critical biological substances.2 Previous reports have demonstrated abnormal endothelial function in chronic smokers.34 Endothelial dysfunction, in turn, has been proposed to play a pathogenetic role in the initiation of vascular disease.5 Although smoking-induced endothelial dysfunction is very likely multifactorial, more recent clinical and experimental observations strongly point to a potential role of oxygen-derived free radicals in mediating this phenomenon.67

    Vitamin C is a strong reducing agent known to act as an antioxidant in vitro and in vivo.8 Vitamin C very effectively protects lipids in human plasma against peroxidative damage by scavenging oxygen-derived free radicals.9 In addition, epidemiological studies have shown that smokers have a significantly lower plasma level of vitamin C compared with nonsmokers.10

    Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate whether the antioxidant vitamin C can improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in chronic smokers.

    Methods

    Subjects

    Ten control subjects (mean age, 51±3 years) and 10 chronic smokers (mean age, 55±3 years) were studied (Table). Chronic smokers were included if they had a history of 20 or more pack-years (1 pack-year defined as smoking 20 cigarettes per day for 1 year or the equivalent). No participant had a history of hypercholesterolemia, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or any other systemic disease predisposing them to endothelial dysfunction. Further exclusion criteria were current use of antioxidants or vasoactive medications. All participants gave written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University of Freiburg.

    Study Protocol

    All studies were performed in a temperature-controlled room in the postabsorptive state. Under local anesthesia and sterile conditions, a 20-gauge polyethylene catheter was inserted into the brachial artery of the nondominant arm for infusion of drugs. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography as recently described.3 Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures and heart rate were determined at the contralateral arm with a Dinamap (845 oscillometric) blood pressure recorder. Forearm vascular resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean blood pressure to forearm blood flow and expressed as units reflecting mm Hg·mL−1·min−1·100 mL tissue−1.

    Baseline measurements were obtained during intra-arterial infusion of 0.9% saline at a rate of 1.66 mL/min. To assess endothelium-dependent vasodilation, acetylcholine chloride was administered at increasing concentrations (7.5, 15, 30, and 60 μg/min). Sodium nitroprusside was infused as an endothelium-independent vasodilator (1, 3, and 10 μg/min). Each concentration of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside was infused for a 5-minute period. Forearm blood flow was measured during the last 2 minutes of the infusion period.

    After another rest period of at least 40 minutes, vitamin C (sodium ascorbate, Merck) was administered intra-arterially to test the effects of vitamin C on forearm blood flow response to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside. Concentration and infusion rate of vitamin C (total dose about 1 g) was chosen to reach local forearm concentrations, which have been demonstrated to inhibit superoxide anion-mediated lipid peroxidation.11 Moreover, a similar concentration of vitamin C has been reported recently to improve endothelial function in patients with diabetes mellitus.12

    We also measured plasma cholinesterase activity in both groups by using a cholinesterase activity assay (kinetic color test, Merck) to address a potentially confounding influence of cholinesterase to our results (normal range, 2300 to 7200 U/L).

    Statistical Analysis

    All values are reported as mean±SEM. Group comparisons with respect to baseline characteristics were performed by unpaired t test. To test for differences in the overall dose-response relationship in response to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside with and without vitamin C, a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was applied. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of α=5%.

    Results

    Patient Characteristics

    The clinical characteristics of the study groups are provided in the Table. All subjects included in this study were men. There was no difference in terms of age, blood pressure, lipid profile, forearm length, forearm volume, and cholinesterase activity. Chronic smokers had a history of 39±7 pack-years. The basal forearm blood flow and forearm vascular resistance were similar in both groups. In a separate group (n=4 smokers), the effect of vitamin C on cholinesterase activity was measured. Cholinesterase activity before and after administration of vitamin C (total dose of 1 g) was virtually identical (5054±193 versus 5037±199 U/L).

    Effects of Intra-arterial Acetylcholine and Sodium Nitroprusside on Forearm Blood Flow in Control Subjects and Chronic Smokers

    Increasing concentrations of acetylcholine dose-dependently increased forearm blood flow in control subjects from 3.2±0.2 to maximally 19.9±0.5 mL·min−1·100 mL−1 and decreased forearm vascular resistance from 29.7±2.4 to maximally 4.6±0.1 mL·min−1·100 mL−1. The vasodilator responses to acetylcholine were significantly (P<.05) attenuated in chronic smokers compared with nonsmoking control subjects (increase maximally from 3.0±0.28 to 12.2±1.1 mL·min−1·100 mL−1). In contrast, the increases in forearm blood flow in response to the endothelium-independent nitrovasodilator sodium nitroprusside were comparable in both groups (Figs 1 and 2).

    Effects of Vitamin C on Forearm Blood Flow Responses to Acetylcholine and Nitroprusside

    In control subjects, concomitant infusion of vitamin C did not alter responses to either acetylcholine or nitroprusside. In contrast, in chronic smokers vitamin C markedly improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in response to acetylcholine (P<.05) while having no effect on vasodilation induced by the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (Figs 1 and 2). Since we did not observe significant changes in mean arterial pressure, changes in forearm vascular resistance mirrored changes in forearm blood flow.

    Discussion

    The present studies demonstrate that impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in chronic smokers can be markedly improved by acute concomitant administration of the antioxidant vitamin C. This observation strongly supports the concept that increased production and/or activity of oxygen-derived free radicals contribute to endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers.

    With these studies we found a marked attenuation of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in forearm resistance vessels in chronic smokers compared with healthy control subjects. This observation is in agreement with previous observations showing in chronic smokers blunted endothelium-dependent vasodilation of large and small arteries in response to pharmacological (such as acetylcholine3 ) and/or mechanical stimuli (such as shear stress4 ). The precise mechanism of smoking-related endothelial dysfunction is not well understood but is probably multifactorial. Blunted responses to endothelium-dependent vasodilators may be explained in general by a nonspecific attenuation of the vasodilator capacity of the vessel at the vascular smooth muscle level, by diminished nitric oxide formation within endothelial cells, or may be secondary to enhanced degradation of nitric oxide as the result of endothelial and/or smooth muscle production of oxygen-derived free radicals.

    A nonspecific attenuation of the vasodilator capacity of forearm resistance arteries is not very likely, since the vasodilator responses to the endothelium-independent nitrovasodilator nitroprusside were preserved. We also can exclude a confounding influence of the cholinesterase activity on our results, since the cholinesterase activity did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers and vitamin C per se had no stimulatory effect on the cholinesterase activity (see “Results”).

    More recent experimental and clinical data strongly demonstrate evidence for increased oxidative stress being responsible for endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers.67 Cigarette smoke (especially the gas phase) contains large amounts of free radicals and prooxidants such as NO, NO2, peroxinitrite, transition metals, phenols, epoxides, and nitrosamines.2 The particulate phase contains high concentrations of lipophilic quinones, which in biological systems undergo redox cycling to produce oxidant species such as O2· and H2O2.2 These two compounds can form the highly reactive OH· radical at site-specific locations where catalytic iron is available.2 Furthermore, O2· from cigarette smoke may reach the vascular endothelium and can then react with NO·,13 reducing the vasoactive levels of NO· and diminishing the response to endothelium-dependent vasodilators via formation of peroxynitrite anion (ONOO), a highly reactive intermediate with strong cytotoxic potency.1314 Thus, the damaging free radicals in cigarette smoke may cause either direct arterial wall injury or more may initiate and/or accelerate secondary processes including depletion of antioxidants (such as vitamin C or vitamin E9 ), protein peroxidation,15 and activation of phagocyte-platelet-endothelial cell interactions.1617 Oxygen-derived free radicals within the vasculature may initiate a vicious cycle by oxidizing lipids or lipoprotein(a), which in turn may inhibit endothelium-dependent vasodilation directly18 or indirectly by the formation of superoxide anions.19 Recently, we demonstrated a close inverse relationship between antibody titers against oxidized LDL and acetylcholine-induced changes in forearm blood flow in chronic smokers, suggesting that oxidized LDL may be involved in endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers.3 Further imbalance between prooxidants and antioxidants within the vasculature also may be operative in smokers, since plasma levels of vitamin C are in general lower compared with healthy control subjects,10 a phenomenon that appears to reflect increased metabolism as the result of oxidant load rather than decreased food intake.20

    In the present study, the acute administration of the antioxidant vitamin C markedly improved endothelium-mediated vasodilatation in chronic smokers while having no significant effects on endothelium-independent vasodilation induced by sodium nitroprusside. This finding strongly suggests that the antioxidant vitamin C decreases oxidative stress within the vasculature of chronic smokers by directly scavenging oxygen-derived free radicals11 such as superoxide anions or hydroxyl radicals. Further antioxidant mechanisms of vitamin C may include an inhibition of smoke-induced leukocyte adhesion and aggregation to endothelial cells,21 protection from oxidized LDL-induced leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium, and protection of LDL against atherogenic modification922 (see Fig 3A). The chemical reaction between superoxide and vitamin C is a protonation of superoxide leading to the perhydroxyl radical (HO2· [Reference 23]) or eventually to H2O2 (Reference 24) (see Fig 3B).

    Conclusions

    The present study demonstrates that acute administration of vitamin C almost completely reverses endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers. Whether or not daily oral intake of vitamin C may limit the cardiovascular consequences of chronic smoking requires further clinical investigation.

    
          Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Mean±SEM responses of forearm blood flow (FBF) to intra-arterial acetylcholine in control subjects (n=10) and chronic smokers (n=10) with and without concomitant administration of vitamin C. Vitamin C treatment markedly improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine in chronic smokers while having no significant effect on the dose-response curve of control subjects. *Significant difference in the overall dose-response relationship compared with control subjects with and without vitamin C and with smokers with vitamin C.

    
          Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Mean±SEM responses of forearm blood flow (FBF) to intra-arterial sodium nitroprusside in control subjects (n=10) and chronic smokers (n=10) with and without concomitant administration of vitamin C. Vitamin C treatment had no significant effect on sodium nitroprusside-induced changes in FBF in chronic smokers as well as control subjects.

    
          Figure 3.
        
          Figure 3.

    Figure 3. A, Schematic: Cigarette smoke containing superoxide (O2·), nitric oxide (·NO), and peroxynitrite (ONOO) induces oxidant stress and impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation through ·NO degradation to peroxynitrite and causes activation of platelets and macrophages and lipid peroxidation. Vitamin C protects the vessel from oxidant-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxations by scavenging superoxide, which in turn prevents ·NO degradation, lipid peroxidation, and platelet and neutrophil activation. Results of O2·-induced lipid peroxidation: LO·, lipid alkoxyl radical; LOO·, lipid peroxyl radical; and eNOS, endothelial NO synthase. B, Possible reactions between ascorbic acid (AH2) and superoxide leading to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or the perhydroxyl radical (HO2·).

    Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population

    Control Subjects Chronic Smokers
    (n=10) (n=10)
    Age, y 51±3 55±2.7
    Mean arterial pressure, mm Hg 93±2 93±3
    Total cholesterol, mg/dL 201±7 197±9
    HDL, mg/dL 45±4 41±6
    LDL, mg/dL 129±5 134±11
    Cholinesterase activity, U/L 6121±591 5820±814
    Forearm volume, L 1.01±0.04 1.1±0.12
    Forearm length, cm 26.9±0.4 27.3±0.4
    Forearm blood flow, mL·min−1·100 mL tissue−1 3.2±0.2 3.0±0.3
    Forearm vascular resistance, U 29.7±2.2 31.2±1.9

    Values are mean±SEM. No comparisons were significantly different.

    Footnotes

    Correspondence to Thomas Mu¨nzel, MD, Universita¨tskrankenhaus Eppendorf, Abteilung fu¨r Kardiologie, Martinistr 55, 20246 Hamburg, FRG.

    References

    • 1 Sackett DL, Gibson RW, Bross IDJ, Pickren JW. Relation between aortic atherosclerosis and the use of cigarettes and alcohol: an autopsy study. N Engl J Med..1968; 279:1413-1420.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Church DF, Pryor WA. Free radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications. Environ Health Perspect..1985; 64:111-126.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Heitzer T, Yla¨-Herttuala S, Luoma J, Kurz S, Mu¨nzel T, Just H, Olschewski M, Drexler H. Cigarette smoking potentiates endothelial dysfunction of forearm resistance vessels in patients with hypercholesterolemia: role of oxidized LDL. Circulation..1996; 93:1347-1353.Google Scholar
    • 4 Zeiher AM, Scha¨chinger V, Minners J. Long-term cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent coronary arterial vasodilator function. Circulation..1995; 92:1094-1100.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Cohen R. The role of nitric oxide and other endothelium-derived vasoactive substances in vascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis..1995; 38:105-128.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Morrow JD, Frei B, Longmire AW, Gaziano JM, Lynch SM, Shyr Y, Strauss WE, Oates JA, Roberts LJ. Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. N Engl J Med..1995; 332:1198-1203.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Murohara T, Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Sugiyama S, Yasue H. Cigarette smoke extract contracts isolated porcine coronary arteries by superoxide anion-mediated degradation of EDRF. Am J Physiol..1994; 266:H874-H880.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Frei B. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant vitamins: mechanisms of action. Am J Med..1994; 97:5S-13S.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Frei B, Forte TM, Ames BN, Cross CE. Gas phase oxidants of cigarette smoke induce lipid peroxidation and changes in lipoprotein properties in human blood plasma: protective effects of ascorbic acid. Biochem J..1991; 277:133-138.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Schectman G, Byrd JC, Gruchow HW. The influence of smoking on vitamin C status in adults. Am J Public Health..1989; 79:158-162.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Frei B, England L, Ames BN. Ascorbate is an outstanding antioxidant in human blood plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A..1989; 86:6377-6381.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Ting HH, Timimi FK, Boles KS, Creager SJ, Ganz P, Creager MA. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest..1996; 97:22-28.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Radi R, Beckman JW, Bush KM, Freeman BA. Peroxynitrite induced membrane lipid peroxidation: the cytotoxic potential of superoxide and nitric oxide. Arch Biochem Biophys..1991; 288:481-487.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 White CR, Brock TA, Chang LY, Crapo J, Briscoe P, Ku D, Bradley WA, Gianturco SH, Gore J, Freeman BA, Tarpey MM. Superoxide and peroxynitrite in atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A..1994; 91:1044-1048.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Reznick AZ, Cross CE, Hu ML, Suzuki YJ, Khwaja S, Safadi A, Motchnik PA, Packer L, Halliwell B. Modification of plasma proteins by cigarette smoke as measured by protein carbonyl formation. Biochem J..1992; 286:607-611.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Lehr HA, Kress E, Menger MD, Friedl HP, Hu¨bner C, Arfors KE, Messmer K. Cigarette smoke elicits leukocyte adhesion to endothelium in hamsters: inhibition by Cu/Zn SOD. Free Radic Biol Med..1993; 14:573-581.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Blache D. Involvement of hydrogen and lipid peroxides in acute tobacco smoking-induced platelet hyperactivity. Am J Physiol..1995; 268:H679-H685.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Galle J, Mu¨lsch A, Busse R, Bassenge E. Effects of native and oxidized low-density lipoproteins on formation and inactivation of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Arterioscler Thromb..1991; 11:198-203.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Galle J, Bengen J, Schollmeyer P, Wanner C. Impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in rabbit renal arteries by oxidized lipoprotein(a): role of oxygen-derived radicals. Circulation..1995; 92:1582-1589.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Duthie GG, Wahle KJ. Smoking, antioxidants, essential fatty acids and coronary heart disease. Biochem Soc Trans..1990; 18:1051-1054.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Lehr HA, Frei B, Arfors KE. Vitamin C prevents cigarette smoke-induced leukocyte aggregation and adhesion to the endothelium in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A..1994; 91:7688-7692.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Retsky KL, Freeman MW, Frei B. Ascorbic acid oxidation product(s) protect human low density lipoprotein against atherogenic modification. J Biol Chem..1993; 268:1304-1309.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Bisby RH, Ahmed S, Cundall RB. Repair of amino acid radicals by vitamin E analogue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun..1984; 119:245-250.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Cabelli DE, Bielski BHJ. Kinetics and mechanism for the oxidation of ascorbic acid/ascorbate by HO2/O2 radicals: a pulse radiolysis and stopped-flow photolysis study. J Phys Chem..1983; 87:1809-1812. File paper.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

    eLetters(0)

    eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

    Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.